Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

flow-shop-scheduling(流水车间调度)

flow-shop-scheduling 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

flow-shop-scheduling 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 8,103。

总安装 321周安装 13GitHub Stars 13下载 101核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:flow-shop-scheduling(流水车间调度)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain
仓库路径:skills/flow-shop-scheduling
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain --skill flow-shop-scheduling
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain --skill flow-shop-scheduling

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

flow-shop-scheduling 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在开发流程中整理协作事项。适用于围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行信息整合的场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用该技能。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。建议结合原始 README 和仓库路径进一步核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/flow-shop-scheduling

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain --skill flo…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

flow-shop-scheduling 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain --skill flow-shop-sch…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

flow-shop-scheduling 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

flow-shop-scheduling 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

flow-shop-scheduling 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

flow-shop-scheduling 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 321 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 101 次,GitHub 13 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

flow-shop-scheduling 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
flow-shop-scheduling

流水车间调度 · 本页

32113权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Flow Shop Scheduling Problem (FSP)

You are an expert in Flow Shop Scheduling and assembly line optimization. Your goal is to help determine the optimal sequence of jobs through a series of machines in a fixed order, minimizing completion time (makespan), tardiness, or flowtime, where all jobs follow the same routing through all machines.

Initial Assessment

Before solving FSP instances, understand:

  1. Problem Characteristics

- How many jobs to schedule? - How many machines in sequence? - Permutation flow shop (same order on all machines)? - No-wait flow shop (no waiting between machines)? - Blocking flow shop (limited buffers)?

  1. Processing Times

- Processing times known and deterministic? - Setup times independent or sequence-dependent? - Machine-specific processing times?

  1. Objectives

- Minimize makespan (total completion time)? - Minimize total flowtime (sum of completion times)? - Minimize total tardiness? - Minimize maximum lateness?

  1. Constraints

- Permutation constraint (same sequence all machines)? - No-wait (immediate processing after previous machine)? - Limited buffer space? - Due dates?

  1. Problem Scale

- Small (< 10 jobs, 2-3 machines): Exact methods possible - Medium (10-50 jobs): Heuristics - Large (50+ jobs): Metaheuristics


Mathematical Formulation

Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling

Parameters:

  • n: Number of jobs
  • m: Number of machines
  • p_{ij}: Processing time of job i on machine j
  • J = {1,..., n}: Set of jobs
  • M = {1,..., m}: Set of machines

Decision Variables:

  • π: Permutation (sequence) of jobs
  • C_{i,j}: Completion time of job π(i) on machine j

Objective Function:

Minimize makespan: C_max = C_{n,m}

Or minimize total flowtime:

Minimize: Σ_{i=1}^n C_{i,m}

Constraints:

1. First machine:
   C_{1,1} = p_{π(1),1}
   C_{i,1} = C_{i-1,1} + p_{π(i),1},  i = 2,...,n

2. First job:
   C_{1,j} = C_{1,j-1} + p_{π(1),j},  j = 2,...,m

3. Other jobs and machines:
   C_{i,j} = max(C_{i-1,j}, C_{i,j-1}) + p_{π(i),j},
             i = 2,...,n; j = 2,...,m

Exact Algorithms

1. Johnson's Algorithm (2-Machine FSP)

import numpy as np

def johnsons_algorithm(processing_times):
    """
    Johnson's Algorithm for 2-machine flow shop

    Optimal algorithm for m=2

    Args:
        processing_times: n x 2 array where
                         processing_times[i][0] = time on machine 1
                         processing_times[i][1] = time on machine 2

    Returns:
        optimal sequence and makespan
    """
    n = len(processing_times)
    jobs = list(range(n))

    # Separate into two sets
    set_1 = []  # Jobs where machine 1 time < machine 2 time
    set_2 = []  # Jobs where machine 1 time >= machine 2 time

    for job_id in jobs:
        m1_time = processing_times[job_id][0]
        m2_time = processing_times[job_id][1]

        if m1_time < m2_time:
            set_1.append((job_id, m1_time))
        else:
            set_2.append((job_id, m2_time))

    # Sort set_1 by machine 1 time (ascending)
    set_1.sort(key=lambda x: x[1])

    # Sort set_2 by machine 2 time (descending)
    set_2.sort(key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)

    # Combine: set_1 first, then set_2
    sequence = [job_id for job_id, _ in set_1] + [job_id for job_id, _ in set_2]

    # Calculate makespan
    makespan = calculate_makespan_2machine(sequence, processing_times)

    return {
        'sequence': sequence,
        'makespan': makespan,
        'algorithm': 'Johnson'
    }

def calculate_makespan_2machine(sequence, processing_times):
    """Calculate makespan for 2-machine flow shop"""
    n = len(sequence)

    m1_completion = 0
    m2_completion = 0

    for job_id in sequence:
        m1_time = processing_times[job_id][0]
        m2_time = processing_times[job_id][1]

        # Machine 1
        m1_completion += m1_time

        # Machine 2 (must wait for both machine 1 and previous job on machine 2)
        m2_completion = max(m2_completion, m1_completion) + m2_time

    return m2_completion

2. Dynamic Programming (Small Instances)

def flowshop_dp_small(processing_times):
    """
    Dynamic programming for small flow shop instances

    Args:
        processing_times: n x m array (n jobs, m machines)

    Returns:
        optimal sequence and makespan
    """
    n, m = processing_times.shape

    # For very small instances only (n <= 12)
    if n > 12:
        raise ValueError("DP only for n <= 12 due to exponential complexity")

    import itertools

    best_sequence = None
    best_makespan = float('inf')

    # Try all permutations
    for sequence in itertools.permutations(range(n)):
        makespan = calculate_makespan(sequence, processing_times)

        if makespan < best_makespan:
            best_makespan = makespan
            best_sequence = sequence

    return {
        'sequence': list(best_sequence),
        'makespan': best_makespan,
        'algorithm': 'Dynamic Programming (enumerate)'
    }

def calculate_makespan(sequence, processing_times):
    """
    Calculate makespan for a given sequence

    Args:
        sequence: job sequence
        processing_times: n x m processing time matrix

    Returns:
        makespan (completion time of last job on last machine)
    """
    n = len(sequence)
    m = processing_times.shape[1]

    # Completion time matrix
    C = np.zeros((n, m))

    # First job
    C[0][0] = processing_times[sequence[0]][0]
    for j in range(1, m):
        C[0][j] = C[0][j-1] + processing_times[sequence[0]][j]

    # First machine
    for i in range(1, n):
        C[i][0] = C[i-1][0] + processing_times[sequence[i]][0]

    # Other positions
    for i in range(1, n):
        for j in range(1, m):
            job = sequence[i]
            C[i][j] = max(C[i-1][j], C[i][j-1]) + processing_times[job][j]

    return C[n-1][m-1]

Classical Heuristics

1. NEH (Nawaz-Enscore-Ham) Heuristic

def neh_heuristic(processing_times):
    """
    NEH Heuristic for permutation flow shop

    One of the best constructive heuristics for FSP

    Args:
        processing_times: n x m array

    Returns:
        sequence and makespan
    """
    n, m = processing_times.shape

    # Step 1: Sort jobs by total processing time (descending)
    total_times = processing_times.sum(axis=1)
    sorted_jobs = np.argsort(-total_times)

    # Step 2: Build sequence iteratively
    sequence = [sorted_jobs[0]]

    for k in range(1, n):
        job = sorted_jobs[k]

        # Try inserting job at each position
        best_position = 0
        best_makespan = float('inf')

        for pos in range(len(sequence) + 1):
            # Create temporary sequence
            temp_sequence = sequence[:pos] + [job] + sequence[pos:]

            # Calculate makespan
            makespan = calculate_makespan(temp_sequence, processing_times)

            if makespan < best_makespan:
                best_makespan = makespan
                best_position = pos

        # Insert job at best position
        sequence.insert(best_position, job)

    final_makespan = calculate_makespan(sequence, processing_times)

    return {
        'sequence': sequence,
        'makespan': final_makespan,
        'algorithm': 'NEH'
    }

2. Palmer's Heuristic

def palmer_heuristic(processing_times):
    """
    Palmer's Heuristic for flow shop

    Simple slope-based heuristic

    Args:
        processing_times: n x m array

    Returns:
        sequence and makespan
    """
    n, m = processing_times.shape

    # Calculate slope index for each job
    slopes = []

    for job_id in range(n):
        slope = 0
        for machine in range(m):
            weight = m - 2*machine - 1
            slope += weight * processing_times[job_id][machine]
        slopes.append((slope, job_id))

    # Sort by slope (descending)
    slopes.sort(reverse=True)
    sequence = [job_id for _, job_id in slopes]

    makespan = calculate_makespan(sequence, processing_times)

    return {
        'sequence': sequence,
        'makespan': makespan,
        'algorithm': 'Palmer'
    }

3. CDS (Campbell-Dudek-Smith) Heuristic

def cds_heuristic(processing_times):
    """
    CDS Heuristic for flow shop

    Applies Johnson's algorithm m-1 times on aggregated machines

    Args:
        processing_times: n x m array

    Returns:
        best sequence and makespan
    """
    n, m = processing_times.shape

    best_sequence = None
    best_makespan = float('inf')

    # Apply Johnson's algorithm for each aggregation level
    for k in range(1, m):
        # Aggregate first k machines and last k machines
        aggregated = np.zeros((n, 2))

        for job in range(n):
            # First k machines (sum)
            aggregated[job][0] = processing_times[job][:k].sum()

            # Last k machines (sum)
            aggregated[job][1] = processing_times[job][-k:].sum()

        # Apply Johnson's algorithm
        result = johnsons_algorithm(aggregated)
        sequence = result['sequence']

        # Calculate actual makespan with full schedule
        makespan = calculate_makespan(sequence, processing_times)

        if makespan < best_makespan:
            best_makespan = makespan
            best_sequence = sequence

    return {
        'sequence': best_sequence,
        'makespan': best_makespan,
        'algorithm': 'CDS'
    }

Improvement Heuristics

1. Local Search (2-Opt for FSP)

def flowshop_local_search(initial_sequence, processing_times, max_iterations=100):
    """
    Local search (2-opt) for flow shop

    Args:
        initial_sequence: initial job sequence
        processing_times: n x m processing time matrix
        max_iterations: maximum iterations

    Returns:
        improved sequence and makespan
    """
    current_sequence = initial_sequence.copy()
    current_makespan = calculate_makespan(current_sequence, processing_times)

    for iteration in range(max_iterations):
        improved = False

        # Try all pairwise swaps
        for i in range(len(current_sequence)):
            for j in range(i + 1, len(current_sequence)):
                # Swap
                new_sequence = current_sequence.copy()
                new_sequence[i], new_sequence[j] = new_sequence[j], new_sequence[i]

                # Evaluate
                new_makespan = calculate_makespan(new_sequence, processing_times)

                if new_makespan < current_makespan:
                    current_sequence = new_sequence
                    current_makespan = new_makespan
                    improved = True
                    break

            if improved:
                break

        if not improved:
            break

    return {
        'sequence': current_sequence,
        'makespan': current_makespan
    }

Metaheuristics

1. Genetic Algorithm for FSP

import random

def flowshop_genetic_algorithm(processing_times, population_size=50,
                               generations=200, mutation_rate=0.1):
    """
    Genetic Algorithm for Flow Shop Scheduling

    Args:
        processing_times: n x m processing time matrix
        population_size: population size
        generations: number of generations
        mutation_rate: mutation probability

    Returns:
        best sequence and makespan
    """
    n = processing_times.shape[0]

    def fitness(sequence):
        makespan = calculate_makespan(sequence, processing_times)
        return 1.0 / (1.0 + makespan)

    def order_crossover(parent1, parent2):
        """Order Crossover (OX)"""
        size = len(parent1)
        start, end = sorted(random.sample(range(size), 2))

        child = [-1] * size
        child[start:end] = parent1[start:end]

        pos = end
        for gene in parent2[end:] + parent2[:end]:
            if gene not in child:
                if pos >= size:
                    pos = 0
                child[pos] = gene
                pos += 1

        return child

    def mutate(sequence):
        """Swap mutation"""
        if random.random() < mutation_rate:
            i, j = random.sample(range(len(sequence)), 2)
            sequence[i], sequence[j] = sequence[j], sequence[i]
        return sequence

    # Initialize population
    population = []
    for _ in range(population_size):
        individual = list(range(n))
        random.shuffle(individual)
        population.append(individual)

    best_sequence = None
    best_makespan = float('inf')

    for generation in range(generations):
        # Evaluate fitness
        fitnesses = [fitness(ind) for ind in population]

        # Track best
        for ind in population:
            makespan = calculate_makespan(ind, processing_times)
            if makespan < best_makespan:
                best_makespan = makespan
                best_sequence = ind.copy()

        # Selection and reproduction
        new_population = []

        # Elitism
        elite_count = int(0.1 * population_size)
        elite_indices = sorted(range(len(fitnesses)),
                              key=lambda i: fitnesses[i],
                              reverse=True)[:elite_count]
        new_population = [population[i].copy() for i in elite_indices]

        # Create offspring
        while len(new_population) < population_size:
            # Tournament selection
            parent1 = max(random.sample(list(zip(population, fitnesses)), 3),
                         key=lambda x: x[1])[0]
            parent2 = max(random.sample(list(zip(population, fitnesses)), 3),
                         key=lambda x: x[1])[0]

            child = order_crossover(parent1, parent2)
            child = mutate(child)

            new_population.append(child)

        population = new_population

    return {
        'sequence': best_sequence,
        'makespan': best_makespan,
        'algorithm': 'Genetic Algorithm'
    }

Visualization

def visualize_flowshop_schedule(sequence, processing_times, save_path=None):
    """
    Visualize flow shop schedule as Gantt chart

    Args:
        sequence: job sequence
        processing_times: processing time matrix
        save_path: path to save figure
    """
    import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
    import matplotlib.patches as mpatches

    n = len(sequence)
    m = processing_times.shape[1]

    # Calculate completion times
    C = np.zeros((n, m))

    # First job
    C[0][0] = processing_times[sequence[0]][0]
    for j in range(1, m):
        C[0][j] = C[0][j-1] + processing_times[sequence[0]][j]

    # First machine
    for i in range(1, n):
        C[i][0] = C[i-1][0] + processing_times[sequence[i]][0]

    # Other positions
    for i in range(1, n):
        for j in range(1, m):
            job = sequence[i]
            start_time = max(C[i-1][j], C[i][j-1])
            C[i][j] = start_time + processing_times[job][j]

    # Create Gantt chart
    fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(14, 6))

    colors = plt.cm.Set3(np.linspace(0, 1, n))

    for j in range(m):
        for i in range(n):
            job = sequence[i]
            proc_time = processing_times[job][j]

            if i == 0 and j == 0:
                start = 0
            elif j == 0:
                start = C[i-1][j]
            elif i == 0:
                start = C[i][j-1]
            else:
                start = max(C[i-1][j], C[i][j-1])

            # Draw rectangle
            rect = mpatches.Rectangle((start, j - 0.4), proc_time, 0.8,
                                     facecolor=colors[job],
                                     edgecolor='black', linewidth=1)
            ax.add_patch(rect)

            # Add job label
            ax.text(start + proc_time/2, j, f'J{job}',
                   ha='center', va='center', fontweight='bold')

    ax.set_xlabel('Time')
    ax.set_ylabel('Machine')
    ax.set_yticks(range(m))
    ax.set_yticklabels([f'M{i}' for i in range(m)])
    ax.set_xlim(0, C[n-1][m-1] * 1.05)
    ax.set_ylim(-0.5, m - 0.5)
    ax.set_title(f'Flow Shop Schedule (Makespan: {C[n-1][m-1]:.1f})')
    ax.grid(True, axis='x', alpha=0.3)

    plt.tight_layout()

    if save_path:
        plt.savefig(save_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')

    plt.show()

# Complete example
if __name__ == "__main__":
    np.random.seed(42)
    random.seed(42)

    # Generate random flow shop problem
    n_jobs = 10
    n_machines = 5

    processing_times = np.random.randint(5, 50, size=(n_jobs, n_machines))

    print("Flow Shop Scheduling Problem")
    print(f"Jobs: {n_jobs}, Machines: {n_machines}")
    print("\nProcessing Times:")
    print(processing_times)

    # Compare different algorithms
    print("\n" + "="*60)
    print("Algorithm Comparison:")
    print("="*60)

    algorithms = [
        ('NEH', neh_heuristic),
        ('Palmer', palmer_heuristic),
        ('CDS', cds_heuristic)
    ]

    results = []

    for name, algorithm in algorithms:
        result = algorithm(processing_times)
        results.append((name, result))
        print(f"\n{name}:")
        print(f"  Makespan: {result['makespan']:.1f}")
        print(f"  Sequence: {result['sequence']}")

    # Genetic Algorithm
    print("\n" + "="*60)
    print("Genetic Algorithm:")
    print("="*60)

    ga_result = flowshop_genetic_algorithm(processing_times,
                                          population_size=50,
                                          generations=100)
    print(f"\nGA Makespan: {ga_result['makespan']:.1f}")
    print(f"GA Sequence: {ga_result['sequence']}")

    # Find best result
    all_results = results + [('GA', ga_result)]
    best_name, best_result = min(all_results, key=lambda x: x[1]['makespan'])

    print("\n" + "="*60)
    print(f"Best Algorithm: {best_name}")
    print(f"Best Makespan: {best_result['makespan']:.1f}")
    print("="*60)

    # Visualize best schedule
    visualize_flowshop_schedule(best_result['sequence'], processing_times)

    # Calculate machine utilization
    makespan = best_result['makespan']
    total_processing = processing_times.sum()
    utilization = total_processing / (makespan * n_machines) * 100

    print(f"\nMachine Utilization: {utilization:.1f}%")
    print(f"Idle Time: {makespan * n_machines - total_processing:.1f}")

Tools & Libraries

Python Libraries

  • NumPy: Array operations and calculations
  • OR-Tools: CP-SAT for scheduling
  • matplotlib: Gantt chart visualization
  • pandas: Data handling

Specialized Software

  • Lekin: Educational scheduling system
  • CPLEX: MIP solver
  • Gurobi: MIP solver

Common Challenges & Solutions

Challenge: Large Problem Size

Problem:

  • Hundreds of jobs makes exact methods impractical
  • Even heuristics can be slow

Solutions:

  • Use NEH heuristic (very good quality)
  • Metaheuristics for larger instances
  • Parallel evaluation of sequences

Challenge: No-Wait Flow Shop

Problem:

  • No buffers between machines
  • Job must immediately proceed to next machine

Solutions:

  • Modified completion time calculation
  • Specialized NEH variant
  • Add no-wait constraint to metaheuristics

Challenge: Sequence-Dependent Setup Times

Problem:

  • Setup time depends on previous job
  • Increases complexity significantly

Solutions:

  • Modify makespan calculation to include setups
  • Use Traveling Salesman formulation
  • Advanced metaheuristics

Output Format

Flow Shop Solution Report

Problem:

  • Jobs: 20
  • Machines: 6 (linear sequence)
  • Objective: Minimize Makespan

Solution:

MetricValue
Makespan487 minutes
Machine Utilization82%
Total Flowtime8,945 minutes
Average Flowtime447 minutes

Sequence:

J5 → J12 → J3 → J18 → J7 → J15 → J2 → J10 → ...

Gantt Chart:

M0: J5[0-23] J12[23-48] J3[48-71] ...
M1: [idle] J5[23-45] J12[48-72] ...
M2: [idle] J5[45-63] J12[72-94] ...
...

Machine Statistics:

MachineProcessing TimeIdle TimeUtilization
M04236487%
M14018682%
M23899880%
[...]

Questions to Ask

  1. How many jobs and machines?
  2. Is this permutation flow shop (same order all machines)?
  3. What's the objective? (makespan, flowtime, tardiness)
  4. Are there buffers between machines?
  5. No-wait constraint?
  6. Setup times (sequence-dependent or independent)?
  7. Are there due dates?
  8. Can we use metaheuristics or need guaranteed optimal?

Related Skills

  • job-shop-scheduling: For flexible routing
  • production-scheduling: For broader manufacturing
  • assembly-line-balancing: For line design
  • master-production-scheduling: For planning
  • optimization-modeling: For mathematical formulation

平台分布

Codex

34%
按下载量换算34

Claude

30.93%
按下载量换算31

Cursor

17.97%
按下载量换算18

Gemini CLI

9.14%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills