Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

geo-brand-mentions(地理品牌提及)

geo-brand-mentions 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

geo-brand-mentions 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 22,931。

总安装 4,418周安装 177GitHub Stars 6,916下载 1,430核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:geo-brand-mentions(地理品牌提及)
来源仓库:https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude
仓库路径:skills/geo-brand-mentions
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude --skill geo-brand-mentions
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude --skill geo-brand-mentions

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

geo-brand-mentions 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持基于关键词或任务场景定位内容。适合在需要从文档、网页或结构化数据中提炼候选信息的场景下使用。通过 npx 安装,需结合原始 README 确认具体用法和参数约定。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude --skill geo-brand-mentions 建议提前评估是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写,并确认相关权限边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/geo-brand-mentions

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude --skill geo-bra…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

geo-brand-mentions 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude --skill geo-brand-mention…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

geo-brand-mentions 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

geo-brand-mentions 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

geo-brand-mentions 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

geo-brand-mentions 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,418 次,近一周安装 177 次,下载 1,430 次,GitHub 6,916 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

geo-brand-mentions 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 6,916 星,维护活跃度相对可查。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
geo-brand-mentions

地理品牌提及 · 本页

4,4186,916只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Brand Mention Scanner Skill

Core Insight

Brand mentions correlate approximately 3x more strongly with AI visibility than traditional backlinks. An Ahrefs study published in December 2025, analyzing 75,000 brands across AI search platforms, found that unlinked brand mentions -- references to a brand name without a hyperlink -- are a stronger predictor of whether AI systems cite and recommend a brand than Domain Rating or backlink count.

The critical finding: the platform where the mention appears matters enormously. Not all mentions are equal. A mention on YouTube or Reddit carries far more weight for AI citation than a mention on a low-authority blog, because AI training data and retrieval systems disproportionately index high-engagement platforms.

This inverts a core assumption of traditional SEO. In traditional SEO, a backlink from a high-DR site is the gold standard. In GEO, an unlinked mention on Reddit or a YouTube video description may be more valuable than a dofollow backlink from a DR 70 blog.


Platform Importance Ranking for AI Citations

Based on the Ahrefs December 2025 study and corroborating research from Profound (2025) and Terakeet (2025):

1. YouTube Mentions -- Correlation ~0.737 (STRONGEST)

Why YouTube matters most:

  • YouTube is the second-largest search engine and the largest video platform globally (2.5B+ monthly users).
  • AI training datasets heavily incorporate YouTube transcripts, descriptions, and metadata.
  • Google's Gemini and AI Overviews directly reference YouTube content.
  • Perplexity and ChatGPT both index and cite YouTube video content.
  • YouTube transcripts are particularly valuable because they contain natural language mentions in conversational context, which aligns with how AI models process and generate text.

What to check:

  • Brand YouTube channel: Does the brand have an active YouTube channel? How many subscribers? Video count? Upload frequency?
  • Third-party video mentions: Are other YouTubers or channels mentioning the brand? In what context (reviews, tutorials, comparisons)?
  • Video descriptions: Does the brand name appear in video descriptions of industry-relevant content?
  • Video transcripts: Is the brand mentioned in spoken content of relevant videos? (AI models index transcripts)
  • YouTube search presence: When searching "[brand name]" on YouTube, do results appear? Are they positive?
  • Comment mentions: Is the brand mentioned in comments on relevant industry videos?

Scoring for YouTube (0-100):

ScoreCriteria
90-100Active channel with 10K+ subscribers, regular uploads, brand mentioned in 20+ third-party videos, appears in YouTube search results for industry terms
70-89Active channel with 1K+ subscribers, brand mentioned in 10-19 third-party videos, some YouTube search presence
50-69Channel exists with some content, brand mentioned in 5-9 third-party videos, limited YouTube search presence
30-49Channel exists but inactive, brand mentioned in 1-4 third-party videos
10-29No channel or empty channel, brand mentioned in 1-2 videos only
0-9No YouTube presence whatsoever

2. Reddit Mentions -- High Correlation

Why Reddit matters:

  • Reddit is one of the most heavily indexed platforms in AI training data (confirmed in Google's $60M/year Reddit licensing deal, 2024).
  • AI systems heavily weight Reddit for product recommendations, comparisons, and user sentiment.
  • "Reddit" is now appended to an estimated 10-15% of Google searches by users seeking authentic opinions.
  • Perplexity frequently cites Reddit threads as sources.
  • ChatGPT and Claude both reference Reddit discussions when answering product/service questions.

What to check:

  • Subreddit presence: Is the brand discussed in relevant subreddits? Which ones?
  • Mention volume: How many Reddit threads mention the brand? What is the trend (increasing/decreasing)?
  • Sentiment: Are mentions mostly positive, negative, or neutral? What are common praise points and complaints?
  • Official presence: Does the brand have an official Reddit account? Do they participate in discussions? Have they done AMAs?
  • Recommendation threads: Does the brand appear in "What do you recommend for X?" threads? Is it the top recommendation or an also-ran?
  • Subreddit community: Does the brand have its own subreddit? How active is it?

Scoring for Reddit (0-100):

ScoreCriteria
90-100Frequently recommended in relevant subreddits, predominantly positive sentiment, active official presence, own subreddit with 5K+ members, appears in top recommendations for industry queries
70-89Regularly mentioned in relevant subreddits, mostly positive sentiment, some official presence, appears in multiple recommendation threads
50-69Mentioned in several relevant threads, mixed sentiment, brand name is recognized by community members
30-49Occasional mentions, limited to 1-2 subreddits, no official presence
10-29Rare mentions, brand largely unknown on Reddit
0-9No Reddit presence

3. Wikipedia Presence -- High Correlation

Why Wikipedia matters:

  • Wikipedia is one of the highest-authority sources in AI training data. All major AI models have been trained on Wikipedia dumps.
  • AI systems use Wikipedia as a primary source for entity recognition -- determining whether a brand is a "real" entity worth knowing about.
  • Wikidata (Wikipedia's structured data sibling) provides machine-readable facts that AI models use for knowledge graph construction.
  • Having a Wikipedia page is a strong signal of notability, which correlates with AI systems treating the brand as an authoritative entity.

What to check:

  • Wikipedia page: Does the brand or company have its own Wikipedia article? Is it marked for deletion or quality issues?
  • Founder page: Does the founder/CEO have a Wikipedia page? (Strong authority signal)
  • Wikipedia citations: Is the brand's website cited as a reference in any Wikipedia articles?
  • Wikidata entry: Does the brand have a Wikidata item (Q-number)? How complete is it?
  • Wikipedia mentions: Is the brand mentioned in other Wikipedia articles (industry articles, competitor pages, category pages)?
  • Article quality: If a Wikipedia page exists, is it a stub, start-class, or higher quality?

Scoring for Wikipedia (0-100):

ScoreCriteria
90-100Detailed Wikipedia article (B-class or higher), Wikidata entry with complete properties, brand cited as reference in multiple articles, founder has Wikipedia page
70-89Wikipedia article exists (start-class or higher), Wikidata entry exists, brand mentioned in 2+ other Wikipedia articles
50-69Wikipedia article exists (stub or start), basic Wikidata entry, limited mentions in other articles
30-49No Wikipedia article but brand is mentioned in other articles or cited as reference; Wikidata entry may exist
10-29Brand mentioned in 1-2 Wikipedia articles as a passing reference only
0-9No Wikipedia or Wikidata presence of any kind

4. LinkedIn Presence -- Moderate Correlation

Why LinkedIn matters:

  • LinkedIn content is increasingly indexed by AI systems for professional and B2B context.
  • Company LinkedIn pages and employee thought leadership posts build brand entity signals.
  • AI models reference LinkedIn for company information, team credentials, and professional authority.
  • LinkedIn articles and posts are indexed by search engines and AI crawlers.

What to check:

  • Company page: Does the brand have a LinkedIn company page? Follower count? Post frequency?
  • Employee thought leadership: Are employees (especially leadership) posting thought leadership content that mentions the brand?
  • Company mentions: Is the brand mentioned in LinkedIn posts by non-employees? Industry analysts? Customers?
  • LinkedIn articles: Are there long-form LinkedIn articles about or mentioning the brand?
  • Employee profiles: Do employees list the company with detailed descriptions? Do they have strong professional profiles?
  • Engagement metrics: What is the typical engagement (likes, comments, shares) on company posts?

Scoring for LinkedIn (0-100):

ScoreCriteria
90-100Active company page with 10K+ followers, leadership regularly posts thought leadership, brand frequently mentioned by industry professionals, strong employee profiles
70-89Active company page with 5K+ followers, some employee thought leadership, occasional third-party mentions
50-69Company page exists with 1K+ followers, irregular posting, limited third-party mentions
30-49Company page exists but is sparse or inactive, few followers, no third-party mentions
10-29Basic company page with minimal information
0-9No LinkedIn company page

5. Other Platform Presence -- Supplementary

These platforms have lower but still meaningful correlation with AI visibility:

Quora
  • Relevance: Quora answers are frequently included in AI training data and cited by Perplexity.
  • What to check: Is the brand mentioned in Quora answers to industry-relevant questions? Does the brand have an official Quora presence?
  • Signal strength: Moderate for B2C, lower for B2B.
Stack Overflow / Stack Exchange
  • Relevance: Critical for developer-facing brands (SaaS, dev tools, APIs).
  • What to check: Is the brand's product discussed in Stack Overflow questions/answers? Does the brand have a tag? Do they have an official account answering questions?
  • Signal strength: High for technical products, irrelevant for most B2C.
GitHub
  • Relevance: Critical for open-source and developer-focused brands.
  • What to check: Does the brand have a GitHub organization? Stars on repositories? Mentions in other repos' documentation or discussions?
  • Signal strength: High for dev tools and open-source, low for non-technical brands.
Industry Forums and Communities
  • Relevance: Niche authority signals that AI models pick up from domain-specific training data.
  • What to check: Is the brand discussed in industry-specific forums (e.g., Hacker News for tech, ProductHunt for startups, industry-specific Slack communities)?
  • Signal strength: Moderate, but valuable for establishing niche authority.
News and Press
  • Relevance: News mentions build entity authority and recency signals.
  • What to check: Has the brand been covered by major news outlets or industry publications? How recently? What was the context?
  • Signal strength: Moderate. Recency matters -- a mention in the last 6 months is far more valuable than one from 3 years ago.
Podcasts
  • Relevance: Growing AI training data source. Transcripts are increasingly indexed.
  • What to check: Has the brand or its leadership appeared on podcasts? Are podcast transcripts mentioning the brand indexed by search engines?
  • Signal strength: Moderate and growing.

Composite Brand Authority Score

Scoring Formula

PlatformWeightRationale
YouTube Presence25%Strongest correlation with AI citation (0.737)
Reddit Presence25%Second strongest correlation; critical for product recommendations
Wikipedia / Wikidata20%Entity recognition foundation; AI training data cornerstone
LinkedIn Authority15%Professional authority signals; B2B relevance
Other Platforms15%Supplementary signals from Quora, GitHub, news, forums, podcasts

Formula:

Brand_Authority_Score = (YouTube * 0.25) + (Reddit * 0.25) + (Wikipedia * 0.20) + (LinkedIn * 0.15) + (Other * 0.15)

Score Interpretation

Score RangeRatingInterpretation
85-100DominantBrand is a well-recognized entity across AI platforms. Highly likely to be cited and recommended by AI systems.
70-84StrongBrand has solid cross-platform presence. AI systems likely recognize and cite it for relevant queries.
50-69ModerateBrand has presence on some platforms but gaps exist. AI citation is inconsistent.
30-49WeakBrand has limited platform presence. AI systems may not recognize it as a distinct entity.
0-29MinimalBrand has negligible platform presence. AI systems are unlikely to cite or recommend it.

Analysis Procedure

Step 1: Identify Brand Information

Gather the following from the user or from the website:

  • Brand name (exact spelling, including any official variants)
  • Founder/CEO name(s)
  • Domain URL
  • Industry/category
  • Key products or services (top 3)
  • Key competitors (for comparison context)

Step 2: Platform Scanning

For each platform, use WebFetch to search and assess presence:

YouTube Check:

  1. Search: [brand name] site:youtube.com
  2. Check: youtube.com/@[brand-name] or youtube.com/c/[brand-name] for official channel
  3. Search: "[brand name]" site:youtube.com (exact match for mentions in descriptions)
  4. Note: Channel subscriber count, video count, latest upload date, third-party mention count

Reddit Check:

  1. Search: [brand name] site:reddit.com
  2. Search: "[brand name]" site:reddit.com (exact match)
  3. Check: reddit.com/r/[brand-name] for official subreddit
  4. Check: reddit.com/user/[brand-name] for official account
  5. Note: Thread count, dominant subreddits, sentiment (positive/negative/neutral), recommendation frequency

Wikipedia Check (IMPORTANT — use BOTH methods to avoid false negatives):

Method 1 — Python API check (MOST RELIABLE, do this FIRST):

python3 -c "
import requests, json
from urllib.parse import quote_plus
brand = '[Brand_Name]'
# Check Wikipedia API directly
api_url = f'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=search&srsearch={quote_plus(brand)}&format=json'
r = requests.get(api_url, headers={'User-Agent': 'GEO-Audit/1.0'}, timeout=15)
data = r.json()
results = data.get('query', {}).get('search', [])
if results and brand.lower() in results[0].get('title', '').lower():
    print(f'WIKIPEDIA PAGE EXISTS: {results[0][\"title\"]}')
    print(f'URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/{results[0][\"title\"].replace(\" \", \"_\")}')
else:
    print('No direct Wikipedia page found')
# Check Wikidata
wd_url = f'https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbsearchentities&search={quote_plus(brand)}&language=en&format=json'
r2 = requests.get(wd_url, headers={'User-Agent': 'GEO-Audit/1.0'}, timeout=15)
wd = r2.json()
entities = wd.get('search', [])
if entities:
    print(f'WIKIDATA ENTRY: {entities[0].get(\"id\", \"\")} — {entities[0].get(\"description\", \"\")}')
"

Method 2 — Direct URL check (backup verification):

  1. WebFetch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/[Brand_Name] — check if the page loads (not a redirect to search)
  2. WebFetch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/[Founder_Name] for founder article

Method 3 — Search (least reliable, use only for supplemental info):

  1. Search: [brand name] site:wikipedia.org
  2. Search: [brand name] site:wikidata.org

CRITICAL: Web search alone is NOT reliable for determining Wikipedia presence. ALWAYS run the Python API check first. If the API says a page exists, it exists — do not override this with a search result that fails to find it.

  1. Note: Article existence, quality, edit history, Wikidata completeness

LinkedIn Check:

  1. Search: [brand name] site:linkedin.com
  2. Check: linkedin.com/company/[brand-name] for company page
  3. Note: Follower count, post frequency, employee count listed, engagement levels

Other Platforms:

  1. Search: [brand name] site:quora.com
  2. Search: [brand name] site:stackoverflow.com (if technical brand)
  3. Search: [brand name] site:github.com (if technical brand)
  4. Search: [brand name] site:news.ycombinator.com (Hacker News)
  5. Search: "[brand name]" broadly for news mentions (filter to last 6 months)
  6. Note: Presence/absence and quality of mentions on each platform

Step 3: Sentiment Assessment

For Reddit and other discussion platforms, assess sentiment by analyzing the most recent and most prominent mentions:

SentimentIndicators
PositiveRecommendations ("I love [brand]," "We switched to [brand] and...", "Highly recommend"), upvoted mentions, positive comparison against competitors
NeutralFactual mentions ("We use [brand] for...", "[Brand] offers..."), questions about the brand, balanced comparisons
NegativeComplaints ("Avoid [brand]", "[Brand] has terrible support"), downvoted recommendations, negative comparisons
MixedCombination of positive and negative. Note the ratio and primary themes.

Step 4: Competitive Comparison (Optional)

If competitors are identified, do a quick scan of their platform presence for context. This helps calibrate the score -- a brand with "moderate" Reddit presence in an industry where competitors have zero Reddit presence is relatively strong.

Step 5: Score Calculation

  1. Score each platform (0-100) using the rubrics above.
  2. Apply weights to calculate the composite Brand Authority Score.
  3. Identify the strongest and weakest platforms.
  4. Generate specific, actionable recommendations for the weakest platforms.

Output Format

Generate a file called GEO-BRAND-MENTIONS.md:

# Brand Authority Report: [Brand Name]

**Analysis Date:** [Date]
**Brand:** [Brand Name]
**Domain:** [URL]
**Industry:** [Industry]

---

## Brand Authority Score: [X]/100 ([Rating])

### Platform Breakdown

| Platform | Score | Weight | Weighted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YouTube | [X]/100 | 25% | [X] | [Active Channel / Mentioned / Absent] |
| Reddit | [X]/100 | 25% | [X] | [Active / Discussed / Absent] |
| Wikipedia | [X]/100 | 20% | [X] | [Article / Mentioned / Absent] |
| LinkedIn | [X]/100 | 15% | [X] | [Active / Basic / Absent] |
| Other Platforms | [X]/100 | 15% | [X] | [Summary] |
| **Total** | | | **[X]/100** | |

---

## Platform Detail

### YouTube ([X]/100)

**Official Channel:** [Yes/No] | [URL if exists]
**Subscribers:** [Count or N/A]
**Videos:** [Count or N/A]
**Last Upload:** [Date or N/A]
**Third-Party Mentions:** [Estimated count]
**Key Findings:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]

### Reddit ([X]/100)

**Official Account:** [Yes/No] | [URL if exists]
**Own Subreddit:** [Yes/No] | [URL and member count if exists]
**Mention Volume:** [Estimated thread count]
**Primary Subreddits:** [List of subreddits where brand is discussed]
**Sentiment:** [Positive/Negative/Neutral/Mixed]
**Key Findings:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]

### Wikipedia ([X]/100)

**Company Article:** [Yes/No] | [URL if exists]
**Founder Article:** [Yes/No] | [URL if exists]
**Wikidata Entry:** [Yes/No] | [Q-number if exists]
**Cited in Other Articles:** [Yes/No] | [Which articles]
**Key Findings:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]

### LinkedIn ([X]/100)

**Company Page:** [Yes/No] | [URL if exists]
**Followers:** [Count or N/A]
**Post Frequency:** [Weekly/Monthly/Rare/Never]
**Key Findings:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]

### Other Platforms ([X]/100)

| Platform | Presence | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Quora | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |
| Stack Overflow | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |
| GitHub | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |
| Hacker News | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |
| News/Press | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |
| Podcasts | [Yes/No] | [Brief note] |

---

## Recommendations

### Immediate Actions (Week 1-2)

1. **[Platform]:** [Specific action to take with expected impact]
2. **[Platform]:** [Specific action]

### Short-Term Strategy (Month 1-3)

1. **[Platform]:** [Strategy with tactics]
2. **[Platform]:** [Strategy with tactics]

### Long-Term Authority Building (Month 3-12)

1. **[Platform]:** [Long-term strategy]
2. **[Platform]:** [Long-term strategy]

---

## Competitive Context

[If competitors were analyzed, show a brief comparison table]

| Brand | YouTube | Reddit | Wikipedia | LinkedIn | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Subject Brand] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |
| [Competitor 1] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |
| [Competitor 2] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |

## Key Takeaway

[1-2 sentence summary of the brand's AI visibility standing and the single most impactful action to take]

Reference Data

Correlation Strengths (Ahrefs Dec 2025, 75K Brands)

SignalCorrelation with AI CitationTraditional SEO Value
YouTube mentions~0.737Low (not a ranking factor)
Reddit mentionsHigh (exact coefficient not published)Low
Wikipedia presenceHighModerate (trust signal)
LinkedIn presenceModerateLow
Domain Rating~0.266Very High
Backlink count~0.266Very High
Organic trafficModerateVery High

Key insight: The signals that matter most for AI visibility (YouTube, Reddit) are almost irrelevant in traditional SEO, and the signals that matter most for traditional SEO (backlinks, DR) are weak predictors of AI visibility. This requires a fundamentally different optimization strategy.

Platform-Specific Tips for Building Presence

YouTube Quick Wins:

  • Create a channel and upload 3-5 explainer videos about your core topics.
  • Ensure your brand name appears in video titles, descriptions, and spoken content.
  • Pursue guest appearances on relevant industry YouTube channels.
  • Create comparison or "alternatives" videos (these get cited by AI for comparison queries).

Reddit Quick Wins:

  • Identify 3-5 subreddits where your target audience is active.
  • Participate authentically (do not shill -- Reddit communities detect and punish this).
  • Do an AMA if appropriate for your brand.
  • Monitor and respond to mentions of your brand.
  • Create genuinely helpful posts that naturally mention your brand's expertise.

Wikipedia Strategy:

  • Hire a Wikipedia-knowledgeable consultant -- do NOT edit your own article (conflict of interest).
  • Build notability through press coverage, academic citations, and industry recognition first.
  • Ensure your Wikidata entry is complete even if you do not have a Wikipedia article.
  • Contribute to industry-relevant articles where your brand can be naturally cited as a source.

LinkedIn Quick Wins:

  • Optimize your company page with complete information and regular posting.
  • Encourage leadership to post thought leadership content weekly.
  • Publish LinkedIn articles on topics where your brand has unique expertise.
  • Engage with industry discussions to increase brand visibility in professional contexts.

平台分布

Codex

38.01%
按下载量换算544

Claude

28.4%
按下载量换算406

Cursor

18.31%
按下载量换算262

Gemini CLI

10.19%
按下载量换算146

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills