Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

eightd(eightd 搜索)

eightd 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

eightd 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 54,235。

总安装 514周安装 21GitHub Stars 1下载 165核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:eightd(eightd 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure
仓库路径:skills/eightd
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Eightd
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Eightd

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

实施完整的 8D 问题解决方法论。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。必须包含 D0 到 D8 全部九个阶段,不可省略。涵盖应急响应、团队组建、问题描述和根本原因分析。提供永久纠正措施和预防措施的标准流程。

eightd 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/eightd

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

eightd 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Eightd。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

eightd 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

eightd 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

eightd 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

eightd 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 514 次,近一周安装 21 次,下载 165 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

eightd 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
eightd

eightd 搜索 · 本页

5141只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

8D Problem Solving Skill

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Complete All Phases

When generating an 8D report, you MUST include ALL nine phases (D0 through D8) in every response. Never truncate or omit phases. If the response would be long, still complete all phases — use concise language but include every discipline. A partial 8D report is invalid.

Mandatory phases checklist for every 8D report output:

  • D0: Emergency Response Actions
  • D1: Team Formation
  • D2: Problem Description (with IS/IS NOT)
  • D3: Interim Containment Actions + Escape Point
  • D4: Root Cause Analysis (occurrence AND detection)
  • D5: Permanent Corrective Actions
  • D6: Implementation and Verification
  • D7: Systemic Prevention
  • D8: Team Recognition and Closure

CONDENSED FORMAT RULE: When generating an 8D report, write each phase in 3-6 bullet points maximum. Do NOT use elaborate multi-column tables — use simple prose or brief bullets. This keeps total length manageable so ALL phases D0–D8 are always included in a single response. Never stop writing before D8 is complete. If you are generating a long response and feel you are running out of space, shorten earlier phases to make room — but D8 MUST always be the final section written, fully completed. An 8D report that ends before D8 is a critical failure.

NO PLACEHOLDERS RULE: Every field must be populated with real, specific content derived from the user's input. Never output brackets like [PART NUMBER] or [TBD] — if information is missing, make a reasonable inference and note the assumption clearly (e.g., "Assumed: thread spec M12×1.75 based on typical application"). A template with empty fields is not an 8D report. The IS/IS NOT analysis in D2 must contain actual specific values for What, Where, When, and Extent — never leave cells empty, never use ⚠️ markers or "unknown" labels, never ask the user to fill in the data later. If a dimension or quantity is not stated, derive a plausible specific value from context and label it as assumed. A D2 section that withholds values pending more information is a failing response.

NEVER REQUEST INFORMATION BEFORE GENERATING RULE: When a user describes a problem or asks for an 8D report, you MUST immediately generate the full D0–D8 report using whatever information is provided. Do NOT ask clarifying questions first. Do NOT present a list of questions requesting the user to supply data before you begin. Use assumed/inferred values for any missing details and label them as assumptions. A response that asks "please provide the following information" instead of generating the 8D report is a critical failure. If the user provides even a brief problem description, that is sufficient to generate a complete 8D report.

D6–D8 TRUNCATION PREVENTION: These three phases are the most commonly truncated. As you write D5, actively monitor response length. If D5 is growing long, cut it short — D6, D7, and D8 are non-negotiable. After completing D5, you must write D6, then D7, then D8 in sequence. Do not stop. Do not summarise with "phases D6–D8 follow the standard template." Write each phase fully. The response is invalid if it ends before D8 closure text is written.

Overview

The 8D (Eight Disciplines) methodology is a team-based problem-solving process for identifying, correcting, and eliminating recurring problems. Originally developed by Ford Motor Company, it is now the automotive industry standard for customer complaint resolution and internal quality problem solving.

Skill Integration

SkillIntegration Point
A3CriticalThinkingRoot cause analysis methods
PFMEAUpdate FMEAs with new failure modes discovered
ControlPlanUpdate Control Plans with new controls
AutomotiveManufacturingWork instructions and process changes
InternalAuditVerify effectiveness through audit

8D Phase Overview

PhaseNamePurposeTimeframe
D0PrepareEmergency response, symptom assessmentImmediate
D1TeamForm cross-functional team24 hours
D2ProblemDefine problem clearly48 hours
D3ContainmentProtect customer, stop bleeding24-72 hours
D4Root CauseIdentify true root cause(s)2-4 weeks
D5Corrective ActionsDevelop permanent solutions2-4 weeks
D6ImplementationImplement and verify1-4 weeks
D7PreventionPrevent recurrence systemicallyOngoing
D8ClosureRecognise team, close reportAfter verification

D0: Prepare for the 8D Process

Emergency Response Actions (ERA)

Before formal 8D begins, immediate actions to protect:

  1. Customer Protection

- Identify all potentially affected product - Stop shipment of suspect product - Notify customer of situation - Provide replacement/rework timeline

  1. Symptom Assessment

- What is the symptom? - When was it first detected? - How much product is affected? - Is this a safety/regulatory issue?

  1. **8D Trigger Criteria
Trigger8D Required?
Customer complaintYes
Field failureYes
Safety/regulatoryYes (expedited)
Internal scrap >thresholdRecommended
Repeat occurrenceYes
High severity PFMEA itemRecommended

D0 Outputs

  • Decision to proceed with 8D
  • Initial ERA documented
  • Urgency level assigned (24h / 72h / Standard)

D1: Establish the Team

Team Composition

RoleResponsibilityRequired?
Champion/SponsorRemove barriers, approve resourcesYes
Team LeaderCoordinate activities, report statusYes
Process ExpertDeep process knowledgeYes
Quality EngineerData analysis, methodologyYes
Production RepShop floor perspectiveYes
Customer RepCustomer perspectiveIf applicable
Supplier RepSupplier perspectiveIf applicable
Subject Matter ExpertsSpecific technical knowledgeAs needed

Team Size

  • Ideal: 4-7 members
  • Minimum: 3 members
  • Maximum: 10 members (larger teams slow progress)

D1 Outputs

  • Team roster with roles and contact information
  • Meeting schedule established
  • Resources allocated
  • Communication plan

D2: Describe the Problem

Problem Description Techniques

5W2H Analysis:

QuestionAnswer
What is the problem?Specific defect/symptom
Where was it found?Location (customer, inspection, operation)
When was it found?Date, time, shift, production lot
Who found it?Person, inspection method
Why is it a problem?Impact to customer/function
How many are affected?Quantity, frequency, trend
How was it detected?Detection method used

IS / IS NOT Analysis:

FactorISIS NOTDistinction
What[Observed defect][Similar but not this]
Where[Location found][Where not found]
When[Time first seen][Time not seen]
Extent[Scope affected][Not affected]

Problem Statement Format

Good problem statement:

"Outer diameter of part #12345 measures 25.08-25.12mm (spec: 25.00 ±0.05mm) on 147 parts from production lot 2026-01-15, discovered at customer receiving inspection."

Bad problem statement:

"Parts are out of spec" (too vague)

D2 Outputs

  • Clear, quantified problem statement
  • IS/IS NOT analysis completed
  • All affected product identified and quantified
  • Timeline of events established

D3: Interim Containment Actions (ICA)

Containment Scope

LocationAction Required
In-process (WIP)Quarantine, sort, disposition
Finished goodsQuarantine, sort, disposition
In-transitRecall or intercept
At customerSort, replace, rework on-site
In fieldService campaign if needed

Containment Actions

  1. Sort - 100% inspection to separate good/bad
  2. Hold - Quarantine suspect product
  3. Replace - Provide conforming product
  4. Enhanced inspection - Temporary additional checks
  5. Process change - Temporary parameter adjustment

Containment Verification

Before releasing containment:

  • Verify containment is effective
  • Track containment metrics (PPM before/after)
  • Document all contained material
  • Customer acceptance of containment

Escape Point Analysis

Critical Question: Where should this have been caught?

StageDid we have detection?Why did it escape?
Source inspection
In-process inspection
Final inspection
Functional test
Audit

D3 Outputs

  • All suspect material identified and quarantined
  • Containment actions verified effective
  • Customer notified of containment
  • Escape point identified

D4: Root Cause Analysis

Root Cause Categories

Occurrence Root Cause: Why did the defect occur?

  • Process, machine, material, method, environment

Detection Root Cause (Escape Point): Why wasn't it caught?

  • Inspection method, frequency, capability, training

Root Cause Analysis Tools

ToolBest ForReference
5-WhySimple cause chainsreference/root-cause-tools.md
Fishbone (Ishikawa)Brainstorming all potential causesreference/root-cause-tools.md
IS/IS NOTNarrowing down causesD2 output
Comparative AnalysisWhen similar items are OKCompare good vs bad
Timeline AnalysisProcess-related issuesSequence of events
Fault TreeComplex failure modesTop-down logic

5-Why Guidelines

GuidelineDescription
Ask "why" until physical root causeNot stopping at symptoms
Stay in your controlDon't blame customer or supplier without evidence
Verify each stepEach "because" must be proven
Multiple branches OKMay have multiple root causes
Stop when actionableRoot cause should suggest solution

Root Cause Verification

Verification Methods:

MethodDescription
Re-creationReproduce defect by applying root cause
EliminationRemove root cause, verify defect stops
Statistical correlationData shows cause-effect relationship
Physical evidenceForensic analysis confirms cause

Root cause is verified when:

  • Can reproduce defect by introducing cause
  • Can eliminate defect by removing cause
  • Explains all data (IS/IS NOT)
  • Team consensus on verification

D4 Outputs

  • Verified occurrence root cause(s)
  • Verified detection root cause(s) (escape point)
  • Root cause analysis documentation
  • Evidence supporting root cause

D5: Develop Corrective Actions

⚠ WORD BUDGET: D5 content MUST NOT exceed 80 words total. Stop writing D5 immediately when you approach 80 words. D6, D7, and D8 MUST be written after D5 — they are more important than a complete D5. After writing D5, your very next characters must be "## D6".

Corrective Action Types

TypeAddressesExample
Permanent Corrective Action (PCA)Occurrence root causeChange process parameter
Detection ImprovementEscape pointAdd inspection step
Systemic PreventionRecurrenceUpdate FMEA/Control Plan

Corrective Action Hierarchy

Prefer higher-order controls:

LevelTypeEffectivenessExample
1EliminateHighestDesign change removes failure mode
2SubstituteHighDifferent material/process
3Engineering controlMedium-HighPoka-yoke, fixture change
4AdministrativeMediumProcedure change, training
5DetectionLowestAdditional inspection

Corrective Action Criteria

Each corrective action must be:

  • Specific - Clear what will be done
  • Measurable - Can verify implementation
  • Assignable - Single owner responsible
  • Realistic - Can be implemented
  • Time-bound - Due date defined

Risk Assessment

Before implementing corrective actions:

  • Will action introduce new risks?
  • Update PFMEA with new information
  • Validate action doesn't create new problems

D5 Outputs: Corrective actions with owners/dates, risk assessed, PFMEA and Control Plan updates identified.


⚠ MANDATORY CONTINUATION: You MUST now write D6, D7, and D8. Do not stop. Do not summarise. Write "## D6" as your next line.


D6: Implement and Verify Corrective Actions

⚠ MANDATORY SECTION — must appear in every 8D report output. Do not skip.

  • Implement each PCA per owner and due date; confirm completion in writing
  • Verify implementation (did we do it correctly?) then validate effectiveness (did it work?)
  • Collect before/after data — control charts, PPM, Cpk — over 1–3 months
  • Update WI, Control Plan, FMEA to reflect changes; retain records

D6 Outputs: Actions implemented, effectiveness data collected, documents updated.


D7: Prevent Recurrence

⚠ MANDATORY SECTION — must appear in every 8D report output. Do not skip.

  • Update PFMEA: add new failure mode, revise S/O/D ratings, add new controls
  • Update Control Plan: add/modify inspection steps and reaction plan
  • Revise Work Instructions: embed process changes permanently
  • Retrain operators and quality staff on changes
  • Document Lessons Learned; deploy horizontally to similar parts/processes/suppliers

D7 Outputs: PFMEA updated, Control Plan updated, WI revised, training done, lessons learned filed, horizontal deployment complete.


D8: Recognise Team and Close

⚠ MANDATORY FINAL SECTION — the 8D report is NOT complete until D8 is written. If you have written D0 through D7, you MUST now write D8. Do not end the response before this section is fully written.

  • Confirm all closure criteria met: root cause verified, PCAs implemented and effective, documents updated, training complete, customer satisfied
  • Obtain customer acceptance of 8D closure (if customer complaint)
  • Formally recognise team contribution — acknowledge individuals, share success with organisation
  • Archive completed 8D report in quality records (minimum 3 years per IATF 16949)
  • Close 8D number in tracking system

D8 Outputs: 8D report approved and archived, customer acceptance received, team recognised, report closed.


COMPLETION CHECK: If you have reached this line, you have completed all nine phases (D0–D8). The 8D report is now complete. Do not truncate any earlier phase to reach this point — shorten prose if needed but all nine phase headers must appear.


Templates

  • templates/8d-report.md - Full 8D report template

Reference Materials

  • reference/root-cause-tools.md - 5-Why, Fishbone, IS/IS NOT
  • reference/verification-methods.md - How to verify root cause and effectiveness

MNMUK-Specific Guidelines

Response Timeframes

CustomerICA DueRCA DueFull 8D Due
OEM Tier 124 hours10 days30 days
Standard48 hours15 days45 days
Internal72 hours20 days60 days

8D Numbering

Format: 8D-[YYYY]-[SEQ] Example: 8D-2026-001

Approval Authority

SeverityApproval Required
Safety/RegulatoryQuality Manager + GM
Customer complaintQuality Manager
Internal >£1000Quality Manager
Internal <£1000Quality Engineer

Quick Reference

# Generate 8D for customer complaint
"Create 8D for customer complaint: [describe problem]"

# Root cause analysis assistance
"Help me do 5-Why analysis for [problem]"
"Generate fishbone diagram for [defect type]"

# Corrective action development
"Recommend corrective actions for [root cause]"

# 8D review
"Review this 8D for completeness"

Workflow Routing

Input / TriggerWorkflowOutput
"Create 8D for..." / "Customer complaint about..."Full D0–D8 report generationComplete 8D report with all 9 phases
"5-Why for..." / "Root cause analysis for..."D4 root cause analysis only5-Why chain with verified root cause
"Fishbone for..." / "Ishikawa for..."Fishbone diagram (6M)Cause-and-effect diagram in text format
"Containment for..." / "ICA for..."D3 containment onlyContainment action plan + escape point
"Corrective actions for..." / "Fix for root cause..."D5 corrective action developmentRanked action list with owners/dates
"Review this 8D..." / "Check 8D quality..."8D quality auditGap list against AIAG criteria
"8D number / format / template"Template provision8D blank template or MNMUK format

Examples

Example 1 — Full 8D for customer complaint:

"Create an 8D for customer complaint: supplier received 50 damper assemblies with incorrect gas charge pressure — 85 bar actual vs 110 bar spec. Customer is Multimatic, complaint received 2026-03-20."

Kai generates a complete D0–D8 report with ERA, team, IS/IS NOT analysis, containment actions, 5-Why root cause, corrective actions, and closure criteria — all in a single condensed response.

Example 2 — Root cause analysis only:

"Help me do a 5-Why analysis: CNC lathe produced 30 parts with OD oversize by 0.08mm — tool offset not applied after tool change."

Kai builds a 5-Why chain from the symptom down to the procedural/training root cause, then identifies both occurrence and detection root causes.

Example 3 — Corrective action development:

"Our 8D root cause is: no documented procedure requires the operator to verify tool offset after an unplanned tool change. Recommend corrective actions."

Kai provides a ranked corrective action hierarchy (eliminate → poka-yoke → procedure → training), with SMART criteria, owners, and FMEA/Control Plan update requirements.

平台分布

Claude Code

31.41%
按下载量换算52

windsurf

21.33%
按下载量换算35

trae

17.4%
按下载量换算29

OpenCode

12.43%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

8.74%
按下载量换算14

Codex

3.61%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills