Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

api(API 问题管理)

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

api 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 66,424。

总安装 264周安装 11GitHub Stars 9下载 88核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:api(API 问题管理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code
仓库路径:skills/api
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill api
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill api

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档和前后端联调。适合梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿或检查字段命名。需结合项目现有代码确认业务语义和鉴权规则。安装前建议核实权限范围和维护状态。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

涉及接口文档时应避免凭空补字段。api 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/api

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill api;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

api 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/florianbuetow/claude-code --skill api。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

api 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

api 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

api 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

api 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 264 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 88 次,GitHub 9 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

api 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
api

API 问题管理 · 本页

2649需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

API Security (API)

Analyze REST and RPC APIs for security vulnerabilities aligned with the OWASP API Security Top 10, including Broken Object-Level Authorization (BOLA), mass assignment, missing rate limiting, broken function-level authorization, and excessive data exposure. API-specific vulnerabilities arise from the unique patterns of programmatic access, where client-side UI constraints do not apply.

Supported Flags

Read ../../shared/schemas/flags.md for the full flag specification. This skill supports all cross-cutting flags. Key flags for this skill:

  • --scope determines which files to analyze (default: changed)
  • --depth standard reads code and checks API endpoint handlers
  • --depth deep traces data from request to database to response serialization
  • --severity filters output (API issues are often high or critical)

Framework Context

Key CWEs in scope:

  • CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (BOLA)
  • CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
  • CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits (rate limiting)
  • CWE-862: Missing Authorization (function-level auth)
  • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information (excessive data)

OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) categories:

  • API1:2023 Broken Object-Level Authorization
  • API2:2023 Broken Authentication
  • API3:2023 Broken Object Property-Level Authorization
  • API4:2023 Unrestricted Resource Consumption
  • API5:2023 Broken Function-Level Authorization

Detection Patterns

Read references/detection-patterns.md for the full catalog of code patterns, search heuristics, language-specific examples, and false positive guidance.

Workflow

1. Determine Scope

Parse flags and resolve the file list per ../../shared/schemas/flags.md. Filter to files likely to contain API logic:

  • Route/endpoint definitions (**/routes/**, **/api/**, **/endpoints/**)
  • Controllers and handlers (**/controllers/**, **/handlers/**, **/views/**)
  • Serializers and DTOs (**/serializers/**, **/dto/**, **/schemas/**)
  • Middleware (**/middleware/**, **/middlewares/**)
  • Rate limiting configuration (**/config/**, **/limiters/**)

2. Check for Available Scanners

Detect scanners per ../../shared/schemas/scanners.md:

  1. semgrep -- primary scanner for API patterns
  2. bandit -- Python API security issues
  3. brakeman -- Rails API vulnerabilities

Record which scanners are available and which are missing.

3. Run Scanners (If Available)

If semgrep is available, run with rules targeting API security:

semgrep scan --config auto --json --quiet <target>

Filter results to rules matching BOLA, mass assignment, authorization, and data exposure patterns. Normalize output to the findings schema.

4. Claude Code Analysis

Regardless of scanner availability, perform manual code analysis:

  1. BOLA audit: Find API endpoints that accept resource IDs and verify each enforces ownership or authorization before returning/modifying data.
  2. Mass assignment: Find endpoints that accept request bodies and bind them directly to models without explicit field allowlisting.
  3. Rate limiting: Check for rate limiting middleware on authentication endpoints, data-intensive endpoints, and mutation endpoints.
  4. Function-level authorization: Verify admin/privileged endpoints have role-based authorization, not just authentication.
  5. Excessive data exposure: Check API responses for fields that should not be exposed (passwords, internal IDs, sensitive user data).

When --depth deep, additionally trace:

  • Full request-to-response data flow including serialization
  • Authorization middleware chains across all API routes
  • Rate limiting configuration and bypass scenarios

5. Report Findings

Format output per ../../shared/schemas/findings.md using the API prefix (e.g., API-001, API-002).

Include for each finding:

  • Severity and confidence
  • Exact file location with code snippet
  • OWASP API Top 10 reference
  • Concrete fix with diff when possible
  • CWE references

What to Look For

These are the high-signal patterns specific to API security. Each maps to a detection pattern in references/detection-patterns.md.

  1. Broken Object-Level Authorization (BOLA) -- API endpoints accept a resource ID from the client and return data without verifying the requesting user owns or is authorized to access that resource.
  2. Mass assignment -- Request body fields are bound directly to database model attributes, allowing attackers to set fields they should not control (role, price, isAdmin).
  3. Missing rate limiting -- API endpoints lack rate limiting, allowing brute-force attacks on authentication, enumeration, and resource exhaustion.
  4. Broken function-level authorization -- Admin or privileged API endpoints are accessible to regular users because they check authentication but not authorization role/permissions.
  5. Excessive data exposure -- API responses include sensitive fields (password hashes, tokens, internal metadata) that the client does not need.
  6. Missing input validation -- API endpoints accept unbounded inputs (no max length, no type validation) enabling injection and resource abuse.

Scanner Integration

ScannerCoverageCommand
semgrepBOLA, mass assignment, missing authsemgrep scan --config auto --json --quiet <target>
banditPython API security patternsbandit -r <target> -f json -q
brakemanRails mass assignment, authorizationbrakeman -q -f json -o /dev/stdout

Fallback (no scanner): Use Grep with patterns from references/detection-patterns.md to find API route definitions, model binding, rate limiting config, and response serialization. Report findings with confidence: medium.

Output Format

Use the findings schema from ../../shared/schemas/findings.md.

  • ID prefix: API (e.g., API-001)
  • metadata.tool: api
  • metadata.framework: api
  • metadata.category: API
  • references.api_top10: API1:2023, API3:2023, etc.
  • references.cwe: CWE-639, CWE-915, CWE-770
  • references.stride: I (Information Disclosure) or E (Elevation of Privilege)

Severity guidance for this category:

  • critical: BOLA on sensitive data (financial, medical, PII), mass assignment on role/privilege fields
  • high: BOLA on user-scoped data, missing auth on admin endpoints, mass assignment on price/status
  • medium: Missing rate limiting on auth endpoints, excessive data exposure of non-critical fields
  • low: Minor data over-exposure, rate limit too generous but present

平台分布

Codex

36.13%
按下载量换算32

Claude

30.26%
按下载量换算27

Cursor

16.36%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

9.45%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills