Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

error-handling-patterns(错误处理模式)

error-handling-patterns 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

error-handling-patterns 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 39,607。

总安装 1,388周安装 59GitHub Stars 98下载 486核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:error-handling-patterns(错误处理模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills
仓库路径:skills/error-handling-patterns
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill error-handling-patterns
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill error-handling-patterns

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

设计使失败显式、可恢复且易于调试的错误处理策略。根据错误语义匹配处理方式,避免对所有错误采用相同应对机制。涵盖异常、Result 类型、错误码选择及重试、熔断等模式实现。适用于 TypeScript/Python 中类型化错误层级构建和 React 错误边界设计。

使用时需结合具体业务场景判断错误分类和处理粒度,避免过度工程化。

来源仓库内路径:skills/error-handling-patterns

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill error-ha…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

error-handling-patterns 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill error-handling-pat…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

error-handling-patterns 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

error-handling-patterns 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

error-handling-patterns 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

error-handling-patterns 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,388 次,近一周安装 59 次,下载 486 次,GitHub 98 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

error-handling-patterns 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
error-handling-patterns

错误处理模式 · 本页

1,38898需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Error Handling Patterns

Design error handling strategies that make failures explicit, recoverable, and debuggable. The central skill is matching error handling style to error semantics: not all errors are equal, and treating them equally produces systems that are equally bad at handling all of them.

When to Use

✅ Use for:

  • Choosing between exceptions, Result types, or error codes for a domain
  • Designing typed error hierarchies in TypeScript or Python
  • Implementing retry logic with backoff, jitter, and circuit breaking
  • Building React error boundaries and graceful degradation
  • Structuring error information for both users and developers
  • Python exception chaining and __cause__ / __context__ semantics

❌ NOT for:

  • Debugging a specific runtime error (use debugger or domain skill)
  • Logging pipeline infrastructure (use observability skill)
  • APM/monitoring configuration (use site-reliability-engineer skill)
  • Writing tests for error paths (use vitest-testing-patterns skill)

Core Decision: Exception vs Result Type vs Error Code

flowchart TD
    Q1{Is this a programming error\nor contract violation?} -->|Yes| EX[Throw exception\nlet it crash]
    Q1 -->|No| Q2{Is the error part of\nnormal control flow?}
    Q2 -->|Yes| Q3{What is the call site context?}
    Q2 -->|No| Q4{Do callers need to\ndistinguish error types?}
    Q3 -->|Functional / monad-friendly| RT[Result or Either type]
    Q3 -->|Simple script or CLI| EC[Error code + message]
    Q4 -->|Yes| EH[Typed exception hierarchy]
    Q4 -->|No| GE[Generic exception\nwith structured message]
    EX --> NOTE1[Never catch at boundary —\nlet process restart]
    RT --> NOTE2[Compose with map/flatMap;\ncheck references/error-hierarchy-examples.md]
    EH --> NOTE3[See hierarchy design rules below]

Rules of thumb:

  • Library code: prefer Result types — never force callers to handle your exceptions
  • Application code: typed exception hierarchies work well; errors are exceptional
  • CLI / scripts: error codes are fine; the user is the error boundary
  • Async workers: Result types or structured error objects with retry metadata

Error Classification

Classify every error along two axes before deciding how to handle it:

Transient (retry may succeed)Permanent (retry won't help)
User-actionableRate limit, quota exceededInvalid input, unauthorized
System-actionableNetwork timeout, DB connectionData corruption, schema mismatch

This classification determines:

  • Whether to retry (transient only)
  • What to show the user (user-actionable → message; system → generic error + tracking ID)
  • Whether to alert on-call (system permanent → page; transient spikes → alert)

Should This Error Be Retried?

flowchart TD
    E[Error occurs] --> C1{Is error transient?\nTimeout, 429, 503, connection reset}
    C1 -->|No| FAIL[Fail immediately\nReturn error to caller]
    C1 -->|Yes| C2{Have we exceeded\nmax retry attempts?}
    C2 -->|Yes| DLQ[Send to dead letter queue\nor return final failure]
    C2 -->|No| C3{Is circuit breaker OPEN?}
    C3 -->|Yes| CB[Return circuit-open error\nDo not attempt request]
    C3 -->|No| WAIT[Wait: exponential backoff\n+ full jitter]
    WAIT --> RETRY[Retry request]
    RETRY --> C1
    CB --> PROBE{After timeout:\nsend probe request}
    PROBE -->|Success| CLOSE[Close circuit\nResume normal traffic]
    PROBE -->|Fail| CB

Consult references/retry-patterns.md for backoff formulas, jitter strategies, and circuit breaker implementation.


TypeScript: Error Hierarchy Design

// Base application error — all domain errors extend this
class AppError extends Error {
  readonly code: string;
  readonly statusCode: number;
  readonly isOperational: boolean; // false = programmer error, crash process

  constructor(message: string, code: string, statusCode: number, isOperational = true) {
    super(message);
    this.name = this.constructor.name;
    this.code = code;
    this.statusCode = statusCode;
    this.isOperational = isOperational;
    Error.captureStackTrace(this, this.constructor);
  }
}

// Domain-specific errors
class ValidationError extends AppError {
  readonly fields: Record<string, string[]>;
  constructor(fields: Record<string, string[]>) {
    super('Validation failed', 'VALIDATION_ERROR', 422);
    this.fields = fields;
  }
}

class NotFoundError extends AppError {
  constructor(resource: string, id: string) {
    super(`${resource} ${id} not found`, 'NOT_FOUND', 404);
  }
}

class RateLimitError extends AppError {
  readonly retryAfterMs: number;
  constructor(retryAfterMs: number) {
    super('Rate limit exceeded', 'RATE_LIMIT', 429);
    this.retryAfterMs = retryAfterMs;
  }
}

Consult references/error-hierarchy-examples.md for Python equivalents, Result type implementations, and full hierarchy patterns.


Result Type Pattern (TypeScript)

When errors are expected outcomes of operations (parsing, API calls, DB queries), use Result instead of throw:

type Result<T, E = AppError> =
  | { ok: true; value: T }
  | { ok: false; error: E };

// Helpers
const ok = <T>(value: T): Result<T, never> => ({ ok: true, value });
const err = <E>(error: E): Result<never, E> => ({ ok: false, error });

// Usage — caller is forced to handle both cases
async function fetchUser(id: string): Promise<Result<User, NotFoundError | NetworkError>> {
  try {
    const user = await db.users.findById(id);
    if (!user) return err(new NotFoundError('User', id));
    return ok(user);
  } catch (e) {
    return err(new NetworkError('DB unavailable', { cause: e }));
  }
}

// At call site — no silent failures
const result = await fetchUser(userId);
if (!result.ok) {
  if (result.error instanceof NotFoundError) return res.status(404).json(...);
  return res.status(500).json(...);
}
const user = result.value; // typed, safe

React Error Boundaries

Error boundaries catch render-time exceptions. They do NOT catch async errors (fetch failures, setTimeout, event handlers).

class RouteErrorBoundary extends React.Component<Props, State> {
  static getDerivedStateFromError(error: Error): State {
    return { hasError: true, error };
  }

  componentDidCatch(error: Error, info: React.ErrorInfo) {
    // Log to error tracking, not console.error in production
    logger.error('Render error', { error, componentStack: info.componentStack });
  }

  render() {
    if (this.state.hasError) {
      return <ErrorFallback error={this.state.error} onRetry={this.reset} />;
    }
    return this.props.children;
  }
}

Place boundaries at route level (one per page) and around isolated expensive subtrees (charts, rich editors). Do not wrap every component — too granular breaks the benefit.


Python: Exception Chaining

Python's raise X from Y syntax preserves causal chains — use it always when re-raising:

class AppError(Exception):
    """Base error. All domain errors subclass this."""
    def __init__(self, message: str, code: str, status: int = 500):
        super().__init__(message)
        self.code = code
        self.status = status

class DatabaseError(AppError):
    def __init__(self, operation: str, cause: Exception):
        super().__init__(f"DB error during {operation}", "DB_ERROR", 503)
        self.__cause__ = cause  # explicit chain

# In application code
try:
    result = db.execute(query)
except psycopg2.OperationalError as e:
    raise DatabaseError("user_fetch", e) from e  # preserves full traceback

Structured Error Logging

Log errors with enough context to diagnose without reading code:

// Good: structured, queryable, developer-oriented
logger.error('Payment processing failed', {
  error: {
    code: error.code,
    message: error.message,
    stack: error.stack,
  },
  context: {
    userId,
    orderId,
    amount,
    paymentProvider,
    attempt: retryCount,
  },
  correlation: { requestId, traceId },
});

// Then surface a sanitized message to the user
// NEVER leak error.message to users — it may contain internals
return res.status(500).json({
  error: 'Payment could not be processed. Please try again.',
  errorId: requestId, // so support can look it up
});

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern: Pokemon Exception Handling

Novice: "Wrap everything in try/catch and log the error. At least it won't crash."

Expert: Catching all exceptions unconditionally ("gotta catch 'em all") hides programmer errors, masks resource leaks, and converts loud failures into silent corruption. The system appears healthy while data is being silently dropped.

// Wrong — swallows everything including programming errors
try {
  await processOrder(order);
} catch (e) {
  console.error('something went wrong', e); // lost forever
}

// Right — catch only what you can handle, let the rest propagate
try {
  await processOrder(order);
} catch (e) {
  if (e instanceof RateLimitError) {
    await queue.requeue(order, { delay: e.retryAfterMs });
    return;
  }
  // programming errors, unexpected DB errors — let them crash
  throw e;
}

Detection: catch (e) {}, catch (e) {log(e)} with no rethrow, except Exception as e: pass in Python. Any catch block with no condition and no rethrow.

Timeline: This has always been wrong. Renewed urgency in async/await era (2017+) because swallowed promise rejections are even harder to detect than swallowed sync exceptions.


Anti-Pattern: Stringly-Typed Errors

Novice: "I'll put the error type in the message string: throw new Error('NOT_FOUND: User 123')"

Expert: String-based error types force callers to parse strings, break under refactoring, provide no IDE support, and make exhaustive matching impossible. Callers pattern-match on strings that drift as the codebase evolves.

// Wrong — caller must parse strings, breaks silently on rename
throw new Error(`RATE_LIMIT: retry after ${ms}ms`);
// Caller: if (error.message.startsWith('RATE_LIMIT')) { ... }

// Right — typed, refactor-safe, IDE-navigable
throw new RateLimitError(ms);
// Caller: if (error instanceof RateLimitError) { ... error.retryAfterMs ... }

Python equivalent:

# Wrong
raise Exception(f"rate_limit:{retry_after}")

# Right
raise RateLimitError(retry_after_ms=retry_after)

LLM mistake: LLMs trained on StackOverflow examples frequently generate stringly-typed errors because SO answers prioritize brevity over correctness. Error codes as strings look concise in tutorials.

Detection: instanceof Error checks everywhere, string .startsWith() or .includes() in catch blocks, error codes stored in message field rather than a dedicated property.


References

  • references/retry-patterns.md — Consult when implementing retry logic: exponential backoff formulas, full vs equal jitter, circuit breaker state machine, dead letter queues
  • references/error-hierarchy-examples.md — Consult for complete TypeScript and Python typed error class examples, Result monad implementations, and error boundary patterns

平台分布

Codex

36.01%
按下载量换算175

Claude

31.89%
按下载量换算155

Cursor

18.97%
按下载量换算92

Gemini CLI

9.96%
按下载量换算48

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills