Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

foundation-meeting-agenda(基金会会议议程)

foundation-meeting-agenda 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

foundation-meeting-agenda 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 8,989。

总安装 267周安装 11GitHub Stars 168下载 87核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:foundation-meeting-agenda(基金会会议议程)
来源仓库:https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills
仓库路径:skills/foundation-meeting-agenda
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill foundation-meeting-agenda
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill foundation-meeting-agenda

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

foundation-meeting-agenda 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更进行整理。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用该技能。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/foundation-meeting-agenda

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill foundatio…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

foundation-meeting-agenda 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill foundation-meeting-…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

foundation-meeting-agenda 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

foundation-meeting-agenda 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

foundation-meeting-agenda 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

foundation-meeting-agenda 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 267 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 87 次,GitHub 168 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

foundation-meeting-agenda 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
foundation-meeting-agenda

基金会会议议程 · 本页

267168只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Meeting Agenda

A meeting agenda is the attendee-facing structural document that sets expectations before a meeting. It answers "what will we discuss, who owns each topic, how will we spend the time, and what does done look like?" Distinct from a meeting brief, which is the user's private strategic prep; the agenda is shared with participants and focused on structure and flow.

This skill belongs to the Meeting Skills Family. It conforms to the Meeting Skills Family Contract, which defines shared frontmatter, file naming, the go-mode behavioral pattern, and universal output requirements across all meeting skills.

When to Use

  • Running or chairing a cross-functional working session, project kickoff, stakeholder review, or decision meeting
  • Any meeting with more than three attendees or more than thirty minutes
  • Recurring meeting where a rolling structure (1-on-1, team sync) needs fresh framing each time
  • Mid-initiative alignment moment where explicit desired outcomes prevent drift

When NOT to Use

  • The user's preparation is private and tactical (positioning, stakeholder reads, asks). Use /meeting-brief instead.
  • The meeting has already happened. Use /meeting-recap for post-meeting summarization.
  • The user wants to communicate outcomes to non-attendees. Use /stakeholder-update after the meeting.

Zero-friction execution

Per the family contract, this skill never blocks on interrogation. Default flow:

  1. Read all provided inputs (topic, any referenced files, attendee list, constraints)
  2. Run inference on missing values (meeting type from topic keywords, duration default, objective from topic phrasing, attendee roles from context)
  3. Present a brief inference summary and accept one-word go or corrections
  4. Produce the agenda

If invoked with --go, skip the inference summary and produce output directly using defaults (duration 30 min, meeting type other, and so on). If the user provides all values upfront, no checkpoint appears.

Blocking questions are used only when inference confidence is actively low on a load-bearing input and no reasonable default exists. This should be rare.

Anti-meeting check

This skill opens with an explicit question: "Does this need to be a meeting, or could it be handled async?"

v1.1.0: the check now requires a positive synchronous-value statement. The meeting passes the check only when at least one of these is named:

  • Tradeoff to discuss. multiple options, uncertain preference
  • Conflict to resolve. named stakeholders disagreeing
  • Co-creation. shared whiteboarding or document-writing in the meeting
  • Relationship-building. first-time stakeholder meeting, mutual calibration
  • Blocker escalation. time-sensitive unblocking

If none apply, the skill recommends the async alternative (written update, doc review, Slack poll) and produces a short one-page "how to handle this async" framing instead of an agenda.

The v1.0.0 version of this check ("single-owner decision with no tradeoffs", "pure information broadcast", "status-only sync with >5 people") was bypassed too easily. users would stay at five attendees or add "decision" to the topic. The stricter v1.1.0 biases toward async; users can still override.

This check is shared with /meeting-brief and not run by the post-meeting skills (recap, synthesize, stakeholder-update).

Instructions

When asked to create a meeting agenda, follow these steps:

  1. Run anti-meeting check Apply the trigger patterns above. If the user's objective matches, propose the async alternative and ask for override. Only proceed to step 2 on explicit override.
  2. Parse and load inputs Read the topic or purpose. Load all @file references provided. Extract any attendee list, time constraints, or linked documents.
  3. Infer missing values Apply these inference rules: Value Inferred from Default Meeting type Topic keywords, attendee seniority mix other (low confidence) Duration Explicit in topic doc (rare); meeting-type-specific default when type is inferred at medium+ confidence v1.1.0: type-specific (see family contract). 30 min only for other, 1-on-1, exec-briefing, customer-call. Kickoff = 60, working-session = 60, decision-making = 45, etc. Objective Topic phrasing Infer; surface in summary Attendee RACI Seniority, topic ownership cues Flag all inferences Desired outcomes Objective plus meeting type heuristics Offer strawman Load-bearing inference gates (v1.1.0): when attendee RACI or desired outcomes are inferred below-high confidence, flag in the go-mode summary with ⚠. See family contract "Zero-friction execution" section.
  4. Present go-mode inference summary Show the inferred values with confidence markers. Accept go to proceed, or corrections to revise. Re-run inference after any correction and present the summary again.
  5. Design the time-boxed topic list Apply the meeting-type variant (see below). Size topic times so their sum equals the meeting duration. If the topic list overflows the available time, flag it explicitly and ask for reconciliation (do not silently trim). Each topic must have:

- Type tag: Discussion | Decision | Information | Working - Owner (name or team) - Goal (what done looks like) - Time allocation - Pre-read link if any

  1. Specify attendee prep List required prep with links and estimated prep time. Add recommended context for attendees who want deeper background. Add "come ready to" expectations that force clarity on what each attendee contributes.
  2. Add parking lot and logistics placeholders Parking lot is a placeholder for off-topic items raised during the meeting. Logistics covers join link, materials needed, recording ownership.
  3. Render the TEMPLATE.md with filled values Remove all guidance blockquotes from the final artifact.
  4. Validate output

- Frontmatter shape conforms to the family contract's universal base fields plus agenda-specific fields (meeting_duration_minutes, desired_outcomes) - Sum of topic times equals meeting duration (+/- 2 min tolerance) - At least one desired outcome is listed - Anti-meeting check result is recorded in Generation context

Meeting-type variants

Applied in step 5. Each variant reshapes the topic list to match the meeting's purpose.

  • 1-on-1: Rolling structure. Last time's items, this time's topics, growth or development, blockers. Default 30 min.
  • standup: Status round-robin, escalations, decisions needed. Default 15 min.
  • planning: Commitments focus, capacity check, dependencies. Default 60 min.
  • review: Presentation-first, heavy pre-read, explicit feedback-capture mechanism. Default 60 min.
  • decision-making: Options upfront, decision criteria, explicit decision ask. Pre-read with proposal required. Default 45 min.
  • brainstorm: Minimal agenda, generative prompts, no decision pressure. Default 45 min.
  • stakeholder-review: TL;DR first, business-impact framing, explicit asks upfront. Default 45 min.
  • project-kickoff: Scope, roles, success criteria, risks, communication plan. Default 60 min.
  • working-session: Minimal agenda, pre-work required, explicit deliverable. Default 60 to 90 min.
  • exec-briefing: TL;DR first, supporting detail after. Default 30 min.
  • other: Generic topic structure, default 30 min.

Quality checklist

Before delivering the agenda, verify:

  • Anti-meeting check was applied and recorded
  • Meeting type is set (or explicitly other with low-confidence flag)
  • Duration is set (default 30 min if not provided, flagged as default)
  • Desired outcomes are concrete and verifiable (not "discuss X" but "decide whether to ship X")
  • Every topic has type tag, owner, goal, time
  • Topic times sum to meeting duration
  • Pre-read prep time is listed (attendees skip prep when duration is not stated)
  • Logistics section has join link and materials references
  • Shareable summary is 5-6 lines, Slack-paste-ready
  • Sources and References section includes Generation context with defaults applied and inferences made

See also

平台分布

Codex

33.17%
按下载量换算29

Claude

32.13%
按下载量换算28

Cursor

21.4%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

10.74%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills