Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

framework-critical-thinking(框架批判性思维)

framework-critical-thinking 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

framework-critical-thinking 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 15,404。

总安装 599周安装 24GitHub Stars 95下载 194核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:framework-critical-thinking(框架批判性思维)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rfxlamia/claude-skillkit
仓库路径:skills/framework-critical-thinking
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rfxlamia/claude-skillkit --skill framework-critical-thinking
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rfxlamia/claude-skillkit --skill framework-critical-thinking

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request 协作信息。支持代码变更追踪、仓库状态整理和协作事项归纳,提升开发效率。可结合原始 README 和安装命令进一步验证功能细节和使用限制。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的网络请求。

使用时需注意信息时效性,优先基于最新提交和历史记录进行分析。

来源仓库内路径:skills/framework-critical-thinking

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/rfxlamia/claude-skillkit --skill framework-cri…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

framework-critical-thinking 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/rfxlamia/claude-skillkit --skill framework-critical-thin…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

framework-critical-thinking 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

framework-critical-thinking 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

framework-critical-thinking 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

framework-critical-thinking 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 599 次,近一周安装 24 次,下载 194 次,GitHub 95 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

framework-critical-thinking 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
framework-critical-thinking

框架批判性思维 · 本页

59995只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Framework Critical Thinking Framework (FCT)

Overview

Critical Thinking Framework (FCT) provides architectural components for building AI agents with metacognition and self-correction capabilities. This framework integrates state-of-the-art techniques such as Chain-of-Thought, Tree-of-Thoughts, and self-verification to produce more reliable and transparent reasoning.

When to use this skill:

  • Building AI agents for complex tasks requiring multi-step reasoning
  • Implementing self-correction and error detection in agent workflows
  • Selecting the appropriate reasoning method (CoT vs ToT vs GoT) based on task characteristics
  • Adding metacognitive monitoring to improve reliability
  • Reducing hallucination and reasoning errors in AI outputs

Triggers: Use this skill when the user requests help with:

  • "build an agent that can self-correct"
  • "implement better reasoning"
  • "reduce hallucination in AI system"
  • "choose between CoT, ToT, or other reasoning methods"
  • "add error detection to agent workflow"

Core Capabilities

1. Reasoning Router

File: references/reasoning_router.md

Detects problem complexity and routes to the optimal reasoning method (CoT/ToT/GoT/Self-Consistency).

Use cases:

  • Straightforward task with single solution path → CoT
  • Complex task with multiple viable paths → ToT (BFS/DFS)
  • Task with interconnected reasoning → GoT
  • Critical task requiring verification → Self-Consistency

2. Metacognitive Monitor

File: references/metacognitive_monitor.md

Self-assessment and error detection in the reasoning process. Implements the Producer-Critic pattern for continuous quality control.

Key features:

  • Confidence scoring per reasoning step
  • Anomaly detection in thought patterns
  • Reflection trigger conditions
  • Human handoff protocols

3. Self-Verification

File: references/self_verification.md

Implementation of Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) and other self-verification techniques to validate outputs before delivery.

Methods covered:

  • Chain-of-Verification (CoVe)
  • Self-Refine loops
  • Backward verification
  • Cross-verification with external sources

4. Bias Detector

File: references/bias_detector.md

Detection of cognitive bias in the reasoning process and mitigation strategies.

Bias types covered:

  • Confirmation bias
  • Anchoring bias
  • Availability heuristic
  • Framing effects
  • Recency bias

5. Producer-Critic Orchestrator

File: references/producer_critic_orchestrator.md

Pattern for orchestrating Generate-Critique-Refine cycles in agent workflows.

Architecture:

  • Master Agent (orchestrator)
  • Producer Agent (generation)
  • Critic Agent (evaluation)
  • Refinement loops with budget constraints

6. Memory Curator

File: references/memory_curator.md

Management of episodic memory with quality weighting to prevent memory pollution from bad episodes.

Features:

  • Quality-weighted memory storage
  • Experience replay for learning
  • Memory consolidation strategies
  • Selective retention policies

7. Reasoning Validator

File: references/reasoning_validator.md

Logical consistency checker and structural validation for reasoning chains.

Validation types:

  • Logical consistency checks
  • Structural completeness
  • Assumption validation
  • Contradiction detection

8. Reflection Trigger

File: references/reflection_trigger.md

Rule-based triggers to activate self-correction loops based on specific conditions.

Trigger conditions:

  • Confidence threshold violations
  • Repeated action patterns
  • Latency spikes
  • Complexity indicators

Workflow Decision Tree

User Request: Build/improve AI agent with critical thinking

├─ Step 1: Analyze Task Complexity
│  ├─ Simple, single-path → Use CoT (Chain-of-Thought)
│  ├─ Complex, multi-path → Use ToT (Tree-of-Thoughts)
│  ├─ Interconnected → Use GoT (Graph-of-Thoughts)
│  └─ Critical, needs verification → Use Self-Consistency
│
├─ Step 2: Implement Metacognitive Layer
│  ├─ Add confidence scoring
│  ├─ Set up reflection triggers
│  └─ Configure human handoff thresholds
│
├─ Step 3: Add Self-Verification
│  ├─ Implement CoVe for factual claims
│  ├─ Add backward verification for math/logic
│  └─ Setup cross-verification if external sources available
│
├─ Step 4: Integrate Bias Detection
│  ├─ Check for confirmation bias
│  ├─ Validate assumption diversity
│  └─ Apply mitigation strategies
│
└─ Step 5: Setup Memory & Learning
   ├─ Configure episodic memory
   ├─ Setup quality weighting
   └─ Implement experience replay

Quick Reference: Reasoning Method Selection

Task CharacteristicRecommended MethodCostAccuracy
Simple, linearCoTLowGood
Complex planningToT-BFSHighVery Good
Deep reasoningToT-DFSHighVery Good
InterconnectedGoTVery HighExcellent
Critical decisionsSelf-ConsistencyVery HighExcellent
Factual claimsCoVeMediumGood

Implementation Example

# Pseudo-code for agent with ACT-F

class CriticalThinkingAgent:
    def __init__(self):
        self.reasoning_router = ReasoningRouter()
        self.metacognitive_monitor = MetacognitiveMonitor()
        self.self_verifier = SelfVerification()
        self.bias_detector = BiasDetector()

    async def solve(self, problem):
        # Step 1: Route to appropriate method
        method = self.reasoning_router.select(problem)

        # Step 2: Generate with monitoring
        thoughts = []
        for step in method.generate(problem):
            confidence = self.metacognitive_monitor.assess(step)
            if confidence < THRESHOLD:
                step = self.reflect_and_improve(step)
            thoughts.append(step)

        # Step 3: Self-verification
        verified = self.self_verifier.verify(thoughts)

        # Step 4: Bias check
        if self.bias_detector.detect(verified):
            verified = self.bias_detector.mitigate(verified)

        return verified

Resources

references/

Complete documentation for each ACT-F component:

  • reasoning_router.md - Reasoning method selection (P0)
  • metacognitive_monitor.md - Self-assessment and monitoring (P0)
  • self_verification.md - Output verification techniques (P0)
  • bias_detector.md - Bias detection and mitigation (P0)
  • producer_critic_orchestrator.md - Generate-critique-refine pattern (P1)
  • memory_curator.md - Memory management (P1)
  • reasoning_validator.md - Logical validation (P1)
  • reflection_trigger.md - Trigger conditions (P1)
  • uncertainty_quantifier.md - Confidence calibration (P2)
  • fallback_handler.md - Graceful degradation (P2)

scripts/

Utilities and templates for implementation (optional).


Sources:

平台分布

Codex

36.02%
按下载量换算70

Claude

27.27%
按下载量换算53

Cursor

19.16%
按下载量换算37

Gemini CLI

10.27%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills