Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

dspy-advanced-module-composition(dspy 高级模块组成)

dspy-advanced-module-composition 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

dspy-advanced-module-composition 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 5,694。

总安装 533周安装 22GitHub Stars 73下载 174核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dspy-advanced-module-composition(dspy 高级模块组成)
来源仓库:https://github.com/omidzamani/dspy-skills
仓库路径:skills/dspy-advanced-module-composition
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/omidzamani/dspy-skills --skill dspy-advanced-module-composition
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/omidzamani/dspy-skills --skill dspy-advanced-module-composition

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

dspy-advanced-module-composition 支持复杂 DSPy 程序的模块化组装,适合构建多阶段推理流水线。它集成 Ensemble 优化器与 MultiChainComparison 进行共识合成与策略对比。适用于需要分支流程、 fallback 机制与高精度输出的高级应用场景。

使用前请确保已定义基础模块并完成签名设计工作流。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/dspy-advanced-module-composition

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/omidzamani/dspy-skills --skill dspy-advanced-m…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

dspy-advanced-module-composition 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/omidzamani/dspy-skills --skill dspy-advanced-module-comp…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

dspy-advanced-module-composition 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

dspy-advanced-module-composition 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

dspy-advanced-module-composition 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

dspy-advanced-module-composition 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 533 次,近一周安装 22 次,下载 174 次,GitHub 73 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

dspy-advanced-module-composition 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
dspy-advanced-module-composition

dspy 高级模块组成 · 本页

53373需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

DSPy Advanced Module Composition

Goal

Compose complex DSPy programs using the Ensemble optimizer, MultiChainComparison for reasoning synthesis, and sequential module patterns.

When to Use

  • Need consensus from multiple approaches
  • Comparing different reasoning strategies
  • Building robust pipelines with fallbacks
  • Complex multi-step workflows with branching
  • Ensemble methods for improved accuracy

Related Skills

Inputs

InputTypeDescription
moduleslist[dspy.Module]Modules to compose
composition_typestr"ensemble", "sequential", "comparison"

Outputs

OutputTypeDescription
composed_programdspy.ModuleComposed multi-module program

Workflow

Phase 1: Ensemble Voting

Combine multiple programs using the Ensemble optimizer:

import dspy
from dspy.teleprompt import Ensemble

dspy.configure(lm=dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini"))

# Define a signature for the task
class BasicQA(dspy.Signature):
    """Answer questions with short factoid answers."""
    question = dspy.InputField()
    answer = dspy.OutputField()

# Create multiple program instances (should be optimized/compiled programs)
# For simple demonstration, we'll use different predictors
program1 = dspy.Predict(BasicQA)
program2 = dspy.ChainOfThought(BasicQA)
program3 = dspy.Predict(BasicQA)

# Ensemble is an optimizer that compiles programs together
ensemble = Ensemble(reduce_fn=dspy.majority)
ensembled_program = ensemble.compile([program1, program2, program3])

# Use the ensembled program
result = ensembled_program(question="What is 2 + 2?")
print(result.answer)  # Voted answer

Phase 2: MultiChainComparison

Compare multiple reasoning attempts:

import dspy

class BasicQA(dspy.Signature):
    """Answer questions with short factoid answers."""
    question = dspy.InputField()
    answer = dspy.OutputField(desc="often between 1 and 5 words")

class ComparisonPipeline(dspy.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        # Generate multiple reasoning attempts
        self.cot = dspy.ChainOfThought(BasicQA)

        # Compare M attempts and select best
        # Must pass a Signature class, not a string
        self.compare = dspy.MultiChainComparison(
            BasicQA,
            M=3,  # Number of attempts to compare
            temperature=0.7
        )

    def forward(self, question):
        # Generate multiple completions to compare
        # Each completion must have rationale/reasoning field
        completions = [
            self.cot(question=question)
            for _ in range(3)
        ]

        # MultiChainComparison synthesizes them into best answer
        # Pass completions as positional arg, not keyword arg
        return self.compare(completions, question=question)

# Usage
dspy.configure(lm=dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini"))
pipeline = ComparisonPipeline()
result = pipeline(question="Explain quantum computing")
print(f"Best answer: {result.answer}")
print(f"Rationale: {result.rationale}")

Phase 3: Sequential Composition

Chain modules for multi-step workflows:

import dspy

# Define signatures for each step
class QueryRewrite(dspy.Signature):
    """Rewrite a question for better retrieval."""
    question = dspy.InputField()
    refined_query: str = dspy.OutputField()

class GenerateAnswer(dspy.Signature):
    """Generate answer from context and question."""
    context = dspy.InputField()
    question = dspy.InputField()
    answer = dspy.OutputField()

class ValidateAnswer(dspy.Signature):
    """Validate answer quality."""
    answer = dspy.InputField()
    question = dspy.InputField()
    is_valid: bool = dspy.OutputField()
    confidence: float = dspy.OutputField()

class SequentialRAG(dspy.Module):
    """Multi-step RAG pipeline."""

    def __init__(self):
        # Step 1: Query rewriting
        self.rewrite = dspy.Predict(QueryRewrite)

        # Step 2: Retrieval
        self.retrieve = dspy.Retrieve(k=5)

        # Step 3: Answer generation
        self.generate = dspy.ChainOfThought(GenerateAnswer)

        # Step 4: Validation
        self.validate = dspy.Predict(ValidateAnswer)

    def forward(self, question):
        # Sequential execution
        refined = self.rewrite(question=question)
        passages = self.retrieve(refined.refined_query).passages

        answer_pred = self.generate(
            context=passages,
            question=question
        )

        validation = self.validate(
            answer=answer_pred.answer,
            question=question
        )

        return dspy.Prediction(
            answer=answer_pred.answer,
            is_valid=validation.is_valid,
            confidence=validation.confidence
        )

# Usage
dspy.configure(lm=dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini"))
rag = SequentialRAG()
result = rag(question="What causes lightning?")
print(f"Answer: {result.answer} (valid: {result.is_valid})")

Phase 4: Fallback Strategies

Handle failures with fallback modules:

import dspy
import logging

logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

class BasicQA(dspy.Signature):
    """Answer questions with short factoid answers."""
    question = dspy.InputField()
    answer = dspy.OutputField()

class RobustQA(dspy.Module):
    """Fallback strategy for errors."""

    def __init__(self):
        self.primary = dspy.ChainOfThought(BasicQA)
        self.fallback = dspy.Predict(BasicQA)

    def forward(self, question):
        try:
            result = self.primary(question=question)
            if result.answer and len(result.answer) > 10:
                return result
        except Exception as e:
            logger.error(f"Primary failed: {e}")

        return self.fallback(question=question)

Production Example

import dspy
from dspy.teleprompt import BootstrapFewShot, Ensemble

class GenerateAnswer(dspy.Signature):
    """Generate answer from context and question."""
    context = dspy.InputField()
    question = dspy.InputField()
    answer = dspy.OutputField()

class MultiStrategyQA(dspy.Module):
    """Production QA with retrieval."""

    def __init__(self):
        self.retrieve = dspy.Retrieve(k=3)
        self.generate = dspy.ChainOfThought(GenerateAnswer)

    def forward(self, question: str):
        context = self.retrieve(question).passages
        return self.generate(context=context, question=question)

# Usage with optimization
dspy.configure(lm=dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini"))
qa = MultiStrategyQA()

# First, optimize the base program
optimizer = BootstrapFewShot(
    metric=lambda ex, pred, trace: ex.answer in pred.answer,
    max_bootstrapped_demos=3
)

compiled_qa = optimizer.compile(qa, trainset=trainset)

# Then create ensemble from multiple optimized programs
# (train with different seeds or optimizers to get diversity)
program1 = optimizer.compile(qa, trainset=trainset)
program2 = optimizer.compile(qa, trainset=trainset)
program3 = optimizer.compile(qa, trainset=trainset)

ensemble = Ensemble(reduce_fn=dspy.majority)
final_program = ensemble.compile([program1, program2, program3])

Best Practices

  1. Test modules independently - Validate each module before composition
  2. Handle failures gracefully - Use try/except in parallel composition
  3. Balance cost vs accuracy - Ensembles are expensive (N × cost)
  4. Optimize composed programs - Use BootstrapFewShot or MIPROv2 on final composition
  5. Module reusability - Design modules to work in multiple compositions

Limitations

  • Ensemble increases cost linearly with module count
  • Voting strategies may not work for all output types
  • Sequential composition amplifies latency
  • Error propagation in chains can be hard to debug
  • Parallel composition requires careful state management

Official Documentation

平台分布

Codex

35.87%
按下载量换算62

Claude

28.59%
按下载量换算50

Cursor

17.04%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

8.71%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills