Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

find-companies-having-simple-signals(寻找具有简单信号的公司)

find-companies-having-simple-signals 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

find-companies-having-simple-signals 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 71,838。

总安装 192周安装 8GitHub Stars 7下载 64核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:find-companies-having-simple-signals(寻找具有简单信号的公司)
来源仓库:https://github.com/openfunnel/openfunnel
仓库路径:skills/find-companies-having-simple-signals
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/openfunnel/openfunnel --skill find-companies-having-simple-signals
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/openfunnel/openfunnel --skill find-companies-having-simple-signals

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

find-companies-having-simple-signals 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。当前顶部介绍为空,需参考原始 SKILL.md 获取详细功能说明。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/find-companies-having-simple-signals

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/openfunnel/openfunnel --skill find-companies-h…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

find-companies-having-simple-signals 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/openfunnel/openfunnel --skill find-companies-having-simp…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

find-companies-having-simple-signals 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

find-companies-having-simple-signals 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

find-companies-having-simple-signals 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

find-companies-having-simple-signals 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 192 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 64 次,GitHub 7 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

find-companies-having-simple-signals 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
find-companies-having-simple-signals

寻找具有简单信号的公司 · 本页

1927需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Find Accounts Skill

Find companies based on what they're doing — hiring, posting, or using specific technologies. This skill checks if a signal is already tracking what the user wants, returns results if so, or deploys a new signal if not.

If the user is looking for people (not companies), use the find-people-having-simple-signals skill instead. If the user is asking about a specific company, use account intelligence or enterprise research instead.

When to Use This Skill

  • "Find companies that are looking to adopt Kubernetes"
  • "Find companies posting about SOC2 compliance"
  • "Companies using Snowflake"
  • "Companies hiring AI engineers"
  • "Find companies posting about their Series A"

Agent Rules

  1. Don't deploy signals without confirming. Signals cost credits. Always confirm before deploying.
  2. Don't guess the signal type. If ambiguous (could be hiring or social), ask.
  3. Close match ≠ loose match. "Building voice AI agents" ≈ "building voice agents" but ≠ "building in-house voice agents." If you have to think about it, it's not a match.
  4. Present what the API returns. No fabrication, no inference.

Workflow

0. Agent Auth Check

Before anything, check that .env contains OPENFUNNEL_API_KEY and OPENFUNNEL_USER_ID.

If both exist: skip to Step 1.

If either is missing:

### Welcome to OpenFunnel

OpenFunnel finds companies based on what they're doing — hiring, posting, or using specific technologies.

To get started, I'll authenticate you via the API.

**What's your work email?**

Wait for user input. Then:

  1. Call POST /api/v1/agent/sign-up with {"email": "<user_email>"}
  2. Tell the user a 6-digit code was sent: I sent a 6-digit verification code to **{email}**. Reply with the code.
  3. Wait for input. Call POST /api/v1/agent/verify with {"email": "<user_email>", "otp_code": "<code>"}
  4. On success, write to .env:

- OPENFUNNEL_API_KEY={api_key} - OPENFUNNEL_USER_ID={email}

  1. Add .env to .gitignore if not already there
  2. Verify with POST /api/v1/signal/get-signal-list {"pagination": {"limit": 1, "offset": 0}}
  3. If verification succeeds → continue to Step 1
  4. If sign-up fails → ask user to retry
  5. If verify fails → tell user the code was invalid or expired (up to 10 attempts in 24 hours), offer to retry or resend

1. Understand the request

What activity or behavior is the user looking for? If unclear, ask.

2. Check existing signals

POST /api/v1/signal/get-signal-list → get all currently deployed signals.

A signal is unique by query + ICP pair. The same query with a different ICP is a different signal and needs separate deployment. When checking for matches, compare BOTH:

  1. Query match — close match on signal name. Same meaning, different wording is fine:

- "Find companies building voice AI agents" ≈ "Find companies building voice agents" → match - "Find companies building voice AI agents" ≠ "Find companies building in-house voice agents" → not a match - "Companies hiring for Kubernetes" ≈ "Companies looking to adopt Kubernetes" → match - "Companies hiring for Kubernetes" ≠ "Companies migrating to container orchestration" → not a match, too much inference

  1. ICP match — the signal's icp.id must match the user's intended ICP. If the user hasn't specified an ICP yet, note which ICP the existing signal uses.

If potential match found (query + ICP both match):

I found an existing signal that covers this:

**{signal_name}** (ID: {signal_id})
**ICP:** {icp.name}

Want to use this one, or deploy a new signal?

If query matches but ICP is different:

I found a signal with a similar query but a different ICP:

**{signal_name}** (ID: {signal_id})
**ICP:** {icp.name}

This uses a different ICP than what you need. Want to:
1. Use this one anyway
2. Deploy a new signal with the right ICP

Wait for user input.

3. Get results from existing signal

POST /api/v1/signal/ {signal_id} → returns accounts and people matched by this signal.

### Results from: {signal_name}

**{total_accounts} accounts found | {total_people} people found**

If the user wants full details, pull with POST /api/v2/account/batch {account_ids: [...]}.

After presenting:

Would you like to:
1. See full details on specific accounts
2. Narrow results with filters (size, funding, location)
3. Deploy an additional signal for broader coverage ⚡ *uses credits*

4. Classify and deploy a new signal

Three company signal types:

Deep Hiring Signal

When: Companies hiring for something, looking to build something, facing a pain point.

Core principle: Job posts are modern RFPs — budget is committed, leadership is aligned, they're ready to act. What a company hires for tells you what they're building, scaling, or fixing.

Prompt format: "Find companies that are looking to [activity] or facing [pain point]"

Examples:

  • "Find Companies with Hiring post mentioning Implementing Guardrails for AI agents"
  • "Find Companies with Hiring post mentioning Setting up Agent Evals and Testing"
  • "Find Companies with Hiring post mentioning Migrating from Heroku to AWS"
  • "Find Companies with Hiring post mentioning Scaling their PLG motion"
  • "Find Companies with Hiring post mentioning Building out their first data engineering team"
  • "Find Companies with Hiring post mentioning Adopting Kubernetes"

Timeframe: Last day to last year. Default: last 3 months.

Deploy: POST /api/v1/signal/deploy/deep-hiring-agent {name, search_query, timeframe, icp_id}


Social Listening Signal (Company)

When: Companies posting about a topic, milestone, or announcement.

What it captures:

  • Decision-maker pain posts (VP/C-level posting about challenges — stronger than press releases)
  • Budget signals (headcount growth, new initiatives, strategic pivots)
  • Vendor evaluation (comparing tools, asking for recommendations, discussing migrations)
  • Conference/event attendance

Prompt format: "Find companies posting about [topic or milestone or announcement]"

Examples:

  • "Find companies posting about their Series A round"
  • "Find companies posting about growing their GTM team"
  • "Find companies posting about attending RSAC conference"
  • "Find companies posting about adding AI to their existing stack"

Timeframe: Last day to last year.

Deploy: POST /api/v1/signal/deploy/social-listening-agent {name, search_query, signal_target: "account", timeframe, icp_id}


Technography Signal

When: Companies using a specific tool, platform, or technology. Inferred from job postings.

Important: Input must be a specific tool name — not general descriptions.

Good inputs: Kubernetes, Snowflake, React, Terraform, dbt, Kafka Bad inputs: "cloud infrastructure" (too general), "data tools" (not specific), "modern stack" (meaningless)

Note on timing: Technographic data alone is a trait (static). It becomes a signal when combined with timing — "just adopted Snowflake" vs "has used Snowflake for 5 years" are very different. The timeframe parameter controls this.

Timeframe: Last day to last year. Default: last 3 months.

Deploy: POST /api/v1/signal/deploy/technography-search-agent {name, technographic_list, technographic_variations, technography_context, timeframe, icp_id}


If ambiguous — e.g., "companies investing in AI" could be hiring or social — ask:

This could be tracked through hiring signals or social signals. Which would be more useful?

1. **Hiring signals** — reveals budget commitment, team building, specific roles
2. **Social signals** — reveals announcements, thought leadership, public positioning
3. **Both** — deploy two signals for broader coverage ⚡ *uses more credits*

5. Confirm before deploying

First, fetch available ICP profiles via GET /api/v1/icp/list. If the user has ICPs, present them:

I'll deploy a **{signal type}** signal:

**Name:** {auto-generated descriptive name}
**Query:** "{formatted prompt}"
**Timeframe:** {default}

**ICP Profile:**
{list available ICPs by name}
→ I'd recommend using **{first/most relevant ICP name}** to qualify results.
   Or "none" to skip ICP filtering.

⚡ *This will use credits from your plan.*

Other options:
- **Repeat daily** — re-run this signal every day for continuous monitoring
- **Audience name** — auto-add results to a named audience
- **Credit limit** — cap spending on this signal

Set any of these, or "deploy" to go with defaults.

If the user types "none" or skips ICP selection:

Auto-create a broad fallback ICP:

{
  "name": "<auto_generated_broad_icp_name>",
  "target_roles": ["Any"],
  "employee_ranges": ["1-10", "11-50", "51-200", "201-500", "501-1000", "1001-5000", "5001-10000", "10001+"],
  "location": ["Any"]
}

Call POST /api/v1/icp/create with the above, then tell the user:

No ICP selected, so I created a broad fallback ICP: **{name}** (ID: {id})

Using this ICP for your signal.

If the user has no ICP profiles:

You don't have an ICP profile yet. A quick one will make results much sharper —
it filters by company size, location, and the roles you're targeting.

1. **Quick setup** (recommended) — takes 30 seconds
2. **Skip** — auto-create a broad fallback ICP and continue

If quick setup → collect ICP name, target roles, company size, and location. Create via POST /api/v1/icp/create.

If skip → auto-create the broad fallback ICP as above.

Then deploy with the selected or created ICP ID.

6. Post-deploy

Signal deployed: **{name}** (ID: {signal_id})

This is now scanning {job posts / social posts / tech stack data}.
Results come in as they're found — just say "check on {signal_name}" anytime.

7. Check back

POST /api/v1/signal/ {signal_id} → present whatever accounts and people have been found so far.

平台分布

Codex

36.93%
按下载量换算24

Claude

25.89%
按下载量换算17

Cursor

17.86%
按下载量换算11

Gemini CLI

9.66%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills