Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

editorial-standards(编辑标准)

editorial-standards 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

editorial-standards 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 65,351。

总安装 282周安装 12GitHub Stars 7下载 99核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:editorial-standards(编辑标准)
来源仓库:https://github.com/hack23/riksdagsmonitor
仓库路径:skills/editorial-standards
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/riksdagsmonitor --skill editorial-standards
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/riksdagsmonitor --skill editorial-standards

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于政治新闻报道的编辑质量控制与事实核查。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中确保 OSINT/INTOP 信息准确性。遵循平衡、清晰、可追溯原则,维护专业新闻伦理。需建立多层审核机制,杜绝虚假或片面陈述。

editorial-standards 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/editorial-standards

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/riksdagsmonitor --skill editorial-stand…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

editorial-standards 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/riksdagsmonitor --skill editorial-standards。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

editorial-standards 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

editorial-standards 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

editorial-standards 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

editorial-standards 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 282 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 99 次,GitHub 7 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

editorial-standards 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
editorial-standards

编辑标准 · 本页

2827需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

✍️ Editorial Standards Skill

Purpose

Provides expertise in maintaining the highest editorial quality standards for political journalism. Covers fact-checking protocols, OSINT/INTOP political intelligence editorial standards, editorial ethics, and quality assurance processes for professional news production.

Core Principles

  1. Accuracy First - Every fact must be verifiable and verified
  2. Clarity Always - Complex ideas explained simply and precisely
  3. Balance Required - Multiple perspectives fairly represented
  4. Attribution Clear - Sources properly cited and credited
  5. Style Consistent - Follow established guidelines rigorously

This Skill Enforces

  • Fact-checking protocols - Two-source rule, primary source verification
  • OSINT/INTOP intelligence style - Analytical, data-driven, concise, contextual
  • AP/Reuters standards - Accuracy, fairness, transparency
  • Copy editing - Grammar, spelling, punctuation, syntax
  • Editorial review - Multi-stage quality checks before publication
  • Error correction - Transparent, prompt, prominent corrections
  • Legal compliance - Defamation avoidance, privacy protection

Political Intelligence Editorial Standards

Writing Principles

  • Clarity - Short sentences, simple words, active voice
  • Precision - Exact meaning, no ambiguity
  • Brevity - No unnecessary words, tight prose
  • Elegance - Sophisticated vocabulary without pretension
  • Engagement - Compelling narratives, reader focus

Prohibited Practices

  • ❌ Jargon and buzzwords (unless explained)
  • ❌ Clichés and overused phrases
  • ❌ Hyperbole and sensationalism
  • ❌ Passive voice (except when appropriate)
  • ❌ Acronyms without definition

Preferred Style

  • ✅ Use "said" not "stated" or "claimed"
  • ✅ Prefer "but" to "however" at sentence start
  • ✅ Use "will" not "shall" for future tense
  • ✅ Spell out numbers one to nine, use numerals for 10+
  • ✅ Use Oxford comma in lists

Fact-Checking Protocol

Pre-Publication Checks

Level 1: Writer Self-Check

  • All facts from authoritative sources
  • Two independent sources for major claims
  • Direct quotes verbatim and in context
  • Statistics from original source documents
  • Names, titles, dates verified
  • Links/citations functional

Level 2: Copy Editor Review

  • Grammar, spelling, punctuation correct
  • Style guide compliance verified
  • Logical flow and structure sound
  • Technical accuracy confirmed
  • Headlines/subheads accurate
  • Photo captions correct

Level 3: Fact-Checker Verification

  • All statistics traced to original sources
  • Expert claims verified with credentials check
  • Historical facts cross-referenced
  • Legal claims reviewed by legal expert
  • Scientific/technical claims expert-verified
  • Potentially controversial claims extra-verified

Level 4: Editorial Review

  • Balanced presentation confirmed
  • Ethical standards met
  • Legal risk assessed
  • Public interest justified
  • Headline doesn't overstate
  • Final approval for publication

Source Hierarchy

Primary Sources (Most Authoritative):

  1. Official government documents
  2. Legislative records
  3. Court filings and judgments
  4. Academic peer-reviewed research
  5. Statistical agencies (SCB, Eurostat)

Secondary Sources (Require Verification): 6. News reports from reputable outlets 7. Think tank reports 8. Expert interviews 9. NGO reports 10. Press releases (treated skeptically)

Tertiary Sources (Generally Avoid): 11. Blog posts 12. Social media posts 13. Wikipedia (useful for leads, not citations) 14. Unverified online sources

Style Guide Quick Reference

Editorial Conventions

Dates: February 6th 2026 (not Feb 6, 2026) Numbers: Spell one to nine, use numerals 10+ Currency: SEK, euros, dollars (spell out, no symbols in body text) Percentages: 10% (use symbol, no space) Titles: Lowercase unless part of name (prime minister, but Prime Minister Andersson) Quotes: Double quotes "standard", single quotes 'for quotes within quotes'

Commonly Misused Terms:

  • Use "which" for non-essential clauses, "that" for essential
  • "Different from" not "different to" or "different than"
  • "Between" for two things, "among" for more
  • "Fewer" for countable, "less" for uncountable
  • "More than" for numbers, "over" for physical position

Swedish Political Terminology

Correct Usage:

  • Riksdag (not Parliament, except in explanatory context)
  • Regeringen (Government, not Cabinet)
  • Myndigheter (Agencies, plural)
  • Folkpartiet liberalerna (Liberals) → L
  • Socialdemokraterna (Social Democrats) → S
  • Moderaterna (Moderates) → M

Editorial Review Process

Daily News Cycle

Morning (08:00-12:00):

  • News gathering and source development
  • Initial research and fact-checking
  • Story assignments and planning

Afternoon (12:00-17:00):

  • Writing and initial editing
  • Fact-checking and verification
  • Copy editing and style review

Evening (17:00-20:00):

  • Editorial review and final approval
  • Legal review if needed
  • Multi-language adaptation
  • Publication scheduling

Quality Gates

Gate 1: Story Pitch - Concept approved by editor Gate 2: Draft Review - Structure and facts sound Gate 3: Copy Edit - Grammar and style correct Gate 4: Fact Check - All facts verified Gate 5: Legal Review - No defamation/privacy issues Gate 6: Editorial Approval - Final green light Gate 7: Publication - Multi-language simultaneous release

Error Correction Protocol

When Errors Occur

Minor Errors (spelling, grammar, formatting):

  • Correct immediately in article
  • Note in revision history: "Updated: [timestamp] - Minor correction"

Factual Errors (incorrect data, misattributions):

  • Correct prominently in article
  • Add editor's note at top: "Correction: [explanation]"
  • Update social media posts if shared

Significant Errors (major facts wrong, unfair representation):

  • Publish separate correction article
  • Link from original article prominently
  • Notify affected parties
  • Review editorial process to prevent recurrence

Remember

  • Accuracy is non-negotiable - No compromise for speed
  • Style serves clarity - Rules aid understanding, not hinder
  • Political intelligence standard - Analytical, data-driven, precise
  • Multiple checks - Four-level review process mandatory
  • Transparent corrections - Acknowledge errors promptly, prominently
  • Legal awareness - Defamation, privacy, GDPR compliance
  • Source hierarchy - Primary sources preferred, secondary verified
  • Attribution clear - Readers must know source of every claim
  • Balance required - Multiple perspectives fairly represented
  • Copy editing matters - Grammar errors undermine credibility

References


Use this skill when: Writing political news articles, editing submissions for quality and style, fact-checking claims before publication, training journalists on editorial standards, or establishing quality assurance processes for news operations.

平台分布

Codex

33.96%
按下载量换算34

Claude

31.48%
按下载量换算31

Cursor

18.75%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

8.34%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills