Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

flutter-debugging(Flutter 调试)

flutter-debugging 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

flutter-debugging 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 54,591。

总安装 504周安装 21GitHub Stars 6下载 168核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:flutter-debugging(Flutter 调试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft
仓库路径:skills/flutter-debugging
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-debugging
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-debugging

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

flutter-debugging 提供 Flutter 应用调试相关的信息检索与筛选功能,辅助定位问题根源。适用于在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速查找日志、异常或性能瓶颈资料。

通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,建议查看原始 README 以掌握调用方式。需注意该技能可能触发网络查询或本地文件读取,安装前应确认所需权限边界。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/flutter-debugging

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-debugging;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

flutter-debugging 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-debugging。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

flutter-debugging 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

flutter-debugging 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-debugging 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

flutter-debugging 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

flutter-debugging 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 504 次,近一周安装 21 次,下载 168 次,GitHub 6 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

flutter-debugging 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
flutter-debugging

Flutter 调试 · 本页

5046执行命令未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Systematic Flutter Debugging

Overview

Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Quick patches mask underlying issues.

Core principle: ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.

Announce at start: "I'm using the flutter-debugging skill to investigate this issue."

The Iron Law

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST

If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes.

When to Use

Use for ANY Flutter technical issue:

  • Widget build errors
  • State management bugs
  • Test failures
  • UI rendering issues
  • Navigation problems
  • API/network errors
  • Build failures
  • Platform-specific issues

Use this ESPECIALLY when:

  • "Just one quick fix" seems obvious
  • You've already tried multiple fixes
  • Previous fix didn't work
  • Under time pressure

Flutter Debugging Tools

1. Console Logging

// Basic logging (truncates long output)
print('Debug: $value');

// No truncation (preferred)
debugPrint('Debug: $value');

// Conditional debug logging
import 'package:flutter/foundation.dart';
if (kDebugMode) {
  debugPrint('Only in debug mode: $value');
}

// Developer log with tags
import 'dart:developer';
log('API response', name: 'NetworkService', error: e);

2. Flutter DevTools

# Open DevTools
flutter run --start-paused
# Then press 'd' or use DevTools button in IDE

DevTools Panels:

  • Widget Inspector: Widget tree, properties, layout
  • Performance: Timeline, frame rendering
  • Memory: Heap usage, leaks
  • Network: HTTP requests/responses
  • Logging: All logs in one place

3. Debug Widgets

// Show widget boundaries
debugPaintSizeEnabled = true;

// Show baseline alignments
debugPaintBaselinesEnabled = true;

// Show repaint regions
debugRepaintRainbowEnabled = true;

4. Breakpoints

// Programmatic breakpoint
import 'dart:developer';
debugger();

// Or use IDE breakpoints

The Four Phases

Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation

BEFORE attempting ANY fix:

1. Read Error Messages Carefully
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
EXCEPTION CAUGHT BY WIDGETS LIBRARY
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
The following assertion was thrown building MyWidget:
'package:flutter/src/widgets/container.dart': Failed assertion: line 287
'child != null || decoration != null || constraints != null'
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Don't skip past errors! They often contain the exact solution.

2. Reproduce Consistently
# Hot reload to reproduce
r  # in terminal

# Hot restart (clears state)
R  # in terminal

# Full restart
flutter run
  • Can you trigger it reliably?
  • What are the exact steps?
  • Does Hot Reload vs Hot Restart matter?
3. Check Recent Changes
# What changed recently?
git diff

# Recent commits
git log --oneline -10

# Diff with specific commit
git diff HEAD~3
4. Add Diagnostic Logging
class MyWidget extends StatelessWidget {
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    debugPrint('=== MyWidget.build() ===');
    debugPrint('context.mounted: ${context.mounted}');

    final state = context.watch<MyState>();
    debugPrint('state: $state');

    return Container(...);
  }
}

Phase 2: Pattern Analysis

1. Find Working Examples
# Search for similar working code
grep -r "similar_pattern" lib/
  • What works that's similar to what's broken?
  • Compare widget structure, state management
2. Compare Against References
// Reference: Working widget
class WorkingWidget extends StatelessWidget {
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    return BlocBuilder<WorkingBloc, WorkingState>(
      builder: (context, state) => ...,
    );
  }
}

// Broken: My widget
class BrokenWidget extends StatelessWidget {
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    // What's different?
    return BlocBuilder<MyBloc, MyState>(
      builder: (context, state) => ...,
    );
  }
}
3. Identify Differences

List every difference, however small:

  • Widget type
  • State provider location
  • BuildContext usage
  • Lifecycle methods

Phase 3: Hypothesis and Testing

1. Form Single Hypothesis

State clearly:

"I think the issue is [X] because [Y]"

Example:

"I think the build error is because the BLoC is not provided above this widget in the widget tree"
2. Test Minimally

Make the SMALLEST possible change:

// Before (broken)
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
  final bloc = context.read<MyBloc>();
  return ...;
}

// After (testing hypothesis)
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
  debugPrint('Looking for MyBloc...');
  try {
    final bloc = context.read<MyBloc>();
    debugPrint('Found: $bloc');
  } catch (e) {
    debugPrint('Error: $e');
  }
  return ...;
}
3. Verify Before Continuing
  • Did it work? → Phase 4
  • Didn't work? → Form NEW hypothesis
  • DON'T add more fixes on top

Phase 4: Implementation

1. Create Test Case (Optional based on priority)

For Repository/DataSource issues (Priority 1):

test('should return user when API succeeds', () async {
  // Arrange
  when(mockApi.getUser(any)).thenAnswer((_) async => userModel);

  // Act
  final result = await repository.getUser('123');

  // Assert
  expect(result, equals(userEntity));
});
2. Implement Single Fix

ONE change at a time:

// Fix the root cause identified in Phase 3
class MyWidget extends StatelessWidget {
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    return BlocProvider(
      create: (_) => getIt<MyBloc>(),
      child: BlocBuilder<MyBloc, MyState>(...),
    );
  }
}
3. Verify Fix
# Run analysis
flutter analyze

# Run tests
flutter test

# Manual verification
flutter run
# Test the specific scenario
4. If Fix Doesn't Work
  • Count: How many fixes have you tried?
  • If < 3: Return to Phase 1, re-analyze
  • If ≥ 3: STOP and question the architecture

Common Flutter Issues & Root Causes

SymptomCommon Root Cause
"No ancestor found"Provider/BLoC not in widget tree above
"setState after dispose"Async operation completing after widget disposed
"RenderBox not laid out"Unbounded constraints (Column in Column, etc.)
"Null check operator"Variable not initialized or API returned null
"Build during build"setState called during build phase
"Ticker not disposed"Missing with TickerProviderStateMixin or dispose

Red Flags - STOP and Follow Process

If you catch yourself thinking:

  • "Quick fix for now"
  • "Just wrap it in a try-catch"
  • "Add a null check here"
  • "Just add a Container around it"
  • "Maybe just hot restart"
  • "It's probably a state issue, let me reset"

ALL of these mean: STOP. Return to Phase 1.

REQUIRED SUB-SKILL

After fixing the bug, you MUST invoke: → flutter-craft:flutter-verification

Verify the fix with flutter analyze, flutter test, and manual testing.

Quick Reference

PhaseFlutter ActivitiesSuccess Criteria
1. Root CauseRead error, reproduce, add debugPrintUnderstand WHAT and WHY
2. PatternFind working widgets, compareIdentify differences
3. HypothesisForm theory, minimal testConfirmed or new hypothesis
4. ImplementationCreate test (priority-based), fix, verifyBug resolved, analysis clean

Real-World Impact

  • Systematic approach: 15-30 minutes to fix
  • Random fixes approach: 2-3 hours of thrashing
  • First-time fix rate: 95% vs 40%
  • New bugs introduced: Near zero vs common

平台分布

Codex

34.97%
按下载量换算59

Claude

30.89%
按下载量换算52

Cursor

18.94%
按下载量换算32

Gemini CLI

9.99%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/vp-k/flutter-craft --skill flutter-debugging 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills