Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

elixir-docs-reviewElixir 文档审查

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

5,217

周安装

209

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,689
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:elixir-docs-review(Elixir 文档审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anderskev/elixir-docs-review
安装命令:
openclaw skills install elixir-docs-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install elixir-docs-review

简介

Elixir文档审查技能用于审核@moduledoc、@doc和doctest的正确性。

  • 适用于检查文档覆盖率和ExDoc最佳实践,确保项目文档的完整性和可读性。
  • 通过自动化工具生成文档质量报告,适合在OpenClaw中辅助文档维护。
  • 安装命令为openclaw skills install elixir-docs-review,需确认权限和文件操作边界。
  • 建议参考原始README了解具体规则,注意维护状态和网络访问限制。

SKILL.md

name
elixir-docs-review
description
Reviews Elixir documentation for completeness, quality, and ExDoc best practices. Use when auditing @moduledoc, @doc, @spec coverage, doctest correctness, and cross-reference usage in .ex files.

Elixir Documentation Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
@moduledoc, @doc quality, anti-patternsreferences/doc-quality.md
@spec, @type, @typedoc coveragereferences/spec-coverage.md

Review Checklist

Module Documentation

  • [ ] All public modules have @moduledoc
  • [ ] First-line summary is concise (one line, used by tools as summary)
  • [ ] @moduledoc includes ## Examples where appropriate
  • [ ] @moduledoc false only on internal/implementation modules

Function Documentation

  • [ ] All public functions have @doc
  • [ ] All public functions have @spec
  • [ ] @doc describes return values clearly
  • [ ] Multi-clause functions documented before first clause
  • [ ] Function head declared when arg names need clarification

Doctests

  • [ ] Doctests present for pure, deterministic functions
  • [ ] No doctests for side-effectful operations (DB, HTTP, etc.)
  • [ ] Doctests actually run (module included in test file)

Cross-References

  • [ ] Module references use backtick auto-linking (MyModule)
  • [ ] Function refs use proper arity format (function/2)
  • [ ] Type refs use t: prefix (t:typename/0)
  • [ ] No plain-text references where auto-links are possible

Metadata

  • [ ] @since annotations on new public API additions
  • [ ] @deprecated with migration guidance where appropriate

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

  • @doc false on callback implementations - Documented at behaviour level
  • @doc false on protocol implementations - Protocol docs cover the intent
  • Missing @spec on private functions - @spec optional for internals
  • Short @moduledoc without ## Examples on simple utility modules - Not every module needs examples
  • Using @impl true without separate @doc - Inherits documentation from behaviour

Context-Sensitive Rules

IssueFlag ONLY IF
Missing @moduledocModule is public AND not a protocol impl
Missing @specFunction is public AND exported
Missing doctestsFunction is pure AND deterministic
Generic @docDoc restates function name without adding value

Gates (sequenced — do not skip)

Work in order. Do not draft or ship a finding until the prior step passes.

  1. Scope lockPass when: You listed the exact .ex/.exs file paths (or Module names) under review; no vague “the project” scope.
  2. Full-context readPass when: For each candidate issue, you read the full surrounding definition (all clauses for multi-clause functions; full @moduledoc block for module-level claims), not only a diff hunk or search snippet.
  3. Evidence bundlePass when: Every draft finding uses the [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE header (line range allowed) and includes a verbatim quote or pointer to the @doc / @spec / doctest text in question. Module.function/arity may appear as supporting context but does not replace the [FILE:LINE] anchor. For “doctest fails” claims, Pass when: you cite mix test output for the relevant file or line, or the exact error string.
  4. Protocol before reportPass when: You loaded and followed review-verification-protocol (its Pre-Report checklist) before finalizing the issue list—not after.

When to Load References

  • Reviewing @moduledoc or @doc quality, seeing anti-patterns -> doc-quality.md
  • Reviewing @spec, @type, or @typedoc coverage -> spec-coverage.md

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

73.9%
按下载量换算1,248

安全审计

VirusTotal

未展示

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills