Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

eventmodeling-storyboarding-events(事件建模故事板事件)

eventmodeling-storyboarding-events 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

eventmodeling-storyboarding-events 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 56,028。

总安装 465周安装 19GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 149核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:eventmodeling-storyboarding-events(事件建模故事板事件)
来源仓库:https://github.com/trogonstack/agentskills
仓库路径:skills/eventmodeling-storyboarding-events
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/trogonstack/agentskills --skill eventmodeling-storyboarding-events
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/trogonstack/agentskills --skill eventmodeling-storyboarding-events

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

eventmodeling-storyboarding-events 结合 UI 现状设计事件驱动的用户界面原型。突出关键数据字段与操作流程,避免过度设计。复用已有设计系统组件,保持视觉一致性。适用于前端与后端协同开发,提前暴露交互矛盾。建议产出可点击 mockup,供利益相关者确认后再编码。

来源仓库内路径:skills/eventmodeling-storyboarding-events

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/trogonstack/agentskills --skill eventmodeling-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

eventmodeling-storyboarding-events 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/trogonstack/agentskills --skill eventmodeling-storyboard…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

eventmodeling-storyboarding-events 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

eventmodeling-storyboarding-events 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

eventmodeling-storyboarding-events 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

eventmodeling-storyboarding-events 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 465 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 149 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

eventmodeling-storyboarding-events 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
eventmodeling-storyboarding-events

事件建模故事板事件 · 本页

465—只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Storyboarding Events

Interview Phase (Optional)

When to Interview: Skip if the user has already specified: existing UI patterns or mockups to reference, critical data fields, and UI/UX preferences. Interview when these details haven't been discussed or when the user wants guidance on storyboarding depth.

Interview Strategy: Clarify UI needs, data priorities, and existing patterns to guide storyboard design. This ensures mockups capture all necessary fields without over-designing.

Critical Questions

When UI design guidance is needed:

  1. Current UI State (Impact: Determines if you're designing from scratch or enhancing existing)

- Question: "Do you have: (A) Existing UI/wireframes to reference, (B) Rough sketches, (C) Starting from scratch?" - Why it matters: Existing UI provides constraints and patterns; starting fresh allows more design freedom - Follow-up triggers: If (A) → ask to share; if (C) → ask about platform/technology

  1. Most Critical Data Fields (Impact: Determines storyboard focus and detail level)

- Question: "Which data fields are most important for users to see? (e.g., order status, payment confirmation, tracking info)" - Why it matters: Knowing priorities helps avoid over-designing; users need to see what matters most first - Follow-up triggers: For each critical field → ask "What decisions do users make based on this data?"

  1. UI/UX Preferences & Constraints (Impact: Shapes storyboard style and interaction patterns)

- Question: "Any UI preferences? (A) Web, (B) Mobile, (C) Both. And design style: (A) Minimal wireframes, (B) Detailed mockups, (C) Interact prototypes?" - Why it matters: Platform and fidelity affect storyboard detail; mobile has different constraints than web - Follow-up triggers: If (C) → ask about prototype tool; if minimal → discuss what level of detail is enough

Interview Flow

Conditional Entry:

If user has provided:
  - Existing UI patterns or references
  - AND identified critical data fields
  - AND specified storyboard detail level

Then: Skip interview, proceed directly to storyboarding

Else: Conduct interview

Phase 1: Context Assessment (Questions 1-2)

  • Understand existing UI context
  • Identify data priorities
  • Establish storyboard scope

Phase 2: Design Guidance (Question 3)

  • Determine platform and fidelity
  • Adjust storyboard detail accordingly

Capturing Interview Findings

Document findings to guide storyboard creation:

## Interview Findings: [Domain Name] UI

**Existing UI Context**: [Starting from scratch / Enhancing / Matching pattern]
**Most Critical Data**: [List fields in priority order]
**Platform**: [Web / Mobile / Both]
**Storyboard Detail**: [Minimal wireframes / Detailed mockups]

**Key UI Interactions**:
- [Action 1]: [What data triggers it]
- [Action 2]: [What data triggers it]

**Storyboard Focus**:
- Prioritize showing [most critical fields]
- Ensure [specific interactions] are clear
- Reference [existing patterns] for consistency

Optional: Write to .trogonai/interviews/[timestamp]-storyboarding-events.interview.internal.trogonai.md.


Workflow

Given the event timeline, create UI storyboards:

1. Identify UI Screens/Views

Create a mockup for each state of the system:

Screen 1: Order Creation Form

 Place Your Order

 Customer ID: [____________]

 Items:
Product 1  Qty: [_]  Price: $_
Product 2  Qty: [_]  Price: $_
Product 3  Qty: [_]  Price: $_

 Total: $___

 Shipping Address:
 [_____________________]
 [_____________________]

 [ Create Order ]

Trigger: CreateOrder command
Result Events: OrderCreated
Data captured from UI:
  - customerId
  - items (products + quantities)
  - total
  - shippingAddress

2. Show State Transitions Between Screens

Document what changes when events occur:

Screen 2: Order Confirmation
(After OrderCreated event)

 Order Confirmation

 Order ID: #12345
 Status: Draft

 Items: 3 products
 Total: $150.00

 Shipping: 123 Main St

 Payment Options:
Credit Card
Bank Transfer

 [ Confirm Order ]

Trigger: ConfirmOrder command
Result Events: OrderConfirmed
Data from UI:
  - orderId (from OrderCreated)
  - paymentMethod

3. Document All Data Fields

For each screen, list what data is displayed:

Screen: Order Status View

 Your Order Status

 Order ID: #12345                 (from OrderCreated)
 Status: Confirmed               (from OrderConfirmed)
 Confirmed at: 2024-12-31 10:00   (from OrderConfirmed)

 Payment: Authorized             (from PaymentAuthorized)
 Auth Code: AUTH-789              (from PaymentAuthorized)

 Inventory: Reserved             (from InventoryReserved)
 Expected Ship: 2025-01-02        (from InventoryReserved)

 Shipped: Pending                 (awaiting OrderShipped)
 Tracking: -- (waiting for shipment)

Fields and their origins:
  orderId → OrderCreated event
  status → OrderConfirmed event
  confirmedAt → OrderConfirmed event
  paymentStatus → PaymentAuthorized event
  authCode → PaymentAuthorized event
  inventoryStatus → InventoryReserved event
  expectedShip → InventoryReserved event
  tracking → OrderShipped event (when available)

4. Show Data Flow Through Screens

Map how data enters/exits UI:

Order Entry UI
   (user inputs)
   customerId
   items[]
   total
   shippingAddress
      ↓
      Command: CreateOrder
      ↓
      Event: OrderCreated
      ↓
      Order Status UI (displays)
       orderId (from event)
       items (from event)
       total (from event)
       shippingAddress (from event)

5. Organize Screens by Swimlane (Actor/System)

MANDATORY: Use the Role Catalog from Step 1 (eventmodeling-brainstorming-events) as the source of swimlanes. Every human role in the catalog MUST have its own swimlane. Every system actor that has a UI or todo-list view gets a swimlane too.

Group screens by who interacts with them:

Swimlane: Customer (Human Role)
   Screen 1: Order Entry Form
   Screen 2: Order Confirmation
   Screen 3: Order Status View
   Screen 4: Tracking View

Swimlane: Seller (Human Role)
   Screen 1: Order Fulfillment Dashboard
   Screen 2: Review Response Form
   Screen 3: Product Management

Swimlane: Support Agent (Human Role)
   Screen 1: Escalation Queue
   Screen 2: Manual Override Panel

Swimlane: Payment Processor (System Actor)
   Screen 1: Payment Verification (automated)
   Screen 2: Authorization Confirmation

Swimlane: Inventory System (System Actor)
   Screen 1: Reservation Todo List (internal)
   Screen 2: Availability Check

Swimlane: Fulfillment System (System Actor)
   Screen 1: Shipment Creation Todo
   Screen 2: Shipping Confirmation

Validation: If a role from the catalog has zero screens, either:

  • The role is missing screens (add them), or
  • The role doesn't belong in the catalog (remove it in Step 1)

This shows which actors interact with which screens and helps visualize system boundaries.

6. Show Processor "Todo List" Pattern

For automated processors, show the todo list metaphor:

Processor: InventoryReserver

Internal "Todo List" (based on received events):

 Inventory Reservation Todos

Order-123: Reserve 2x Prod-1  (triggered by PaymentAuthorized)
Order-124: Reserve 3x Prod-2  (triggered by PaymentAuthorized)
Order-125: Reserve 1x Prod-3  (triggered by PaymentAuthorized)

 Processor checks todo items:
 For each: Check availability
          If available:  Mark done
          Reserve inventory
          Produce event

This todo list is driven by:
Events received → Items added to todo
Processor logic → Items processed
Success → InventoryReserved event produced + todo marked done
Failure → InventoryFailed event produced + todo marked failed

7. Identify Missing Data

Highlight where data doesn't have a clear source:

Problem: Order Status screen needs "expectedShip" date
Current state: Not in any event
Solution: Add expectedShip to InventoryReserved event

Problem: Order status needs "last updated" timestamp
Current state: No tracking of when last change occurred
Solution: Every event includes timestamp

Output Format

Present as:

# Storyboard: [Domain Name]

## Swimlane Organization (from Role Catalog)

### Human Role Swimlanes

#### Customer Swimlane
- Screen 1: Order Entry Form
- Screen 2: Order Confirmation
- Screen 3: Order Status View

#### [Other Human Role Swimlanes — one per role in the catalog]

### System Actor Swimlanes

#### Payment Processor Swimlane
- Screen 1: Payment Verification (automated)
- [Shows what UI/views the processor interacts with]

#### [Other System Actor Swimlanes]

---

## Screen 1: [Screen Name]

### Mockup

[ASCII art mockup or description]

### Data Displayed
- Field 1: Description, source event
- Field 2: Description, source event

### User Actions (Commands)
- Action: [Action], produces: [Event]

### Business Rules
- Rule about what can/cannot be done on this screen

---

## Screen 2: [Screen Name]

[Repeat for each screen]

---

## Processor Todo Lists

### Processor: [Processor Name]

Internal "Todo List" pattern:

Triggered by: [Event type] Todo action: [What needs to be done] Success produces: [Event] Failure produces: [Event]

[Repeat for each processor]

---

## Data Flow Diagram

[Show how data enters from UI and returns via events]

---

## Field Traceability Matrix

| Field | Screen | Source Event | Status |
|-------|--------|-------------|--------|
| orderId | Status View | OrderCreated |  |
| shipmentId | Status View | OrderShipped |  |
| customerId | All | OrderCreated |  |

---

## Missing Data Analysis

[Any fields without clear source or destination]

Quality Checklist

  • Every screen has a mockup or clear description
  • Every displayed field has a source event
  • Every user action maps to a command
  • Commands map to events
  • Data flows make sense
  • No missing data sources
  • State transitions are clear
  • Alternative states are shown
  • Error states are shown
  • Every human role from the Role Catalog has at least one swimlane
  • Every swimlane is labeled with the role/actor name from the catalog
  • Swimlanes organized by actor/system
  • Human role screens clearly separated from processor screens
  • Processor todo list pattern shown for automated systems
  • System boundaries visible through swimlane organization

Key Principles

  1. User-Centric: Design from what users see and do
  2. Data Traceability: Every field has origin and destination
  3. Completeness: All needed data is visible
  4. Clarity: UI clearly shows system state
  5. Consistency: Same data presented consistently across screens

Common Patterns

Input Screen Pattern

User fills form (captures command data)
  ↓
Submit button (issues command)
  ↓
Event created with form data
  ↓
Confirmation screen displayed

Status Screen Pattern

System displays current state (from read model)
  ↓
Based on latest events
  ↓
Shows all relevant information
  ↓
Available actions based on state

Error State Pattern

User action fails (command rejected)
  ↓
No event created
  ↓
Error message displayed
  ↓
UI allows retry or alternative action

平台分布

Codex

36.4%
按下载量换算54

Claude

27.17%
按下载量换算40

Cursor

18.89%
按下载量换算28

Gemini CLI

9.16%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills