Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

frontmatter-guard(头条卫士)

frontmatter-guard 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

frontmatter-guard 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 65,351。

总安装 282周安装 12GitHub Stars 12,477下载 99核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:frontmatter-guard(头条卫士)
来源仓库:https://github.com/garrytan/gbrain
仓库路径:skills/frontmatter-guard
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/garrytan/gbrain --skill frontmatter-guard
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/garrytan/gbrain --skill frontmatter-guard

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持关键词或任务场景快速定位结果。适合在需要根据来源线索快速获取候选信息时使用。frontmatter-guard 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。可通过来源仓库和原始 README 进一步核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件读写。建议结合具体任务场景验证其检索准确性和覆盖范围。

来源仓库内路径:skills/frontmatter-guard

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/garrytan/gbrain --skill frontmatter-guard;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

frontmatter-guard 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/garrytan/gbrain --skill frontmatter-guard。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

frontmatter-guard 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

frontmatter-guard 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

frontmatter-guard 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

frontmatter-guard 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 282 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 99 次,GitHub 12,477 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

frontmatter-guard 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 12,477 星,维护活跃度相对可查。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
frontmatter-guard

头条卫士 · 本页

28212,477只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Frontmatter Guard Skill

Convention: see skills/conventions/quality.md for citation rules; this skill is structural validation, not citation auditing.

Contract

This skill guarantees:

  • Every brain page is scanned against the seven canonical frontmatter validation classes
  • Mechanical errors (nested quotes, missing closing ---, null bytes, slug mismatch) are auto-repairable on demand with .bak backups
  • Validation logic is shared with gbrain doctor's frontmatter_integrity subcheck — single source of truth
  • Reports per source (gbrain is multi-source since v0.18.0); never silently audits the wrong root

Why This Exists

Brain pages pile up over months. Agents write them with malformed frontmatter:

  • Missing closing --- (entity detector bugs)
  • Unstructured YAML in meeting pages (ingestion bugs)
  • Slug mismatches (path renames not propagated)
  • Null bytes (binary corruption from copy-paste accidents)
  • Nested double quotes in titles (title: "Phil "Nick" Last")

Without a guard, these accumulate silently until gbrain sync chokes or search returns garbage. The guard makes the failure visible at audit time and trivially fixable.

Validation classes

CodeMeaningAuto-fixable?
MISSING_OPENFile doesn't start with ---No (needs human)
MISSING_CLOSENo closing --- before first headingYes
YAML_PARSEYAML failed to parseSometimes (depends on cause)
SLUG_MISMATCHFrontmatter slug: differs from path-derived slugYes (removes the field)
NULL_BYTESBinary corruption (\x00)Yes
NESTED_QUOTEStitle: "outer "inner" outer" shapeYes
EMPTY_FRONTMATTEROpen + close present but nothing betweenNo (needs human)

Phases

Phase 1: Audit

Run a read-only scan across all registered sources (or one with --source <id>).

gbrain frontmatter audit --json

Reports:

  • Per-source counts grouped by error code
  • Sample of up to 20 affected pages per source
  • Total count
  • Scan timestamp

Output is JSON; agents parse errors_by_code and per_source to decide next steps.

Phase 2: Validate one path

Validate a single file or directory (does not require source registration):

gbrain frontmatter validate <path> --json

Exit code 0 = clean; 1 = errors found. Use this in CI pipelines or pre-commit hooks.

Phase 3: Fix

When issues are found:

gbrain frontmatter validate <path> --fix

--fix writes <file>.bak for every modified file before mutating. The backup is the safety contract — works whether the brain is a git repo or a plain directory.

--dry-run previews without writing. Use this before applying fixes in batch.

Phase 4: Pre-commit hook (optional)

For brain repos that ARE git repos, install the pre-commit hook to block malformed pages from being committed in the first place:

gbrain frontmatter install-hook [--source <id>]

The hook runs gbrain frontmatter validate against staged .md/.mdx files. Bypass with git commit --no-verify.

Trigger words

When the user says any of these, route here:

  • "validate frontmatter"
  • "check frontmatter"
  • "fix frontmatter"
  • "frontmatter audit"
  • "brain lint"

Output rules

  • Always run gbrain frontmatter audit --json first; never assume a brain is clean.
  • Surface counts to the user in plain language; do not dump raw JSON.
  • For --fix operations: state how many files will be modified BEFORE running, then confirm.
  • SLUG_MISMATCH fixes remove the frontmatter slug: field — gbrain derives slug from path. Mention this when the user's title is intentionally renamed.
  • Never auto-fix MISSING_OPEN or EMPTY_FRONTMATTER without explicit user input — these usually mean a human author started a page and didn't finish.

Chains with

  • gbrain doctor — the frontmatter_integrity subcheck reports the same counts as audit.
  • skills/maintain/SKILL.md — broader brain health audit; chain after this skill if other classes of issue are suspected.
  • skills/lint/SKILL.md (via gbrain lint) — overlapping rules for skill-file lint; the frontmatter-* rule names in lint output come from this skill's validation surface.

Output Format

Audit summary (terse, agent-friendly):

Frontmatter audit — 17 issue(s) across 1 source(s)

[default] /Users/me/brain
  17 issue(s)
    MISSING_CLOSE: 8
    NESTED_QUOTES: 5
    NULL_BYTES: 4
  sample:
    people/jane.md — MISSING_CLOSE
    companies/acme.md — NESTED_QUOTES
    (+ 12 more)

Fix with: gbrain frontmatter validate /Users/me/brain --fix

JSON envelope (when --json is passed):

{
  "ok": false,
  "total": 17,
  "errors_by_code": { "MISSING_CLOSE": 8, "NESTED_QUOTES": 5, "NULL_BYTES": 4 },
  "per_source": [
    {
      "source_id": "default",
      "source_path": "/Users/me/brain",
      "total": 17,
      "errors_by_code": { "MISSING_CLOSE": 8, "NESTED_QUOTES": 5, "NULL_BYTES": 4 },
      "sample": [{ "path": "people/jane.md", "codes": ["MISSING_CLOSE"] }]
    }
  ],
  "scanned_at": "2026-04-25T22:30:00.000Z"
}

gbrain frontmatter validate <path> --json returns a similar envelope keyed on per-file results instead of per-source.

Anti-Patterns

Don't auto-fix MISSING_OPEN or EMPTY_FRONTMATTER without user input. These usually mean a human author started a page and didn't finish — silently inserting --- markers around an unfinished draft is wrong.

Don't use --fix to "make doctor green" without reading the audit first. SLUG_MISMATCH cases are surfaced for manual review specifically because gbrain derives the slug from path. A mismatch usually means the user renamed a file intentionally; auto-removing the slug field is the right outcome only when you've confirmed the rename was deliberate.

Don't skip the .bak backups. The .bak is the safety contract for non-git brain repos. If .bak files accumulate after a fix run, that's a feature, not a bug — the user can review the diffs and delete the backups when satisfied.

Don't run audit on a brain where sources aren't registered. The CLI returns "no registered sources to audit" gracefully, but the migration emits a skipped: no_sources phase result. Don't paper over this with a manual path-walk; the right fix is to register the source via gbrain sources add.

Don't install the pre-commit hook on non-git brain dirs. The install-hook command skips them automatically with a one-line note. If you see "skipped — not a git repo" and want validation at write time anyway, use the audit command on a cron schedule.

平台分布

Codex

36.54%
按下载量换算36

Claude

29.36%
按下载量换算29

Cursor

16.95%
按下载量换算17

Gemini CLI

8.58%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills