Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

refactoring(refactoring 工具)

refactoring 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

refactoring 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 44,265。

总安装 927周安装 39GitHub Stars 4下载 324核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:refactoring(refactoring 工具)
来源仓库:https://github.com/eyadsibai/ltk
仓库路径:skills/refactoring
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/eyadsibai/ltk --skill Refactoring
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/eyadsibai/ltk --skill Refactoring

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于安全重构代码结构,包括重命名、迁移与现代化工序。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中优化遗留系统。提供搜索模式、依赖检查与回滚策略。安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/eyadsibai/ltk --skill Refactoring。

每次仅实施一项变更并充分测试。

来源仓库内路径:skills/refactoring

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/eyadsibai/ltk --skill Refactoring;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

refactoring 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/eyadsibai/ltk --skill Refactoring。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

refactoring 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

refactoring 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

refactoring 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

refactoring 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 927 次,近一周安装 39 次,下载 324 次,GitHub 4 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

refactoring 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
refactoring

refactoring 工具 · 本页

9274需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Refactoring

Comprehensive refactoring skill for safe code restructuring, migrations, and modernization.

Core Capabilities

Safe Renaming

Rename identifiers across the codebase:

Rename workflow:

  1. Find all references: Search for all usages
  2. Identify scope: Module-local, package-wide, or public API
  3. Check dependencies: External code that might break
  4. Perform rename: Update all occurrences
  5. Verify: Run tests, check imports

Search patterns:

# Find all references to a function
grep -rn "function_name" --include="*.py"

# Find class usages
grep -rn "ClassName" --include="*.py"

# Find imports
grep -rn "from .* import.*function_name" --include="*.py"

Renaming considerations:

  • Update docstrings mentioning the old name
  • Update comments referencing the name
  • Update configuration files
  • Update tests
  • Consider deprecation period for public APIs

Method Extraction

Extract code into separate functions:

When to extract:

  • Code block is too long (> 20 lines)
  • Code is duplicated elsewhere
  • Code has a clear single purpose
  • Code can be tested independently

Extraction process:

  1. Identify the code block to extract
  2. Determine inputs (parameters)
  3. Determine outputs (return values)
  4. Create new function with clear name
  5. Replace original code with function call
  6. Add tests for new function

Before:

def process_order(order):
    # Validate order (candidate for extraction)
    if not order.items:
        raise ValueError("Empty order")
    if order.total < 0:
        raise ValueError("Invalid total")
    for item in order.items:
        if item.quantity <= 0:
            raise ValueError("Invalid quantity")

    # Process payment
    payment_result = gateway.charge(order.total)
    return payment_result

After:

def validate_order(order: Order) -> None:
    """Validate order has valid items and total."""
    if not order.items:
        raise ValueError("Empty order")
    if order.total < 0:
        raise ValueError("Invalid total")
    for item in order.items:
        if item.quantity <= 0:
            raise ValueError("Invalid quantity")

def process_order(order: Order) -> PaymentResult:
    validate_order(order)
    return gateway.charge(order.total)

Class Splitting

Split large classes into focused components:

When to split:

  • Class has multiple responsibilities
  • Class has > 500 lines
  • Groups of methods work on different data
  • Testing requires excessive mocking

Splitting strategies:

Extract class:

# Before: God class
class OrderManager:
    def create_order(self): ...
    def validate_order(self): ...
    def calculate_tax(self): ...
    def calculate_shipping(self): ...
    def send_confirmation_email(self): ...
    def send_shipping_notification(self): ...

# After: Focused classes
class OrderService:
    def create_order(self): ...
    def validate_order(self): ...

class PricingService:
    def calculate_tax(self): ...
    def calculate_shipping(self): ...

class NotificationService:
    def send_confirmation_email(self): ...
    def send_shipping_notification(self): ...

Complexity Reduction

Reduce cyclomatic complexity:

Replace conditionals with polymorphism:

# Before: Complex switch
def calculate_price(product_type, base_price):
    if product_type == "physical":
        return base_price + shipping_cost
    elif product_type == "digital":
        return base_price
    elif product_type == "subscription":
        return base_price * 12 * 0.9
    else:
        raise ValueError("Unknown type")

# After: Polymorphism
class Product(ABC):
    @abstractmethod
    def calculate_price(self, base_price): ...

class PhysicalProduct(Product):
    def calculate_price(self, base_price):
        return base_price + self.shipping_cost

class DigitalProduct(Product):
    def calculate_price(self, base_price):
        return base_price

class Subscription(Product):
    def calculate_price(self, base_price):
        return base_price * 12 * 0.9

Extract guard clauses:

# Before: Nested conditionals
def process(data):
    if data:
        if data.is_valid:
            if data.is_ready:
                return do_processing(data)
    return None

# After: Guard clauses
def process(data):
    if not data:
        return None
    if not data.is_valid:
        return None
    if not data.is_ready:
        return None
    return do_processing(data)

Code Migration

Migrate code between patterns or versions:

Migration types:

  • Python 2 to 3
  • Sync to async
  • ORM migrations
  • API version upgrades
  • Framework migrations

Migration workflow:

  1. Assess scope: What needs to change
  2. Create compatibility layer: If gradual migration
  3. Migrate in phases: Start with low-risk areas
  4. Maintain tests: Ensure behavior preserved
  5. Remove old code: Clean up after migration

Example: Sync to Async

# Before: Synchronous
def fetch_user(user_id: int) -> User:
    response = requests.get(f"/users/{user_id}")
    return User.from_dict(response.json())

# After: Asynchronous
async def fetch_user(user_id: int) -> User:
    async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session:
        async with session.get(f"/users/{user_id}") as response:
            data = await response.json()
            return User.from_dict(data)

Refactoring Workflow

Safe Refactoring Process

  1. Ensure test coverage: Add tests if missing
  2. Run tests: Verify green baseline
  3. Make small change: One refactoring at a time
  4. Run tests again: Verify still green
  5. Commit: Save progress
  6. Repeat: Continue with next change

Pre-Refactoring Checklist

[ ] Tests exist for affected code
[ ] All tests pass
[ ] Change is well understood
[ ] Impact scope identified
[ ] Rollback plan exists

Post-Refactoring Verification

[ ] All tests still pass
[ ] No new linting errors
[ ] Type checking passes
[ ] Functionality unchanged
[ ] Performance acceptable

Common Refactorings

Remove Dead Code

# Find and remove:
# - Unused imports
# - Unused variables
# - Unreachable code
# - Commented-out code
# - Deprecated functions

# Tools:
# - vulture (Python)
# - autoflake (Python)
# - eslint (JavaScript)

Simplify Expressions

# Before
if condition == True:
    return True
else:
    return False

# After
return condition

Introduce Explaining Variables

# Before
if user.age >= 18 and user.country in ['US', 'CA'] and user.verified:
    allow_purchase()

# After
is_adult = user.age >= 18
is_supported_country = user.country in ['US', 'CA']
is_verified = user.verified
can_purchase = is_adult and is_supported_country and is_verified

if can_purchase:
    allow_purchase()

Safety Guidelines

Breaking Changes

When refactoring public APIs:

  1. Add deprecation warnings first
  2. Maintain backwards compatibility
  3. Document migration path
  4. Remove after deprecation period

Database Migrations

When refactoring data models:

  1. Create migration scripts
  2. Test migrations on copy of data
  3. Plan for rollback
  4. Consider zero-downtime migrations

Performance Impact

After refactoring:

  1. Run performance benchmarks
  2. Compare with baseline
  3. Profile if regression found
  4. Optimize if necessary

Integration

Coordinate with other skills:

  • code-quality skill: Measure improvement
  • test-coverage skill: Ensure test coverage
  • architecture-review skill: Validate structural changes
  • git-workflows skill: Proper commit messages for refactors

平台分布

Codex

40.06%
按下载量换算130

Claude

28.51%
按下载量换算92

Cursor

17.75%
按下载量换算58

Gemini CLI

9.29%
按下载量换算30

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills