Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

foundation-meeting-recap(基金会会议回顾)

foundation-meeting-recap 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

foundation-meeting-recap 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 67,721。

总安装 242周安装 10GitHub Stars 168下载 79核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:foundation-meeting-recap(基金会会议回顾)
来源仓库:https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills
仓库路径:skills/foundation-meeting-recap
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill foundation-meeting-recap
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill foundation-meeting-recap

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

foundation-meeting-recap 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据任务场景定位内容。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用该技能。安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。

建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/foundation-meeting-recap

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill foundatio…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

foundation-meeting-recap 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill foundation-meeting-…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

foundation-meeting-recap 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

foundation-meeting-recap 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

foundation-meeting-recap 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

foundation-meeting-recap 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 242 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 79 次,GitHub 168 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

foundation-meeting-recap 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
foundation-meeting-recap

基金会会议回顾 · 本页

242168调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Meeting Recap

A meeting recap is a post-meeting topic-segmented summary produced for attendees and light distribution. It organizes content by topic rather than chronology, highlights decisions visually, and captures actions inline (with owner, due date, dependencies) per topic segment, plus a consolidated actions view at the end for scannability.

This skill absorbs what would otherwise be a separate "meeting-actions" skill. Actions in this family live alongside the context that makes them meaningful, not in a sibling artifact.

This skill belongs to the Meeting Skills Family. It conforms to the Meeting Skills Family Contract.

When to Use

  • After any internal meeting that produces decisions or actions affecting attendees
  • When a sibling /meeting-agenda exists and needs reconciliation (planned vs. actual topics)
  • When the team needs a topic-organized reference rather than a chronological transcript dump
  • When inputs include a transcript (Zoom, Meet, Otter, Fireflies, Krisp MCP) or mixed notes and transcript

When NOT to Use

  • Communicating outcomes to non-attendees. Use /stakeholder-update. recap assumes reader context; stakeholder-update translates to readers without it.
  • Cross-meeting synthesis (patterns across multiple meetings). Use /meeting-synthesize.
  • Live meeting note-taking. This skill consumes finished inputs; it does not transcribe live.

Zero-friction execution

Per the family contract, this skill never blocks on interrogation. Default flow:

  1. Read all provided inputs (transcript, notes, or hybrid) and note input quality upfront
  2. Auto-discover related agenda via filename-prefix match on same-directory *_{title}_agenda.md
  3. Run inference: meeting metadata from content, decisions from language markers, actions from imperative-future patterns, owners from attendee context
  4. Present a brief inference summary and accept one-word go or corrections
  5. Produce the recap

If invoked with --go, skip the inference summary. If the user provides all metadata upfront, no checkpoint appears.

Fabrication prohibition

This skill never fabricates owners, decisions, or actions. When an action lacks an explicit owner, it is captured as [owner: unassigned, needs confirmation] not invented. When a decision is implicit ("it sounded like we decided X"), it is flagged with a confidence marker rather than stated as fact. Trust decay from fabrication is worse than the mild friction of flagging.

Ownership reconciliation threshold (v1.1.0)

When the ratio of unassigned actions to total actions exceeds 0.3 (30%), OR when any high-priority action lacks an owner, the skill surfaces a dedicated ## ⚠ Ownership reconciliation required section at the top of the recap (above the topic segments) listing:

  • All unassigned actions
  • A suggested next step for each (who should probably own this based on topic context, flagged as inference)
  • A recommended follow-up action (Slack thread, 15-min sync, async survey)

The shareable summary also leads with this flag when triggered: ⚠ Ownership reconciliation required: N of M actions lack owners.

The unassigned_action_ratio frontmatter field (float 0.0–1.0) records the ratio for downstream tools.

Rationale: a recap with 60% ownerless actions is "non-fabricated" (per the prohibition above) but operationally broken. a pile of broken tickets. The threshold makes this visible instead of silently shipping.

Instructions

When asked to create a meeting recap, follow these steps:

  1. Parse inputs and detect type Transcript (timestamped speaker-attributed lines), notes (bullet or prose), or hybrid. Note input quality upfront. transcript plus structured notes is high; scrappy bullets is low.
  2. Auto-discover related agenda Look in the same directory for a file matching the pattern {YYYY-MM-DD}_{HH-MMtimezone}_{title-slug}_agenda.md. If found, load it. its topic list is the recap's topic skeleton and its desired_outcomes drive the meeting-quality reconciliation.
  3. Present go-mode inference summary Show detected meeting date, title, attendees (if inferred), input quality assessment. Accept go or corrections.
  4. Topic-segment the content

- If agenda was loaded, use its topic list as scaffold (plus any emergent topics) - If no agenda, identify topics from transcript discourse markers ("moving on to", "the other thing")

  1. Per topic segment, extract

- Discussion summary: 2-3 sentences capturing what was discussed - Decisions made: bold-flagged visually. Never fabricate. if uncertain, flag "appears to have decided X [confidence: medium]" - Actions: owner + due date + dependencies. Flag missing owners as [owner: unassigned] and missing dates as [due: not specified]. Never invent. - Open questions: unresolved items with confidence marker on whether they are truly unresolved or simply not re-raised

  1. Consolidate actions by owner Regroup all actions under each owner. Enables single-owner scan ("what do I owe after this meeting?").
  2. Reconcile agenda (if agenda loaded)

- topics_planned: from agenda topic list - topics_hit: topics actually discussed - topics_skipped: planned but not discussed, with brief reason - topics_emerged: discussed but not on agenda

  1. Assess meeting quality signals

- outcomes_achieved: N/M ratio of agenda desired_outcomes met (when agenda present) - started_on_time / ended_on_time: from timestamps when available; skipped when not - key_attendees_present: flag if decision-makers were absent

  1. Surface next steps When we reconvene, what needs to happen on the critical path before that.
  2. Render TEMPLATE.md and validate

- Every action's owner appears in attendees or is explicitly unassigned - meeting_quality.outcomes_achieved matches N/M pattern when populated - agenda_reconciliation fields present even when empty lists

Quality checklist

  • Input quality flagged honestly (high / medium / low)
  • Agenda auto-discovery attempted; result noted in Generation context
  • Every topic segment has Discussion / Decisions / Actions / Open questions subsections
  • Decisions are bold-flagged; never invented; confidence marked when inferred
  • Every action has owner (or explicit unassigned) + due date (or explicit not specified)
  • Consolidated actions view regrouped by owner
  • Agenda reconciliation populated when agenda was loaded
  • Meeting quality signals populated with data available; skipped fields flagged
  • Shareable summary 5-6 lines, lead with decisions and top actions
  • Sources and References Generation context notes transcript source and any missing owners/dates

See also

平台分布

Codex

33.7%
按下载量换算27

Claude

30.59%
按下载量换算24

Cursor

19.99%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

8.94%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills