Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

enrich-teaching-guide丰富教学指导

Agent Skill

enrich-teaching-guide 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

624

周安装

26

GitHub Stars

158

下载量

208
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:enrich-teaching-guide(丰富教学指导)
来源仓库:https://github.com/panaversity/agentfactory
仓库路径:skills/enrich-teaching-guide
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/panaversity/agentfactory --skill enrich-teaching-guide
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/panaversity/agentfactory --skill enrich-teaching-guide

简介

生成面向教师的教学指导元数据,包含重点提示、易错点与理解检测方法。

  • 输出 YAML frontmatter 格式,便于集成到课程材料与学习系统中。
  • 强调实用性与非显而易见性,拒绝泛泛而谈的教学建议。
  • 需结合具体学科与受众水平定制内容,避免模板化输出降低参考价值。
  • enrich-teaching-guide 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Enrich Teaching Guide

Generate teaching_guide YAML frontmatter blocks that give teachers what they need to confidently deliver a lesson: what to emphasize, where students stumble, what to discuss, and how to check understanding.

Quality Bar

This metadata is read by real teachers. Every field must pass this test:

"Would an experienced educator read this and think: yes, this is genuinely useful — not obvious, not generic?"

Good: "Students confuse General Agents with ChatGPT-style chatbots — emphasize the action-taking (agentic) difference" Bad: "Students may find this topic challenging"

Good: "Start with the ChatGPT copy-paste pain point — every student has experienced this" Bad: "Begin with an engaging introduction"

Invocation

/enrich-teaching-guide ch 3              # All lessons in chapter 3
/enrich-teaching-guide ch 3 lesson 1     # Single lesson
/enrich-teaching-guide ch 3 lessons 1-5  # Range within chapter
/enrich-teaching-guide ch 1,3,5          # Multiple chapters
/enrich-teaching-guide <path>            # Direct lesson path

Process

Step 1: Resolve Scope

Parse the user's input to determine which lessons to process.

# For "ch 3" — discover chapter path:
ls -d apps/learn-app/docs/*/03-*/

# List lesson files (exclude README, summary, quiz):
ls apps/learn-app/docs/<part>/<chapter>/*.md | grep -v README | grep -v summary | grep -v quiz

Build an ordered list of lessons to process. Process sequentially — each lesson needs the previous one as context.

Step 2: For Each Lesson — Gather Context

For lesson N, read these files in this order:

  1. Lesson N-1 (previous lesson) — read FULL content

- Purpose: understand what students already know, what vocabulary is established, what concepts are fresh - If N=1, skip — note "this is the chapter opener"

  1. Lesson N (target) — read FULL content + all existing frontmatter

- Purpose: deep understanding of what this lesson teaches - Note which frontmatter fields already exist vs missing

  1. Lesson N+1 (next lesson) — read ONLY the title and first 2 headings

- Purpose: know where the lesson arc is heading (for "this leads into..." tips) - If last lesson, skip — note "this is the chapter closer"

DO NOT read the chapter README. The value is in actual lesson content, not chapter metadata.

Step 3: Analyze the Lesson

Before generating, answer these questions internally:

For key_points:

"If a teacher has 2 minutes to prep, what 3 things must they know about THIS lesson?"

Look for:

  • Concepts that are foundational (used again later in the chapter or book)
  • Pivotal distinctions the lesson makes (X vs Y comparisons)
  • Non-obvious connections to prior lessons ("this builds on the OODA loop from lesson 1")

For misconceptions:

"Where will students confidently get it WRONG?"

Look for:

  • Terms that sound familiar but mean something specific here
  • Concepts that seem similar but are fundamentally different
  • Assumptions students bring from other tools/contexts
  • The lesson's own "this is NOT..." warnings

For discussion_prompts:

"What question would make a student STOP and think for 30 seconds?"

Look for:

  • Questions that connect lesson content to the student's own experience
  • "What if..." counterfactuals that test understanding
  • Questions with no single right answer (genuine discussion, not recall)

For teaching_tips:

"What would a veteran teacher of this lesson whisper to a first-time instructor?"

Look for:

  • The best entry point (which example/scenario to start with)
  • Live demo opportunities
  • Whiteboard-worthy diagrams or tables in the lesson
  • Pacing advice ("spend more time on X, students breeze through Y")

For assessment_quick_check:

"In 60 seconds at the end of the lesson, how can a teacher know if students got it?"

Look for:

  • "Explain X in one sentence" checks for core concepts
  • "Draw/diagram Y from memory" for frameworks/processes
  • "What's the difference between A and B?" for key distinctions

Step 4: Generate the YAML Block

Generate a teaching_guide block matching this exact schema:

teaching_guide:
  lesson_type: "core" # core | supplementary | hands-on | capstone
  session_group: 1 # Which session/class this belongs to (integer)
  session_title: "Session Name" # Human-readable session grouping
  key_points:
    - "Point with specific detail, not generic advice"
    - "Reference to where concept recurs: 'used again in Ch X, lesson Y'"
    - "Maximum 4 points — if you need more, the lesson is too dense"
  misconceptions:
    - "Specific misconception — what students think vs what's true"
    - "Maximum 4 — focus on the dangerous ones"
  discussion_prompts:
    - "Open-ended question connecting to student experience?"
    - "Counterfactual or 'what if' that tests understanding?"
    - "Maximum 3 — quality over quantity"
  teaching_tips:
    - "Specific, actionable advice with lesson reference"
    - "Maximum 4 tips"
  assessment_quick_check:
    - "Quick check that takes <30 seconds per student"
    - "Maximum 3 checks"

Constraints:

  • lesson_type: Infer from content — core (teaches new concepts), supplementary (extends/enriches), hands-on (primarily exercises), capstone (integrates multiple concepts)
  • session_group: Infer from lesson position. Lessons 1-3 → session 1, 4-6 → session 2, etc. Adjust based on natural breakpoints.
  • Every string must be a single line (no multiline YAML strings)
  • No generic advice. Every point must reference specific lesson content.
  • Use quotes consistently for all string values.

Step 5: Inject or Present

If processing 1-3 lessons: Present the generated YAML for review before injecting.

If processing 4+ lessons (batch mode): Inject directly into each lesson's frontmatter, placing the teaching_guide block after the differentiation block (or at the end of frontmatter if differentiation doesn't exist).

Injection rules:

  • If teaching_guide already exists: SKIP unless user passed --force
  • Preserve all existing frontmatter — only ADD the teaching_guide block
  • Maintain YAML indentation (2 spaces)

Step 6: Report

After processing, output a summary:

ENRICHMENT COMPLETE
──────────────────
Lessons processed: X
Lessons skipped (already enriched): Y
Lessons enriched: Z

Files modified:
  ✓ apps/learn-app/docs/.../01-lesson.md
  ✓ apps/learn-app/docs/.../02-lesson.md
  ⊘ apps/learn-app/docs/.../03-lesson.md (already has teaching_guide)

Anti-Patterns

Don'tDo Instead
"Students may struggle with this concept""Students confuse X with Y because [specific reason]"
"Start with an engaging introduction""Start with the ChatGPT copy-paste pain point — every student has experienced this"
"This is an important topic""OODA loop is foundational — referenced again in Chapters 5, 11, and 13"
"Ask students what they learned""Ask students to explain passive vs agentic AI in one sentence"
"Demo the concepts""Demo the OODA loop live: show Claude reading a file, deciding what to do, acting, then correcting"
Generic tips that fit any lessonTips that reference THIS lesson's specific examples, tables, or code

Handling Edge Cases

  • Lesson has no learning_objectives: Generate teaching_guide anyway — the lesson content is sufficient input
  • First lesson in chapter: Note "chapter opener" — tips should include "set expectations for the chapter arc"
  • Last lesson in chapter: Note "chapter closer" — tips should include "connect back to chapter themes"
  • Very short lesson (<500 words): May only need 2 key_points, 1-2 misconceptions
  • Hands-on/exercise lesson: Focus teaching_tips on facilitation; assessment_quick_check on output verification

Reference: High-Quality Example

From Chapter 3, Lesson 1 (01-origin-story.md):

teaching_guide:
  lesson_type: "core"
  session_group: 1
  session_title: "Getting Started with Claude Code"
  key_points:
    - "OODA loop is foundational — referenced again in Chapters 5, 11, and 13"
    - "Product Overhang explains why capability existed before the product — this mental model recurs throughout the book"
    - "General Agent vs Custom Agent distinction is the entire thesis of the book"
  misconceptions:
    - "Students confuse General Agents with ChatGPT-style chatbots — emphasize the action-taking (agentic) difference"
    - "Students think 'agentic' means 'smarter' rather than 'can take actions on files and systems'"
    - "Students assume Claude Code requires coding skills — Cowork section addresses this"
  discussion_prompts:
    - "What would change in your daily work if AI could see your actual files instead of you describing them?"
    - "Can you think of other 'product overhangs' in technology — capabilities that existed but needed a better interface?"
    - "Why do you think adoption hit 50% in 5 days internally at Anthropic?"
  teaching_tips:
    - "Start with the ChatGPT copy-paste pain point — every student has experienced this"
    - "Demo the OODA loop live: show Claude reading a file, deciding what to do, acting, then correcting"
    - "The General Agent vs Custom Agent table is a good whiteboard moment"
  assessment_quick_check:
    - "Ask students to explain passive vs agentic AI in one sentence"
    - "Have students draw the OODA loop from memory"

Notice: every point is specific to this lesson. No generic teaching advice. A teacher reading this for the first time can immediately use it.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.21%
按下载量换算73

Claude

30.85%
按下载量换算64

Cursor

21.13%
按下载量换算44

Gemini CLI

10.16%
按下载量换算21

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills