Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

exhaustiveness-checking(详尽性检查)

exhaustiveness-checking 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

exhaustiveness-checking 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 8,294。

总安装 297周安装 12GitHub Stars 2下载 93核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:exhaustiveness-checking(详尽性检查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/marius-townhouse/effective-typescript-skills
仓库路径:skills/exhaustiveness-checking
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/marius-townhouse/effective-typescript-skills --skill exhaustiveness-checking
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/marius-townhouse/effective-typescript-skills --skill exhaustiveness-checking

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

详尽性检查利用 never 类型确保联合类型的所有分支都被处理,提供编译时完整性保障。适用于标记联合类型的 switch 语句、新增变体时的自动用例更新和遗漏 case 的错误捕获。必须为所有联合类型 switch 添加详尽性检查,作为防止遗漏的硬性规则。

安装前应核实项目 TypeScript 版本及 union 类型定义,避免误报或兼容性问题。exhaustiveness-checking 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/exhaustiveness-checking

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/marius-townhouse/effective-typescript-skills -…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

exhaustiveness-checking 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/marius-townhouse/effective-typescript-skills --skill exh…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

exhaustiveness-checking 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

exhaustiveness-checking 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

exhaustiveness-checking 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

exhaustiveness-checking 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 297 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 93 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

exhaustiveness-checking 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
exhaustiveness-checking

详尽性检查 · 本页

2972只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Use Never Types for Exhaustiveness Checking

Overview

Use never to ensure all cases in a union are handled.

When you add a new variant to a union type, TypeScript can automatically flag every switch statement that needs updating. This catches errors of omission at compile time.

When to Use This Skill

  • Handling all cases of a tagged union
  • Adding new variants to discriminated unions
  • Writing switch statements that must be complete
  • Want compile-time errors when cases are missed

The Iron Rule

ALWAYS add exhaustiveness checking to switch statements on union types.

Remember:

  • After exhaustive cases, the type is never
  • Nothing is assignable to never except never
  • Missing cases turn into type errors
  • This catches errors of omission

Detection: The Missing Case Problem

Without exhaustiveness checking, new union variants are silently ignored:

type Shape = Box | Circle | Line;

function drawShape(shape: Shape, ctx: CanvasRenderingContext2D) {
  switch (shape.type) {
    case 'box':
      ctx.rect(...shape.topLeft, ...shape.size);
      break;
    case 'circle':
      ctx.arc(...shape.center, shape.radius, 0, 2 * Math.PI);
      break;
    // Forgot 'line' - NO ERROR! Lines silently don't draw.
  }
}

The Exhaustiveness Pattern

The assertUnreachable Helper

function assertUnreachable(value: never): never {
  throw new Error(`Unexpected value: ${value}`);
}

Using It in Switch Statements

function drawShape(shape: Shape, ctx: CanvasRenderingContext2D) {
  switch (shape.type) {
    case 'box':
      ctx.rect(...shape.topLeft, ...shape.size);
      break;
    case 'circle':
      ctx.arc(...shape.center, shape.radius, 0, 2 * Math.PI);
      break;
    default:
      assertUnreachable(shape);
      // If we missed a case, shape won't be 'never' and we get a type error!
  }
}

When You Add a New Type

// Add a new shape type
interface Line {
  type: 'line';
  start: Coord;
  end: Coord;
}
type Shape = Box | Circle | Line;  // Added Line

// Now drawShape shows an error:
function drawShape(shape: Shape, ctx: CanvasRenderingContext2D) {
  switch (shape.type) {
    case 'box': /* ... */ break;
    case 'circle': /* ... */ break;
    default:
      assertUnreachable(shape);
      //                ~~~~~
      // Argument of type 'Line' is not assignable to parameter of type 'never'
  }
}

Fix by handling the new case:

function drawShape(shape: Shape, ctx: CanvasRenderingContext2D) {
  switch (shape.type) {
    case 'box':
      ctx.rect(...shape.topLeft, ...shape.size);
      break;
    case 'circle':
      ctx.arc(...shape.center, shape.radius, 0, 2 * Math.PI);
      break;
    case 'line':
      ctx.moveTo(...shape.start);
      ctx.lineTo(...shape.end);
      break;
    default:
      assertUnreachable(shape);  // Now shape is 'never', no error!
  }
}

How It Works

After handling all cases, the remaining type is never:

function processShape(shape: Shape) {
  switch (shape.type) {
    case 'box': break;
    case 'circle': break;
    case 'line': break;
    default:
      shape
      // ^? (parameter) shape: never
  }
}

If you miss a case, the type isn't never:

function processShape(shape: Shape) {
  switch (shape.type) {
    case 'box': break;
    case 'circle': break;
    // (forgot 'line')
    default:
      shape
      // ^? (parameter) shape: Line
  }
}

Since Line is not assignable to never, you get a type error.

Alternative: Return Type Enforcement

You can also use return types to enforce exhaustiveness:

function getShapeName(shape: Shape): string {
  switch (shape.type) {
    case 'box':
      return 'Box';
    case 'circle':
      return 'Circle';
    // Missing 'line' - TypeScript error!
    // Function lacks ending return statement and return type does not include 'undefined'
  }
}

This only works if:

  • The function has an explicit return type
  • All cases must return
  • strictNullChecks is enabled

Complete Example

// Types
type Coord = [x: number, y: number];

interface Box {
  type: 'box';
  topLeft: Coord;
  size: Coord;
}

interface Circle {
  type: 'circle';
  center: Coord;
  radius: number;
}

interface Line {
  type: 'line';
  start: Coord;
  end: Coord;
}

type Shape = Box | Circle | Line;

// Helper
function assertUnreachable(value: never): never {
  throw new Error(`Unexpected value: ${value}`);
}

// Usage - guaranteed to handle all shapes
function getArea(shape: Shape): number {
  switch (shape.type) {
    case 'box':
      return shape.size[0] * shape.size[1];
    case 'circle':
      return Math.PI * shape.radius ** 2;
    case 'line':
      return 0;  // Lines have no area
    default:
      return assertUnreachable(shape);
  }
}

When NOT to Use

Sometimes you intentionally want to ignore some cases:

function handleCommonShapes(shape: Shape) {
  switch (shape.type) {
    case 'box':
    case 'circle':
      // Handle common cases
      break;
    // Intentionally ignore 'line' - don't add assertUnreachable here
  }
}

Pressure Resistance Protocol

1. "The Default Case Handles It"

Pressure: "We have a default case, so it's fine"

Response: A silent default hides bugs when new variants are added.

Action: Use assertUnreachable in default to make missing cases explicit.

2. "We'll Remember to Update"

Pressure: "We know where to add new cases"

Response: Human memory fails. Compiler checking doesn't.

Action: Let TypeScript track it for you.

Red Flags - STOP and Reconsider

  • Switch on union type without exhaustiveness check
  • Default cases that silently do nothing
  • Adding variants to unions without checking all usages
  • "TODO: handle new case" comments

Common Rationalizations (All Invalid)

ExcuseReality
"We'll remember to update"You won't, or your teammates won't
"Default handles unknowns"It hides bugs from new variants
"It's just one switch"Union types often have many switches

Quick Reference

// The pattern
function assertUnreachable(value: never): never {
  throw new Error(`Unexpected value: ${value}`);
}

// In switch statements
switch (union.type) {
  case 'a': /* ... */ break;
  case 'b': /* ... */ break;
  default:
    assertUnreachable(union);  // Type error if cases missing
}

The Bottom Line

Turn missing cases into compile-time errors with never.

When handling tagged unions, add assertUnreachable(value) to your default case. This ensures that adding new variants to the union produces type errors everywhere the union is handled, catching errors of omission at compile time rather than runtime.

Reference

Based on "Effective TypeScript" by Dan Vanderkam, Item 59: Use Never Types to Perform Exhaustiveness Checking.

平台分布

Codex

37.32%
按下载量换算35

Claude

28.89%
按下载量换算27

Cursor

19.28%
按下载量换算18

Gemini CLI

9.21%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills