Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

exception-hierarchies(异常层次结构)

exception-hierarchies 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

exception-hierarchies 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 51,536。

总安装 582周安装 25GitHub Stars 10下载 204核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:exception-hierarchies(异常层次结构)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft
仓库路径:skills/exception-hierarchies
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill exception-hierarchies
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill exception-hierarchies

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

设计精准异常层次结构以提升错误处理能力。避免随机异常类导致 catch-all 或遗漏问题。支持自定义异常类与第三方库错误包装。exception-hierarchies 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适用于重构分散的 try/catch 代码块。

严格禁止在非应用边界捕获 Exception 基类。

来源仓库内路径:skills/exception-hierarchies

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill exception-hiera…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

exception-hierarchies 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/yanko-belov/code-craft --skill exception-hierarchies。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

exception-hierarchies 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

exception-hierarchies 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

exception-hierarchies 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

exception-hierarchies 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 582 次,近一周安装 25 次,下载 204 次,GitHub 10 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

exception-hierarchies 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
exception-hierarchies

异常层次结构 · 本页

58210需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Exception Hierarchies

Overview

Design exception hierarchies that enable precise catching and meaningful handling.

Random exception classes lead to catch-all blocks or missed errors. A well-designed hierarchy lets callers catch at the right abstraction level.

When to Use

  • Creating custom exception classes
  • Designing error handling strategy
  • Refactoring scattered try/catch blocks
  • Wrapping third-party library errors
  • Debugging "unexpected error" catch-alls

The Iron Rule

NEVER catch base Exception except at application boundaries.

No exceptions:

  • Not for "I'll handle all cases"
  • Not for "it's simpler"
  • Not for "I don't know what to expect"
  • Not for "the library throws too many types"

Specific exceptions enable specific handling. Generic catches hide bugs.

The Three-Layer Hierarchy

Design exceptions in three layers:

                    ApplicationError (base)
                           │
          ┌────────────────┼────────────────┐
          │                │                │
    DomainError      InfrastructureError    ExternalError
          │                │                │
    ┌─────┴─────┐    ┌─────┴─────┐    ┌─────┴─────┐
    │           │    │           │    │           │
ValidationError  │  DatabaseError │   APIError   │
BusinessRuleError│  CacheError    │   TimeoutError│
NotFoundError    │  FileIOError   │   RateLimitError

Layer 1: Root Exception

// All application errors inherit from this
class ApplicationError extends Error {
  constructor(
    message: string,
    public readonly code: string,
    public readonly context?: Record<string, unknown>
  ) {
    super(message);
    this.name = this.constructor.name;
    Error.captureStackTrace(this, this.constructor);
  }

  toJSON() {
    return {
      name: this.name,
      message: this.message,
      code: this.code,
      context: this.context,
    };
  }
}

Layer 2: Category Exceptions

// Domain logic errors
class DomainError extends ApplicationError {
  constructor(message: string, code: string, context?: Record<string, unknown>) {
    super(message, `DOMAIN.${code}`, context);
  }
}

// Infrastructure failures
class InfrastructureError extends ApplicationError {
  constructor(message: string, code: string, context?: Record<string, unknown>) {
    super(message, `INFRA.${code}`, context);
  }
}

// External service failures
class ExternalError extends ApplicationError {
  constructor(
    message: string,
    code: string,
    public readonly service: string,
    context?: Record<string, unknown>
  ) {
    super(message, `EXTERNAL.${code}`, { ...context, service });
  }
}

Layer 3: Specific Exceptions

// Domain exceptions
class ValidationError extends DomainError {
  constructor(public readonly fields: Record<string, string>) {
    super('Validation failed', 'VALIDATION', { fields });
  }
}

class BusinessRuleError extends DomainError {
  constructor(rule: string, message: string) {
    super(message, 'BUSINESS_RULE', { rule });
  }
}

class NotFoundError extends DomainError {
  constructor(entity: string, id: string) {
    super(`${entity} not found: ${id}`, 'NOT_FOUND', { entity, id });
  }
}

// Infrastructure exceptions
class DatabaseError extends InfrastructureError {
  constructor(operation: string, cause?: Error) {
    super(`Database ${operation} failed`, 'DATABASE', {
      operation,
      cause: cause?.message
    });
  }
}

// External service exceptions
class PaymentGatewayError extends ExternalError {
  constructor(message: string, public readonly gatewayCode: string) {
    super(message, 'PAYMENT', 'PaymentGateway', { gatewayCode });
  }
}

Correct Catching Pattern

Catch at the right abstraction level:

// ✅ CORRECT: Specific catching
async function createOrder(data: OrderData): Promise<Order> {
  try {
    return await orderService.create(data);
  } catch (error) {
    // Catch what you can handle specifically
    if (error instanceof ValidationError) {
      // Can show field-specific errors to user
      throw error; // Re-throw for controller to format response
    }
    if (error instanceof BusinessRuleError) {
      // Log business rule violation, maybe alert
      logger.warn('Business rule prevented order', { rule: error.context?.rule });
      throw error;
    }
    if (error instanceof PaymentGatewayError) {
      // Retry logic, fallback gateway, etc.
      return await retryWithFallbackGateway(data);
    }
    // Unknown error - don't swallow, let it propagate
    throw error;
  }
}

// ❌ WRONG: Catch-all that hides errors
async function createOrder(data: OrderData): Promise<Order | null> {
  try {
    return await orderService.create(data);
  } catch (error) {
    logger.error('Order failed', error);  // Lost specificity
    return null;  // Caller doesn't know why
  }
}

Boundary Handling

Only catch broadly at application boundaries:

// ✅ CORRECT: HTTP boundary translates to responses
app.use((error: Error, req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => {
  // This is the ONLY place catch-all is acceptable

  if (error instanceof ValidationError) {
    return res.status(400).json({
      error: 'Validation failed',
      fields: error.fields,
    });
  }

  if (error instanceof NotFoundError) {
    return res.status(404).json({
      error: error.message,
    });
  }

  if (error instanceof BusinessRuleError) {
    return res.status(422).json({
      error: error.message,
      code: error.code,
    });
  }

  if (error instanceof ExternalError) {
    // Log full context, return generic message
    logger.error('External service error', error.toJSON());
    return res.status(502).json({
      error: 'External service unavailable',
      retryAfter: 30,
    });
  }

  if (error instanceof InfrastructureError) {
    logger.error('Infrastructure error', error.toJSON());
    return res.status(503).json({
      error: 'Service temporarily unavailable',
    });
  }

  // Truly unexpected - log everything
  logger.error('Unhandled error', {
    error: error.message,
    stack: error.stack,
    request: { method: req.method, path: req.path }
  });
  return res.status(500).json({
    error: 'Internal server error',
  });
});

Wrapping Third-Party Errors

Never let raw library errors leak:

// ✅ CORRECT: Wrap at the adapter boundary
class PostgresUserRepository implements UserRepository {
  async findById(id: string): Promise<User> {
    try {
      const result = await this.client.query(
        'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1',
        [id]
      );
      if (!result.rows[0]) {
        throw new NotFoundError('User', id);
      }
      return this.mapToUser(result.rows[0]);
    } catch (error) {
      if (error instanceof NotFoundError) throw error;

      // Wrap postgres-specific error
      if (error instanceof pg.DatabaseError) {
        throw new DatabaseError('query', error);
      }
      throw error;
    }
  }
}

// ❌ WRONG: Let pg.DatabaseError leak to controllers
// ❌ WRONG: Catch Error and throw generic Error

Pressure Resistance Protocol

1. "Just Catch Exception, It's Simpler"

Pressure: "Don't overcomplicate with hierarchy"

Response: Catching Exception hides bugs and prevents specific handling. You'll debug for hours when a specific catch would have told you immediately.

Action: Create hierarchy. Catch specifically. Worth the upfront time.

2. "The Library Throws 10 Different Exceptions"

Pressure: "I can't anticipate all of them"

Response: Wrap at the boundary. Your code shouldn't know about library internals.

Action: Create adapter that catches library exceptions, throws your domain exceptions.

3. "I Don't Know What Errors to Expect"

Pressure: "Let me catch all and log"

Response: Logging isn't handling. If you don't know what to expect, let it propagate. The boundary handler will catch it.

Action: Don't catch what you can't handle specifically. Add catches as you learn.

4. "Error Codes Are Enough"

Pressure: "We use error codes, not exception types"

Response: Codes require string comparison, are easy to typo, and don't provide type safety.

Action: Exception types for control flow. Codes for serialization/logging.

Red Flags - STOP and Reconsider

If you notice ANY of these, refactor:

  • catch (Exception e) in non-boundary code
  • catch (Error e) {throw new Error(e.message)} (losing type)
  • Same exception type for different failure modes
  • Library-specific exceptions in business logic
  • No base exception for the application
  • Catch blocks that log and continue
  • instanceof checks for exception codes, not types

All of these mean: Redesign the exception hierarchy.

Exception Design Checklist

RequirementCheck
All app errors inherit from base class☐
Category exceptions for domain/infra/external☐
Specific exceptions carry relevant context☐
Third-party errors wrapped at boundary☐
HTTP codes mapped in error middleware☐
No raw Exception catches outside middleware☐
Exceptions are immutable (readonly fields)☐
toJSON() for structured logging☐

Common Rationalizations (All Invalid)

ExcuseReality
"Hierarchy is over-engineering"Hierarchy enables handling. Catch-all hides bugs.
"I'll just catch Exception"You'll lose why it failed and how to handle it.
"Error codes work fine"Types are compile-checked. Codes are strings.
"Library errors are fine to throw"Library coupling spreads. Wrap at boundaries.
"I'll add types when I need them"By then catch-all is everywhere. Start with types.
"Logging in catch is handling"Logging isn't handling. Bubble or handle specifically.

Quick Reference

ScenarioAction
New projectCreate ApplicationError base + category classes
Using third-party libraryWrap in adapter, throw your exceptions
Don't know what to catchDon't catch - let boundary handle it
Multiple failure modesOne exception class per mode
Catch block just logsRemove catch, let it propagate
Need error detailsAdd context to exception constructor

The Bottom Line

Design exception hierarchies that enable precise catching.

Catch specifically what you can handle. Let everything else propagate to boundaries. Wrap third-party exceptions at adapters. Never catch base Exception in business logic.

平台分布

Codex

24.91%
按下载量换算51

Claude Code

23.83%
按下载量换算49

windsurf

17.64%
按下载量换算36

Antigravity

12.09%
按下载量换算25

trae

7.71%
按下载量换算16

OpenCode

3.37%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills