Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

generating-apex-test生成顶点测试

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

8,799

周安装

363

GitHub Stars

212

下载量

2,875
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:generating-apex-test(生成顶点测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/forcedotcom/afv-library
仓库路径:skills/generating-apex-test
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/forcedotcom/afv-library --skill generating-apex-test
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/forcedotcom/afv-library --skill generating-apex-test

简介

用于辅助测试设计、用例整理和回归验证。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中编写单元测试或端到端测试。
  • 通过 GitHub 安装,使用 npx skills add 命令添加技能。
  • 需确认测试框架和运行命令,避免为了通过测试而改坏逻辑。
  • generating-apex-test 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Generating Apex Tests

Generate production-ready Apex test classes and run disciplined test-fix loops with coverage analysis.

Core Principles

  1. One behavior per method — each test method validates a single scenario. Separate positive, negative, and bulk tests. NEVER combine related-but-distinct inputs (e.g., null and empty) in one method — create _NullInput_ and _EmptyInput_ as separate test methods
  2. Bulkify tests — test with 251+ records to cross the 200-record trigger batch boundary. Batch Apex exception: in test context only one execute() invocation runs, so set batchSize >= testRecordCount. See references/async-testing.md
  3. Isolate test data — every @TestSetup must delegate record creation to a TestDataFactory class. If none exists, create one first. Never build record lists inline in @TestSetup. Never rely on org data (SeeAllData=false) or hardcoded IDs. For duplicate rule handling, see references/test-data-factory.md
  4. Assert meaningfully — use exact expected values computed from test data setup. NEVER use range assertions or approximate counts when the value is deterministic. Always include failure messages. See references/assertion-patterns.md
  5. Use Assert class onlyAssert.areEqual, Assert.isTrue, Assert.fail, etc. Never use legacy System.assert, System.assertEquals, or System.assertNotEquals
  6. Mock external boundaries — use HttpCalloutMock for callouts, Test.setFixedSearchResults for SOSL, DML mock classes for database isolation. Design for testability via constructor injection. See references/mocking-patterns.md
  7. Test negative paths — validate error handling and exception scenarios, not just happy paths
  8. Wrap with start/stop — pair Test.startTest() with Test.stopTest() to reset governor limits and force async execution

Test.startTest() / Test.stopTest()

Always wrap the code under test in Test.startTest() / Test.stopTest():

  • Resets governor limits so the test measures only the code under test
  • Executes async operations synchronously (queueables, batch, future methods)
  • Fires scheduled jobs immediately

Test Code Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternFix
SOQL/DML inside loopsQuery once before the loop; use Map<Id, SObject> for lookups
Magic numbers in assertionsDerive expected values from setup constants
God test class (>500 lines)Split into multiple test classes by behavior area
Long test methods (>30 lines)Extract Given/When/Then into helper methods
Generic Exception catchCatch the specific expected type (e.g., DmlException)

Workflow

Step 1 — Gather Context

Before generating or fixing tests, identify:

  • the target production class(es) under test
  • existing test classes, test data factories, and setup helpers
  • desired test scope (single class, specific methods, suite, or local tests)
  • coverage threshold (75% minimum for deploy, 90%+ recommended)
  • org alias when running tests against an org

Step 2 — Generate the Test Class

Apply the structure, naming conventions, and patterns from the asset templates and reference docs.

MANDATORY — File Deliverables: For every test class, create BOTH files:

  1. {ClassName}Test.cls — the test class (use assets/test-class-template.cls as starting point)
  2. {ClassName}Test.cls-meta.xml — the metadata file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ApexClass xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
    <apiVersion>66.0</apiVersion>
    <status>Active</status>
</ApexClass>

If no TestDataFactory exists in the project, create TestDataFactory.cls + TestDataFactory.cls-meta.xml using assets/test-data-factory-template.cls.

@TestSetup Example

@TestSetup
static void setupTestData() {
    List<Account> accounts = TestDataFactory.createAccounts(251, true);
}

Test Method Structure

Use Given/When/Then:

@isTest
static void shouldUpdateStatus_WhenValidInput() {
    // Given
    List<Account> accounts = [SELECT Id FROM Account];

    // When
    Test.startTest();
    MyService.processAccounts(accounts);
    Test.stopTest();

    // Then
    List<Account> updated = [SELECT Id, Status__c FROM Account];
    Assert.areEqual(251, updated.size(), 'All accounts should be processed');
}

Negative Test — Exception Pattern

Use try/catch with Assert.fail to verify expected exceptions:

@isTest
static void shouldThrowException_WhenInvalidInput() {
    // Given
    List<Account> emptyList = new List<Account>();

    // When/Then
    Test.startTest();
    try {
        MyService.processAccounts(emptyList);
        Assert.fail('Expected MyCustomException to be thrown');
    } catch (MyCustomException e) {
        Assert.isTrue(e.getMessage().contains('cannot be empty'),
            'Exception message should indicate empty input');
    }
    Test.stopTest();
}

Naming Convention

  • should[ExpectedResult]_When[Scenario]: shouldSendNotification_WhenOpportunityClosedWon
  • [SubjectOrAction]_[Scenario]_[ExpectedResult]: AccountUpdate_ChangeName_Success

Step 3 — Run Tests

Start narrow when debugging; widen after the fix is stable.

# Single test class
sf apex run test --class-names MyServiceTest --result-format human --code-coverage --target-org <alias>

# Specific test methods
sf apex run test --tests MyServiceTest.shouldUpdateStatus_WhenValidInput --result-format human --target-org <alias>

# All local tests
sf apex run test --test-level RunLocalTests --result-format human --code-coverage --target-org <alias>

Step 4 — Analyze Results

Focus on:

  • failing methods — exception types and stack traces
  • uncovered lines and weak coverage areas
  • whether failures indicate bad test data, brittle assertions, or broken production logic

Step 5 — Fix Loop

When tests fail, run a disciplined fix loop (max 3 iterations — stop and surface root cause if still failing):

  1. Read the failing test class and the class under test
  2. Identify root cause from error messages and stack traces
  3. Apply fix — adjust test data or assertions for test-side issues; delegate production code issues to the generating-apex skill
  4. Rerun the focused test before broader regression
  5. Repeat until all tests pass, iteration limit reached, or root cause requires design change

Step 6 — Validate Coverage

LevelCoveragePurpose
Production deploy75% minimumRequired by Salesforce
Recommended90%+Best practice target
Critical paths100%Business-critical code

Cover all paths: positive, negative/exception, bulk (251+ records), callout/async.

What to Test by Component

ComponentKey Test Scenarios
TriggerBulk insert/update/delete, recursion guard, field change detection
ServiceValid/invalid inputs, bulk operations, exception handling
ControllerPage load, action methods, view state
Batchstart/execute/finish, scope matching (batch size >= record count), Database.Stateful tracking, error handling, chaining (separate methods — finish() calling Database.executeBatch() throws UnexpectedException)
QueueableChaining (only first job runs in tests), bulkification, error handling, callout mocks before Test.startTest()
CalloutSuccess response, error response, timeout
SelectorValid/null/empty inputs, bulk (251+), field population, sort order, WITH USER_MODE via System.runAs
ScheduledDirect execution via execute(null), CRON registration via CronTrigger query
Platform EventTest.enableChangeDataCapture(), Test.getEventBus().deliver(), verify subscriber side effects

Output Expectations

Deliverables per test class:

  • {ClassName}Test.cls + {ClassName}Test.cls-meta.xml (match API version of class under test; default 66.0)
  • TestDataFactory.cls + TestDataFactory.cls-meta.xml (if not already present)

Reference Files

Load on demand for detailed patterns:

ReferenceWhen to use
references/test-data-factory.mdTestDataFactory patterns, field overrides, duplicate rule handling
references/assertion-patterns.mdAssertion best practices, anti-patterns, common pitfalls
references/mocking-patterns.mdHttpCalloutMock, DML mocking, StubProvider, SOSL, Email, Platform Events
references/async-testing.mdBatch, Queueable, Future, Scheduled job testing

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.87%
按下载量换算1,060

Claude

30.29%
按下载量换算871

Cursor

18.25%
按下载量换算525

Gemini CLI

9.27%
按下载量换算267

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills