Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

exploring-llm-clusters(exploring LLM clusters 搜索)

exploring-llm-clusters 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

exploring-llm-clusters 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 43,484。

总安装 979周安装 40GitHub Stars 31下载 317核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:exploring-llm-clusters(exploring LLM clusters 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/posthog/skills
仓库路径:skills/exploring-llm-clusters
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/skills --skill exploring-llm-clusters
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/skills --skill exploring-llm-clusters

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

exploring-llm-clusters 分析 LLM 调用聚类模式与行为特征。支持按集群 ID 检索 traces 并计算性能指标。适用于 AI 流量监控与异常响应根因定位。需配置 PostHog 数据源与相应权限才能访问聚类作业。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/exploring-llm-clusters

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/skills --skill exploring-llm-clusters;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

exploring-llm-clusters 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/skills --skill exploring-llm-clusters。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

exploring-llm-clusters 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

exploring-llm-clusters 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

exploring-llm-clusters 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

exploring-llm-clusters 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 979 次,近一周安装 40 次,下载 317 次,GitHub 31 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

exploring-llm-clusters 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
exploring-llm-clusters

exploring LLM clusters 搜索 · 本页

97931接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Exploring LLM clusters

Use this skill when investigating LLM analytics clusters — understanding what patterns exist in your AI/LLM traffic, comparing cluster behavior, and drilling into individual clusters.

Tools

ToolPurpose
posthog:llm-analytics-clustering-jobs-listList clustering job configurations for the team
posthog:llm-analytics-clustering-jobs-retrieveGet a specific clustering job by ID
posthog:execute-sqlQuery cluster run events and compute metrics
posthog:query-llm-traces-listFind traces belonging to a cluster
posthog:query-llm-traceInspect a specific trace in detail

How clustering works

PostHog clusters LLM traces (or individual generations) by embedding similarity. A Temporal workflow runs periodically or on-demand, producing cluster events stored as $ai_trace_clusters (trace-level) or $ai_generation_clusters (generation-level).

Each cluster event contains:

  • $ai_clustering_run_id — unique run identifier (format: <team_id>_<level>_<YYYYMMDD>_<HHMMSS>[_<job_id>])
  • $ai_clustering_level — "trace" or "generation"
  • $ai_window_start / $ai_window_end — time window analyzed
  • $ai_total_items_analyzed — number of traces/generations processed
  • $ai_clusters — JSON array of cluster objects
  • $ai_clustering_params — algorithm parameters used

Cluster object shape (inside $ai_clusters)

{
  "cluster_id": 0,
  "size": 42,
  "title": "User authentication flows",
  "description": "Traces involving login, signup, and token refresh operations",
  "traces": {
    "<trace_or_generation_id>": {
      "distance_to_centroid": 0.123,
      "rank": 0,
      "x": -2.34,
      "y": 1.56,
      "timestamp": "2026-03-28T10:00:00Z",
      "trace_id": "abc-123",
      "generation_id": "gen-456"
    }
  },
  "centroid_x": -2.1,
  "centroid_y": 1.4
}
  • cluster_id: -1 is the noise/outlier cluster (items that didn't fit any cluster)
  • Items in traces are keyed by trace ID (trace-level) or generation event UUID (generation-level)
  • rank orders items by proximity to centroid (0 = closest)
  • x, y are 2D coordinates for visualization (UMAP/PCA/t-SNE reduced)

Clustering jobs

Each team can have up to 5 clustering jobs. A job defines:

  • name — human-readable label
  • analysis_level — "trace" or "generation"
  • event_filters — property filters scoping which traces are included
  • enabled — whether the job runs on schedule

Default jobs named "Default - trace" and "Default - generation" are auto-created and disabled when a custom job is created for the same level.

Workflow: explore clusters

Step 1 — List recent clustering runs

posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_run_id') as run_id,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_level') as level,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_window_start') as window_start,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_window_end') as window_end,
    JSONExtractInt(properties, '$ai_total_items_analyzed') as total_items,
    timestamp
FROM events
WHERE event IN ('$ai_trace_clusters', '$ai_generation_clusters')
    AND timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 7 DAY
ORDER BY timestamp DESC
LIMIT 10

Step 2 — Get clusters from a specific run

posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_run_id') as run_id,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_level') as level,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_job_id') as job_id,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_job_name') as job_name,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_window_start') as window_start,
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_window_end') as window_end,
    JSONExtractInt(properties, '$ai_total_items_analyzed') as total_items,
    JSONExtractRaw(properties, '$ai_clusters') as clusters,
    JSONExtractRaw(properties, '$ai_clustering_params') as params
FROM events
WHERE event IN ('$ai_trace_clusters', '$ai_generation_clusters')
    AND JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_clustering_run_id') = '<run_id>'
LIMIT 1

The clusters field is a JSON array. Parse it to see cluster titles, sizes, and descriptions.

Important: The clusters JSON can be very large (thousands of trace IDs with coordinates). When the result is too large for inline display, it auto-persists to a file. Use print_clusters.py from scripts/ to get a readable summary.

Step 3 — Compute metrics for clusters

For trace-level clusters, compute cost/latency/token metrics:

posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_trace_id') as trace_id,
    sum(toFloat(properties.$ai_total_cost_usd)) as total_cost,
    max(toFloat(properties.$ai_latency)) as latency,
    sum(toInt(properties.$ai_input_tokens)) as input_tokens,
    sum(toInt(properties.$ai_output_tokens)) as output_tokens,
    countIf(properties.$ai_is_error = 'true') as error_count
FROM events
WHERE event IN ('$ai_generation', '$ai_embedding', '$ai_span')
    AND timestamp >= parseDateTimeBestEffort('<window_start>')
    AND timestamp <= parseDateTimeBestEffort('<window_end>')
    AND JSONExtractString(properties, '$ai_trace_id') IN ('<trace_id_1>', '<trace_id_2>', ...)
GROUP BY trace_id

For generation-level clusters, match by event UUID:

posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    toString(uuid) as generation_id,
    toFloat(properties.$ai_total_cost_usd) as cost,
    toFloat(properties.$ai_latency) as latency,
    toInt(properties.$ai_input_tokens) as input_tokens,
    toInt(properties.$ai_output_tokens) as output_tokens,
    if(properties.$ai_is_error = 'true', 1, 0) as is_error
FROM events
WHERE event = '$ai_generation'
    AND timestamp >= parseDateTimeBestEffort('<window_start>')
    AND timestamp <= parseDateTimeBestEffort('<window_end>')
    AND toString(uuid) IN ('<gen_uuid_1>', '<gen_uuid_2>', ...)

Step 4 — Drill into specific traces

Once you've identified interesting clusters, use the trace tools to inspect individual traces:

posthog:query-llm-trace
{
  "traceId": "<trace_id_from_cluster>",
  "dateRange": {"date_from": "<window_start>", "date_to": "<window_end>"}
}

Investigation patterns

"What kinds of LLM usage do we have?"

  1. List recent clustering runs (Step 1)
  2. Load the latest run's clusters (Step 2)
  3. Review cluster titles and descriptions — each represents a distinct usage pattern
  4. Compare cluster sizes to understand traffic distribution

"Which cluster is most expensive / slowest?"

  1. Load clusters from a run (Step 2)
  2. Extract trace IDs from each cluster
  3. Compute metrics per cluster (Step 3)
  4. Aggregate: avg(cost), avg(latency), sum(cost) per cluster
  5. Compare across clusters

"What's in this cluster?"

  1. Load the cluster's traces (from the traces field)
  2. Sort by rank (closest to centroid = most representative)
  3. Inspect the top 3-5 traces via query-llm-trace to understand the pattern
  4. Check the cluster title and description for the AI-generated summary

"Are there error-heavy clusters?"

  1. Compute metrics (Step 3) with error_count
  2. Calculate error rate per cluster: items_with_errors / total_items
  3. Focus on clusters with high error rates
  4. Drill into errored traces to find root causes

"How do clusters compare across runs?"

  1. List multiple runs (Step 1)
  2. Load clusters from each run
  3. Compare cluster titles — similar titles across runs indicate stable patterns
  4. Track cluster size changes to detect shifts in traffic patterns

Constructing UI links

  • Clusters overview: https://app.posthog.com/llm-analytics/clusters
  • Specific run: https://app.posthog.com/llm-analytics/clusters/<url_encoded_run_id>
  • Cluster detail: https://app.posthog.com/llm-analytics/clusters/<url_encoded_run_id>/<cluster_id>

Always surface these links so the user can verify visually in the PostHog UI.

Tips

  • Always set a time range in SQL queries — cluster events without time bounds are slow
  • Start with run listing to orient, then drill into specific clusters
  • Cluster titles and descriptions are AI-generated summaries — verify by inspecting traces
  • The noise cluster (cluster_id: -1) contains outliers that didn't fit any pattern
  • Use llm-analytics-clustering-jobs-list to understand what clustering configs are active
  • Trace IDs in clusters can be used directly with query-llm-trace for deep inspection
  • For large clusters, inspect the top-ranked traces (closest to centroid) for representative examples

平台分布

Codex

35.41%
按下载量换算112

Claude

32.41%
按下载量换算103

Cursor

19.36%
按下载量换算61

Gemini CLI

10.39%
按下载量换算33

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills