Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

eng-agent-task-breakdown工程师 Agent 任务分解

Agent Skill

eng-agent-task-breakdown 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

245

周安装

10

GitHub Stars

2

下载量

79
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:eng-agent-task-breakdown(工程师 Agent 任务分解)
来源仓库:https://github.com/hungv47/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/eng-agent-task-breakdown
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/hungv47/agent-skills --skill eng-agent-task-breakdown
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/hungv47/agent-skills --skill eng-agent-task-breakdown

简介

工程师 Agent 任务分解用于将系统架构拆解为可执行的独立任务。

  • 适合复杂系统开发前的任务规划和资源分配场景。eng-agent-task-breakdown 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 提供结构化任务格式,包含依赖、验收标准和预期结果。
  • 使用时需明确项目边界和技术栈,避免任务粒度不均。
  • 建议在团队协作环境中使用,确保任务间依赖关系清晰。

SKILL.md

Agent Task Breakdown

Break architecture into executable tasks. Build them one at a time with AI agents.


Phase 1: Task Decomposition

Task Format

## Task [N]: [Title]

**Depends on:** [Task numbers this requires, or "None"]

**Outcome:** [What exists when done - one sentence]

**Why:** [What this unblocks]

**Acceptance:** [How to verify - specific test, expected result]

**Human action:** [External setup needed, if any]

Sizing Rules

Right size:

  • Changes ONE testable thing
  • 5-30 min agent implementation time
  • Failure cause is obvious and isolated

Split if:

  • Multiple independent things to test
  • Multiple files for different reasons
  • Acceptance has multiple unrelated conditions

Content Rules

Outcomes, not implementation.

Bad: "Create users table with id, email, created_at using Prisma" Good: "Database stores user records with unique emails and timestamps"

Bad: "Install React Query and create useUser hook" Good: "User data fetches efficiently with caching"

The agent knows their tools. Define success, not steps.

Risk-first ordering.

Put uncertain/complex tasks early. Fail fast on hard problems. Don't save integrations and edge cases for the end.

Typical flow: setup > risky core logic > database > API > UI > integration

Dependencies explicit.

Every task lists what it needs. Enables parallel work and failure impact analysis.

Output Structure

# [Project] Tasks

## Prerequisites
[External setup: accounts, keys, env vars]

## Tasks
[Ordered task list with dependencies]

## Out of Scope
[What's NOT in this MVP]

Validation Checklist

Before starting execution, verify:

  • Every task has exactly ONE acceptance test
  • No task depends on something not yet defined
  • Risky/uncertain work is front-loaded
  • All external config is in Prerequisites, not buried in tasks
  • A junior dev could verify each acceptance criteria
  • No task requires unstated knowledge to complete

Anti-Patterns

Too big: "Build the auth system" - This is 5+ tasks disguised as one.

Too small: "Create the Button component" then "Add onClick to Button" - Combine unless genuinely separate concerns.

Hidden dependency: Task 8 needs an API key not mentioned until Task 8. Put it in Prerequisites.

Vague acceptance: "User flow works correctly" - Works how? What's the test?

Implementation-as-outcome: "Use Redux for state management" - That's a how, not a what.


Phase 2: Task Execution

Before Starting

  1. Read architecture doc fully
  2. Read task list fully
  3. Understand the end state before writing code
  4. If ANYTHING is ambiguous, ask. Don't assume.

Per-Task Protocol

  1. State which task you're starting
  2. Write minimum code to pass acceptance
  3. State exactly what to test and expected result
  4. STOP. Wait for confirmation.
  5. Pass → commit, announce next task
  6. Fail → fix the specific issue only, don't expand scope

Coding Rules

DO:
- Write absolute minimum code required
- Focus only on current task
- Keep code modular and testable
- Preserve existing functionality

DO NOT:
- Make sweeping changes
- Touch unrelated code
- Refactor unless task requires it
- Add features not in current task
- Optimize prematurely
- Assume - ask instead

WHEN HUMAN ACTION NEEDED:
- State exactly what to do
- State which file/value to update
- Wait for confirmation before continuing

When Stuck

  1. State what's blocking
  2. Propose smallest modification to unblock
  3. Wait for approval

Never silently skip acceptance criteria. Never reinterpret the task.

Scope Change Protocol

If you discover a missing requirement:

  1. STOP current task
  2. State what's missing and why it's needed
  3. Propose where it fits in task order
  4. Wait for PM to update task list
  5. Resume only after task list is updated

Don't improvise new requirements into existing tasks.


PM Feedback Format

When reporting test results:

Task [N]: PASS | FAIL | BLOCKED

[If FAIL]: What broke, error message, steps to reproduce
[If BLOCKED]: What's preventing test

Keep it tight. Agent needs signal, not narrative.


Example

# Todo App Tasks

## Prerequisites
- Supabase project with URL + anon key in .env.local
- Resend API key in .env.local

## Tasks

## Task 1: Scaffold
**Depends on:** None
**Outcome:** Next.js app runs with Supabase client configured
**Why:** Foundation for all features
**Acceptance:** `npm run dev` shows page, console logs "Supabase connected"

## Task 2: Signup
**Depends on:** 1
**Outcome:** Users create accounts via email/password
**Why:** Unblocks all authenticated features
**Acceptance:** Submit signup form → user appears in Supabase Auth → confirmation email sent

## Task 3: Login + Protected Routes
**Depends on:** 2
**Outcome:** Users log in and access protected pages
**Why:** Unblocks task management UI
**Acceptance:** Login → redirect to /dashboard. Visit /dashboard logged out → redirect to /login

## Task 4: Tasks Table + RLS
**Depends on:** 1
**Outcome:** Database stores tasks per user
**Why:** Unblocks task CRUD
**Acceptance:** Insert task via Supabase dashboard with user_id, title, due_date, completed. Query as different user returns empty.

## Task 5: Create Task
**Depends on:** 3, 4
**Outcome:** Users create tasks from UI
**Why:** Core feature
**Acceptance:** Submit form → task in DB → appears in list without refresh

## Out of Scope
- Social auth
- Task sharing
- Mobile app

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.28%
按下载量换算27

Claude

32.67%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

17.73%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

9.97%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills