Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ethical-hacking-ethics(道德黑客道德)

ethical-hacking-ethics 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ethical-hacking-ethics 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 65,612。

总安装 279周安装 12GitHub Stars 4下载 98核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ethical-hacking-ethics(道德黑客道德)
来源仓库:https://github.com/igbuend/grimbard
仓库路径:skills/ethical-hacking-ethics
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/igbuend/grimbard --skill ethical-hacking-ethics
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/igbuend/grimbard --skill ethical-hacking-ethics

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ethical-hacking-ethics 提供道德黑客活动的合规指导,涵盖漏洞赏金与渗透测试规范。适合参与 HackerOne 等平台项目、执行授权测试或撰写漏洞披露报告,强调书面授权必要性。使用时需明确测试范围、记录授权凭证并遵守 GDPR 与 CFAA 法规,避免法律风险。

安装前应确认本地司法管辖区对安全测试的规定,建议咨询法律顾问后再开展敏感操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ethical-hacking-ethics

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/igbuend/grimbard --skill ethical-hacking-ethic…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ethical-hacking-ethics 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/igbuend/grimbard --skill ethical-hacking-ethics。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ethical-hacking-ethics 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ethical-hacking-ethics 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ethical-hacking-ethics 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ethical-hacking-ethics 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 279 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 98 次,GitHub 4 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ethical-hacking-ethics 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ethical-hacking-ethics

道德黑客道德 · 本页

2794需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Ethical Hacking Ethics

Guidance for ethical hacking: bug bounties, pentesting, and security research.

When to Use This Skill

  • Participating in bug bounty programs (HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack)
  • Conducting authorized penetration testing
  • Performing security research on your own systems
  • Evaluating legality of security testing activities
  • Creating vulnerability disclosure reports

DO's - Always Do These

1. Obtain Explicit Authorization

  • Get written permission before testing any system you don't own
  • Verify scope - know exactly what assets are authorized
  • Document authorization - keep records of written consent
  • Check safe harbor status - confirm program has safe harbor policy

2. Follow Platform Rules of Engagement

  • Read and understand program-specific rules before testing
  • Adhere to testing timeframes specified by the program
  • Use only authorized testing methods
  • Report through official channels only
  • Human-in-the-loop required: HackerOne requires human validation before submitting findings

3. Practice Good Faith Security Research

Access systems solely for good-faith testing, avoid harm to individuals/public, use findings to improve security.

4. Document Everything

  • Keep detailed logs of all testing activities
  • Capture evidence of vulnerabilities for reports
  • Record timeline of discovery and reporting
  • Document all communication with program owners

5. Practice Responsible Disclosure

  • Report vulnerabilities promptly through official channels
  • Allow reasonable time for remediation before disclosure
  • Coordinate disclosure with affected organization
  • Follow platform-specific disclosure guidelines

6. Respect Data Privacy

  • Minimize data access to only what's necessary for testing
  • Don't store or share personal data discovered during testing
  • Report data exposure vulnerabilities without exploiting them
  • Follow GDPR and local data protection laws

DON'Ts - Never Do These

1. Never Test Without Authorization

  • Never access systems without explicit permission
  • Don't assume permission - verify scope explicitly
  • Never test "out of scope" assets even if you find them
  • Don't exceed authorized access - stay within defined boundaries

Legal risk: CFAA (US) and CMA 1990 (UK) prohibit unauthorized access. Penalties include imprisonment.

2. Never Cause Harm

  • Don't modify or destroy data during testing
  • Never create backdoors or permanent access mechanisms
  • Don't disrupt services or availability
  • Never exfiltrate data beyond what's necessary for proof

3. Never Blackmail or Extort

  • Never threaten to publish vulnerabilities for payment
  • Don't use vulnerabilities for extortion
  • Never demand bounties as condition for not publishing
  • Result: Permanent platform ban + potential criminal charges

4. Never Disclose Prematurely

  • Don't publish vulnerability details before remediation
  • Never share findings with third parties without permission
  • Don't post proof-of-concept code publicly without coordination
  • Never disclose program existence for private programs

5. Never Use Deceptive Practices

  • Don't impersonate authorized security researchers
  • Never falsify vulnerability reports or evidence
  • Don't misrepresent your identity or affiliation
  • Never submit false reports for rewards

6. Never Violate Privacy Laws

  • Don't access personal data beyond testing scope
  • Never store or share PII discovered during testing
  • Don't bypass privacy controls beyond what's necessary
  • Follow GDPR/data protection requirements

Scope Verification Checklist

Before beginning any testing, verify:

  • Authorization Document: Written permission to test?
  • In-Scope Assets: All authorized targets identified?
  • Out-of-Scope Assets: Know what's explicitly prohibited?
  • Testing Methods: Required or prohibited techniques?
  • Time Restrictions: Designated testing windows?
  • Safe Harbor: Program has and honors safe harbor policies?
  • Reporting Channel: Know official vulnerability submission process?
  • Disclosure Policy: Understand when/how you can publish findings?

Authorization Types

TypeAuthorizationSafe HarborNotes
Bug BountyImplicit via programIf offeredFollow program rules
PentestWritten contract/SOWPer contractMay require NDA
VDPProgram invitationVariesUsually no rewards
CTFCompetition rulesWithin boundariesLegal only in competition

Authorization Best Practices

  • Always get it in writing - verbal authorization is insufficient
  • Define scope explicitly - "everything except X" is too vague
  • Specify time boundaries - testing windows and deadlines
  • Include escalation procedures - what to do if issues arise

Responsible Disclosure Process

  1. Validate - Reproduce issue, document PoC, assess severity, check for duplicates
  2. Submit - Use official channels, include description + steps + impact + remediation
  3. Coordinate - Allow validation time, respond to questions, agree on timeline
  4. Verify - Confirm fix applied, test that vulnerability is remediated
  5. Disclose - Per agreed terms (coordinated, limited, full, or non-disclosure)

Red Lines - Violation Severity

SeverityViolationsConsequence
CriticalUnauthorized access, data theft, service disruption, extortion, social engineering, physical breachPermanent ban + legal action
SeverePremature disclosure, prohibited techniques, third-party sharing, withholding detailsWarnings + potential ban
MinorUnintentional scope violation, incomplete reports, format issuesEducation + warning

When to Stop and Escalate

Stop Immediately If:

SituationAction
Outside scopeHalt, document, report, await guidance
Sensitive data exposureStop exploration, don't download, report immediately
Service disruption (or near)Stop, document, report, await instructions
Asked to stopCease all activities, get written confirmation

Escalate When:

  • Legal questions - Consult legal counsel
  • Disputes - Request platform mediation
  • Unresponsive programs - Follow platform escalation procedures
  • Criminal activity discovered - Report to authorities
  • Safety concerns - Escalate if human safety at risk

Legal Framework Summary

JurisdictionLawKey Points
USCFAA (18 U.S.C. § 1030)Prohibits unauthorized access. Van Buren (2021) narrowed scope.
UKCMA 1990No "good faith" defense. Section 1: up to 2 years. No safe harbor equivalent.
EUGDPRLegal basis required for data. Report breaches within 72 hours.

Other jurisdictions: Canada, Australia, Germany, France, Japan have similar laws. Research local laws before international testing.

References: CFAA | CMA | GDPR

Standards Compliance

StandardUse CaseReference
PTESGeneral pentesting (7 stages)pentest-standard.org
OWASP WSTGWeb application testingowasp.org/wstg
NIST SP 800-115Government/compliance testingcsrc.nist.gov
OSSTMMMetrics-based security testingisecom.org

Platform Quick Reference

PlatformSafe HarborDisclosureKey Requirement
HackerOneGold Standard (GSSH)Program-specificHuman-in-the-loop validation
BugcrowdDisclose.io frameworkCoordinated/Custom/NonSecure POC sharing
IntigritiVariesCoordinatedGDPR compliance
YesWeHackVariesProgram-specificFollow program brief

Platform Docs: HackerOne | Bugcrowd | Intigriti | YesWeHack

Certifications Reference

CertificationFocusEthics Requirement
OSCPPractical exploitationLegal boundaries, documentation
CEHTheory + practicalCode of ethics required
GPENAdvanced pentestingLegal/ethical training
CREST/CHECKUK government schemesBackground checks, conduct codes
PCI-DSSCardholder data environmentsQualified assessor, documentation

References

Platforms: HackerOne Docs | Bugcrowd Docs | Disclose.io

Standards: PTES | OWASP WSTG | NIST SP 800-115

Legal: CFAA | CMA 1990

For detailed reference material, see the references/ directory.

平台分布

Codex

33.04%
按下载量换算32

Claude

30.7%
按下载量换算30

Cursor

18.36%
按下载量换算18

Gemini CLI

10.35%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills