Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

competitive-analysis(竞争分析)

competitive-analysis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

competitive-analysis 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 71,838。

总安装 192周安装 8GitHub Stars 4下载 64核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:competitive-analysis(竞争分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/flight505/claude-project-planner
仓库路径:skills/competitive-analysis
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/flight505/claude-project-planner --skill competitive-analysis
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/flight505/claude-project-planner --skill competitive-analysis

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

competitive-analysis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合快速定位候选结果。适用于关键词搜索、任务场景匹配或来源线索筛选等研究检索场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写操作。

建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/competitive-analysis

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/flight505/claude-project-planner --skill compe…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

competitive-analysis 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/flight505/claude-project-planner --skill competitive-ana…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

competitive-analysis 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

competitive-analysis 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

competitive-analysis 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

competitive-analysis 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 192 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 64 次,GitHub 4 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

competitive-analysis 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
competitive-analysis

竞争分析 · 本页

1924需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Competitive Analysis

Overview

Competitive analysis is a systematic process for understanding the market landscape, identifying competitors, and finding differentiation opportunities. Research existing solutions, analyze their strengths and weaknesses, understand market positioning, and inform product strategy with evidence-based insights.

When to Use This Skill

This skill should be used when:

  • Researching competitors before starting a new project
  • Analyzing market positioning and differentiation opportunities
  • Understanding feature landscapes across competing products
  • Identifying market gaps and opportunities
  • Creating competitive analysis documents for stakeholders
  • Informing product strategy and roadmap decisions

Visual Enhancement with Project Diagrams

When documenting competitive analysis, always include visualizations.

Use the project-diagrams skill to generate:

  • Competitive positioning maps (2x2 matrices)
  • Feature comparison charts
  • Market segment diagrams
  • SWOT analysis visualizations
  • Competitor landscape maps
python .claude/skills/project-diagrams/scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram description" -o diagrams/output.png

Competitive Analysis Framework

Analysis Components

ComponentPurposeKey Questions
Market OverviewUnderstand the marketWhat is the market size? Who are the players?
Competitor ProfilesDeep dive on competitorsWhat do they do? How are they positioned?
Feature AnalysisCompare capabilitiesWhat features exist? What's missing?
Positioning AnalysisUnderstand market positionsWhere do competitors position themselves?
Differentiation StrategyFind your angleHow can we be different and better?

Research Process

Phase 1: Market Discovery

Identify the market landscape:

  1. Define the market category

- What problem space are we in? - What are adjacent categories? - How do customers describe this space?

  1. Search for competitors

- Use research-lookup to find existing solutions - Search product directories (G2, Capterra, Product Hunt) - Review industry reports and analyst coverage - Search for "[category] alternatives" and "[competitor] vs"

  1. Categorize competitors Category Description Priority Direct Same problem, same solution approach High Indirect Same problem, different solution Medium Potential Could enter this space easily Monitor Substitute Alternative ways to solve the problem Awareness

Phase 2: Competitor Profiling

For each significant competitor, research:

competitor_profile:
  name: "Competitor Name"
  website: "https://..."
  category: "direct | indirect | potential | substitute"
  priority: "primary | secondary | tertiary"

  company_info:
    founded: YYYY
    headquarters: "City, Country"
    funding: "Series X / Public / Bootstrapped"
    employees: "Range"
    valuation_revenue: "If known"

  product:
    description: "What they do in 1-2 sentences"
    target_market: "Who they serve"
    positioning: "How they position themselves"
    pricing:
      model: "SaaS / Usage / One-time / Freemium"
      tiers: ["Free", "Pro: $X/mo", "Enterprise: Custom"]

  strengths:
    - "Key strength 1"
    - "Key strength 2"

  weaknesses:
    - "Key weakness 1"
    - "Key weakness 2"

  market_presence:
    estimated_customers: "If known"
    notable_customers: ["Company A", "Company B"]
    geographic_focus: "Global / Regional"

  technology:
    platform: "Web / Mobile / Desktop / API"
    tech_stack: "If known"
    integrations: ["Integration 1", "Integration 2"]

  recent_developments:
    - date: "YYYY-MM"
      event: "What happened"

  sources:
    - "URL where information was found"

Phase 3: Feature Analysis

Create a feature comparison matrix:

feature_comparison:
  categories:
    - name: "Core Features"
      features:
        - name: "Feature A"
          description: "What this feature does"
          importance: "critical | important | nice_to_have"
          competitors:
            "Competitor 1": "full | partial | none"
            "Competitor 2": "full | partial | none"
            "Our Plan": "full | partial | none | future"

        - name: "Feature B"
          # ...

    - name: "Advanced Features"
      features:
        # ...

    - name: "Platform & Integration"
      features:
        # ...

Feature rating definitions:

  • Full: Complete implementation
  • Partial: Limited or basic implementation
  • None: Not offered
  • Future: Planned for our product

Phase 4: Positioning Analysis

Map competitors on positioning dimensions:

Common positioning axes:

  • Price (Low ↔ High)
  • Complexity (Simple ↔ Advanced)
  • Target Market (SMB ↔ Enterprise)
  • Focus (Generalist ↔ Specialist)
  • Approach (Self-serve ↔ High-touch)

Positioning Map:

                    High Price
                        │
          ┌─────────────┼─────────────┐
          │ Premium     │ Enterprise  │
          │ [Comp C]    │ [Comp A]    │
          │             │             │
Simple ───┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─── Advanced
          │             │             │
          │ Budget      │ Power User  │
          │ [Comp D]    │ [Comp B]    │
          └─────────────┼─────────────┘
                        │
                    Low Price

Identify white space:

  • Where are there gaps in the map?
  • Which positions are crowded?
  • Where could we uniquely position?

Phase 5: SWOT Analysis

For each major competitor:

swot_analysis:
  competitor: "Competitor Name"

  strengths:
    - factor: "Strong brand recognition"
      impact: "high"
      evidence: "Top-of-mind in category, high search volume"

    - factor: "Extensive integrations"
      impact: "medium"
      evidence: "500+ integrations listed"

  weaknesses:
    - factor: "Complex pricing"
      impact: "medium"
      evidence: "Frequent complaints in reviews about unexpected costs"

    - factor: "Poor mobile experience"
      impact: "high"
      evidence: "2.5 star app store rating"

  opportunities:
    - factor: "Underserved SMB segment"
      impact: "high"
      evidence: "Pricing starts at $50/user, reviews mention 'too expensive for small teams'"

  threats:
    - factor: "Strong network effects"
      impact: "high"
      evidence: "Viral adoption within organizations"

Aggregate into market SWOT:

  • Industry-wide strengths and weaknesses
  • Market opportunities
  • Competitive threats

Phase 6: Differentiation Strategy

Identify differentiation opportunities:

  1. Feature Gaps

- What do customers want that no one offers? - What's done poorly by everyone? - What new capabilities are becoming possible?

  1. Market Segment Gaps

- Which customer segments are underserved? - Where is pricing misaligned with value? - Which use cases are ignored?

  1. Experience Gaps

- Where is UX frustrating? - What's overly complex? - Where can we simplify?

  1. Technology Gaps

- What's outdated? - What new tech enables better solutions? - Where is performance lacking?

Differentiation Strategy Options:

StrategyWhen to UseRisk
Cost LeadershipCan sustainably be cheaperRace to bottom
DifferentiationClear unique valueHard to communicate
Focus (Niche)Specific segment underservedLimited market
InnovationNew approach is possibleExecution risk
ExperienceCan be significantly better UXEasily copied

Output Templates

Competitive Analysis Report

# Competitive Analysis: [Market Category]

## Executive Summary
- Market overview (2-3 sentences)
- Number of competitors analyzed
- Key insights (3-5 bullets)
- Recommended positioning

## Market Overview
### Market Size and Growth
[TAM, SAM, SOM if available]

### Market Segments
[Key customer segments and their characteristics]

### Market Trends
[Important trends affecting the market]

## Competitor Landscape

### Primary Competitors
[Detailed profiles of direct competitors]

### Secondary Competitors
[Brief profiles of indirect competitors]

### Competitive Positioning Map
[Visual representation of market positions]

## Feature Comparison
[Feature matrix comparing capabilities]

## Analysis and Insights

### Market Opportunities
[Where gaps exist]

### Competitive Threats
[What to watch out for]

### Differentiation Opportunities
[How to stand out]

## Recommended Strategy
[Positioning recommendation with rationale]

## Appendix
- Detailed competitor profiles
- Data sources
- Feature comparison data

Competitor Profile Template

# Competitor Profile: [Name]

## Overview
**Website:** [URL]
**Category:** Direct / Indirect
**Founded:** [Year]
**Funding:** [Amount or status]
**Employees:** [Range]

## Product Description
[What they do and who they serve]

## Pricing
| Tier | Price | Key Features |
|------|-------|--------------|
| | | |

## Strengths
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]

## Weaknesses
- [Weakness 1]
- [Weakness 2]

## Key Features
[List of notable features]

## Customer Reviews Summary
**Positive themes:**
- [Theme 1]

**Negative themes:**
- [Theme 1]

## Recent News
- [Date]: [Event]

## Sources
- [URL 1]
- [URL 2]

Research Best Practices

Do's

  • Use multiple sources (don't rely on competitor's marketing alone)
  • Include customer reviews (G2, Capterra, Reddit, Twitter)
  • Look for recent news and funding announcements
  • Document all sources for credibility
  • Update analysis regularly (market changes)
  • Talk to actual users when possible

Don'ts

  • Don't just copy competitor marketing claims
  • Don't ignore indirect competitors
  • Don't assume feature lists equal actual capabilities
  • Don't skip pricing research
  • Don't make analysis too long (focus on insights)
  • Don't let analysis replace customer research

Finding Information

Product information:

  • Company websites and blogs
  • Press releases and news
  • Crunchbase, PitchBook for funding
  • LinkedIn for employee counts

Customer sentiment:

  • G2, Capterra, TrustRadius reviews
  • Reddit discussions
  • Twitter mentions
  • App store reviews

Market data:

  • Industry analyst reports
  • Market research firms
  • Trade publications
  • SEC filings (public companies)

Feature details:

  • Product documentation
  • Help centers
  • YouTube demos
  • Free trials

Quality Checklist

Before completing competitive analysis:

  • Market clearly defined
  • All major competitors identified
  • At least 3 direct competitors profiled
  • Feature comparison completed
  • Positioning map created
  • Strengths and weaknesses documented
  • Differentiation opportunities identified
  • All sources cited
  • Analysis is actionable (not just descriptive)
  • Insights support product strategy decisions

平台分布

Codex

32.84%
按下载量换算21

Claude

30.76%
按下载量换算20

Cursor

17.72%
按下载量换算11

Gemini CLI

9.93%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills