Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

eng-agent-task-breakdown(工程师 Agent 任务分解)

eng-agent-task-breakdown 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

eng-agent-task-breakdown 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 67,439。

总安装 245周安装 10GitHub Stars 2下载 79核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:eng-agent-task-breakdown(工程师 Agent 任务分解)
来源仓库:https://github.com/hungv47/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/eng-agent-task-breakdown
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/hungv47/agent-skills --skill eng-agent-task-breakdown
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/hungv47/agent-skills --skill eng-agent-task-breakdown

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

工程师 Agent 任务分解用于将系统架构拆解为可执行的独立任务。适合复杂系统开发前的任务规划和资源分配场景。eng-agent-task-breakdown 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。提供结构化任务格式,包含依赖、验收标准和预期结果。使用时需明确项目边界和技术栈,避免任务粒度不均。

建议在团队协作环境中使用,确保任务间依赖关系清晰。

来源仓库内路径:skills/eng-agent-task-breakdown

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/hungv47/agent-skills --skill eng-agent-task-br…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

eng-agent-task-breakdown 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/hungv47/agent-skills --skill eng-agent-task-breakdown。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

eng-agent-task-breakdown 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

eng-agent-task-breakdown 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

eng-agent-task-breakdown 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

eng-agent-task-breakdown 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 245 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 79 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

eng-agent-task-breakdown 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
eng-agent-task-breakdown

工程师 Agent 任务分解 · 本页

2452接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Agent Task Breakdown

Break architecture into executable tasks. Build them one at a time with AI agents.


Phase 1: Task Decomposition

Task Format

## Task [N]: [Title]

**Depends on:** [Task numbers this requires, or "None"]

**Outcome:** [What exists when done - one sentence]

**Why:** [What this unblocks]

**Acceptance:** [How to verify - specific test, expected result]

**Human action:** [External setup needed, if any]

Sizing Rules

Right size:

  • Changes ONE testable thing
  • 5-30 min agent implementation time
  • Failure cause is obvious and isolated

Split if:

  • Multiple independent things to test
  • Multiple files for different reasons
  • Acceptance has multiple unrelated conditions

Content Rules

Outcomes, not implementation.

Bad: "Create users table with id, email, created_at using Prisma" Good: "Database stores user records with unique emails and timestamps"

Bad: "Install React Query and create useUser hook" Good: "User data fetches efficiently with caching"

The agent knows their tools. Define success, not steps.

Risk-first ordering.

Put uncertain/complex tasks early. Fail fast on hard problems. Don't save integrations and edge cases for the end.

Typical flow: setup > risky core logic > database > API > UI > integration

Dependencies explicit.

Every task lists what it needs. Enables parallel work and failure impact analysis.

Output Structure

# [Project] Tasks

## Prerequisites
[External setup: accounts, keys, env vars]

## Tasks
[Ordered task list with dependencies]

## Out of Scope
[What's NOT in this MVP]

Validation Checklist

Before starting execution, verify:

  • Every task has exactly ONE acceptance test
  • No task depends on something not yet defined
  • Risky/uncertain work is front-loaded
  • All external config is in Prerequisites, not buried in tasks
  • A junior dev could verify each acceptance criteria
  • No task requires unstated knowledge to complete

Anti-Patterns

Too big: "Build the auth system" - This is 5+ tasks disguised as one.

Too small: "Create the Button component" then "Add onClick to Button" - Combine unless genuinely separate concerns.

Hidden dependency: Task 8 needs an API key not mentioned until Task 8. Put it in Prerequisites.

Vague acceptance: "User flow works correctly" - Works how? What's the test?

Implementation-as-outcome: "Use Redux for state management" - That's a how, not a what.


Phase 2: Task Execution

Before Starting

  1. Read architecture doc fully
  2. Read task list fully
  3. Understand the end state before writing code
  4. If ANYTHING is ambiguous, ask. Don't assume.

Per-Task Protocol

  1. State which task you're starting
  2. Write minimum code to pass acceptance
  3. State exactly what to test and expected result
  4. STOP. Wait for confirmation.
  5. Pass → commit, announce next task
  6. Fail → fix the specific issue only, don't expand scope

Coding Rules

DO:
- Write absolute minimum code required
- Focus only on current task
- Keep code modular and testable
- Preserve existing functionality

DO NOT:
- Make sweeping changes
- Touch unrelated code
- Refactor unless task requires it
- Add features not in current task
- Optimize prematurely
- Assume - ask instead

WHEN HUMAN ACTION NEEDED:
- State exactly what to do
- State which file/value to update
- Wait for confirmation before continuing

When Stuck

  1. State what's blocking
  2. Propose smallest modification to unblock
  3. Wait for approval

Never silently skip acceptance criteria. Never reinterpret the task.

Scope Change Protocol

If you discover a missing requirement:

  1. STOP current task
  2. State what's missing and why it's needed
  3. Propose where it fits in task order
  4. Wait for PM to update task list
  5. Resume only after task list is updated

Don't improvise new requirements into existing tasks.


PM Feedback Format

When reporting test results:

Task [N]: PASS | FAIL | BLOCKED

[If FAIL]: What broke, error message, steps to reproduce
[If BLOCKED]: What's preventing test

Keep it tight. Agent needs signal, not narrative.


Example

# Todo App Tasks

## Prerequisites
- Supabase project with URL + anon key in .env.local
- Resend API key in .env.local

## Tasks

## Task 1: Scaffold
**Depends on:** None
**Outcome:** Next.js app runs with Supabase client configured
**Why:** Foundation for all features
**Acceptance:** `npm run dev` shows page, console logs "Supabase connected"

## Task 2: Signup
**Depends on:** 1
**Outcome:** Users create accounts via email/password
**Why:** Unblocks all authenticated features
**Acceptance:** Submit signup form → user appears in Supabase Auth → confirmation email sent

## Task 3: Login + Protected Routes
**Depends on:** 2
**Outcome:** Users log in and access protected pages
**Why:** Unblocks task management UI
**Acceptance:** Login → redirect to /dashboard. Visit /dashboard logged out → redirect to /login

## Task 4: Tasks Table + RLS
**Depends on:** 1
**Outcome:** Database stores tasks per user
**Why:** Unblocks task CRUD
**Acceptance:** Insert task via Supabase dashboard with user_id, title, due_date, completed. Query as different user returns empty.

## Task 5: Create Task
**Depends on:** 3, 4
**Outcome:** Users create tasks from UI
**Why:** Core feature
**Acceptance:** Submit form → task in DB → appears in list without refresh

## Out of Scope
- Social auth
- Task sharing
- Mobile app

平台分布

Codex

34.28%
按下载量换算27

Claude

32.67%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

17.73%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

9.97%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills