Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

flowstudio-power-automate-debug(flowstudio 强大的自动调试能力)

flowstudio-power-automate-debug 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

flowstudio-power-automate-debug 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 4,153。

总安装 35,280周安装 1,481GitHub Stars 31,709下载 12,360核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:flowstudio-power-automate-debug(flowstudio 强大的自动调试能力)
来源仓库:https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot
仓库路径:skills/flowstudio-power-automate-debug
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill flowstudio-power-automate-debug
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill flowstudio-power-automate-debug

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

通过逐步错误检查来诊断和修复失败的 Power Automate 云流。

需要具有有效 JWT 的 FlowStudio MCP 服务器连接;请参阅 flowstudio-power-automate-mcp 设置技巧 提供结构化的 8 步工作流程:定位流程、查找失败运行、提取顶级错误、读取流程定义、检查操作输出、查明根本原因、应用修复和验证 支持使用 get_store_flow_errors 通过 FlowStudio for Teams 订阅进行快速路径诊断 每次运行失败摘要和修复提示 涵盖表达式错误、空字段路径、连接身份验证失败以及使用自定义负载进行 HTTP 触发的流测试

来源仓库内路径:skills/flowstudio-power-automate-debug

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill flowstudio-powe…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

flowstudio-power-automate-debug 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill flowstudio-power-automate…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

flowstudio-power-automate-debug 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

flowstudio-power-automate-debug 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

flowstudio-power-automate-debug 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

flowstudio-power-automate-debug 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 35,280 次,近一周安装 1,481 次,下载 12,360 次,GitHub 31,709 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

flowstudio-power-automate-debug 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 31,709 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
flowstudio-power-automate-debug

flowstudio 强大的自动调试能力 · 本页

35,28031,709调用外部服务未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Power Automate Debugging with FlowStudio MCP

A step-by-step diagnostic process for investigating failing Power Automate cloud flows through the FlowStudio MCP server.

Real debugging examples: Expression error in child flow | Data entry, not a flow bug | Null value crashes child flow

Prerequisite: A FlowStudio MCP server must be reachable with a valid JWT. See the power-automate-mcp skill for connection setup. Subscribe at https://mcp.flowstudio.app


Source of Truth

Always call tools/list first to confirm available tool names and their parameter schemas. Tool names and parameters may change between server versions. This skill covers response shapes, behavioral notes, and diagnostic patterns — things tools/list cannot tell you. If this document disagrees with tools/list or a real API response, the API wins.

Python Helper

import json, urllib.request

MCP_URL   = "https://mcp.flowstudio.app/mcp"
MCP_TOKEN = "<YOUR_JWT_TOKEN>"

def mcp(tool, **kwargs):
    payload = json.dumps({"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 1, "method": "tools/call",
                          "params": {"name": tool, "arguments": kwargs}}).encode()
    req = urllib.request.Request(MCP_URL, data=payload,
        headers={"x-api-key": MCP_TOKEN, "Content-Type": "application/json",
                 "User-Agent": "FlowStudio-MCP/1.0"})
    try:
        resp = urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=120)
    except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
        body = e.read().decode("utf-8", errors="replace")
        raise RuntimeError(f"MCP HTTP {e.code}: {body[:200]}") from e
    raw = json.loads(resp.read())
    if "error" in raw:
        raise RuntimeError(f"MCP error: {json.dumps(raw['error'])}")
    return json.loads(raw["result"]["content"][0]["text"])

ENV = "<environment-id>"   # e.g. Default-xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx

Step 1 — Locate the Flow

result = mcp("list_live_flows", environmentName=ENV)
# Returns a wrapper object: {mode, flows, totalCount, error}
target = next(f for f in result["flows"] if "My Flow Name" in f["displayName"])
FLOW_ID = target["id"]   # plain UUID — use directly as flowName
print(FLOW_ID)

Step 2 — Find the Failing Run

runs = mcp("get_live_flow_runs", environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID, top=5)
# Returns direct array (newest first):
# [{"name": "08584296068667933411438594643CU15",
#   "status": "Failed",
#   "startTime": "2026-02-25T06:13:38.6910688Z",
#   "endTime": "2026-02-25T06:15:24.1995008Z",
#   "triggerName": "manual",
#   "error": {"code": "ActionFailed", "message": "An action failed..."}},
#  {"name": "...", "status": "Succeeded", "error": null, ...}]

for r in runs:
    print(r["name"], r["status"], r["startTime"])

RUN_ID = next(r["name"] for r in runs if r["status"] == "Failed")

Step 3 — Get the Top-Level Error

CRITICAL: get_live_flow_run_error tells you which action failed. get_live_flow_run_action_outputs tells you why. You must call BOTH. Never stop at the error alone — error codes like ActionFailed, NotSpecified, and InternalServerError are generic wrappers. The actual root cause (wrong field, null value, HTTP 500 body, stack trace) is only visible in the action's inputs and outputs.
err = mcp("get_live_flow_run_error",
    environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID, runName=RUN_ID)
# Returns:
# {
#   "runName": "08584296068667933411438594643CU15",
#   "failedActions": [
#     {"actionName": "Apply_to_each_prepare_workers", "status": "Failed",
#      "error": {"code": "ActionFailed", "message": "An action failed..."},
#      "startTime": "...", "endTime": "..."},
#     {"actionName": "HTTP_find_AD_User_by_Name", "status": "Failed",
#      "code": "NotSpecified", "startTime": "...", "endTime": "..."}
#   ],
#   "allActions": [
#     {"actionName": "Apply_to_each", "status": "Skipped"},
#     {"actionName": "Compose_WeekEnd", "status": "Succeeded"},
#     ...
#   ]
# }

# failedActions is ordered outer-to-inner. The ROOT cause is the LAST entry:
root = err["failedActions"][-1]
print(f"Root action: {root['actionName']} → code: {root.get('code')}")

# allActions shows every action's status — useful for spotting what was Skipped
# See common-errors.md to decode the error code.

Step 4 — Inspect the Failing Action's Inputs and Outputs

This is the most important step. get_live_flow_run_error only gives you a generic error code. The actual error detail — HTTP status codes, response bodies, stack traces, null values — lives in the action's runtime inputs and outputs. Always inspect the failing action immediately after identifying it.
# Get the root failing action's full inputs and outputs
root_action = err["failedActions"][-1]["actionName"]
detail = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs",
    environmentName=ENV,
    flowName=FLOW_ID,
    runName=RUN_ID,
    actionName=root_action)

out = detail[0] if detail else {}
print(f"Action: {out.get('actionName')}")
print(f"Status: {out.get('status')}")

# For HTTP actions, the real error is in outputs.body
if isinstance(out.get("outputs"), dict):
    status_code = out["outputs"].get("statusCode")
    body = out["outputs"].get("body", {})
    print(f"HTTP {status_code}")
    print(json.dumps(body, indent=2)[:500])

    # Error bodies are often nested JSON strings — parse them
    if isinstance(body, dict) and "error" in body:
        err_detail = body["error"]
        if isinstance(err_detail, str):
            err_detail = json.loads(err_detail)
        print(f"Error: {err_detail.get('message', err_detail)}")

# For expression errors, the error is in the error field
if out.get("error"):
    print(f"Error: {out['error']}")

# Also check inputs — they show what expression/URL/body was used
if out.get("inputs"):
    print(f"Inputs: {json.dumps(out['inputs'], indent=2)[:500]}")

What the action outputs reveal (that error codes don't)

Error code from get_live_flow_run_errorWhat get_live_flow_run_action_outputs reveals
ActionFailedWhich nested action actually failed and its HTTP response
NotSpecifiedThe HTTP status code + response body with the real error
InternalServerErrorThe server's error message, stack trace, or API error JSON
InvalidTemplateThe exact expression that failed and the null/wrong-type value
BadRequestThe request body that was sent and why the server rejected it

Example: HTTP action returning 500

Error code: "InternalServerError" ← this tells you nothing

Action outputs reveal:
  HTTP 500
  body: {"error": "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'toLowerCase')
    at getClientParamsFromConnectionString (storage.js:20)"}
  ← THIS tells you the Azure Function crashed because a connection string is undefined

Example: Expression error on null

Error code: "BadRequest" ← generic

Action outputs reveal:
  inputs: "body('HTTP_GetTokenFromStore')?['token']?['access_token']"
  outputs: ""   ← empty string, the path resolved to null
  ← THIS tells you the response shape changed — token is at body.access_token, not body.token.access_token

Step 5 — Read the Flow Definition

defn = mcp("get_live_flow", environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID)
actions = defn["properties"]["definition"]["actions"]
print(list(actions.keys()))

Find the failing action in the definition. Inspect its inputs expression to understand what data it expects.


Step 6 — Walk Back from the Failure

When the failing action's inputs reference upstream actions, inspect those too. Walk backward through the chain until you find the source of the bad data:

# Inspect multiple actions leading up to the failure
for action_name in [root_action, "Compose_WeekEnd", "HTTP_Get_Data"]:
    result = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs",
        environmentName=ENV,
        flowName=FLOW_ID,
        runName=RUN_ID,
        actionName=action_name)
    out = result[0] if result else {}
    print(f"\n--- {action_name} ({out.get('status')}) ---")
    print(f"Inputs:  {json.dumps(out.get('inputs', ''), indent=2)[:300]}")
    print(f"Outputs: {json.dumps(out.get('outputs', ''), indent=2)[:300]}")
⚠️ Output payloads from array-processing actions can be very large. Always slice (e.g. [:500]) before printing.
Tip: Omit actionName to get ALL actions in a single call. This returns every action's inputs/outputs — useful when you're not sure which upstream action produced the bad data. But use 120s+ timeout as the response can be very large.

Step 7 — Pinpoint the Root Cause

Expression Errors (e.g. split on null)

If the error mentions InvalidTemplate or a function name:

  1. Find the action in the definition
  2. Check what upstream action/expression it reads
  3. Inspect that upstream action's output for null / missing fields
# Example: action uses split(item()?['Name'], ' ')
# → null Name in the source data
result = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs", ..., actionName="Compose_Names")
if not result:
    print("No outputs returned for Compose_Names")
    names = []
else:
    names = result[0].get("outputs", {}).get("body") or []
nulls = [x for x in names if x.get("Name") is None]
print(f"{len(nulls)} records with null Name")

Wrong Field Path

Expression triggerBody()?['fieldName'] returns null → fieldName is wrong. Inspect the trigger output to see the actual field names:

result = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs", ..., actionName="<trigger-action-name>")
print(json.dumps(result[0].get("outputs"), indent=2)[:500])

HTTP Actions Returning Errors

The error code says InternalServerError or NotSpecified — always inspect the action outputs to get the actual HTTP status and response body:

result = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs", ..., actionName="HTTP_Get_Data")
out = result[0]
print(f"HTTP {out['outputs']['statusCode']}")
print(json.dumps(out['outputs']['body'], indent=2)[:500])

Connection / Auth Failures

Look for ConnectionAuthorizationFailed — the connection owner must match the service account running the flow. Cannot fix via API; fix in PA designer.

Outlook user-picker failures (DynamicListValuesUndefinedOrInvalid)

Outlook actions like GetEmailsV3 use parameters (mailboxAddress, to, cc, from) whose dropdown is backed by builtInOperation:AadGraph.GetUsers — which is broken at the PA listEnum layer and always returns DynamicListValuesUndefinedOrInvalid. This shows up when an agent rebuilds or modifies an Outlook action via update_live_flow and tries to resolve a user through dynamic options. Don't fix it by retrying AadGraph — switch to shared_office365users.SearchUserV2 instead (returns the same AAD user shape). See the power-automate-build skill, Step 3a — Resolving Dynamic Connector Values, for the working pattern. describe_live_connector (v1.1.6+) returns this fallback as a structured fallback field on the affected parameter.


Step 8 — Apply the Fix

For expression/data issues:

defn = mcp("get_live_flow", environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID)
acts = defn["properties"]["definition"]["actions"]

# Example: fix split on potentially-null Name
acts["Compose_Names"]["inputs"] = \
    "@coalesce(item()?['Name'], 'Unknown')"

conn_refs = defn["properties"]["connectionReferences"]
result = mcp("update_live_flow",
    environmentName=ENV,
    flowName=FLOW_ID,
    definition=defn["properties"]["definition"],
    connectionReferences=conn_refs)

print(result.get("error"))  # None = success
⚠️ update_live_flow always returns an error key. A value of null (Python None) means success.

Step 9 — Verify the Fix

Use resubmit_live_flow_run to test ANY flow — not just HTTP triggers. resubmit_live_flow_run replays a previous run using its original trigger payload. This works for every trigger type: Recurrence, SharePoint "When an item is created", connector webhooks, Button triggers, and HTTP triggers. You do NOT need to ask the user to manually trigger the flow or wait for the next scheduled run. The only case where resubmit is not available is a brand-new flow that has never run — it has no prior run to replay.
# Resubmit the failed run — works for ANY trigger type
resubmit = mcp("resubmit_live_flow_run",
    environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID, runName=RUN_ID)
print(resubmit)   # {"resubmitted": true, "triggerName": "..."}

# Wait ~30 s then check
import time; time.sleep(30)
new_runs = mcp("get_live_flow_runs", environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID, top=3)
print(new_runs[0]["status"])   # Succeeded = done

When to use resubmit vs trigger

ScenarioUseWhy
Testing a fix on any flowresubmit_live_flow_runReplays the exact trigger payload that caused the failure — best way to verify
Recurrence / scheduled flowresubmit_live_flow_runCannot be triggered on demand any other way
SharePoint / connector triggerresubmit_live_flow_runCannot be triggered without creating a real SP item
HTTP trigger with custom test payloadtrigger_live_flowWhen you need to send different data than the original run
Brand-new flow, never runtrigger_live_flow (HTTP only)No prior run exists to resubmit

Testing HTTP-Triggered Flows with custom payloads

For flows with a Request (HTTP) trigger, use trigger_live_flow when you need to send a different payload than the original run:

# First inspect what the trigger expects
schema = mcp("get_live_flow_http_schema",
    environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID)
print("Expected body schema:", schema.get("requestSchema"))
print("Response schemas:", schema.get("responseSchemas"))

# Trigger with a test payload
result = mcp("trigger_live_flow",
    environmentName=ENV,
    flowName=FLOW_ID,
    body={"name": "Test User", "value": 42})
print(f"Status: {result['responseStatus']}, Body: {result.get('responseBody')}")
trigger_live_flow handles AAD-authenticated triggers automatically. Only works for flows with a Request (HTTP) trigger type.

Quick-Reference Diagnostic Decision Tree

SymptomFirst ToolThen ALWAYS CallWhat to Look For
Flow shows as Failedget_live_flow_run_errorget_live_flow_run_action_outputs on the failing actionHTTP status + response body in outputs
Error code is generic (ActionFailed, NotSpecified)—get_live_flow_run_action_outputsThe outputs.body contains the real error message, stack trace, or API error
HTTP action returns 500—get_live_flow_run_action_outputsoutputs.statusCode + outputs.body with server error detail
Expression crash—get_live_flow_run_action_outputs on prior actionnull / wrong-type fields in output body
Flow never startsget_live_flow—check properties.state = "Started"
Action returns wrong dataget_live_flow_run_action_outputs—actual output body vs expected
Fix applied but still failsget_live_flow_runs after resubmit—new run status field
Rule: never diagnose from error codes alone. get_live_flow_run_error identifies the failing action. get_live_flow_run_action_outputs reveals the actual cause. Always call both.

Reference Files

Related Skills

  • power-automate-mcp — Foundation skill: connection setup, MCP helper, tool discovery
  • power-automate-build — Build and deploy new flows

平台分布

Codex

36.16%
按下载量换算4,469

Claude

30.75%
按下载量换算3,801

Cursor

20.42%
按下载量换算2,524

Gemini CLI

10.64%
按下载量换算1,315

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills