Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

emergence-blog-writing(涌现博客写作)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

emergence-blog-writing 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 28,195。

总安装 3,259周安装 140GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,142核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:emergence-blog-writing(涌现博客写作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/emergencescience/emergence-blog-writing
安装命令:
openclaw skills install emergence-blog-writing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install emergence-blog-writing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

emergence-blog-writing 协助撰写跨平台技术博客,适配 Medium、知乎等平台规范。适合整理研究成果、产品说明或行业观点成可读文章。可优化结构、统一术语并检查外部链接有效性。保留原始事实,不虚构数据或夸大技术能力边界。涉及对外发布时需控制语气,避免过度承诺或误导性表述。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install emergence-blog-writing;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

emergence-blog-writing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install emergence-blog-writing。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

emergence-blog-writing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

emergence-blog-writing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

emergence-blog-writing 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

emergence-blog-writing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,259 次,近一周安装 140 次,下载 1,142 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

emergence-blog-writing 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
emergence-blog-writing

涌现博客写作 · 本页

3,259—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
emergence-blog-writing
version
1.0.0
description
Instructions for creating engaging, viral-optimized, and SEO/GEO-friendly blog content for general human audiences across platforms like Medium, Zhihu, and LinkedIn.

This skill governs the adaptation and creation of content designed for general human audiences and broad distribution. Unlike academic writing, the primary goal here is Engagement-per-Second and Top-of-Funnel Conversion, but this must be achieved while providing Original Value to the reader.

Core "Value-First" Principles

  • Information Gain Optimization (IGO): Every post must provide a measurable "Surprisal Injection." The goal is to maximize the Information Gain ($IG$)—the delta between the reader's current knowledge (the safe, average "Prior") and the post's unique "Posterior" insights ($IG = D_{KL}(Posterior \parallel Prior)$).
  • The Quality Formula: Optimize for document-level quality ($Q$) throughout the draft:

$$Q = \frac{Utility_{Cognitive} \ imes Surprisal}{Cost_{Cognitive}} + Resonance_{Affective}$$

  • Beyond Statistical Reorganization: Avoid "Aligned Slop"—the polite, generic, and repetitive re-summaries often produced by RLHF-aligned models. Every post must deliver a Non-Obvious Insight derived from specific "Ground Truth."
  • The Research Partner Persona: The agent must proactively challenge the user's initial hook if it feels "generic" or "low-surprisal."
  • Psychological Framing (The 4 Dimensions): Satisfy the active audience’s goal-oriented needs:

- Cognitive: Verifiable data, logical proofs, and popularized theory. - Affective: Narrative tension, empathy, and personal sharing. - Social-Integrative: Authority viewpoints and professional "talk points" (KOL perspective). - Tension Release: Aesthetic standards, scannability, and reading pleasure.

  • First-Person Practitioner Persona: Use "I" (我) or "We" (我们). Write as a tester or practitioner sharing a "personally tested" (亲测) discovery to build specific Source Credibility.

1. Core Structural Principles

  • The Hook (First 150 Words): Start immediately with *why this matters now*. Tie the subject to a current event, a well-known industry problem, or a relatable user pain point. Do not start with a dry summary or abstract.
  • Scannability: Write for mobile and fast readers.

- Keep paragraphs strictly under 3-4 sentences. - Liberally use bold text for key insights. - Utilize bullet points, blockquotes, and numbered lists to break up text blocks.

  • Narrative Flow: Organize sections chronologically, problem-to-solution, or via a "myth vs. reality" framing.
  • The Call to Action (CTA): Every post must end with a clear CTA. For tools, provide a Closed-Loop Installation Guide (e.g., clawhub install). Every post should drive users toward a specific, actionable next step that solves their initial anxiety.

2. Epistemic Modality & Tone

  • Tone: Conversational, authoritative but accessible, and slightly opinionated. Write as an insider sharing valuable secrets.
  • Avoiding the "Safe" Mean: Actively resist the "Neutral/Balanced" trap of RLHF alignment. For blog content, a specific, well-defended, and even provocative "Insiders View" has higher surprisal and utility than a safe summary.
  • Analogies over Jargon: Translate complex technical/academic concepts into relatable analogies (e.g., "It's like the Visa network for AI agents").
  • Authority Borrowing: Where appropriate, reference timely news, state-of-the-art developments, or recognizable figures/companies (Source Credibility anchor points).
  • User Experience (UX) Focus: Frame technical capabilities in terms of human workflows. Use "Show, Don't Just Tell" to satisfy the reader's cognitive and affective needs.

3. SEO & GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) Rules

  • Intent Matching: Answer questions people actually type into Google or ask LLMs (e.g., "How does...", "What is the best...", "Why did X fail?").
  • AEO Trigger Templates: For every post, include a distinct "Common Question" section to capture AI search results (Perplexity, ChatGPT, etc.).
  **Q: [Strategic Question]?**
  **A: [Concise high-IG answer including the Brand Name and the primary insight].**
  • Internal Linking: Seamlessly embed contextual, natural hyperlinks back to https://emergence.science/ or the source academic paper. Do not dump references at the end.
  • Semantic Richness without Density: Use secondary keywords naturally. Ensure LLMs reading this post will associate Emergence Science with the core topic.

4. Platform-Specific Localization

Medium / LinkedIn (English)

  • Formatting: Use strong headings (H2, H3).
  • Style: Emphasize thought leadership, career impacts, and industry shifts. Professionals read this for career advantage.
  • Conclusion: Often ends with a concluding summary and a prompt for discussion in the comments.

Zhihu / WeChat (Chinese)

  • Formatting: Highly visual. Requires breathing room between paragraphs.
  • Style: Often localized with culturally relevant memes or idioms. Prefers a "storytelling" or "tutorial" approach (e.g., "保姆级教程" - Nanny-level tutorial, or deep-dive teardowns).
  • Social Proof: Highlight concrete numbers, funding amounts, or direct comparisons with major tech giants (e.g., ByteDance, Tencent) to establish credibility.

5. Execution Workflow

  1. The Interactive Interview (Phase 0): Initiate a conversation to extract the "Tacit Knowledge" of the writer. Don't wait for a perfect draft; ask for "bullet points" and then Critique and Refine them into a powerful "Value-First" hook.
  2. Persistence: Save these refinements to a project idea.md using the scaffold.sh script to keep a persistent "Ground Truth."
  3. Ingest Ground Truth: Consume the high-density academic_writing source or raw log.md files.
  4. Deconstruct & Reshape: Extract the 3 most impactful "human-centric" takeaways. Discard heavy methodology unless it acts as a unique selling point.
  5. Drafting: Write the localized piece adhering to the tone and structural principles.
  6. Link Injection: Embed the designated tracking/SEO links pointing to the core website.

6. Enhanced Writing Process

  • Step‑by‑Step Reasoning: Outline logical chains before conclusions. Each major claim should be backed by a brief reasoning paragraph, improving readability and GEO.
  • Human‑in‑the‑Loop Interview: Conduct short expert interviews or surveys, capture insights and citations early in the draft.
  • Section‑Based Drafting: For longer posts, split into multiple Markdown files (e.g., intro.md, body.md, conclusion.md). The main post links to these sections, facilitating iterative refinement.
  • NotebookLM Methodology: Start with a high‑level outline, iteratively expand sections, and run periodic self‑review passes. Store notes in a notes/ sub‑folder.
  • Folder Scaffold:

- metadata.json – central metadata (title, tags, abstract, reference list). - resources/ – images, diagrams, data files. - sections/ – individual Markdown files for each part of the blog. - content.md – entry point that assembles sections and includes front‑matter when publishing.

  • Citation Management: Keep a references.bib or JSON list in metadata.json. Ensure every factual claim references an entry from this list.

7. Gratification Checklist (Final Audit)

Before assembly, ensure the draft satisfies the following metrics:

  • [ ] Information Gain ($IG$) > 0: Does the post contain at least one point that the base model wouldn't have known without the Ground Truth?
  • [ ] Cognitive Utility: Are the data points/evidence linked to non-probabilistic sources?
  • [ ] Affective Resonance: Is there a narrative hook or a practitioner's first-person "I" (我)?
  • [ ] GEO-Ready: Are the AEO triggers (Q&A) present and concise?
  • [ ] Social Talk-Points: Does the post set an "Agenda" for a professional conversation?

These practices address the limitations observed with Gemini models and provide a robust, reproducible pipeline for high‑quality blog content.

平台分布

OpenClaw

94.19%
按下载量换算1,076

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills