Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

edge-cases(边缘情况)

edge-cases 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

edge-cases 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 43,364。

总安装 989周安装 40GitHub Stars 228下载 310核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:edge-cases(边缘情况)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rohunj/claude-build-workflow
仓库路径:skills/edge-cases
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rohunj/claude-build-workflow --skill edge-cases
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rohunj/claude-build-workflow --skill edge-cases

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

edge-cases 系统分析 PRD 以识别遗漏的边缘情况、失败模式、竞态条件与潜在风险点。覆盖输入边界、网络中断、并发冲突、资源耗尽等多维度场景,提出 PRD 更新建议。输出结构化列表,便于团队补充验收标准或新增用户故事,降低上线后事故概率。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/rohunj/claude-build-workflow --skill edge-cases edge-cases 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/edge-cases

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/rohunj/claude-build-workflow --skill edge-case…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

edge-cases 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/rohunj/claude-build-workflow --skill edge-cases。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

edge-cases 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

edge-cases 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

edge-cases 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

edge-cases 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 989 次,近一周安装 40 次,下载 310 次,GitHub 228 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

edge-cases 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
edge-cases

边缘情况 · 本页

989228操作浏览器MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Edge Case Analysis

Systematically analyze a PRD to identify edge cases, failure modes, race conditions, and scenarios that might be overlooked during implementation.


The Job

  1. Read the provided PRD thoroughly
  2. Analyze each user story and functional requirement
  3. Identify potential edge cases across multiple categories
  4. Propose updates to the PRD (new acceptance criteria, new stories, or updates to existing stories)

Output: A list of edge cases with recommended PRD updates.


Edge Case Categories

1. Input Edge Cases

  • Empty/null values: What if required fields are empty?
  • Boundary values: Max lengths, min/max numbers, date ranges
  • Invalid formats: Wrong data types, malformed input
  • Unicode/special characters: Emojis, RTL text, HTML injection attempts
  • Large data: What if there are 10,000 items instead of 10?

2. State Edge Cases

  • Race conditions: Two users editing the same thing simultaneously
  • Stale data: Data changed by another process between read and write
  • Partial completion: What if the operation fails halfway?
  • Concurrent operations: Multiple tabs, multiple sessions
  • Offline/reconnection: What happens when connection drops?

3. User Behavior Edge Cases

  • Rapid clicks: User clicks submit multiple times quickly
  • Back button: User navigates back during an operation
  • Browser refresh: User refreshes during a multi-step flow
  • Abandoned flows: User leaves in the middle of a process
  • Unexpected navigation: User directly accesses URLs they shouldn't

4. Error Handling Edge Cases

  • Network failures: API timeouts, server errors
  • Validation errors: How are errors displayed and recovered from?
  • Permission errors: User loses access mid-operation
  • Resource exhaustion: Rate limits, storage limits

5. Data Edge Cases

  • First-time use: No data exists yet (empty states)
  • Legacy data: Old data that doesn't match new schema
  • Data migration: What happens to existing data when schema changes?
  • Cascade effects: Deleting something that other things depend on

6. Security Edge Cases

  • Authentication expiry: Session times out during operation
  • Authorization changes: Permissions change while user is active
  • Input sanitization: XSS, SQL injection, command injection
  • Data leakage: Error messages exposing sensitive info

7. Performance Edge Cases

  • Cold start: First load performance
  • Large payloads: Response times with lots of data
  • Memory leaks: Long-running sessions
  • N+1 queries: Database performance at scale

Analysis Process

For each user story in the PRD:

Step 1: Read the Story

Understand what the story is trying to accomplish.

Step 2: Apply Category Checklist

Go through each edge case category above and ask:

  • Does this category apply to this story?
  • What specific edge cases might occur?

Step 3: Rate Severity

For each identified edge case:

  • Critical: Could cause data loss, security breach, or system crash
  • High: User-facing error or broken functionality
  • Medium: Poor UX or minor functionality issue
  • Low: Minor annoyance or cosmetic issue

Step 4: Propose PRD Update

For each edge case, propose one of:

  • New acceptance criteria for existing story
  • New user story if scope is significant
  • Update to functional requirements
  • Note in Technical Considerations

Output Format

# Edge Case Analysis for [PRD Name]

## Summary
- Total edge cases identified: X
- Critical: X | High: X | Medium: X | Low: X

## Edge Cases by Story

### US-001: [Story Title]

| Edge Case | Category | Severity | Recommended Action |
|-----------|----------|----------|-------------------|
| User submits empty form | Input | High | Add acceptance criteria: "Empty form shows validation errors" |
| User double-clicks submit | User Behavior | Medium | Add acceptance criteria: "Submit button disabled after first click" |

### US-002: [Story Title]
...

## New Stories Recommended

### US-NEW-001: Handle concurrent edits
**Description:** As a user, I want to see a warning if someone else has edited the item since I started editing.

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] System checks for updates before saving
- [ ] Warning shown if data has changed
- [ ] User can choose to overwrite or refresh

**Rationale:** Addresses race condition edge case in US-003 and US-004.

## Updated Functional Requirements

- FR-NEW-1: The system must validate all user input on both client and server side
- FR-NEW-2: All destructive operations must be idempotent

## Technical Considerations to Add

- Implement optimistic locking for concurrent edit detection
- Add retry logic with exponential backoff for network failures
- Use database transactions for multi-step operations

Checklist Before Completing

  • Analyzed each user story against all edge case categories
  • Rated severity for each edge case
  • Provided concrete, actionable recommendations
  • Grouped related edge cases to avoid duplicate stories
  • Kept recommendations focused (don't over-engineer)
  • Prioritized critical and high severity items

Tips

  • Don't go overboard: Focus on likely scenarios, not every theoretically possible edge case
  • Be specific: "User enters > 255 characters in name field" is better than "Input validation"
  • Consider the context: A personal project needs less edge case handling than a banking app
  • Look for patterns: If you find one race condition, there are probably more
  • Think like an attacker: What would someone try to break the system?

平台分布

Claude Code

28.78%
按下载量换算89

OpenCode

22.51%
按下载量换算70

Codex

14.98%
按下载量换算46

Gemini CLI

11.84%
按下载量换算37

Antigravity

8.07%
按下载量换算25

Cursor

3.59%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills