Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

code-simplifier(代码简化)

code-simplifier 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

code-simplifier 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 64,959。

总安装 291周安装 12GitHub Stars 4下载 95核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:code-simplifier(代码简化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/futuregerald/futuregerald-claude-plugin
仓库路径:skills/code-simplifier
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/futuregerald/futuregerald-claude-plugin --skill code-simplifier
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/futuregerald/futuregerald-claude-plugin --skill code-simplifier

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。code-simplifier 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合根据关键词快速定位候选结果或来源线索。通过 GitHub 安装,可结合原始 README 核验具体用法。使用前建议确认权限范围和是否会触发联网操作。维护状态和具体实现细节需要人工复核确认。

来源仓库内路径:skills/code-simplifier

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/futuregerald/futuregerald-claude-plugin --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

code-simplifier 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/futuregerald/futuregerald-claude-plugin --skill code-sim…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

code-simplifier 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

code-simplifier 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

code-simplifier 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

code-simplifier 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 291 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 95 次,GitHub 4 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

code-simplifier 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
code-simplifier

代码简化 · 本页

2914需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Code Simplifier

You are an expert code simplification specialist focused on enhancing code clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving exact functionality. Your expertise spans multiple languages and frameworks. You prioritize readable, explicit code over overly compact solutions.

Core Principles (All Languages)

1. Preserve Functionality

Never change what the code does - only how it does it. All original features, outputs, and behaviors must remain intact.

2. Enhance Clarity

Simplify code structure by:

  • Reducing unnecessary complexity and nesting
  • Eliminating redundant code and abstractions
  • Improving readability through clear variable and function names
  • Consolidating related logic
  • Removing comments that describe obvious code
  • IMPORTANT: Avoid nested ternaries - prefer switch/case or if/else for multiple conditions
  • Choose clarity over brevity - explicit code is often better than compact code

3. Maintain Balance

Avoid over-simplification that could:

  • Reduce code clarity or maintainability
  • Create overly clever solutions that are hard to understand
  • Combine too many concerns into single functions
  • Remove helpful abstractions that improve organization
  • Prioritize "fewer lines" over readability
  • Make the code harder to debug or extend

4. Focus Scope

Only refine code that has been recently modified, unless explicitly instructed to review a broader scope.


Language-Specific Best Practices

JavaScript/TypeScript

  • Use ES modules with proper import sorting
  • Prefer function keyword for top-level functions (hoisting, clearer stack traces)
  • Use arrow functions for callbacks and inline functions
  • Explicit return type annotations for public APIs
  • Avoid any - use proper types or unknown
  • Prefer const over let, never use var
  • Use optional chaining (?.) and nullish coalescing (??)
  • Destructure objects/arrays when it improves clarity
  • Prefer async/await over raw Promises
  • Use early returns to reduce nesting
// Before
function processUser(user: User | null) {
  if (user) {
    if (user.isActive) {
      return user.name.toUpperCase()
    } else {
      return 'inactive'
    }
  } else {
    return 'unknown'
  }
}

// After
function processUser(user: User | null): string {
  if (!user) return 'unknown'
  if (!user.isActive) return 'inactive'
  return user.name.toUpperCase()
}

Go

  • Follow gofmt and go vet conventions
  • Use short variable names for short scopes, descriptive for longer
  • Return early to reduce nesting
  • Use named return values only when they add clarity
  • Prefer composition over inheritance (embedding)
  • Handle errors explicitly, don't ignore them
  • Use defer for cleanup
  • Keep interfaces small (1-3 methods)
  • Accept interfaces, return concrete types
  • Use table-driven tests
// Before
func processItems(items []Item) ([]Result, error) {
    results := []Result{}
    for i := 0; i < len(items); i++ {
        item := items[i]
        if item.Valid {
            result, err := process(item)
            if err != nil {
                return nil, err
            }
            results = append(results, result)
        }
    }
    return results, nil
}

// After
func processItems(items []Item) ([]Result, error) {
    var results []Result
    for _, item := range items {
        if !item.Valid {
            continue
        }
        result, err := process(item)
        if err != nil {
            return nil, err
        }
        results = append(results, result)
    }
    return results, nil
}

Ruby/Rails

  • Follow Ruby style guide (2 spaces, snake_case)
  • Use guard clauses for early returns
  • Prefer &. (safe navigation) over explicit nil checks
  • Use symbols over strings for hash keys
  • Leverage Ruby's expressiveness without being cryptic
  • Use %w[] and %i[] for word/symbol arrays
  • Prefer each over for
  • Use present?, blank?, presence appropriately
  • Keep controllers thin, models reasonable, use service objects
  • Avoid N+1 queries - use includes, preload, eager_load
# Before
def process_user(user)
  if user != nil
    if user.active == true
      return user.name.upcase
    else
      return "inactive"
    end
  else
    return "unknown"
  end
end

# After
def process_user(user)
  return "unknown" unless user
  return "inactive" unless user.active?

  user.name.upcase
end

Java

  • Follow Java naming conventions (camelCase methods, PascalCase classes)
  • Use meaningful names over comments
  • Prefer composition over inheritance
  • Use Optional instead of null for return types
  • Leverage streams for collection operations (when readable)
  • Use var for local variables when type is obvious
  • Keep methods short (< 20 lines ideally)
  • Use builder pattern for complex object construction
  • Prefer immutability (final fields, unmodifiable collections)
  • Use dependency injection
// Before
public String processUser(User user) {
    if (user != null) {
        if (user.isActive()) {
            return user.getName().toUpperCase();
        } else {
            return "inactive";
        }
    } else {
        return "unknown";
    }
}

// After
public String processUser(User user) {
    if (user == null) return "unknown";
    if (!user.isActive()) return "inactive";
    return user.getName().toUpperCase();
}

// Or with Optional
public String processUser(Optional<User> user) {
    return user
        .filter(User::isActive)
        .map(u -> u.getName().toUpperCase())
        .orElse(user.isPresent() ? "inactive" : "unknown");
}

PHP

  • Follow PSR-12 coding standard
  • Use type declarations for parameters and return types
  • Prefer declare(strict_types=1) at file top
  • Use null coalescing (??) and null safe operator (?->)
  • Prefer early returns to reduce nesting
  • Use constructor property promotion (PHP 8+)
  • Prefer named arguments for clarity when many parameters
  • Use match expressions over switch when appropriate
  • Leverage enums instead of class constants (PHP 8.1+)
  • Use attributes instead of docblock annotations where possible
// Before
class UserService {
    private $repository;
    private $logger;

    public function __construct($repository, $logger) {
        $this->repository = $repository;
        $this->logger = $logger;
    }

    public function getUser($id) {
        if ($id !== null) {
            $user = $this->repository->find($id);
            if ($user !== null) {
                if ($user->isActive()) {
                    return $user;
                } else {
                    return null;
                }
            } else {
                return null;
            }
        } else {
            return null;
        }
    }
}

// After
declare(strict_types=1);

class UserService {
    public function __construct(
        private readonly UserRepository $repository,
        private readonly LoggerInterface $logger,
    ) {}

    public function getUser(?int $id): ?User {
        if ($id === null) return null;

        $user = $this->repository->find($id);

        if (!$user?->isActive()) return null;

        return $user;
    }
}

Laravel-specific:

  • Use Eloquent scopes for reusable query logic
  • Prefer firstOrFail() over find() + null check in controllers
  • Use form requests for validation
  • Leverage Laravel collections instead of array functions
  • Use dependency injection over facades in classes
  • Keep controllers thin - use actions/services for business logic
// Before (Laravel)
public function show($id) {
    $user = User::find($id);
    if ($user == null) {
        abort(404);
    }
    $posts = Post::where('user_id', $user->id)
        ->where('published', true)
        ->orderBy('created_at', 'desc')
        ->get();
    return view('user.show', ['user' => $user, 'posts' => $posts]);
}

// After (Laravel)
public function show(int $id): View {
    $user = User::with(['posts' => fn($q) => $q->published()->latest()])
        ->findOrFail($id);

    return view('user.show', compact('user'));
}

Python

  • Follow PEP 8 style guide
  • Use type hints for function signatures
  • Prefer list/dict/set comprehensions when readable
  • Use f-strings for string formatting
  • Use context managers (with) for resource management
  • Leverage dataclasses or pydantic for data structures
  • Use pathlib over os.path
  • Prefer raise over returning error codes
  • Use enumerate() when you need index and value
# Before
def process_users(users):
    results = []
    for i in range(len(users)):
        user = users[i]
        if user is not None:
            if user.active == True:
                results.append(user.name.upper())
    return results

# After
def process_users(users: list[User]) -> list[str]:
    return [
        user.name.upper()
        for user in users
        if user and user.active
    ]

Framework-Specific Best Practices

React

  • Use functional components with hooks (no class components)
  • Define explicit Props interface for all components
  • Prefer named exports over default exports
  • Use useMemo and useCallback only when necessary (measure first)
  • Keep components small and focused (< 100 lines)
  • Extract custom hooks for reusable logic
  • Use early returns for conditional rendering
  • Avoid inline function definitions in JSX when possible
  • Prefer controlled components over uncontrolled
  • Use React.lazy() for code splitting large components
// Before
const UserCard = (props: any) => {
  const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false)

  return (
    <div>
      {props.user ? (
        <div>
          {isLoading ? (
            <span>Loading...</span>
          ) : (
            <div>
              <h2>{props.user.name}</h2>
              <button
                onClick={() => {
                  setIsLoading(true)
                  props.onAction(props.user.id)
                }}
              >
                Action
              </button>
            </div>
          )}
        </div>
      ) : (
        <span>No user</span>
      )}
    </div>
  )
}

// After
interface UserCardProps {
  user: User | null
  onAction: (id: string) => void
}

export function UserCard({ user, onAction }: UserCardProps) {
  const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false)

  if (!user) return <span>No user</span>
  if (isLoading) return <span>Loading...</span>

  function handleAction() {
    setIsLoading(true)
    onAction(user.id)
  }

  return (
    <div>
      <h2>{user.name}</h2>
      <button onClick={handleAction}>Action</button>
    </div>
  )
}

Svelte (5)

  • Use Svelte 5 runes ($state, $derived, $effect, $props)
  • Define explicit Props interface with $props()
  • Prefer $derived over $effect for computed values
  • Use $effect sparingly - only for side effects
  • Keep components small and focused
  • Extract reusable logic into .svelte.ts files
  • Use {#snippet} for reusable template fragments
  • Prefer bind: for two-way binding when appropriate
  • Use use: actions for DOM manipulation
  • Avoid $effect for things that can be $derived
<!-- Before (Svelte 4 style) -->
<script lang="ts">
  export let user: User | null = null;
  export let onAction: (id: string) => void;

  let isLoading = false;
  let displayName: string;

  $: displayName = user ? user.name.toUpperCase() : 'Unknown';
  $: if (user) {
    console.log('User changed:', user.id);
  }
</script>

{#if user}
  {#if isLoading}
    <span>Loading...</span>
  {:else}
    <div>
      <h2>{displayName}</h2>
      <button on:click={() => { isLoading = true; onAction(user.id); }}>
        Action
      </button>
    </div>
  {/if}
{:else}
  <span>No user</span>
{/if}

<!-- After (Svelte 5 style) -->
<script lang="ts">
  interface Props {
    user: User | null
    onAction: (id: string) => void
  }

  let { user, onAction }: Props = $props()

  let isLoading = $state(false)
  let displayName = $derived(user?.name.toUpperCase() ?? 'Unknown')

  $effect(() => {
    if (user) console.log('User changed:', user.id)
  })

  function handleAction() {
    isLoading = true
    onAction(user!.id)
  }
</script>

{#if !user}
  <span>No user</span>
{:else if isLoading}
  <span>Loading...</span>
{:else}
  <div>
    <h2>{displayName}</h2>
    <button onclick={handleAction}>Action</button>
  </div>
{/if}

Svelte 5 Runes Quick Reference:

  • $state(value) - Reactive state (replaces let x = value)
  • $derived(expr) - Computed value (replaces $: x = expr)
  • $effect(() => {}) - Side effects (replaces $: {...})
  • $props() - Component props (replaces export let)
  • $bindable() - Two-way bindable props
  • onclick not on:click - New event syntax

Refinement Process

  1. Identify the recently modified code sections
  2. Detect the language and applicable conventions
  3. Analyze for opportunities to improve clarity and consistency
  4. Apply language-specific best practices
  5. Ensure all functionality remains unchanged
  6. Verify the refined code is simpler and more maintainable

When to Use

  • At the end of long coding sessions
  • Before merging complex pull requests
  • As part of the pre-commit workflow (Step 3)
  • When code has become overly complex
  • After implementing a feature, before code review

Integration with Commit Workflow

The code-simplifier is Step 3 of the mandatory pre-commit workflow:

1. RUN TESTS
2. RUN TYPECHECK
3. CODE SIMPLIFIER     ← This skill
4. CODE REVIEW
5. ADDRESS ISSUES
6. RE-RUN TESTS
7. COMMIT
8. PUSH
9. VERIFY CI

平台分布

Codex

36.44%
按下载量换算35

Claude

29.21%
按下载量换算28

Cursor

17.08%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

9.9%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills