Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

flutter-verification(Flutter verification 命令行)

flutter-verification 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

flutter-verification 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 17,537。

总安装 399周安装 16GitHub Stars 6下载 129核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:flutter-verification(Flutter verification 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft
仓库路径:skills/flutter-verification
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-verification
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-verification

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

flutter-verification 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/flutter-verification

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-verificatio…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

flutter-verification 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-verification。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

flutter-verification 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

flutter-verification 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

flutter-verification 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

flutter-verification 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 399 次,近一周安装 16 次,下载 129 次,GitHub 6 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

flutter-verification 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
flutter-verification

Flutter verification 命令行 · 本页

3996需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Flutter Verification Before Completion

Overview

Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.

Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.

Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.

The Iron Law

NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

Flutter Verification Commands

1. Static Analysis (Always Required)

flutter analyze

Expected output:

Analyzing <project>...
No issues found!

If issues found:

Analyzing <project>...
   info • ... • lib/path/file.dart:42:10 • ...
   warning • ... • lib/path/file.dart:50:5 • ...

3 issues found. (1 warning, 2 hints)

2. Unit Tests (Priority 1 & 2)

# All tests
flutter test

# Specific feature tests
flutter test test/features/<feature>/

# Specific test file
flutter test test/features/<feature>/data/repositories/user_repository_test.dart

Expected output:

00:05 +12: All tests passed!

If tests fail:

00:03 +10 -2: Some tests failed.

3. Build Verification

# Android debug build
flutter build apk --debug

# iOS debug build (macOS only)
flutter build ios --debug --no-codesign

# Web build
flutter build web

Expected output:

✓ Built build/app/outputs/flutter-apk/app-debug.apk (XX.XMB)

4. Format Check (Optional)

dart format --set-exit-if-changed lib/

The Gate Function

BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying

Common Flutter Failures

ClaimRequiresNot Sufficient
"Code is clean"flutter analyze: No issues"I wrote correct code"
"Tests pass"flutter test: All passed"Should pass", "Looks correct"
"Build succeeds"flutter build: Built successfully"Analyze passed"
"Feature complete"All verification + requirements check"Tests pass"
"Bug fixed"Test original symptom + verify"Code changed"
"Widget works"Widget test or manual verification"Code looks right"

Red Flags - STOP

If you catch yourself thinking or saying:

  • "should work now"
  • "probably passes"
  • "looks correct"
  • "I'm confident"
  • "just this once"
  • "analyze passed, so build will work"
  • "the code is right"
  • ANY wording implying success without running verification

STOP. Run the verification command.

Verification Checklist

Before claiming completion:

### Verification Results

**Static Analysis:**

$ flutter analyze Analyzing flutter_app... No issues found!


✅ Passed

**Unit Tests:**

$ flutter test test/features/<feature>/ 00:05 +12: All tests passed!


✅ 12/12 passed

**Build:**

$ flutter build apk --debug ✓ Built build/app/outputs/flutter-apk/app-debug.apk


✅ Built successfully

**Ready to claim completion.**

Key Patterns

Static Analysis:


✅ [Run flutter analyze] [See: No issues found!] "Analysis passes" ❌ "Code looks clean" / "I wrote it correctly"

Tests:


✅ [Run flutter test] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass" ❌ "Should pass now" / "Tests look correct"

Build:


✅ [Run flutter build] [See: Built successfully] "Build passes" ❌ "Analyze passed" (analyze doesn't check build)

Feature completion:


✅ Re-read plan → Verify each requirement → Run all verifications → Report ❌ "Tests pass, feature complete"

Rationalization Prevention

ExcuseReality
"Should work now"RUN flutter analyze/test
"I'm confident"Confidence ≠ evidence
"Just this once"No exceptions
"Analyze passed"Analyze ≠ build ≠ test
"Code looks right"Verify independently
"I'm tired"Exhaustion ≠ excuse
"It's simple code"Simple code can still fail

Why This Matters

  • Trust: If you claim "tests pass" without running them, trust is broken
  • Time: False completion → redirect → rework wastes everyone's time
  • Quality: Unverified code may crash in production
  • Integrity: Honesty is a core value

When To Apply

ALWAYS before:

  • ANY variation of success/completion claims
  • ANY expression of satisfaction ("Done!", "Fixed!", "Works!")
  • Committing code
  • Creating PRs
  • Moving to next task
  • Reporting to user

The Bottom Line

No shortcuts for verification.

Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

# Always run these before claiming completion:
flutter analyze
flutter test
flutter build apk --debug  # or appropriate build target

This is non-negotiable.


5. Visual Verification (Optional — Flutter Web)

UI 변경이 포함된 작업에서, design-polish 플러그인이 설치되어 있다면 시각적 검증을 수행합니다. 설치되어 있지 않으면 이 단계를 건너뜁니다 (SOFT_FAIL).

전제 조건

  • design-polish 플러그인 설치됨 (~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/design-polish 또는 ~/.claude/plugins/design-polish)
  • scripts/capture.cjs 존재
  • Node.js + npx 사용 가능

절차

  1. Flutter Web 빌드 flutter build web
  2. 빌드 결과 로컬 서빙 npx serve build/web -l 3000 & SERVER_PID=$!
  3. 스크린샷 + WCAG 체크 BASE_URL=http://localhost:3000 node <design-polish-path>/scripts/capture.cjs --wcag /
  4. 결과 확인

- .design-polish/health-score.json: 디자인 건강 점수 (0-100) - .design-polish/accessibility/wcag-report.json: WCAG 위반 사항 - .design-polish/screenshots/current-main.png: 현재 스크린샷

  1. 서버 종료 kill $SERVER_PID 2>/dev/null

판정 기준

결과조건액션
PASSWCAG 위반 0개, Health Score ≥ 60완료
WARNWCAG 위반 1-3개 (minor/moderate)개선 권장, 차단 아님
FAILWCAG critical 위반 존재수정 권장 (SOFT_FAIL: 차단하지 않음)
SKIPdesign-polish 미설치건너뜀

증거 기록

**Visual Verification:**
- Health Score: 85/100
- WCAG: 0 violations
- Screenshot: .design-polish/screenshots/current-main.png
✅ Visual check passed (or ⚠️ skipped / ⚠️ warnings found)

平台分布

Codex

34.31%
按下载量换算44

Claude

31.29%
按下载量换算40

Cursor

18.35%
按下载量换算24

Gemini CLI

9.75%
按下载量换算13

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills