Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

frappe-agent-architect(冰沙 Agent 建筑师)

frappe-agent-architect 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

frappe-agent-architect 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 5,591。

总安装 642周安装 27GitHub Stars 87下载 225核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:frappe-agent-architect(冰沙 Agent 建筑师)
来源仓库:https://github.com/openaec-foundation/erpnext_anthropic_claude_development_skill_package
仓库路径:skills/frappe-agent-architect
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/openaec-foundation/erpnext_anthropic_claude_development_skill_package --skill frappe-agent-architect
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/openaec-foundation/erpnext_anthropic_claude_development_skill_package --skill frappe-agent-architect

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request 协作信息。支持代码变更追踪、仓库状态整理和协作事项归纳,提升开发效率。可结合原始 README 和安装命令进一步验证功能细节和使用限制。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的网络请求。

使用时需注意信息时效性,优先基于最新提交和历史记录进行分析。

来源仓库内路径:skills/frappe-agent-architect

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/openaec-foundation/erpnext_anthropic_claude_de…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

frappe-agent-architect 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/openaec-foundation/erpnext_anthropic_claude_development_…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

frappe-agent-architect 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

frappe-agent-architect 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

frappe-agent-architect 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

frappe-agent-architect 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 642 次,近一周安装 27 次,下载 225 次,GitHub 87 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

frappe-agent-architect 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
frappe-agent-architect

冰沙 Agent 建筑师 · 本页

64287需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Multi-App Architecture Agent

Designs Frappe/ERPNext multi-app architectures by analyzing business requirements, deciding app boundaries, and generating implementation roadmaps.

Purpose: Make the right architecture decisions BEFORE writing code — prevent costly refactoring later.

When to Use This Agent

ARCHITECTURE TRIGGER
|
+-- New project with multiple modules
|   "We need CRM, inventory, and custom billing"
|   --> USE THIS AGENT
|
+-- Deciding whether to extend ERPNext or build custom
|   "Should we customize Sales Invoice or create our own DocType?"
|   --> USE THIS AGENT
|
+-- Multiple teams building on same Frappe instance
|   "Team A does HR, Team B does manufacturing"
|   --> USE THIS AGENT
|
+-- Existing monolith needs splitting
|   "Our single custom app has 50 DocTypes"
|   --> USE THIS AGENT
|
+-- Cross-app communication needed
|   "App A needs to react when App B creates a document"
|   --> USE THIS AGENT

Architecture Workflow

STEP 1: ANALYZE REQUIREMENTS
  Business needs → DocTypes, workflows, integrations

STEP 2: DECIDE APP BOUNDARIES
  Single app vs multiple apps decision framework

STEP 3: DESIGN CROSS-APP DEPENDENCIES
  required_apps, shared DocTypes, hook contracts

STEP 4: DESIGN DATA MODEL
  DocTypes, relationships, naming conventions

STEP 5: GENERATE IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP
  Build order, milestones, team assignments

See references/workflow.md for detailed steps.

Step 1: Requirement Analysis Matrix

Map each business requirement to Frappe mechanisms:

Requirement TypeFrappe MechanismExample
Data storageDocType"Track customer contracts"
Business rulesController/Server Script"Auto-calculate totals"
Approval flowWorkflow"Manager must approve orders >10k"
Scheduled tasksScheduler/hooks.py"Daily report email"
External syncIntegration/API"Sync with Shopify"
Custom UIClient Script/Page"Dashboard for warehouse"
ReportsScript Report/Query Report"Monthly sales by region"
PermissionsRole Permission"Sales team sees own data only"
Print outputPrint Format (Jinja)"Custom invoice layout"
Portal accessWebsite/Portal"Customer can view orders"

Step 2: App Boundary Decision Framework

Single App: Use When

  • Total DocTypes < 15
  • Single team maintains the code
  • All DocTypes share the same business domain
  • No plans to distribute/sell components separately
  • All DocTypes have tight data dependencies

Multiple Apps: Use When

  • Total DocTypes > 15
  • Multiple teams with separate release cycles
  • Clear domain boundaries exist (HR vs Manufacturing vs CRM)
  • Components may be installed independently
  • Some modules are reusable across projects
  • Different licensing needs per module

Decision Tree

HOW MANY DOCTYPES?
|
+-- < 15 total
|   +-- Single domain? --> SINGLE APP
|   +-- Multiple domains? --> Consider splitting
|
+-- 15-30 total
|   +-- Tight coupling between all? --> SINGLE APP (with modules)
|   +-- Clear domain boundaries? --> 2-3 APPS
|
+-- > 30 total
|   --> ALWAYS SPLIT into multiple apps
|       Group by domain/team/release cycle

See references/decision-tree.md for the complete decision framework.

Step 3: Cross-App Dependency Patterns

required_apps Declaration

ALWAYS declare dependencies explicitly in hooks.py:

# myapp/hooks.py
required_apps = ["frappe", "erpnext"]  # NEVER omit frappe

Dependency Rules

  • NEVER create circular dependencies (App A requires App B requires App A)
  • ALWAYS declare ALL dependencies (direct and indirect)
  • ALWAYS put shared/base apps first in required_apps
  • NEVER depend on a specific version — use compatible APIs only

Dependency Diagram Pattern

frappe (base framework)
  └── erpnext (ERP modules)
       ├── custom_manufacturing (extends Manufacturing)
       └── custom_crm (extends CRM)
            └── crm_analytics (extends custom_crm)

RULE: Dependencies flow DOWN only. Never up, never sideways.

Cross-App Communication Patterns

PatternMechanismUse When
Hook Eventsdoc_events in hooks.pyApp B reacts to App A's documents
Shared DocTypeLink fields to other app's DocTypesApps share reference data
API Callfrappe.call() to whitelisted methodLoose coupling between apps
Custom Fieldsfixtures with Custom FieldExtend another app's DocType without modifying it
Overrideextend_doctype_class (v16) or doc_eventsModify another app's behavior
Signalsfrappe.publish_realtime()Real-time notifications between apps

Step 4: Data Model Design

DocType Relationship Types

RelationshipImplementationExample
One-to-ManyChild Table DocTypeInvoice → Invoice Items
Many-to-OneLink fieldInvoice → Customer
Many-to-ManyLink DocType (intermediary)Student → Course (via Enrollment)
One-to-OneLink field + unique validationEmployee → User
Self-referentialLink to same DocTypeEmployee → Reports To (Employee)

Naming Conventions

ElementConventionExample
App namelowercase, underscorescustom_manufacturing
DocType nameTitle Case, spacesProduction Order
Field namelowercase, underscoresproduction_date
Controllersnake_case filenameproduction_order.py
ModuleTitle CaseManufacturing

Data Model Rules

  • NEVER duplicate data that exists in another DocType — use Link fields
  • ALWAYS define autoname/naming_series for every DocType
  • ALWAYS add created_by and modified_by awareness (built-in)
  • NEVER use Data fields for references — use Link fields
  • ALWAYS set mandatory fields for data integrity
  • ALWAYS define permissions at DocType level

App Composition Patterns

Pattern 1: Base + Vertical

base_app (shared DocTypes, utilities)
├── vertical_retail (retail-specific DocTypes)
├── vertical_manufacturing (manufacturing-specific DocTypes)
└── vertical_services (services-specific DocTypes)

Use when: Building industry-specific solutions on shared foundation.

Pattern 2: Core + Extensions

erpnext (standard ERP)
├── custom_fields_app (Custom Fields only, no DocTypes)
├── custom_reports_app (Script Reports and dashboards)
└── custom_workflows_app (Workflows and automation)

Use when: Extending ERPNext without modifying core. Keeps upgrades clean.

Pattern 3: Shared Utilities

frappe_utils (shared library: PDF generation, email templates, etc.)
├── app_crm (uses frappe_utils)
├── app_hr (uses frappe_utils)
└── app_projects (uses frappe_utils)

Use when: Multiple apps need the same utility functions.

Pattern 4: Marketplace App

standalone_app (zero dependencies beyond frappe)
├── Works on any Frappe site
├── Self-contained DocTypes and logic
└── Optional ERPNext integration via hooks

Use when: Building for distribution/sale on Frappe marketplace.

ERPNext Extension Patterns

Custom Fields vs Custom DocTypes vs Override

ApproachUse WhenProsCons
Custom FieldsAdding 1-10 fields to existing DocTypeSurvives upgrades, no codeLimited logic, UI clutter
Custom DocTypeNew business entity not in ERPNextFull control, clean designNo built-in ERPNext logic
Controller OverrideModifying existing ERPNext behaviorFull Python accessFragile on upgrades
Server ScriptSimple validation/automationNo custom app neededSandbox limitations
Client ScriptUI customizationNo custom app neededJS only, no server logic

Extension Decision Rules

  • ALWAYS prefer Custom Fields for < 10 additional fields
  • ALWAYS prefer Server Script for simple validations
  • NEVER override ERPNext controllers unless absolutely necessary
  • ALWAYS use extend_doctype_class (v16) over doc_events for overrides
  • NEVER modify ERPNext source files directly — ALWAYS use hooks or extensions

Common Architecture Mistakes

MistakeWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Circular app dependenciesInstall/update breaksRestructure dependency tree
One mega-app with 50+ DocTypesUnmaintainable, slow testsSplit by domain into 3-5 apps
Duplicating ERPNext DocTypesData inconsistency, double maintenanceExtend with Custom Fields + hooks
No required_apps declarationSilent failures on fresh installALWAYS declare all dependencies
Shared database tables between appsTight coupling, migration conflictsUse Link fields and API calls
Modifying ERPNext source filesLost on every upgradeUse hooks, Custom Fields, extensions
No module organization within appFiles scattered, hard to navigateGroup DocTypes into modules
Hardcoded site/company namesBreaks on multi-site/multi-companyUse frappe.defaults and filters

Agent Output Format

ALWAYS produce architecture output in this format:

## Architecture Design

### Requirements Summary
| # | Requirement | DocTypes | Mechanism |
|---|------------|----------|-----------|

### App Structure
[Diagram showing apps and dependencies]

### App Inventory
| App | Module(s) | DocTypes | Dependencies |
|-----|-----------|----------|-------------|

### Data Model
| DocType | App | Key Fields | Relationships |
|---------|-----|------------|---------------|

### Cross-App Communication
| Source App | Target App | Mechanism | Trigger |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|---------|

### ERPNext Extensions
| Extension Type | Target DocType | Purpose |
|---------------|---------------|---------|

### Implementation Roadmap
| Phase | App(s) | Deliverables | Dependencies |
|-------|--------|-------------|-------------|

### Risk Assessment
| Risk | Mitigation |
|------|-----------|

### Referenced Skills
- `frappe-syntax-customapp`: App structure
- `frappe-syntax-hooks`: Hook configuration
- `frappe-syntax-doctypes`: DocType definition
- `frappe-impl-customapp`: App development workflow

See references/decision-tree.md for complete decision frameworks. See references/examples.md for architecture design examples.

平台分布

Codex

35.81%
按下载量换算81

Claude

31.71%
按下载量换算71

Cursor

17.16%
按下载量换算39

Gemini CLI

9.44%
按下载量换算21

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills