Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

flowstudio-power-automate-debugflowstudio 强大的自动调试能力

Agent Skill

flowstudio-power-automate-debug 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

35,280

周安装

1,481

GitHub Stars

31,709

下载量

12,360
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:flowstudio-power-automate-debug(flowstudio 强大的自动调试能力)
来源仓库:https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot
仓库路径:skills/flowstudio-power-automate-debug
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill flowstudio-power-automate-debug
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill flowstudio-power-automate-debug

简介

通过逐步错误检查来诊断和修复失败的 Power Automate 云流。

  • 需要具有有效 JWT 的 FlowStudio MCP 服务器连接;请参阅 flowstudio-power-automate-mcp
  • 设置技巧
  • 提供结构化的 8 步工作流程:定位流程、查找失败运行、提取顶级错误、读取流程定义、检查操作输出、查明根本原因、应用修复和验证
  • 支持使用 get_store_flow_errors 通过 FlowStudio for Teams 订阅进行快速路径诊断
  • 每次运行失败摘要和修复提示
  • 涵盖表达式错误、空字段路径、连接身份验证失败以及使用自定义负载进行 HTTP 触发的流测试

SKILL.md

Power Automate Debugging with FlowStudio MCP

A step-by-step diagnostic process for investigating failing Power Automate cloud flows through the FlowStudio MCP server.

Real debugging examples: Expression error in child flow | Data entry, not a flow bug | Null value crashes child flow

Prerequisite: A FlowStudio MCP server must be reachable with a valid JWT. See the power-automate-mcp skill for connection setup. Subscribe at https://mcp.flowstudio.app


Source of Truth

Always call tools/list first to confirm available tool names and their parameter schemas. Tool names and parameters may change between server versions. This skill covers response shapes, behavioral notes, and diagnostic patterns — things tools/list cannot tell you. If this document disagrees with tools/list or a real API response, the API wins.

Python Helper

import json, urllib.request

MCP_URL   = "https://mcp.flowstudio.app/mcp"
MCP_TOKEN = "<YOUR_JWT_TOKEN>"

def mcp(tool, **kwargs):
    payload = json.dumps({"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 1, "method": "tools/call",
                          "params": {"name": tool, "arguments": kwargs}}).encode()
    req = urllib.request.Request(MCP_URL, data=payload,
        headers={"x-api-key": MCP_TOKEN, "Content-Type": "application/json",
                 "User-Agent": "FlowStudio-MCP/1.0"})
    try:
        resp = urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=120)
    except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
        body = e.read().decode("utf-8", errors="replace")
        raise RuntimeError(f"MCP HTTP {e.code}: {body[:200]}") from e
    raw = json.loads(resp.read())
    if "error" in raw:
        raise RuntimeError(f"MCP error: {json.dumps(raw['error'])}")
    return json.loads(raw["result"]["content"][0]["text"])

ENV = "<environment-id>"   # e.g. Default-xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx

Step 1 — Locate the Flow

result = mcp("list_live_flows", environmentName=ENV)
# Returns a wrapper object: {mode, flows, totalCount, error}
target = next(f for f in result["flows"] if "My Flow Name" in f["displayName"])
FLOW_ID = target["id"]   # plain UUID — use directly as flowName
print(FLOW_ID)

Step 2 — Find the Failing Run

runs = mcp("get_live_flow_runs", environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID, top=5)
# Returns direct array (newest first):
# [{"name": "08584296068667933411438594643CU15",
#   "status": "Failed",
#   "startTime": "2026-02-25T06:13:38.6910688Z",
#   "endTime": "2026-02-25T06:15:24.1995008Z",
#   "triggerName": "manual",
#   "error": {"code": "ActionFailed", "message": "An action failed..."}},
#  {"name": "...", "status": "Succeeded", "error": null, ...}]

for r in runs:
    print(r["name"], r["status"], r["startTime"])

RUN_ID = next(r["name"] for r in runs if r["status"] == "Failed")

Step 3 — Get the Top-Level Error

CRITICAL: get_live_flow_run_error tells you which action failed. get_live_flow_run_action_outputs tells you why. You must call BOTH. Never stop at the error alone — error codes like ActionFailed, NotSpecified, and InternalServerError are generic wrappers. The actual root cause (wrong field, null value, HTTP 500 body, stack trace) is only visible in the action's inputs and outputs.
err = mcp("get_live_flow_run_error",
    environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID, runName=RUN_ID)
# Returns:
# {
#   "runName": "08584296068667933411438594643CU15",
#   "failedActions": [
#     {"actionName": "Apply_to_each_prepare_workers", "status": "Failed",
#      "error": {"code": "ActionFailed", "message": "An action failed..."},
#      "startTime": "...", "endTime": "..."},
#     {"actionName": "HTTP_find_AD_User_by_Name", "status": "Failed",
#      "code": "NotSpecified", "startTime": "...", "endTime": "..."}
#   ],
#   "allActions": [
#     {"actionName": "Apply_to_each", "status": "Skipped"},
#     {"actionName": "Compose_WeekEnd", "status": "Succeeded"},
#     ...
#   ]
# }

# failedActions is ordered outer-to-inner. The ROOT cause is the LAST entry:
root = err["failedActions"][-1]
print(f"Root action: {root['actionName']} → code: {root.get('code')}")

# allActions shows every action's status — useful for spotting what was Skipped
# See common-errors.md to decode the error code.

Step 4 — Inspect the Failing Action's Inputs and Outputs

This is the most important step. get_live_flow_run_error only gives you a generic error code. The actual error detail — HTTP status codes, response bodies, stack traces, null values — lives in the action's runtime inputs and outputs. Always inspect the failing action immediately after identifying it.
# Get the root failing action's full inputs and outputs
root_action = err["failedActions"][-1]["actionName"]
detail = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs",
    environmentName=ENV,
    flowName=FLOW_ID,
    runName=RUN_ID,
    actionName=root_action)

out = detail[0] if detail else {}
print(f"Action: {out.get('actionName')}")
print(f"Status: {out.get('status')}")

# For HTTP actions, the real error is in outputs.body
if isinstance(out.get("outputs"), dict):
    status_code = out["outputs"].get("statusCode")
    body = out["outputs"].get("body", {})
    print(f"HTTP {status_code}")
    print(json.dumps(body, indent=2)[:500])

    # Error bodies are often nested JSON strings — parse them
    if isinstance(body, dict) and "error" in body:
        err_detail = body["error"]
        if isinstance(err_detail, str):
            err_detail = json.loads(err_detail)
        print(f"Error: {err_detail.get('message', err_detail)}")

# For expression errors, the error is in the error field
if out.get("error"):
    print(f"Error: {out['error']}")

# Also check inputs — they show what expression/URL/body was used
if out.get("inputs"):
    print(f"Inputs: {json.dumps(out['inputs'], indent=2)[:500]}")

What the action outputs reveal (that error codes don't)

Error code from get_live_flow_run_errorWhat get_live_flow_run_action_outputs reveals
ActionFailedWhich nested action actually failed and its HTTP response
NotSpecifiedThe HTTP status code + response body with the real error
InternalServerErrorThe server's error message, stack trace, or API error JSON
InvalidTemplateThe exact expression that failed and the null/wrong-type value
BadRequestThe request body that was sent and why the server rejected it

Example: HTTP action returning 500

Error code: "InternalServerError" ← this tells you nothing

Action outputs reveal:
  HTTP 500
  body: {"error": "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'toLowerCase')
    at getClientParamsFromConnectionString (storage.js:20)"}
  ← THIS tells you the Azure Function crashed because a connection string is undefined

Example: Expression error on null

Error code: "BadRequest" ← generic

Action outputs reveal:
  inputs: "body('HTTP_GetTokenFromStore')?['token']?['access_token']"
  outputs: ""   ← empty string, the path resolved to null
  ← THIS tells you the response shape changed — token is at body.access_token, not body.token.access_token

Step 5 — Read the Flow Definition

defn = mcp("get_live_flow", environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID)
actions = defn["properties"]["definition"]["actions"]
print(list(actions.keys()))

Find the failing action in the definition. Inspect its inputs expression to understand what data it expects.


Step 6 — Walk Back from the Failure

When the failing action's inputs reference upstream actions, inspect those too. Walk backward through the chain until you find the source of the bad data:

# Inspect multiple actions leading up to the failure
for action_name in [root_action, "Compose_WeekEnd", "HTTP_Get_Data"]:
    result = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs",
        environmentName=ENV,
        flowName=FLOW_ID,
        runName=RUN_ID,
        actionName=action_name)
    out = result[0] if result else {}
    print(f"\n--- {action_name} ({out.get('status')}) ---")
    print(f"Inputs:  {json.dumps(out.get('inputs', ''), indent=2)[:300]}")
    print(f"Outputs: {json.dumps(out.get('outputs', ''), indent=2)[:300]}")
⚠️ Output payloads from array-processing actions can be very large. Always slice (e.g. [:500]) before printing.
Tip: Omit actionName to get ALL actions in a single call. This returns every action's inputs/outputs — useful when you're not sure which upstream action produced the bad data. But use 120s+ timeout as the response can be very large.

Step 7 — Pinpoint the Root Cause

Expression Errors (e.g. split on null)

If the error mentions InvalidTemplate or a function name:

  1. Find the action in the definition
  2. Check what upstream action/expression it reads
  3. Inspect that upstream action's output for null / missing fields
# Example: action uses split(item()?['Name'], ' ')
# → null Name in the source data
result = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs", ..., actionName="Compose_Names")
if not result:
    print("No outputs returned for Compose_Names")
    names = []
else:
    names = result[0].get("outputs", {}).get("body") or []
nulls = [x for x in names if x.get("Name") is None]
print(f"{len(nulls)} records with null Name")

Wrong Field Path

Expression triggerBody()?['fieldName'] returns null → fieldName is wrong. Inspect the trigger output to see the actual field names:

result = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs", ..., actionName="<trigger-action-name>")
print(json.dumps(result[0].get("outputs"), indent=2)[:500])

HTTP Actions Returning Errors

The error code says InternalServerError or NotSpecifiedalways inspect the action outputs to get the actual HTTP status and response body:

result = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs", ..., actionName="HTTP_Get_Data")
out = result[0]
print(f"HTTP {out['outputs']['statusCode']}")
print(json.dumps(out['outputs']['body'], indent=2)[:500])

Connection / Auth Failures

Look for ConnectionAuthorizationFailed — the connection owner must match the service account running the flow. Cannot fix via API; fix in PA designer.

Outlook user-picker failures (DynamicListValuesUndefinedOrInvalid)

Outlook actions like GetEmailsV3 use parameters (mailboxAddress, to, cc, from) whose dropdown is backed by builtInOperation:AadGraph.GetUsers — which is broken at the PA listEnum layer and always returns DynamicListValuesUndefinedOrInvalid. This shows up when an agent rebuilds or modifies an Outlook action via update_live_flow and tries to resolve a user through dynamic options. Don't fix it by retrying AadGraph — switch to shared_office365users.SearchUserV2 instead (returns the same AAD user shape). See the power-automate-build skill, Step 3a — Resolving Dynamic Connector Values, for the working pattern. describe_live_connector (v1.1.6+) returns this fallback as a structured fallback field on the affected parameter.


Step 8 — Apply the Fix

For expression/data issues:

defn = mcp("get_live_flow", environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID)
acts = defn["properties"]["definition"]["actions"]

# Example: fix split on potentially-null Name
acts["Compose_Names"]["inputs"] = \
    "@coalesce(item()?['Name'], 'Unknown')"

conn_refs = defn["properties"]["connectionReferences"]
result = mcp("update_live_flow",
    environmentName=ENV,
    flowName=FLOW_ID,
    definition=defn["properties"]["definition"],
    connectionReferences=conn_refs)

print(result.get("error"))  # None = success
⚠️ update_live_flow always returns an error key. A value of null (Python None) means success.

Step 9 — Verify the Fix

Use resubmit_live_flow_run to test ANY flow — not just HTTP triggers. resubmit_live_flow_run replays a previous run using its original trigger payload. This works for every trigger type: Recurrence, SharePoint "When an item is created", connector webhooks, Button triggers, and HTTP triggers. You do NOT need to ask the user to manually trigger the flow or wait for the next scheduled run. The only case where resubmit is not available is a brand-new flow that has never run — it has no prior run to replay.
# Resubmit the failed run — works for ANY trigger type
resubmit = mcp("resubmit_live_flow_run",
    environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID, runName=RUN_ID)
print(resubmit)   # {"resubmitted": true, "triggerName": "..."}

# Wait ~30 s then check
import time; time.sleep(30)
new_runs = mcp("get_live_flow_runs", environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID, top=3)
print(new_runs[0]["status"])   # Succeeded = done

When to use resubmit vs trigger

ScenarioUseWhy
Testing a fix on any flowresubmit_live_flow_runReplays the exact trigger payload that caused the failure — best way to verify
Recurrence / scheduled flowresubmit_live_flow_runCannot be triggered on demand any other way
SharePoint / connector triggerresubmit_live_flow_runCannot be triggered without creating a real SP item
HTTP trigger with custom test payloadtrigger_live_flowWhen you need to send different data than the original run
Brand-new flow, never runtrigger_live_flow (HTTP only)No prior run exists to resubmit

Testing HTTP-Triggered Flows with custom payloads

For flows with a Request (HTTP) trigger, use trigger_live_flow when you need to send a different payload than the original run:

# First inspect what the trigger expects
schema = mcp("get_live_flow_http_schema",
    environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID)
print("Expected body schema:", schema.get("requestSchema"))
print("Response schemas:", schema.get("responseSchemas"))

# Trigger with a test payload
result = mcp("trigger_live_flow",
    environmentName=ENV,
    flowName=FLOW_ID,
    body={"name": "Test User", "value": 42})
print(f"Status: {result['responseStatus']}, Body: {result.get('responseBody')}")
trigger_live_flow handles AAD-authenticated triggers automatically. Only works for flows with a Request (HTTP) trigger type.

Quick-Reference Diagnostic Decision Tree

SymptomFirst ToolThen ALWAYS CallWhat to Look For
Flow shows as Failedget_live_flow_run_errorget_live_flow_run_action_outputs on the failing actionHTTP status + response body in outputs
Error code is generic (ActionFailed, NotSpecified)get_live_flow_run_action_outputsThe outputs.body contains the real error message, stack trace, or API error
HTTP action returns 500get_live_flow_run_action_outputsoutputs.statusCode + outputs.body with server error detail
Expression crashget_live_flow_run_action_outputs on prior actionnull / wrong-type fields in output body
Flow never startsget_live_flowcheck properties.state = "Started"
Action returns wrong dataget_live_flow_run_action_outputsactual output body vs expected
Fix applied but still failsget_live_flow_runs after resubmitnew run status field
Rule: never diagnose from error codes alone. get_live_flow_run_error identifies the failing action. get_live_flow_run_action_outputs reveals the actual cause. Always call both.

Reference Files

Related Skills

  • power-automate-mcp — Foundation skill: connection setup, MCP helper, tool discovery
  • power-automate-build — Build and deploy new flows

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.16%
按下载量换算4,469

Claude

30.75%
按下载量换算3,801

Cursor

20.42%
按下载量换算2,524

Gemini CLI

10.64%
按下载量换算1,315

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills