Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

dynamic-schema-design(动态模式设计)

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

dynamic-schema-design 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 65,351。

总安装 282周安装 12GitHub Stars 61下载 99核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dynamic-schema-design(动态模式设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
仓库路径:skills/dynamic-schema-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill dynamic-schema-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill dynamic-schema-design

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

动态模式设计专注于 EF Core JSON 列的灵活 schema 构建与迁移管理。适用于 CMS 内容类型扩展、动态属性存储及避免频繁数据库结构变更。支持 LINQ 查询 JSON 数据、制定索引策略,并提供从 EAV 到 JSON 的迁移方案。

需结合具体 .NET 版本和 EF Core 配置使用,建议在严格类型模式下开发以确保安全。dynamic-schema-design 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/dynamic-schema-design

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill d…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

dynamic-schema-design 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill dynamic-sch…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

dynamic-schema-design 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

dynamic-schema-design 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

dynamic-schema-design 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

dynamic-schema-design 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 282 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 99 次,GitHub 61 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

dynamic-schema-design 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
dynamic-schema-design

动态模式设计 · 本页

28261权限未标注MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Dynamic Schema Design with EF Core JSON Columns

Guidance for implementing flexible content schemas using EF Core JSON columns, enabling dynamic custom fields without database migrations.

When to Use This Skill

  • Designing custom field storage for CMS content types
  • Implementing dynamic properties that vary per content instance
  • Avoiding frequent database migrations for schema changes
  • Querying JSON data with LINQ in EF Core
  • Planning indexing strategies for JSON columns
  • Migrating from EAV (Entity-Attribute-Value) to JSON storage

EF Core JSON Column Fundamentals

Basic Configuration (.NET 10 / EF Core 10)

// Entity with JSON-stored custom fields
public class ContentItem
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public string ContentType { get; set; } = string.Empty;
    public string Title { get; set; } = string.Empty;
    public DateTime CreatedUtc { get; set; }

    // JSON column for dynamic fields
    public CustomFieldsData CustomFields { get; set; } = new();
}

// Owned entity stored as JSON
public class CustomFieldsData
{
    public Dictionary<string, object?> Fields { get; set; } = new();
    public Dictionary<string, FieldMetadata> Metadata { get; set; } = new();
}

public class FieldMetadata
{
    public string FieldType { get; set; } = string.Empty;
    public bool IsRequired { get; set; }
    public string? DisplayName { get; set; }
}

DbContext Configuration

public class ContentDbContext : DbContext
{
    protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.Entity<ContentItem>(entity =>
        {
            entity.HasKey(e => e.Id);

            // Configure JSON column with ToJson()
            entity.OwnsOne(e => e.CustomFields, builder =>
            {
                builder.ToJson();
            });
        });
    }
}

JSON Column Patterns

Pattern 1: Typed Custom Fields

Best for when field schemas are known at compile time.

// Strongly-typed custom fields
public class ArticleFields
{
    public string? Subtitle { get; set; }
    public List<string> Tags { get; set; } = new();
    public AuthorInfo? Author { get; set; }
    public int? ReadTimeMinutes { get; set; }
    public bool IsFeatured { get; set; }
}

public class AuthorInfo
{
    public Guid AuthorId { get; set; }
    public string DisplayName { get; set; } = string.Empty;
    public string? Bio { get; set; }
}

// Entity using typed fields
public class Article
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public string Title { get; set; } = string.Empty;
    public string Body { get; set; } = string.Empty;

    public ArticleFields Fields { get; set; } = new();
}

// Configuration
modelBuilder.Entity<Article>(entity =>
{
    entity.OwnsOne(e => e.Fields, builder =>
    {
        builder.ToJson();
        builder.OwnsOne(f => f.Author);
    });
});

Pattern 2: Dynamic Property Bag

Best for fully dynamic schemas where fields vary per instance.

public class DynamicContent
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public string ContentType { get; set; } = string.Empty;

    // Flexible property bag
    public JsonDocument? Properties { get; set; }
}

// Alternative using Dictionary
public class FlexibleContent
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public string ContentType { get; set; } = string.Empty;

    public Dictionary<string, JsonElement> Fields { get; set; } = new();
}

Pattern 3: Hybrid Approach (Recommended)

Combine fixed columns for common fields with JSON for extensions.

public class ContentItem
{
    // Fixed columns (indexed, frequently queried)
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public string ContentType { get; set; } = string.Empty;
    public string Title { get; set; } = string.Empty;
    public string? Slug { get; set; }
    public ContentStatus Status { get; set; }
    public DateTime CreatedUtc { get; set; }
    public DateTime? PublishedUtc { get; set; }

    // JSON column for type-specific and custom fields
    public ContentExtensions Extensions { get; set; } = new();
}

public class ContentExtensions
{
    // Part-specific data stored as nested JSON
    public TitlePartData? TitlePart { get; set; }
    public SeoPartData? SeoPart { get; set; }
    public MediaPartData? MediaPart { get; set; }

    // Fully dynamic custom fields
    public Dictionary<string, object?> CustomFields { get; set; } = new();
}

Querying JSON Columns

LINQ Queries on JSON Properties

// Query nested JSON property
var featuredArticles = await context.Articles
    .Where(a => a.Fields.IsFeatured == true)
    .ToListAsync();

// Query nested object property
var articlesByAuthor = await context.Articles
    .Where(a => a.Fields.Author!.AuthorId == authorId)
    .ToListAsync();

// Query array contains
var taggedArticles = await context.Articles
    .Where(a => a.Fields.Tags.Contains("technology"))
    .ToListAsync();

// Order by JSON property
var orderedArticles = await context.Articles
    .OrderByDescending(a => a.Fields.ReadTimeMinutes)
    .ToListAsync();

Raw SQL for Complex JSON Queries

// SQL Server JSON_VALUE
var results = await context.ContentItems
    .FromSqlRaw(@"
        SELECT * FROM ContentItems
        WHERE JSON_VALUE(Extensions, '$.CustomFields.rating') > 4
    ")
    .ToListAsync();

// PostgreSQL jsonb operators
var results = await context.ContentItems
    .FromSqlRaw(@"
        SELECT * FROM ""ContentItems""
        WHERE ""Extensions""->>'CustomFields'->>'category' = 'tech'
    ")
    .ToListAsync();

Indexing Strategies

Computed Columns for Frequently Queried JSON Properties

-- SQL Server: Add computed column
ALTER TABLE ContentItems
ADD Status AS JSON_VALUE(Extensions, '$.status') PERSISTED;

-- Create index on computed column
CREATE INDEX IX_ContentItems_Status ON ContentItems(Status);

PostgreSQL GIN Index for JSONB

-- Index entire JSON column
CREATE INDEX IX_ContentItems_Extensions ON "ContentItems"
USING GIN ("Extensions");

-- Index specific path
CREATE INDEX IX_ContentItems_Tags ON "ContentItems"
USING GIN (("Extensions"->'CustomFields'->'tags'));

EF Core Migration for Computed Column

migrationBuilder.Sql(@"
    ALTER TABLE ContentItems
    ADD ComputedStatus AS JSON_VALUE(Extensions, '$.SeoPart.noIndex') PERSISTED;

    CREATE INDEX IX_ContentItems_ComputedStatus
    ON ContentItems(ComputedStatus);
");

Schema Evolution

Adding New Fields

No migration required - just update the class and serialize:

// Before
public class ArticleFields
{
    public string? Subtitle { get; set; }
}

// After - no migration needed
public class ArticleFields
{
    public string? Subtitle { get; set; }
    public string? Summary { get; set; }  // New field
    public List<string> RelatedLinks { get; set; } = new();  // New field
}

Handling Missing/Null Properties

// Use nullable types with defaults
public class ContentFields
{
    public string? OptionalField { get; set; }
    public int RequiredWithDefault { get; set; } = 0;
    public List<string> CollectionWithDefault { get; set; } = new();
}

// Query with null handling
var items = await context.ContentItems
    .Where(c => c.Extensions.CustomFields != null
             && c.Extensions.CustomFields.ContainsKey("rating"))
    .ToListAsync();

Data Migration for Schema Changes

// Background job to migrate existing data
public async Task MigrateContentSchema(ContentDbContext context)
{
    var batchSize = 100;
    var skip = 0;

    while (true)
    {
        var items = await context.ContentItems
            .OrderBy(c => c.Id)
            .Skip(skip)
            .Take(batchSize)
            .ToListAsync();

        if (!items.Any()) break;

        foreach (var item in items)
        {
            // Transform old schema to new
            if (item.Extensions.CustomFields.TryGetValue("old_field", out var value))
            {
                item.Extensions.CustomFields["new_field"] = value;
                item.Extensions.CustomFields.Remove("old_field");
            }
        }

        await context.SaveChangesAsync();
        skip += batchSize;
    }
}

Performance Considerations

When to Use JSON Columns

ScenarioUse JSON ColumnUse Regular Column
Frequently filtered/sortedNoYes
Rarely queried, display onlyYesNo
Variable per content typeYesNo
Fixed across all instancesNoYes
Part of unique constraintNoYes
Full-text search neededConsiderYes

Best Practices

DO:
- Use hybrid approach (fixed + JSON)
- Index frequently queried JSON paths
- Use typed DTOs when schema is known
- Validate JSON structure in application layer
- Use pagination for large JSON arrays

DON'T:
- Store large binary data in JSON
- Use JSON for foreign key relationships
- Rely solely on JSON queries for performance-critical paths
- Store deeply nested hierarchies (flatten when possible)
- Skip schema validation for user-supplied data

Serialization Configuration

System.Text.Json Options

services.AddDbContext<ContentDbContext>(options =>
{
    options.UseSqlServer(connectionString, sqlOptions =>
    {
        // Configure JSON serialization
    });
});

// Custom JsonSerializerOptions
public static class JsonDefaults
{
    public static JsonSerializerOptions ContentOptions { get; } = new()
    {
        PropertyNamingPolicy = JsonNamingPolicy.CamelCase,
        DefaultIgnoreCondition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull,
        Converters =
        {
            new JsonStringEnumConverter(JsonNamingPolicy.CamelCase)
        }
    };
}

Custom Type Converters

// For complex types not directly serializable
public class PolymorphicFieldConverter : JsonConverter<object>
{
    public override object? Read(ref Utf8JsonReader reader,
        Type typeToConvert, JsonSerializerOptions options)
    {
        using var doc = JsonDocument.ParseValue(ref reader);
        var root = doc.RootElement;

        // Determine type from discriminator
        if (root.TryGetProperty("$type", out var typeElement))
        {
            var typeName = typeElement.GetString();
            // Resolve and deserialize appropriate type
        }

        return root.Clone();
    }

    public override void Write(Utf8JsonWriter writer,
        object value, JsonSerializerOptions options)
    {
        JsonSerializer.Serialize(writer, value, value.GetType(), options);
    }
}

Content Part JSON Storage

Storing Multiple Parts in Single JSON Column

public class ContentItem
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public string ContentType { get; set; } = string.Empty;

    // All parts stored in single JSON column
    public ContentParts Parts { get; set; } = new();
}

public class ContentParts
{
    public TitlePart? Title { get; set; }
    public BodyPart? Body { get; set; }
    public AutoroutePart? Autoroute { get; set; }
    public PublishLaterPart? PublishLater { get; set; }
    public SeoMetaPart? SeoMeta { get; set; }

    // Extension point for custom parts
    public Dictionary<string, JsonElement> CustomParts { get; set; } = new();
}

// Part definitions
public record TitlePart(string Title, string? DisplayTitle = null);
public record BodyPart(string Html, string? PlainText = null);
public record AutoroutePart(string Path, bool IsCustom = false);
public record PublishLaterPart(DateTime? ScheduledUtc, string? TimeZone = null);
public record SeoMetaPart(string? MetaTitle, string? MetaDescription, bool NoIndex = false);

Validation Patterns

Fluent Validation for JSON Fields

public class ContentItemValidator : AbstractValidator<ContentItem>
{
    public ContentItemValidator(IContentTypeRegistry typeRegistry)
    {
        RuleFor(x => x.Title).NotEmpty().MaximumLength(200);

        RuleFor(x => x.Extensions)
            .SetValidator(new ContentExtensionsValidator(typeRegistry));
    }
}

public class ContentExtensionsValidator : AbstractValidator<ContentExtensions>
{
    public ContentExtensionsValidator(IContentTypeRegistry typeRegistry)
    {
        When(x => x.SeoPart != null, () =>
        {
            RuleFor(x => x.SeoPart!.MetaTitle)
                .MaximumLength(60)
                .When(x => x.SeoPart?.MetaTitle != null);

            RuleFor(x => x.SeoPart!.MetaDescription)
                .MaximumLength(160)
                .When(x => x.SeoPart?.MetaDescription != null);
        });
    }
}

Related Skills

  • content-type-modeling - Content Type hierarchy and composition
  • content-versioning - Version history with JSON snapshots
  • headless-api-design - API contracts for JSON-based content

平台分布

Antigravity

31.52%
按下载量换算31

trae

23.87%
按下载量换算24

windsurf

18.1%
按下载量换算18

Claude Code

13.26%
按下载量换算13

Codex

7.78%
按下载量换算8

Gemini CLI

3.09%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills