Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

research(研究)

research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

research 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 42,038。

总安装 1,115周安装 46GitHub Stars 6下载 364核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:research(研究)
来源仓库:https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform
仓库路径:skills/research
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill research
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill research

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

research 执行多轮网络搜索交叉验证技术主题信息。限定最大搜索次数保证效率同时控制成本消耗。综合比对来源可靠性与时效性生成可信结论。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。明确标注存疑部分与证据不足的观点避免误导。

research 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/research

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill research;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

research 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform --skill research。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

research 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

research 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

research 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

research 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,115 次,近一周安装 46 次,下载 364 次,GitHub 6 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

research 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
research

研究 · 本页

1,1156需要联网MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.

Quick Summary

Goal: Research, analyze, and report on technical topics using multi-source web investigation.

Workflow:

  1. Scope Definition — Identify key terms, recency needs, evaluation criteria
  2. Information Gathering — Use gemini CLI or WebSearch (max 5 searches), cross-reference sources
  3. Analysis & Synthesis — Identify patterns, pros/cons, security/performance implications
  4. Report Generation — Save structured markdown report with findings and recommendations

Key Rules:

  • Maximum 5 research tool calls per session
  • Prefer gemini CLI if available, fallback to WebSearch
  • Always cite sources and verify across multiple independent sources

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Research

Research Methodology

Always honoring YAGNI, KISS, and DRY principles. Be honest, be brutal, straight to the point, and be concise.

Phase 1: Scope Definition

First, you will clearly define the research scope by:

  • Identifying key terms and concepts to investigate
  • Determining the recency requirements (how current must information be)
  • Establishing evaluation criteria for sources
  • Setting boundaries for the research depth

Phase 2: Systematic Information Gathering

You will employ a multi-source research strategy:

  1. Search Strategy:

- Check if gemini bash command is available, if so, execute gemini -m gemini-2.5-flash -p "...your search prompt..." bash command (timeout: 10 minutes) and save the output using Report: path from ## Naming section (including all citations). - If gemini bash command is not available, fallback to WebSearch tool. - Run multiple gemini bash commands or WebSearch tools in parallel to search for relevant information. - Craft precise search queries with relevant keywords - Include terms like "best practices", "2024", "latest", "security", "performance" - Search for official documentation, GitHub repositories, and authoritative blogs - Prioritize results from recognized authorities (official docs, major tech companies, respected developers) - IMPORTANT: You are allowed to perform at most 5 researches (max 5 tool calls), user might request less than this amount, strictly respect it, think carefully based on the task before performing each related research topic.

  1. Deep Content Analysis:

- When you found a potential Github repository URL, use docs-seeker skill to find read it. - Focus on official documentation, API references, and technical specifications - Analyze README files from popular GitHub repositories - Review changelog and release notes for version-specific information

  1. Video Content Research:

- Prioritize content from official channels, recognized experts, and major conferences - Focus on practical demonstrations and real-world implementations

  1. Cross-Reference Validation:

- Verify information across multiple independent sources - Check publication dates to ensure currency - Identify consensus vs. controversial approaches - Note any conflicting information or debates in the community

Phase 3: Analysis and Synthesis

You will analyze gathered information by:

  • Identifying common patterns and best practices
  • Evaluating pros and cons of different approaches
  • Assessing maturity and stability of technologies
  • Recognizing security implications and performance considerations
  • Determining compatibility and integration requirements

Phase 4: Report Generation

Notes:

  • Research reports are saved using Report: path from ## Naming section.
  • If ## Naming section is not available, ask main agent to provide the output path.

You will create a comprehensive markdown report with the following structure:

# Research Report: [Topic]

## Executive Summary

[2-3 paragraph overview of key findings and recommendations]

## Research Methodology

- Sources consulted: [number]
- Date range of materials: [earliest to most recent]
- Key search terms used: [list]

## Key Findings

### 1. Technology Overview

[Comprehensive description of the technology/topic]

### 2. Current State & Trends

[Latest developments, version information, adoption trends]

### 3. Best Practices

[Detailed list of recommended practices with explanations]

### 4. Security Considerations

[Security implications, vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies]

### 5. Performance Insights

[Performance characteristics, optimization techniques, benchmarks]

## Comparative Analysis

[If applicable, comparison of different solutions/approaches]

## Implementation Recommendations

### Quick Start Guide

[Step-by-step getting started instructions]

### Code Examples

[Relevant code snippets with explanations]

### Common Pitfalls

[Mistakes to avoid and their solutions]

## Resources & References

### Official Documentation

- [Linked list of official docs]

### Recommended Tutorials

- [Curated list with descriptions]

### Community Resources

- [Forums, Discord servers, Stack Overflow tags]

### Further Reading

- [Advanced topics and deep dives]

## Appendices

### A. Glossary

[Technical terms and definitions]

### B. Version Compatibility Matrix

[If applicable]

### C. Raw Research Notes

[Optional: detailed notes from research process]

Quality Standards

You will ensure all research meets these criteria:

  • Accuracy: Information is verified across multiple sources
  • Currency: Prioritize information from the last 12 months unless historical context is needed
  • Completeness: Cover all aspects requested by the user
  • Actionability: Provide practical, implementable recommendations
  • Clarity: Use clear language, define technical terms, provide examples
  • Attribution: Always cite sources and provide links for verification

Special Considerations

  • When researching security topics, always check for recent CVEs and security advisories
  • For performance-related research, look for benchmarks and real-world case studies
  • When investigating new technologies, assess community adoption and support levels
  • For API documentation, verify endpoint availability and authentication requirements
  • Always note deprecation warnings and migration paths for older technologies

Output Requirements

Your final report must:

  1. Be saved using the Report: path from ## Naming section with a descriptive filename
  2. Include a timestamp of when the research was conducted
  3. Provide clear section navigation with a table of contents for longer reports
  4. Use code blocks with appropriate syntax highlighting
  5. Include diagrams or architecture descriptions where helpful (in mermaid or ASCII art)
  6. Conclude with specific, actionable next steps

IMPORTANT: Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports. IMPORTANT: In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.

Remember: You are not just collecting information, but providing strategic technical intelligence that enables informed decision-making. Your research should anticipate follow-up questions and provide comprehensive coverage of the topic while remaining focused and practical.


Closing Reminders

  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
  • IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality

平台分布

Claude Code

27.36%
按下载量换算100

windsurf

21.03%
按下载量换算77

OpenCode

16.85%
按下载量换算61

Codex

12.5%
按下载量换算46

Antigravity

8.47%
按下载量换算31

Gemini CLI

3.21%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills