Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

bolder(bolder 分析)

bolder 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

bolder 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 2,381。

总安装 2,328周安装 98GitHub Stars 163下载 815核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:bolder(bolder 分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/flora131/atomic
仓库路径:skills/bolder
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/flora131/atomic --skill bolder
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/flora131/atomic --skill bolder

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

bolder 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中整理仓库状态或代码变更。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否触发联网或文件读写。

bolder 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/bolder

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/flora131/atomic --skill bolder;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

bolder 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/flora131/atomic --skill bolder。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

bolder 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

bolder 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

bolder 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

bolder 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,328 次,近一周安装 98 次,下载 815 次,GitHub 163 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

bolder 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · 本页

2,328163只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Increase visual impact and personality in designs that are too safe, generic, or visually underwhelming, creating more engaging and memorable experiences.

MANDATORY PREPARATION

Invoke /impeccable — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /impeccable teach first.


Assess Current State

Analyze what makes the design feel too safe or boring:

  1. Identify weakness sources:

- Generic choices: System fonts, basic colors, standard layouts - Timid scale: Everything is medium-sized with no drama - Low contrast: Everything has similar visual weight - Static: No motion, no energy, no life - Predictable: Standard patterns with no surprises - Flat hierarchy: Nothing stands out or commands attention

  1. Understand the context:

- What's the brand personality? (How far can we push?) - What's the purpose? (Marketing can be bolder than financial dashboards) - Who's the audience? (What will resonate?) - What are the constraints? (Brand guidelines, accessibility, performance)

If any of these are unclear from the codebase, ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer.

CRITICAL: "Bolder" doesn't mean chaotic or garish. It means distinctive, memorable, and confident. Think intentional drama, not random chaos.

WARNING - AI SLOP TRAP: When making things "bolder," AI defaults to the same tired tricks: cyan/purple gradients, glassmorphism, neon accents on dark backgrounds, gradient text on metrics. These are the OPPOSITE of bold—they're generic. Review ALL the DON'T guidelines in the impeccable skill before proceeding. Bold means distinctive, not "more effects."

Plan Amplification

Create a strategy to increase impact while maintaining coherence:

  • Focal point: What should be the hero moment? (Pick ONE, make it amazing)
  • Personality direction: Maximalist chaos? Elegant drama? Playful energy? Dark moody? Choose a lane.
  • Risk budget: How experimental can we be? Push boundaries within constraints.
  • Hierarchy amplification: Make big things BIGGER, small things smaller (increase contrast)

IMPORTANT: Bold design must still be usable. Impact without function is just decoration.

Amplify the Design

Systematically increase impact across these dimensions:

Typography Amplification

  • Replace generic fonts: Swap system fonts for distinctive choices (see impeccable skill for inspiration)
  • Extreme scale: Create dramatic size jumps (3x-5x differences, not 1.5x)
  • Weight contrast: Pair 900 weights with 200 weights, not 600 with 400
  • Unexpected choices: Variable fonts, display fonts for headlines, condensed/extended widths, monospace as intentional accent (not as lazy "dev tool" default)

Color Intensification

  • Increase saturation: Shift to more vibrant, energetic colors (but not neon)
  • Bold palette: Introduce unexpected color combinations—avoid the purple-blue gradient AI slop
  • Dominant color strategy: Let one bold color own 60% of the design
  • Sharp accents: High-contrast accent colors that pop
  • Tinted neutrals: Replace pure grays with tinted grays that harmonize with your palette
  • Rich gradients: Intentional multi-stop gradients (not generic purple-to-blue)

Spatial Drama

  • Extreme scale jumps: Make important elements 3-5x larger than surroundings
  • Break the grid: Let hero elements escape containers and cross boundaries
  • Asymmetric layouts: Replace centered, balanced layouts with tension-filled asymmetry
  • Generous space: Use white space dramatically (100-200px gaps, not 20-40px)
  • Overlap: Layer elements intentionally for depth

Visual Effects

  • Dramatic shadows: Large, soft shadows for elevation (but not generic drop shadows on rounded rectangles)
  • Background treatments: Mesh patterns, noise textures, geometric patterns, intentional gradients (not purple-to-blue)
  • Texture & depth: Grain, halftone, duotone, layered elements—NOT glassmorphism (it's overused AI slop)
  • Borders & frames: Thick borders, decorative frames, custom shapes (not rounded rectangles with colored border on one side)
  • Custom elements: Illustrative elements, custom icons, decorative details that reinforce brand

Motion & Animation

  • Entrance choreography: Staggered, dramatic page load animations with 50-100ms delays
  • Scroll effects: Parallax, reveal animations, scroll-triggered sequences
  • Micro-interactions: Satisfying hover effects, click feedback, state changes
  • Transitions: Smooth, noticeable transitions using ease-out-quart/quint/expo (not bounce or elastic—they cheapen the effect)

Composition Boldness

  • Hero moments: Create clear focal points with dramatic treatment
  • Diagonal flows: Escape horizontal/vertical rigidity with diagonal arrangements
  • Full-bleed elements: Use full viewport width/height for impact
  • Unexpected proportions: Golden ratio? Throw it out. Try 70/30, 80/20 splits

NEVER:

  • Add effects randomly without purpose (chaos ≠ bold)
  • Sacrifice readability for aesthetics (body text must be readable)
  • Make everything bold (then nothing is bold - need contrast)
  • Ignore accessibility (bold design must still meet WCAG standards)
  • Overwhelm with motion (animation fatigue is real)
  • Copy trendy aesthetics blindly (bold means distinctive, not derivative)

Verify Quality

Ensure amplification maintains usability and coherence:

  • NOT AI slop: Does this look like every other AI-generated "bold" design? If yes, start over.
  • Still functional: Can users accomplish tasks without distraction?
  • Coherent: Does everything feel intentional and unified?
  • Memorable: Will users remember this experience?
  • Performant: Do all these effects run smoothly?
  • Accessible: Does it still meet accessibility standards?

The test: If you showed this to someone and said "AI made this bolder," would they believe you immediately? If yes, you've failed. Bold means distinctive, not "more AI effects."

Remember: Bold design is confident design. It takes risks, makes statements, and creates memorable experiences. But bold without strategy is just loud. Be intentional, be dramatic, be unforgettable.

平台分布

Codex

34.27%
按下载量换算279

Claude

33.95%
按下载量换算277

Cursor

18.07%
按下载量换算147

Gemini CLI

9.33%
按下载量换算76

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills