Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

fail-fast(快速失败)

fail-fast 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

fail-fast 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 45,786。

总安装 824周安装 34GitHub Stars 10下载 269核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:fail-fast(快速失败)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft
仓库路径:skills/fail-fast
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill fail-fast
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill fail-fast

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持根据关键词快速定位结果。强调立即失败原则,避免隐藏错误或传播无效状态。适用于编写错误处理代码时,确保异常可见且处理及时。安装方式:通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,建议确认权限范围。

fail-fast 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/fail-fast

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill fail-fast;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

fail-fast 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill fail-fast。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

fail-fast 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

fail-fast 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

fail-fast 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

fail-fast 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 824 次,近一周安装 34 次,下载 269 次,GitHub 10 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

fail-fast 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
fail-fast

快速失败 · 本页

82410需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Fail Fast

Overview

When something goes wrong, fail immediately and visibly.

Don't hide errors with try/catch that returns defaults. Don't let invalid state propagate. Fail at the point of failure, not three layers later with corrupted data.

When to Use

  • Writing error handling code
  • Tempted to catch and return default
  • Adding "defensive" null checks everywhere
  • Wrapping everything in try/catch
  • Returning error objects instead of throwing

The Iron Rule

NEVER hide failures. Fail loud, fail early.

No exceptions:

  • Not for "the app shouldn't crash"
  • Not for "return something rather than throw"
  • Not for "handle errors gracefully"
  • Not for "defensive programming"

Detection: The "Swallow" Smell

If errors disappear silently, you're failing slow:

// ❌ VIOLATION: Hiding failures
async function processPayment(userId: string, amount: number): Promise<PaymentResult> {
  try {
    const user = await getUser(userId);
    if (!user) return { success: false, error: 'User not found' };

    const card = await validateCard(user.cardToken);
    if (!card.valid) return { success: false, error: 'Invalid card' };

    const result = await chargeCard(card, amount);
    if (!result.success) return { success: false, error: 'Payment failed' };

    return { success: true, transactionId: result.id };
  } catch (error) {
    return { success: false, error: 'Internal error' };  // ← SWALLOWED!
  }
}

Problems:

  • Caller doesn't know WHAT failed
  • Stack trace is lost
  • Bugs hide as "internal error"
  • No visibility into actual failures

The Correct Pattern: Fail Fast

Throw at the point of failure. Let errors propagate:

// ✅ CORRECT: Fail fast
async function processPayment(userId: string, amount: number): Promise<Transaction> {
  // Validate early - fail fast on bad input
  if (!userId) throw new ValidationError('userId is required');
  if (amount <= 0) throw new ValidationError('amount must be positive');

  // Let failures propagate - don't swallow
  const user = await getUser(userId);
  if (!user) throw new NotFoundError(`User ${userId} not found`);

  const card = await validateCard(user.cardToken);
  if (!card.valid) throw new PaymentError('Card validation failed', card.errors);

  // This might throw - that's okay! Let it.
  const transaction = await chargeCard(card, amount);

  return transaction;
}

// Caller handles errors appropriately
try {
  const tx = await processPayment(userId, amount);
  res.json({ success: true, transactionId: tx.id });
} catch (error) {
  if (error instanceof ValidationError) {
    res.status(400).json({ error: error.message });
  } else if (error instanceof NotFoundError) {
    res.status(404).json({ error: error.message });
  } else if (error instanceof PaymentError) {
    res.status(402).json({ error: error.message });
  } else {
    // Unknown error - log it, return 500
    logger.error('Payment failed', error);
    res.status(500).json({ error: 'Internal server error' });
  }
}

Why Fail-Slow Is Dangerous

ProblemImpact
Hidden bugsErrors become "it didn't work"
Lost contextStack trace shows catch, not cause
Corrupted stateInvalid data propagates
Debugging nightmareWhere did it actually fail?
Silent data lossOperations fail but app continues

Fail Fast Techniques

1. Validate Early

function createUser(data: unknown): User {
  // Fail IMMEDIATELY on bad input
  if (!data || typeof data !== 'object') {
    throw new ValidationError('Invalid user data');
  }

  const { email, name } = data as Record<string, unknown>;

  if (!email || typeof email !== 'string') {
    throw new ValidationError('Email is required');
  }

  if (!name || typeof name !== 'string') {
    throw new ValidationError('Name is required');
  }

  // Only proceed with valid data
  return new User(email, name);
}

2. Assert Invariants

function withdraw(account: Account, amount: number): void {
  // Assert what must be true
  assert(amount > 0, 'Withdrawal amount must be positive');
  assert(account.balance >= amount, 'Insufficient funds');

  account.balance -= amount;

  // Post-condition check
  assert(account.balance >= 0, 'Balance went negative - invariant violated');
}

3. Use Type System

// ❌ Fail slow: null checks everywhere
function processOrder(order: Order | null): void {
  if (!order) return;  // Silent failure
  // ...
}

// ✅ Fail fast: require valid input
function processOrder(order: Order): void {
  // If order is null, TypeScript catches it
  // If it gets here with null, it will throw - good!
}

Pressure Resistance Protocol

1. "The App Shouldn't Crash"

Pressure: "Users will see errors if we throw"

Response: Users seeing a clear error is better than corrupted data or silent failure.

Action: Throw errors, catch at boundaries (API layer), return appropriate HTTP codes.

2. "Return Something Rather Than Throw"

Pressure: "Returning error objects is more functional"

Response: Error objects are fine IF callers check them. They usually don't.

Action: Throw for unexpected failures. Use Result types only if callers actually handle both cases.

3. "Handle Errors Gracefully"

Pressure: "Graceful = don't throw"

Response: Graceful = appropriate response. Swallowing is not graceful.

Action: Throw, catch at boundary, return meaningful error response.

4. "Defensive Programming"

Pressure: "Defensive code handles all cases"

Response: Defensive = validate early and fail. Not = hide failures.

Action: Validate inputs, assert invariants, throw on violations.

Red Flags - STOP and Reconsider

If you notice ANY of these, refactor:

  • catch (e) {return null;}
  • catch (e) {return {success: false};}
  • if (!x) return; (silent early return)
  • try {} catch {} (empty catch)
  • Returning default values on error
  • "Error: Internal error" (generic catch-all)
  • Logs error but continues execution

All of these mean: Let the error propagate or throw explicitly.

Quick Reference

Fail Slow (Bad)Fail Fast (Good)
catch (e) {return null}catch (e) {throw e}
if (!user) returnif (!user) throw new NotFoundError()
return {success: false}throw new OperationError()
Generic "internal error"Specific error types
Swallow and continuePropagate and handle at boundary

Common Rationalizations (All Invalid)

ExcuseReality
"App shouldn't crash"Clear errors are better than hidden bugs.
"Return instead of throw"Callers ignore return values. Throws can't be ignored.
"Graceful error handling"Swallowing isn't graceful.
"Defensive programming"Defensive = validate and fail, not hide.
"Never let functions crash"Crashing on errors finds bugs.
"User experience"Users prefer "payment failed" over silent failures.

The Bottom Line

Fail fast. Fail loud. Fail at the source.

When errors occur: throw immediately with context. Let errors propagate to boundaries where they can be logged and translated to user-appropriate responses. Never swallow. Never return defaults to hide failure.

平台分布

Claude Code

30.24%
按下载量换算81

Codex

25.32%
按下载量换算68

windsurf

15.94%
按下载量换算43

Antigravity

13.76%
按下载量换算37

trae

7.75%
按下载量换算21

OpenCode

3.13%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills