game-design-ftue-hero-journey-audit（游戏设计 ftue 英雄之旅审核）

Game Design FTUE Hero's Journey Audit

Audit the FTUE as if the player is the hero of a story.

Use this skill to evaluate whether a game's onboarding creates emotional connection, delivers a compelling call to adventure, introduces guidance in a motivating way, and gives the player an early moment of meaningful control. This is not just a tutorial audit. It is an audit of the player's first heroic arc.

Core principle

The purpose of FTUE is not merely to explain controls. The deeper purpose is to create an emotional connection and make the player feel like the hero of their own story.

Audit lens

Focus on these stages:

1. Part 0 / Framing - Is the FTUE treated broadly as the first meaningful arc, not just a tutorial?
2. Call to Adventure - Does the game quickly establish why this world, fantasy, or challenge is worth entering?
3. Meeting the Mentor - Does the game provide emotional guidance, framing, and useful gifts without drowning the player?
4. Crossing the Threshold - Does the player get to take meaningful action with enough autonomy and competence to feel good?

What to produce

Generate:

1. FTUE scope - what span of the experience is being audited
2. Hero's Journey stage review - strengths and weaknesses by stage
3. Psychological need check - autonomy, competence, relatedness where relevant
4. Drop-risk diagnosis - where the FTUE is likely to lose players
5. Recommendations - what to cut, pace, reframe, or strengthen

Process

1. Define the FTUE scope

Clarify:

• what counts as the FTUE in this game
• whether the audit covers first 30 seconds, first session, or several early sessions
• where the player is most likely to bounce

2. Audit the broad framing

Ask:

• is FTUE treated only as a control tutorial, or as the player's first arc with the game?
• does the experience aim to build emotional investment?
• does the flow respect the player's time and attention?
• are early retention risks acknowledged in the design?

3. Audit the Call to Adventure

Ask:

• does the game establish an inviting fantasy, promise, or problem quickly?
• does the player understand why they should care?
• is there a strong emotional hook before explanation overload begins?
• how much friction appears before meaningful interaction?
• are there blockers such as large downloads, mandatory account creation, intrusive popups, or heavy exposition?

Look for:

• fast entry into meaningful interaction
• minimal pre-play friction
• emotional hooks over yellow-arrow obedience
• intrigue, mood, and promise without infodump

4. Audit Meeting the Mentor

Ask:

• is there a mentor figure, guide, or equivalent framing device?
• does it create emotional connection or just dump instructions?
• does the guide explain only what matters now?
• does the player receive meaningful starter gifts, tools, or framing?
• is the mentor reused effectively for later mini-FTUE moments?

Look for:

• empathic or authoritative guidance
• gift-giving that feels magical, useful, and motivating
• character or framing that helps the world feel inhabited
• concise explanation rather than lore drowning

5. Audit Crossing the Threshold

Ask:

• when does the player first gain meaningful control?
• is the first self-directed action actually meaningful?
• does it satisfy autonomy as well as competence?
• is the task achievable by a novice while still feeling like real play?
• is the FTUE overloaded with too many mechanics or abilities too fast?
• are rules softened, randomness reduced, and feedback sped up during this phase?

Look for:

• early self-directed action
• clear and satisfying feedback
• low chance of early failure or humiliation
• only the minimum needed to start having fun
• gradual pacing of advanced systems

6. Check psychological needs

Use these lenses where relevant:

• Autonomy - how quickly the player gets meaningful agency
• Competence - whether the player can understand and succeed at the first tasks
• Relatedness - whether characters, framing, or social cues create emotional connection

7. Diagnose likely failure shapes

Common FTUE failure patterns:

• Yellow-arrow servitude - the player obeys prompts without caring
• Pre-play bureaucracy - too much friction before play begins
• Lore drowning - backstory arrives before emotional investment exists
• Mentor as textbox - guide character explains but does not emotionally connect
• Threshold humiliation - first real action is confusing or failure-prone
• Overloaded onboarding - too many mechanics too quickly
• Competence trap - player sleepwalks through tutorial and then crashes in real play

8. Convert findings into recommendations

For each issue, specify:

• what stage it damages
• what player need it frustrates
• what should be removed, delayed, simplified, reframed, or strengthened
• what emotional effect the change should produce

Response structure

FTUE Scope

• ...

Part 0 / Framing

• Strengths: ...
• Weaknesses: ...

Call to Adventure

• Strengths: ...
• Weaknesses: ...

Meeting the Mentor

• Strengths: ...
• Weaknesses: ...

Crossing the Threshold

• Strengths: ...
• Weaknesses: ...

Psychological Need Check

• Autonomy: ...
• Competence: ...
• Relatedness: ...

Drop-Risk Diagnosis

• ...

Recommendations

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Fast mode

• What is the player's first emotional hook?
• What friction appears before meaningful play?
• Who or what acts as the mentor?
• What is the first real self-directed action?
• Where is the FTUE most likely to lose the player?

References

Read these when useful:

• references/hero-journey-ftue-notes.md for the article-derived stage mapping
• references/failure-patterns.md for common FTUE breakdowns through this lens

Working principle

Do not design the player like a confused clerk filling forms. Design them like the hero crossing into a world worth caring about.