Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

offer-comparison-analyzer(报价比较分析器)

offer-comparison-analyzer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

offer-comparison-analyzer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 65,745。

总安装 275周安装 11GitHub Stars 31下载 89核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:offer-comparison-analyzer(报价比较分析器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ericgandrade/claude-superskills
仓库路径:skills/offer-comparison-analyzer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ericgandrade/claude-superskills --skill offer-comparison-analyzer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ericgandrade/claude-superskills --skill offer-comparison-analyzer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

offer-comparison-analyzer 横向对比多个工作机会的总薪酬与职业发展潜力。量化分析薪资、福利、期权与隐性成本(如通勤、 workload)差异。生成数据可视化图表辅助决策,避免仅凭 title 或口头承诺做判断。适用于收到 multiple offers 时的谈判准备与取舍权衡场景。

输出包含 counteroffer 策略与退出机制的完整分析报告。

来源仓库内路径:skills/offer-comparison-analyzer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ericgandrade/claude-superskills --skill offer-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

offer-comparison-analyzer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ericgandrade/claude-superskills --skill offer-comparison…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

offer-comparison-analyzer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

offer-comparison-analyzer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

offer-comparison-analyzer 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

offer-comparison-analyzer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 275 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 89 次,GitHub 31 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

offer-comparison-analyzer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
offer-comparison-analyzer

报价比较分析器 · 本页

27531只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

---name: Offer Comparison Analyzer description: Compare multiple job offers side-by-side with total compensation analysis

version: 2.0.0 author: Eric Andrade category: career risk: safe platforms: [github-copilot, claude-code, codex, opencode, gemini, antigravity, cursor, adal]

Offer Comparison Analyzer

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when the user:

  • Has multiple job offers to compare
  • Needs to evaluate total compensation
  • Wants to make a data-driven job decision
  • Is weighing different opportunities
  • Mentions: "compare offers", "multiple offers", "which job", "offer comparison", "deciding between jobs"

Core Capabilities

  • Compare total compensation across offers
  • Evaluate non-monetary factors
  • Create weighted decision frameworks
  • Calculate true offer value
  • Identify hidden costs and benefits
  • Guide the decision-making process

The Comparison Challenge

The Problem: Comparing offers is hard because:

  • Different compensation structures
  • Non-monetary factors matter
  • Hidden benefits and costs
  • Emotional factors cloud judgment
  • Information asymmetry

The Solution: Systematic comparison framework that considers:

  • Total compensation (not just salary)
  • Career growth potential
  • Work-life factors
  • Risk assessment
  • Personal values alignment

Total Compensation Calculator

Components to Include

Cash Compensation:

  • Base salary
  • Signing bonus (one-time)
  • Annual bonus (target %)
  • Commission (for sales roles)
  • Relocation assistance

Equity Compensation:

  • Stock options (value = current price - strike price)
  • RSUs (value = current price × shares)
  • Vesting schedule
  • Refresh grant expectations

Benefits Value:

  • Health insurance (employer contribution)
  • 401(k) match
  • HSA/FSA contributions
  • Life/disability insurance
  • Other insurance benefits

Perks Value:

  • Vacation days (can assign $ value)
  • Remote work (saves commute costs)
  • Professional development budget
  • Equipment/office stipend
  • Meals, gym, etc.

Calculation Template

OFFER A - TOTAL COMPENSATION

CASH
Base Salary:                    $150,000
Signing Bonus (year 1 only):     $25,000
Target Bonus (15%):              $22,500
--------------------------------
Cash Compensation:              $197,500 (year 1)
                               $172,500 (ongoing)

EQUITY
RSU Grant: $200,000 over 4 years
Annual Value:                    $50,000
--------------------------------
Equity Compensation:             $50,000/year

BENEFITS
401(k) Match (4%):               $6,000
Health Insurance:                $15,000 (employer portion)
HSA Contribution:                 $1,000
--------------------------------
Benefits Value:                  $22,000/year

PERKS
Vacation: 20 days (vs 10 standard)
  Extra 10 days × ~$575/day:      $5,750 value
Remote Work Savings:              $3,000 (commute, lunch)
Professional Dev:                 $2,000 budget
--------------------------------
Perks Value:                     $10,750/year

TOTAL YEAR 1:        $280,250
TOTAL ONGOING:       $255,250/year

Parallel Offer Analysis

For each offer, launch 8 analyzers simultaneously. If comparing N offers, launch all 8×N agents in one block.

Compensation agents:

AgentRole
CashAnalyzerSum base salary + target bonus + signing bonus. Annualize. Account for bonus probability.
EquityAnalyzerCalculate equity value: RSU shares × current/projected price ÷ vesting years. Note cliff and vesting schedule.
BenefitsAnalyzerQuantify 401k match (annual $), insurance premiums saved vs. market rate, HSA contribution, other benefits.
PerksAnalyzerQuantify: vacation days × daily rate, commute cost savings (remote vs. in-office), learning/dev budget, other perks.

Non-monetary scoring agents:

AgentRole
GrowthScorerScore 0–10: career trajectory, learning opportunities, brand-name value, promotion clarity
WorkLifeScorerScore 0–10: expected hours, flexibility, remote policy, travel burden, on-call requirements
CultureScorerScore 0–10: team dynamics, manager quality, company values alignment, DEI signals
RiskScorerScore 0–10 (inverted — lower = more stable): funding runway, layoff history, industry volatility, severance terms

Each agent prompt begins with:

# {AgentName} — Offer Analysis Agent
Role: Analyze ONLY {DIMENSION} for {OFFER_NAME}. Return a structured result with numbers and brief justification.

Wait for all agents to complete. Build total compensation comparison table and weighted scoring matrix.

Side-by-Side Comparison Template

# OFFER COMPARISON

|                          | Company A | Company B | Notes |
|--------------------------|-----------|-----------|-------|
| **CASH**                 |           |           |       |
| Base Salary              | $150,000  | $160,000  | B +$10K |
| Signing Bonus            | $25,000   | $10,000   | A +$15K |
| Target Bonus             | 15%       | 10%       | A +$6.5K |
| **Cash Total (Yr 1)**    | $197,500  | $186,000  | A +$11.5K |
|                          |           |           |       |
| **EQUITY**               |           |           |       |
| Grant Value (4yr)        | $200,000  | $300,000  | B +$100K |
| Annual Equity            | $50,000   | $75,000   | B +$25K |
|                          |           |           |       |
| **BENEFITS**             |           |           |       |
| 401(k) Match             | 4%        | 6%        | B +$3.2K |
| Health Insurance         | Good      | Premium   | B better |
| PTO                      | 20 days   | Unlimited | Varies |
|                          |           |           |       |
| **TOTAL COMP (Yr 1)**    | $280,250  | $285,000  | B +$4.7K |
| **TOTAL COMP (Ongoing)** | $255,250  | $275,000  | B +$19.7K |

Non-Monetary Factor Framework

Career Growth (Weight: High)

Questions to Consider:

  • Which role offers more learning?
  • Which company/brand helps future job search?
  • Which has better promotion track?
  • Which offers more scope/responsibility?
  • Which manager will develop you more?

Scoring:

Company A: Growth Score
- Learning opportunity: 8/10
- Brand/resume value: 7/10
- Promotion potential: 6/10
- Scope: 8/10
Average: 7.25/10

Company B: Growth Score
- Learning opportunity: 7/10
- Brand/resume value: 9/10
- Promotion potential: 8/10
- Scope: 7/10
Average: 7.75/10

Work-Life Balance (Weight: Personal)

Factors:

  • Expected hours
  • Remote/hybrid flexibility
  • Vacation usage culture
  • On-call requirements
  • Travel requirements
  • Commute time

Team & Culture (Weight: High)

Factors:

  • Manager quality (crucial!)
  • Team health/dynamics
  • Company culture fit
  • DEI considerations
  • Company stability/growth
  • Values alignment

Risk Assessment (Weight: Medium)

Startup vs. Established:

  • Funding runway
  • Market position
  • Company trajectory
  • Equity risk (could be worth $0)

Questions:

  • What happens if company struggles?
  • How stable is this role?
  • What's the severance policy?

Weighted Decision Matrix

Step 1: Define Your Priorities

Factor                  Weight
------------------------------------
Total Compensation       25%
Career Growth            25%
Work-Life Balance        20%
Team & Culture           20%
Location/Commute         10%
------------------------------------
Total:                   100%

Step 2: Score Each Factor

                    Company A   Company B
Factor              Score (1-10)
------------------------------------
Compensation        7           8
Career Growth       7           8
Work-Life           8           6
Team & Culture      9           7
Location            8           5

Step 3: Calculate Weighted Score

Company A:
(7 × 0.25) + (7 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.20) + (9 × 0.20) + (8 × 0.10)
= 1.75 + 1.75 + 1.60 + 1.80 + 0.80
= 7.70

Company B:
(8 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.25) + (6 × 0.20) + (7 × 0.20) + (5 × 0.10)
= 2.00 + 2.00 + 1.20 + 1.40 + 0.50
= 7.10

Result: Company A scores higher (7.70 vs 7.10)

Red Flags to Watch

In the Offer

  • ❌ Vague bonus language ("up to 20%")
  • ❌ Equity with no liquidity path
  • ❌ High base but no equity (at startup)
  • ❌ Cliff longer than 1 year
  • ❌ Vesting acceleration absent
  • ❌ Non-compete restrictions
  • ❌ Verbal promises not in writing

About the Company

  • ❌ High turnover (check LinkedIn)
  • ❌ Recent layoffs or reorgs
  • ❌ Manager seems checked out
  • ❌ Glassdoor patterns in bad reviews
  • ❌ Funding concerns
  • ❌ Unclear path to profitability

About the Role

  • ❌ Vague responsibilities
  • ❌ Role seems to change during interviews
  • ❌ Red flags in why position is open
  • ❌ No growth path discussed
  • ❌ Unrealistic expectations set

Questions to Ask Yourself

The Gut Check

  • Which offer excites me more?
  • Which would I regret not taking?
  • Which aligns with my 5-year goals?
  • Which would I brag about to friends?

The Monday Morning Test

  • Which job do I want to wake up for?
  • Which team do I want to work with?
  • Which problems do I want to solve?

The Learning Test

  • Where will I grow more?
  • Which skills will I develop?
  • Which looks better on my resume in 3 years?

The Risk Test

  • What's the downside of each?
  • Which failure would I regret more?
  • What's my backup plan for each?

Progress Tracking

Display progress before each comparison phase:

[████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░] 25% — Phase 1/4: Collecting Offer Details
[████████░░░░░░░░░░░░] 50% — Phase 2/4: Calculating Total Compensation
[████████████░░░░░░░░] 75% — Phase 3/4: Scoring Against Priorities
[████████████████████] 100% — Phase 4/4: Delivering Recommendation

Output Format

When comparing offers:

# JOB OFFER COMPARISON

## Offers Being Compared
- **Offer A:** [Role] at [Company]
- **Offer B:** [Role] at [Company]

## Total Compensation Comparison

| Component | Offer A | Offer B | Difference |
|-----------|---------|---------|------------|
| Base | $X | $X | |
| Bonus | $X | $X | |
| Equity (annual) | $X | $X | |
| Benefits | $X | $X | |
| **Year 1 Total** | $X | $X | |
| **Ongoing Total** | $X | $X | |

## Non-Monetary Comparison

| Factor | Offer A | Offer B | Notes |
|--------|---------|---------|-------|
| Career Growth | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Work-Life | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Team/Culture | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Risk Level | X/10 | X/10 | |

## Weighted Analysis

Using your priorities:
- Offer A Score: X.XX
- Offer B Score: X.XX

## Key Differences
1. [Key difference 1]
2. [Key difference 2]
3. [Key difference 3]

## Recommendation

Based on your stated priorities of [X, Y, Z], **Offer [A/B]** appears to be the stronger choice because:
- [Reason 1]
- [Reason 2]
- [Reason 3]

## Things to Clarify Before Deciding
- [ ] [Question for Company A]
- [ ] [Question for Company B]

## Negotiation Opportunities
- [Opportunity 1]
- [Opportunity 2]

Error Handling

ErrorLikely CauseAction
Only one offer providedUser asks to compare but shares only one optionProceed as single-offer analysis; ask if user has other offers or is considering staying in current role
Incomplete offer detailsMissing salary, equity, or benefits informationFlag gaps explicitly; ask user to fill in what they know; estimate where possible and flag estimates
Non-standard equity structureRSUs vs. options vs. profit sharing vs. warrantsAsk for clarification on equity type, cliff, vesting schedule, and last valuation
High uncertainty in startup equityPrivate company with no known valuationCalculate a range using conservative and optimistic scenarios; explain assumptions
Offers in different currenciesOne offer in USD, another in EUR or BRLConvert to common currency at current exchange rate; note exchange rate risk
Non-monetary factors hard to compareCulture, commute, growth potential are subjectiveCreate scoring rubric with user-defined weights; let user rate each factor

Comparison Checklist

  • ✅ Calculated total comp (not just base)
  • ✅ Included equity with realistic valuation
  • ✅ Factored in benefits value
  • ✅ Considered tax implications
  • ✅ Weighted non-monetary factors
  • ✅ Assessed career growth potential
  • ✅ Evaluated team and manager quality
  • ✅ Checked company stability/risk
  • ✅ Aligned with personal priorities
  • ✅ Gut-checked the decision

平台分布

Codex

35.01%
按下载量换算31

Claude

28.96%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

17.57%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

9.22%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills