Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

geo-optimization地理优化

Agent Skill

geo-optimization 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

120,588

周安装

4,926

GitHub Stars

8

下载量

38,620
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:geo-optimization(地理优化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/capt-marbles/geo-optimization
安装命令:
openclaw skills install geo-optimization
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install geo-optimization

简介

用于 AI 搜索可见性的生成引擎优化 (GEO)。优化内容以显示在 ChatGPT、Perplexity、Claude 和 Google AI 概述中。在优化网站、页面或内容以提高 LLM 的可发现性和引用时使用。

SKILL.md

name
geo-optimization
description
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for AI search visibility. Optimize content to appear in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. Use when optimizing websites, pages, or content for LLM discoverability and citation.
metadata
version
1.1.0
tags
["geo", "seo", "llm", "ai-search", "perplexity", "chatgpt", "content"]

GEO: Generative Engine Optimization

Optimize content to appear in AI-powered search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews). GEO is about being parseable, quotable, and authoritative — not keyword stuffing.


Quick Reference

GoalTactic
Get cited in AI answersAdd specific statistics, quotable facts
Appear in comparisonsCreate definitive comparison tables
Answer user questionsComprehensive FAQ sections
Establish entityClear first-paragraph definitions
Build authorityThird-party mentions, backlinks, freshness signals

GEO vs SEO: Key Differences

AspectTraditional SEOGEO
GoalRank on SERPsGet cited in AI responses
KeywordsExact match mattersSemantic understanding
Content styleCan be promotionalMust be factual, neutral
StructureHeaders for scanningHeaders + parseable data
LinksBacklinks for authorityCitations + entity mentions
FreshnessHelpfulCritical (LLMs prefer recent)
FormatLong-form winsQuotable chunks win

The GEO Audit Checklist

Score each page 0-2 points per item (0=missing, 1=partial, 2=excellent):

1. Entity Clarity (Max 10 pts)

  • [ ] First paragraph clearly defines what/who the entity is
  • [ ] Entity name used consistently throughout
  • [ ] Clear category placement ("X is a [type of thing]")
  • [ ] Relationship to other known entities stated
  • [ ] Wikipedia-style objectivity in tone

2. Quotable Facts (Max 10 pts)

  • [ ] Specific numbers present (not "many" or "fast")
  • [ ] Statistics are current and sourced
  • [ ] Claims are concrete and verifiable
  • [ ] Key facts in standalone sentences (easy to extract)
  • [ ] "By the numbers" or facts section exists

3. FAQ Coverage (Max 10 pts)

  • [ ] FAQ section exists
  • [ ] Questions match how users prompt LLMs
  • [ ] Answers are direct and complete
  • [ ] FAQ schema markup implemented
  • [ ] Covers "what is", "how does", "why", "vs" questions

4. Comparison Positioning (Max 10 pts)

  • [ ] Comparison tables exist
  • [ ] Competitors named explicitly
  • [ ] Factual differences highlighted (not just marketing)
  • [ ] "Alternative to X" content exists
  • [ ] Fair representation (not obviously biased)

5. Structural Clarity (Max 10 pts)

  • [ ] Clear heading hierarchy (H1→H2→H3)
  • [ ] Bullet points for lists
  • [ ] Tables for comparisons
  • [ ] Short paragraphs (2-4 sentences)
  • [ ] Summary/TL;DR at top or bottom

6. Authority Signals (Max 10 pts)

  • [ ] Author/company credentials stated
  • [ ] Customer names/logos (social proof)
  • [ ] Case studies with real numbers
  • [ ] Third-party mentions/citations
  • [ ] "Last updated" date present

7. Freshness (Max 10 pts)

  • [ ] Page has recent update date
  • [ ] Content reflects current year
  • [ ] No outdated references
  • [ ] Regular content updates
  • [ ] News/changelog section exists

Scoring:

  • 60-70: Excellent GEO readiness
  • 45-59: Good, needs some optimization
  • 30-44: Fair, significant gaps
  • <30: Poor, major overhaul needed

Content Optimization Templates

Template 1: Entity Definition Page

# [Entity Name]

**[Entity Name]** is a [category] that [primary function]. 
Unlike [alternative/competitor], [Entity Name] offers [key differentiator].

## [Entity Name] by the Numbers

- [Specific stat 1]
- [Specific stat 2]
- [Specific stat 3]
- [Specific stat 4]

## How [Entity Name] Works

[2-3 paragraphs explaining core functionality]

## Who Uses [Entity Name]

[Named customers with context]

## Frequently Asked Questions

### What is [Entity Name]?
[Direct answer in 2-3 sentences]

### How is [Entity Name] different from [Competitor]?
[Factual comparison]

### How much does [Entity Name] cost?
[Pricing info or guidance]

*Last updated: [Date]*

Template 2: Comparison Page (Alternative To)

# Best [Competitor] Alternative: [Your Product] (2026)

> **Summary:** [Your Product] is a [category] offering [key differentiators]. 
> [Customers] report [specific result] compared to [Competitor].

*Last updated: [Date]*

## Why [Users] Look for [Competitor] Alternatives

### Problem 1: [Specific Pain Point]
[Explanation with specifics]

### Problem 2: [Specific Pain Point]
[Explanation with specifics]

## [Your Product] vs [Competitor]: Comparison

| Feature | [Competitor] | [Your Product] |
|---------|--------------|----------------|
| [Feature 1] | [Their approach] | [Your approach] |
| [Feature 2] | [Their approach] | [Your approach] |
| [Feature 3] | [Their approach] | [Your approach] |

## Key Differences

### [Differentiator 1]
[Factual explanation with numbers]

### [Differentiator 2]
[Factual explanation with numbers]

## Customer Results

> "[Quote with specific result]"
> — [Name], [Title], [Company]

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Is [Your Product] a good alternative to [Competitor]?
[Direct answer]

### How does [Your Product] compare to [Competitor] on [key factor]?
[Specific comparison]

### Can I migrate from [Competitor] to [Your Product]?
[Migration info]

## Summary

[Your Product] is a [category] offering [key benefits]. [Customers] 
using [Your Product] instead of [Competitor] report [specific results].

*[Your Product] has [credibility stat]. Learn more at [link].*

Template 3: FAQ Page (LLM Optimized)

# [Topic] FAQ

Answers to common questions about [topic].

*Last updated: [Date]*

## General Questions

### What is [thing]?
[Thing] is a [category] that [function]. It is used by [who] to [accomplish what].

### How does [thing] work?
[Thing] works by [process]. [Additional detail].

### Who uses [thing]?
[Thing] is used by [user types], including [specific examples like Company A, Company B].

## Comparison Questions

### How is [thing] different from [alternative]?
[Thing] differs from [alternative] in [specific ways]:
- [Difference 1]
- [Difference 2]
- [Difference 3]

### Is [thing] better than [alternative]?
[Thing] is better suited for [use cases] because [reasons]. 
[Alternative] may be better for [other use cases].

## Pricing & Access

### How much does [thing] cost?
[Pricing information or range]

### Is there a free trial?
[Trial information]

## Technical Questions

### What are the requirements for [thing]?
[Requirements list]

### How do I get started with [thing]?
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
3. [Step 3]

Platform-Specific Optimization

Perplexity AI

How it works: 3-layer reranking system

  1. Initial retrieval from web index
  2. Relevance scoring
  3. Citation selection based on authority + recency

Optimization tactics:

  • Strong domain authority matters
  • Freshness signals critical (update dates)
  • Direct answers to questions
  • Being cited by other authoritative sources
  • Structured data helps parsing

ChatGPT / SearchGPT

How it works: Bing-powered search + LLM synthesis

Optimization tactics:

  • Bing indexing matters (submit sitemap to Bing)
  • E-E-A-T signals weighted heavily
  • Conversational content structure
  • FAQ format highly effective
  • Named entities help recognition

Google AI Overviews

How it works: Google's index + Gemini synthesis

Optimization tactics:

  • Traditional SEO still matters (ranking helps)
  • Featured snippet optimization
  • Schema markup (FAQ, HowTo, Product)
  • Clear, authoritative content
  • Mobile-first indexing

Claude

How it works: Training data + retrieval (when web-enabled)

Optimization tactics:

  • Quality content in training sources
  • Wikipedia mentions help entity recognition
  • Technical accuracy valued
  • Clear, well-structured prose
  • Being cited in authoritative sources

Technical Implementation

Schema Markup for GEO

Organization Schema:

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Company Name",
  "description": "Clear description of what company does",
  "url": "https://example.com",
  "foundingDate": "2017",
  "numberOfEmployees": "50-100",
  "sameAs": [
    "https://twitter.com/company",
    "https://linkedin.com/company/company"
  ]
}

FAQ Schema:

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [{
    "@type": "Question",
    "name": "What is [thing]?",
    "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "Direct answer here."
    }
  }]
}

Product Schema:

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Product",
  "name": "Product Name",
  "description": "Product description",
  "brand": {"@type": "Brand", "name": "Brand"},
  "offers": {
    "@type": "Offer",
    "priceCurrency": "USD",
    "price": "99"
  }
}

llms.txt Protocol

Create /llms.txt at your site root to help LLMs understand your site:

# Site Name

> Brief description of what this site/company is.

## Main Sections

- [Products](/products): Description of products section
- [Documentation](/docs): Technical documentation
- [Blog](/blog): Industry insights and updates

## Key Facts

- Founded: 2017
- Customers: 500+ companies
- Key metric: [specific number]

## Contact

- Website: https://example.com
- Email: hello@example.com

Monitoring GEO Performance

Manual Testing

Regularly search these prompts on each platform:

Perplexity:

  • "What is [your company]?"
  • "Best [competitor] alternative"
  • "[Your category] comparison"
  • "How does [your product] work?"

ChatGPT:

  • Same queries with web browsing enabled
  • "Compare [your product] vs [competitor]"

Google (AI Overview):

  • "[Your category] solutions"
  • "[Competitor] alternative"

Tracking Tools

ToolWhat It TracksPrice
Otterly.AIMulti-platform AI visibilityFree tier
Ahrefs Brand RadarAI search mentions$129+/mo
ProfoundEnterprise benchmarkingEnterprise
Manual trackingDIY spreadsheetFree

Key Metrics

  • Mention rate: % of relevant queries where you appear
  • Citation rate: % of mentions that cite/link to you
  • Sentiment: Positive/neutral/negative portrayal
  • Share of voice: Your mentions vs competitors
  • Position: Where in the response you appear

GEO Content Principles

DO:

  • ✅ Use specific numbers ("0.5 seconds" not "fast")
  • ✅ Make claims quotable and standalone
  • ✅ Structure content with clear hierarchy
  • ✅ Include FAQ sections
  • ✅ Update content regularly with dates
  • ✅ Create comparison content
  • ✅ Use tables for data
  • ✅ Be factual and neutral in tone
  • ✅ Name real customers and results

DON'T:

  • ❌ Use vague superlatives ("best", "leading", "top")
  • ❌ Keyword stuff (LLMs see through it)
  • ❌ Write walls of text without structure
  • ❌ Hide information (be comprehensive)
  • ❌ Use outdated statistics
  • ❌ Ignore competitors (address them directly)
  • ❌ Be obviously promotional (neutral wins)

Quick Start Checklist

For any page you want to optimize for GEO:

  1. [ ] Add clear entity definition in first paragraph
  2. [ ] Include 5+ specific, quotable statistics
  3. [ ] Add FAQ section with 5+ questions
  4. [ ] Create comparison table (if relevant)
  5. [ ] Add "last updated" date
  6. [ ] Implement FAQ schema markup
  7. [ ] Ensure H1→H2→H3 hierarchy
  8. [ ] Test on Perplexity: does your content appear?

Automated GEO Monitoring

Track your citation rate over time with the included monitoring scripts!

Quick Start

Test current visibility:

python3 scripts/geo-monitor.py --test

Single query test:

python3 scripts/geo-monitor.py --query "best game server orchestration platform"

Generate daily report:

python3 scripts/geo-daily-report.py

Setup Automated Monitoring

1. Create your test queries file (scripts/geo-test-queries.json):

{
  "queries": [
    {
      "query": "your target query here",
      "category": "brand|product|comparison|problem|competitor"
    }
  ]
}

2. Run daily monitoring:

# Add to cron for daily 9am checks
0 9 * * * cd /path/to/skill && bash scripts/geo-daily-monitor.sh

Understanding the Reports

Citation Rate: Percentage of queries where you appear in AI responses

  • 0-20%: Early stage, needs work
  • 20-40%: Building visibility
  • 40-60%: Strong presence
  • 60%+: Dominant authority

Categories tracked:

  • Brand queries (you should own these!)
  • Product/feature queries
  • Comparison queries (vs competitors)
  • Problem/pain point queries
  • Competitor comparison queries

Monitoring Best Practices

  1. Start with 15-20 strategic queries across all categories
  2. Test daily during optimization period (first 2 weeks)
  3. Weekly checks once you hit target citation rate
  4. Track changes after content updates (expect 3-7 day lag)
  5. Focus on gaps - queries with 0% citation are your opportunities

What to Track

Current state:

  • Total citation rate
  • Citations by category
  • Position when cited (#1, #2, etc.)
  • Critical gaps (0% coverage)

Over time:

  • Citation rate trend (weekly/monthly)
  • New citations gained
  • Lost citations (content freshness!)
  • Category improvements

Files Included

  • scripts/geo-monitor.py - Main testing script (uses Perplexity API)
  • scripts/geo-daily-report.py - Formatted report generator
  • scripts/geo-daily-monitor.sh - Cron-friendly wrapper
  • scripts/geo-test-queries.json - Example query file

Requirements: Perplexity API key (configure via web_search in Clawdbot)


Resources

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

79.46%
按下载量换算30,687

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills