Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

experiment-queue实验队列

Agent Skill

experiment-queue 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

569

周安装

23

GitHub Stars

7,832

下载量

178
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:experiment-queue(实验队列)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
仓库路径:skills/experiment-queue
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill experiment-queue
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill experiment-queue

简介

管理大规模 ML 实验批处理,支持 GPU 资源调度与状态追踪。

  • 具备 OOM 重试、波次切换与混合种子网格管理能力。
  • 适合 SSH 远程服务器上的复杂实验编排。experiment-queue 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 使用前需确保目标环境具备相应计算资源与网络访问权限。
  • 适用于高性能计算场景下的 Agent 协作。

SKILL.md

Experiment Queue

Orchestrate large batches of ML experiments on SSH remote GPU servers with proper state tracking, OOM retry, stale cleanup, and wave transitions.

When to Use This Skill

Use when /run-experiment is insufficient:

  • ≥10 jobs that need batching across GPUs
  • Multi-seed sweeps (e.g., 21 seeds × 12 cells)
  • Wave transitions (run wave 1, wait, run wave 2, wait, run wave 3...)
  • Teacher+student chains (train teacher then distill; auto-trigger student after teacher done)
  • OOM-prone configs where you need to retry with different GPU or wait
  • Mixed seed grids where failed cells need re-running

Do NOT use for:

  • Single ad-hoc experiment (use /run-experiment)
  • Modal/Vast.ai deployments (those have their own orchestration)
  • Experiments that need manual inspection between runs

Why This Exists

Based on session audit (2026-04-16), the major wall-clock sinks in multi-seed grid experiments are:

  1. Stale screens — python finishes, wandb uploads, screen hangs, next wave blocked
  2. OOM on shared GPU — previous job's memory not yet released
  3. Wave race — new wave launches before previous wave fully settles
  4. Missing checkpoints — student launches before teacher saved
  5. Parser duplication — rewriting multi-seed analysis python every batch

All of these are pure engineering friction that can be orchestrated.

Core Concepts

Job Manifest

A manifest lists jobs with explicit state:

project: dllm_distill
cwd: /home/rfyang/rfyang_code/dllm_experiments_torch
conda: dllm
# Optional: override conda hook path if conda is not at a standard location.
# Can be a bare path (wrapped automatically) or a full `eval "$(... shell.bash hook)"` string.
# Falls back to auto-detect of ~/anaconda3, ~/miniconda3, /opt/anaconda3, etc.,
# or the ARIS_CONDA_HOOK environment variable.
# conda_hook: /custom/path/to/conda
ssh: SJTUServer5
default_cmd: >
  python run_pc_distill_exp.py --backbone softmax --lam 0.5
  --K 500 --L 96 --W 16 --n_steps 30000 --batch_size 128 --lr 1e-4

preconditions:
  - type: checkpoint_exists
    path: checkpoints/transformer/pcc_softmax_L96_K500_N{N}_wikitext103.pt

gpus: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
max_parallel: 8
gpu_free_threshold_mib: 500  # optional, default 500; raise for shared servers, lower for tight packing
oom_retry:
  delay: 120
  max_attempts: 3

jobs:
  - id: s200_N64_n50K
    args: {seed: 200, n_hidden: 64, n_train_subset: 50000, subset_seed: 2024}
  - id: s200_N128_n50K
    args: {seed: 200, n_hidden: 128, n_train_subset: 50000, subset_seed: 2024}
  # ... 14 more

Job State Machine

pending → running → completed
                 ↘ failed_oom → pending (after delay) [retry up to N]
                 ↘ failed_other → stuck (needs manual inspection)
stale_screen_detected → cleaned → pending

Wave Orchestration

A "wave" is a batch of jobs that fit available GPUs. Next wave only starts when:

  1. All current-wave python processes have exited
  2. No stale screens remain for current-wave tags
  3. GPU memory has dropped below threshold (≤500 MiB)
  4. Precondition checks pass for next-wave jobs

Workflow

Step 1: Parse Manifest / Build from Grid

Input can be:

  • YAML manifest (explicit job list, recommended for complex cases)
  • Grid spec (Cartesian product of param values, e.g., N=[64,128,256] × n=[50K,150K,500K,652K])
  • Natural language description (Claude parses into manifest)

Save the built manifest to <project>/experiment_queue/<timestamp>/manifest.json for reproducibility.

Step 2: Pre-flight

  • Check SSH connection works
  • Check conda env exists on remote
  • Check cwd exists on remote
  • Check all preconditions (checkpoints, input files)
  • Check GPU availability (at least max_parallel free GPUs)

If any precondition fails, show user which jobs are blocked and why.

Step 3: Launch Scheduler

Run tools/queue_manager.py (bundled with this skill) as a detached nohup process on the SSH host:

ssh <server> 'nohup python3 ~/.aris_queue/queue_manager.py \
  --manifest /tmp/manifest.json \
  --state /tmp/queue_state.json \
  --log /tmp/queue.log \
  > /tmp/queue_mgr.log 2>&1 &'

The scheduler:

  • Reads manifest
  • Loops: for each pending job, assign to free GPU, launch via screen
  • Polls job status (every 60s)
  • Detects stale screens (python exited but screen detached → kill)
  • Detects OOM (CUDA OOM in log → mark failed_oom → retry after delay)
  • Detects completion (expected output JSON/file exists) → mark completed
  • Launches next wave when current wave settles
  • Writes state to queue_state.json continuously

Step 4: Monitoring

User can check state anytime:

ssh <server> cat /tmp/queue_state.json | jq '.jobs | group_by(.status) | map({(.[0].status): length}) | add'

Or invoke /monitor-experiment which reads the state file.

Step 5: Post-completion

When all jobs in manifest.json are completed or stuck:

  • Scheduler exits cleanly
  • Write final summary to <project>/experiment_queue/<timestamp>/summary.md
  • Invoke /analyze-results if analyze_on_complete: true

Grid Spec Syntax

Instead of writing 24 job entries manually:

grid:
  N: [64, 128, 256]
  n: [50000, 150000, 500000, 652000]
  seed: [42, 200, 201]
template:
  id: "s${seed}_N${N}_n${n}"
  args: {seed: ${seed}, n_hidden: ${N}, n_train_subset: ${n}}

Expands to 36 jobs automatically.

Wave Chaining

For sequential phases (teacher → student):

phases:
  - name: train_teachers
    grid:
      N: [384, 512]
    template:
      cmd: python run_pc_exp.py --direction c --backbone softmax --n_hidden ${N} ...
      output_check: checkpoints/transformer/pcc_softmax_L96_K500_N${N}_wikitext103.pt

  - name: distill_students
    depends_on: train_teachers
    grid:
      N: [384, 512]
      seed: [42, 200, 201]
    template:
      cmd: python run_pc_distill_exp.py --n_hidden ${N} --seed ${seed} ...
      output_check: figures/pcdistill_sw_N${N}_*_seed${seed}.json

Scheduler enforces depends_on: distill_students jobs stay pending until all train_teachers jobs are completed.

OOM Handling

Detect OOM from stdout:

torch\.OutOfMemoryError: CUDA out of memory

On detection:

  1. Mark job failed_oom
  2. Kill screen
  3. Wait oom_retry.delay seconds
  4. Check if current GPU is free; if not, try another free GPU
  5. Requeue as pending
  6. Max oom_retry.max_attempts before marking stuck

Stale Screen Detection

Every 60s, for each running screen:

  1. Check screen exists (screen -ls)
  2. Check python PID still running (ps -p)
  3. If screen exists but python exited:

- If expected output file exists → mark completed, kill stale screen - If no output file → mark failed_other, kill screen

Resume-on-restart

If scheduler crashes / is killed:

  1. Read queue_state.json
  2. For each running job: check screen; if still alive, keep; if not, re-evaluate state
  3. For each pending: continue normally
  4. Idempotent: safe to restart scheduler without losing state

Output: Summary Report

# Experiment Queue Summary

**Project**: dllm_distill
**Started**: 2026-04-16 11:36:29
**Completed**: 2026-04-16 18:02:14
**Total wall-clock**: 6h 25m
**Jobs**: 40 completed, 2 OOM-retried then completed, 0 stuck

## Phases
| Phase | Jobs | Success | OOM retries | Duration |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| train_teachers | 2 | 2 | 0 | 58m |
| distill_students | 24 | 24 | 2 | 4h 02m |
| multi_seed_validation | 16 | 16 | 0 | 1h 25m |

## Results Files
- 42 JSON files in `figures/pcdistill_sw_*.json`

## Next Steps
- Run `/analyze-results` on output JSONs
- Figures auto-regen via `artifact-sync` (if configured)

Comparison with /run-experiment

Feature/run-experimentexperiment-queue
Single-shot experiment✅ (overkill)
Multi-GPU parallelBasicProper scheduling
Wave transitionsManualAutomatic
OOM retryManualAutomatic
Stale screen cleanupManualAutomatic
Teacher→student chainManualBuilt-in
State persistenceNoYes (JSON)
Resume on crashNoYes
Grid expansionManualDeclarative

Rule: Use /run-experiment for ≤5 jobs. Use experiment-queue for ≥10 jobs or anything with phases.

Key Rules

  • Never overlap screens on the same GPU — always wait for memory.used < 500 MiB before launching new job
  • Always write state to disk — every state change flushed to queue_state.json
  • Idempotent scheduler — safe to restart; picks up from state file
  • Expected-output-based completion — don't trust screen state alone; verify output file exists
  • Bounded retry — max N OOM retries, then mark stuck and alert
  • Dependencies enforced at launch — never launch student before teacher checkpoint exists

Known Failure Modes

  • SSH connection drop during scheduling: scheduler keeps running on remote (nohup), just reconnect and check
  • GPU reservation by another user: scheduler waits, does not pre-empt
  • Disk full on remote: scheduler detects write failure, marks all pending stuck, alerts

Example Session

User: "跑 T5+T6 全部实验:T5 = N∈{80,192} × n 4 values × seed {200,201}, T6 = N∈{384,512} × n 4 values × seed {42,200,201}; T6 需要先 train teacher"

Claude invokes /experiment-queue:

  1. Parses description into 2-phase manifest
  2. Phase 1: T5 (16 jobs, no teacher dependency) + T6 teacher training (2 jobs)
  3. Phase 2: T6 distillation (24 jobs, depends on teachers)
  4. Deploys scheduler via nohup
  5. Reports: "Scheduler PID 93534, total 42 jobs, estimated 6-7h wall-clock"

Then user can check anytime or wait for summary report.

See Also

  • /run-experiment — single experiment deployment
  • /monitor-experiment — check progress (now reads from queue_state.json)
  • /analyze-results — post-hoc analysis
  • tools/queue_manager.py (bundled) — the scheduler implementation
  • tools/build_manifest.py (bundled) — build manifest from grid spec

Rationale / Source

Identified via 2026-04-16 post-mortem analysis (Codex GPT-5.4 xhigh) of a 1.5-day multi-seed paper experiment session:

  • Wall-clock sink: stale screens, OOM, wave transitions, manual parser
  • Token sink: re-writing orchestration code each session
  • Cognitive sink: tracking which cells succeeded, which failed, which to retry

This skill targets the wall-clock sink specifically; see artifact-sync and paper-fix-auto-apply for the other two.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.75%
按下载量换算69

Claude

29.91%
按下载量换算53

Cursor

19.72%
按下载量换算35

Gemini CLI

8.77%
按下载量换算16

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills