Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

empathic-expressions(移情表达)

empathic-expressions 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

empathic-expressions 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 67,016。

总安装 256周安装 11GitHub Stars 37下载 90核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:empathic-expressions(移情表达)
来源仓库:https://github.com/simhacker/moollm
仓库路径:skills/empathic-expressions
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill empathic-expressions
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill empathic-expressions

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

empathic-expressions 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。多语言代码意图解释工具。理解用户编程意图而非仅语法解析。支持跨编程语言和语法切换。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/empathic-expressions

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill empathic-expressions;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

empathic-expressions 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill empathic-expressions。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

empathic-expressions 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

empathic-expressions 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

empathic-expressions 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

empathic-expressions 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 256 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 90 次,GitHub 37 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

empathic-expressions 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
empathic-expressions

移情表达 · 本页

25637需要联网未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Empathic Expressions

*"Understand intent, generate correct code, teach gently."*

What Is It?

Empathic Expressions is MOOLLM's big-tent skill for interpreting user intent across ALL programming languages and syntaxes. One pipeline. Many languages. Code-switching supported.

The LLM isn't a syntax parser — it's an intent interpreter. It understands what you MEAN, generates what you NEED, and teaches you the correct form as a gift.


The Philosophy

Traditional code processing:

User writes: syntactically correct code
Parser: accepts or rejects
Error: "Unexpected token at line 47"

Empathic expression processing:

User writes: approximate intent, fuzzy syntax, vernacular code
LLM: understands what you meant
Output: correct, idiomatic, working code
Teaching: "Here's how to write that properly"

This is what LLMs are great at. Lean into it.


The Empathic Suite

Empathic Expressions encompasses:

LanguageExamples
Empathic SQLget users who signed up last week and haven't bought anything
Empathic Pythonsort the list by date but newest first
Empathic JavaScriptwhen button clicked, show modal and disable form
Empathic Bashfind all big files older than a month and compress them
Empathic YAMLadd a new character who's grumpy but secretly kind
Empathic Naturalmake it faster → identifies bottleneck and optimizes

All under one roof. One pipeline. Seamless transitions.


Generous Interpretation

Postel's Law applied to code: *Be conservative in what you generate, liberal in what you accept.*

What It Does

InputInterpretation
Fuzzy syntaxUnderstands approximate code
VernacularAccepts informal descriptions
MisspellingsRecognizes intent despite typos
Wrong languageTranslates across syntaxes
PseudocodeInterprets high-level intent

What It Generates

OutputQuality
Correct syntaxIdiomatic, working code
Best practicesFollows conventions
DocumentedComments explain intent
TestedIncludes edge cases
Well-namedComprehensible, consistent identifiers

Naming Conventions

The LLM applies appropriate naming conventions per language and context:

ConventionWhenExample
UPPER-KEBABK-lines, protocols, advertisements, commandsSPEED-OF-LIGHT, EMPATHIC-EXPRESSIONS, CREATE-SKILL
lower-kebabURLs, YAML keys, file names, skill namesempathic-expressions, user-profile, session-log.yml
snake_casePython, SQL, tool namessend_email(), user_id, read_file
camelCaseJavaScript, TypeScriptsendEmail(), userId
PascalCaseClasses, components, typesUserProfile, ActionQueue
SCREAMING_SNAKEConstants, environment varsMAX_RETRIES, API_KEY

Big-endian naming: General → Specific

# Good (big-endian): category first, specific last
user-profile-avatar
session-log-entry
room-description-short

# Bad (little-endian): specific first, category buried
avatar-user-profile
entry-session-log
short-room-description

Why big-endian:

  • Sorts related things together
  • Tab-completion finds related items
  • Grep patterns work naturally
  • Human scanning is faster

The Teaching Gift

generous-interpretation-protocol:

  step-1-understand:
    # Accept whatever the user wrote
    # Interpret with maximum charity
    # Model what they probably meant

  step-2-generate:
    # Produce correct, idiomatic code
    # Follow language best practices
    # Include appropriate comments

  step-3-teach:
    # Echo back the correct form
    # Show what they wrote vs. what it becomes
    # Gentle, not pedantic
    # Gift, not correction

  step-4-clarify:
    # If truly ambiguous, ASK
    # Don't guess when stakes are high
    # Prefer clarification over assumption

Critical: Never make unwarranted assumptions. When truly ambiguous, ask for clarification.


Code-Switching Support

Explicit Switching (Markdown Style)

First, let's query the data:

SELECT * FROM users WHERE active = true


Then process in Python:

for user in results: send_welcome_email(user)


And deploy with bash:

kubectl apply -f deployment.yaml

Clean data islands. Clear boundaries. Syntax highlighting preserved.

Nesting code blocks (CommonMark/GFM standard):

  • Use 4+ backticks for outer fence: ``````` wraps content with ```` blocks
  • Or use tildes for one level: ~~~ outer, ``` inner
  • Both are widely supported (GitHub, GitLab, VS Code, most parsers)
  • Individual backticks can be escaped with ``` but fences cannot

Inline Switching

When context makes it clear:

Get the user_id from the request, look it up in the database,
and return JSON with their profile and last 10 orders.

The LLM understands this involves:

  • HTTP request handling (language TBD)
  • SQL query (SELECT * FROM users WHERE id =?)
  • JSON serialization
  • Another SQL query (SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id =? LIMIT 10)

Context carries across switches. Variables established in one block are available in the next.

Polylinguistic Expressions

Sometimes the best expression mixes languages:

users.filter(u => u.active)  // JS filter
  .map(u => `INSERT INTO archive VALUES (${u.id})`)  // SQL generation
  .forEach(sql => db.exec(sql))  // execution

Empathic Expressions handles these mashups gracefully.


The LLM as Code Processor

The LLM plays many roles:

RoleFunction
Pseudocode InterpreterExecutes high-level intent
Empathic Pretty PrinterFormats with understanding
Generous LinterCatches errors, suggests fixes kindly
Intent CompilerTranslates intent → working code
DepseudofierConverts vague to precise

Example: The Full Pipeline

User writes:

get me all the users who havent logged in for like 30 days
and send them a "we miss you" email
but dont send to anyone whos unsubscribed

LLM interprets:

-- Empathic SQL interpretation
SELECT id, email, name
FROM users
WHERE last_login < NOW() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
  AND unsubscribed = FALSE
  AND email IS NOT NULL;

LLM generates:

# Empathic Python generation
from datetime import datetime, timedelta

def send_win_back_emails():
    """Send 'we miss you' emails to inactive users."""
    cutoff = datetime.now() - timedelta(days=30)

    inactive_users = User.objects.filter(
        last_login__lt=cutoff,
        unsubscribed=False,
        email__isnull=False
    )

    for user in inactive_users:
        send_email(
            to=user.email,
            subject="We miss you!",
            template="win_back",
            context={"name": user.name}
        )

LLM teaches:

I interpreted your request as:
- "30 days" → `datetime.now() - timedelta(days=30)`
- "haven't logged in" → `last_login < cutoff`
- "unsubscribed" → `unsubscribed=False` filter
- "we miss you email" → win-back campaign template

Here's the idiomatic way to write this query...

Used Throughout MOOLLM

Empathic Expressions powers:

SystemUsage
Empathic Templates{{#if user.active}} — expressions in templates
Buff Expressionstrigger: "happiness > 80" — conditions
Advertisementscondition: "has_item('key')" — capability checks
Action Queueparameters: {count: user_input} — dynamic params
Mind Mirrorcuriosity: "very high" — fuzzy state descriptions
Room Exitslocked_unless: "player.has('golden_key')" — gate conditions

The glue that makes everything expressive.


Clarification Protocol

When should the LLM ask for clarification?

SituationAction
Low stakes, clear intentInterpret and proceed
Low stakes, ambiguousMake reasonable choice, note it
High stakes, clear intentProceed with confirmation
High stakes, ambiguousASK FIRST

High stakes examples:

  • Deleting data
  • Financial transactions
  • Irreversible operations
  • Security-sensitive code
clarification-triggers:
  always-ask:
    - "DELETE" without WHERE clause
    - "DROP TABLE" anything
    - Production deployments
    - Payment processing
    - User data exports

  ask-if-ambiguous:
    - Multiple valid interpretations
    - Missing critical parameters
    - Conflicting requirements

Relationship to Other Skills

# The Empathic Suite
empathic_suite:
  components:
    empathic_expressions:
      role: "interpret intent"
      feeds_into: [empathic_templates, postel]
    empathic_templates:
      role: "instantiate"
      feeds_into: [yaml_jazz]
    postel:
      role: "generous interpretation"
    yaml_jazz:
      role: "expressive style"

  philosophy: "SPEED-OF-LIGHT"
  principles:
    - "Work in vectors, delay tokenization"
    - "Preserve precision as long as possible"
    - "Minimize boundary crossings"

Dovetails With


Protocol Symbol

EMPATHIC-EXPRESSIONS

Invoke when: Interpreting fuzzy user intent into working code.

See: PROTOCOLS.yml

平台分布

Codex

39.75%
按下载量换算36

Claude

28.59%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

18.4%
按下载量换算17

Gemini CLI

10.32%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills