Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

drill-recovery(钻恢复)

drill-recovery 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

drill-recovery 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 15,487。

总安装 588周安装 24GitHub Stars 12下载 190核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:drill-recovery(钻恢复)
来源仓库:https://github.com/quangrau/vibekit
仓库路径:skills/drill-recovery
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/quangrau/vibekit --skill drill-recovery
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/quangrau/vibekit --skill drill-recovery

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

drill-recovery 提供面向独立 Web 应用的灾难恢复演练场景与安全检查清单,强调实战韧性。聚焦 SPA、SSR 与全栈项目,覆盖备份策略、故障转移、监控告警与数据恢复流程设计。采用渐进式学习路径,从项目上下文读取到技术栈扫描,逐步构建高可用架构认知。

适用于个人开发者与小团队,避免复杂运维术语,注重可落地与低成本实践原则。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/drill-recovery

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/quangrau/vibekit --skill drill-recovery;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

drill-recovery 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/quangrau/vibekit --skill drill-recovery。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

drill-recovery 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

drill-recovery 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

drill-recovery 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

drill-recovery 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 588 次,近一周安装 24 次,下载 190 次,GitHub 12 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

drill-recovery 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
drill-recovery

钻恢复 · 本页

58812需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Disaster Recovery Drills

Disaster drill scenarios and security checklists for indie web apps. Teaches big-tech resilience principles through indie-scale practice.

Scope: Web applications only (SPA, SSR, full-stack). Not mobile, desktop, CLI, or games. Audience: Solo devs, indie builders, vibe-coders. No corporate jargon.

Workflow

Step 1: Read Project Context

Read the project's context file to understand the codebase:

  • Look for CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md at the project root
  • If none found, ask the human to describe their project briefly

Step 2: Scan Project Stack

Scan the project directly using your file tools. Gather:

From package.json:

  • Framework (next.js, vite-react, nuxt, sveltekit, remix, astro, etc.)
  • Database SDK (@supabase/supabase-js, firebase, prisma, drizzle, mongoose)
  • Auth (supabase-auth, nextauth, lucia, clerk)
  • Payments (stripe, lemonsqueezy)
  • AI APIs (openai, @anthropic-ai/sdk, @google/generative-ai)
  • Monitoring (@sentry/react, dd-trace, logrocket)

From project files:

  • Hosting config (vercel.json, wrangler.toml, netlify.toml, fly.toml)
  • TypeScript (tsconfig.json)
  • CI/CD (.github/workflows/)
  • Edge functions (supabase/functions/*)
  • Database tables (from supabase/migrations/ or prisma/schema.prisma)
  • Storage buckets (from migrations or storage config)

From env/security files:

  • .gitignore covers.env files?
  • Client-side env vars (NEXT_PUBLIC_*, VITE_*) — flag only if they contain actual secrets, not public-by-design keys like anon keys or site keys
  • CSP headers configured? (check _headers, middleware, next.config)
  • RLS enabled? (check migration files for ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY)

If no project files are available, ask 3-5 quick questions: stack, hosting, database, users, backups.

Step 3: Load Previous State

Check for docs/.dr-state.json. This tracks completed items across runs.

{
  "last_run": "2026-02-21",
  "checklist_completed": ["monitoring_added", "ci_pipeline_added"],
  "drills_completed": [
    { "domain": "secrets", "difficulty": "beginner", "date": "2026-02-21" }
  ],
  "runbook_exists": true,
  "postmortem_exists": false,
  "stack_snapshot": {
    "edge_functions": ["advance-game", "submit-answer"],
    "tables": ["users", "questions", "game_sessions"],
    "services": ["supabase", "cloudflare", "resend"],
    "storage_buckets": ["question-images"]
  }
}

If it exists:

  • Skip checklist items in checklist_completed — these are items the human confirmed they fixed, NOT items that were already safe at scan time. Items that are "already safe" (e.g., RLS enabled, CSP configured) are handled by the conciseness rules — the agent re-scans and re-skips them naturally every run. Never auto-populate checklist_completed.
  • Skip drill domains already done at that difficulty
  • Don't re-ask about runbook/postmortem if already created
  • Show a brief "Previously completed" summary

Only add to checklist_completed when the human explicitly confirms they fixed an action item (e.g., "I added Sentry" → add "monitoring_added").

If it doesn't exist, this is a first run — create it after this session.

Step 4: Choose Mode

Present two options:

📋 CHECKLIST — "Am I prepared?" Proactive audit with prioritized fixes. Best for: first-time use, new projects, pre-launch, quarterly review.

🔥 EXERCISE DRILL — "Can I handle it?" Simulated incident in three phases:

  • Before: Prep your playbook, confirm monitoring, define stop conditions
  • During: Scenario injects with pause-and-think prompts
  • After: Observation log, follow-up TODOs with deadlines Best for: after basics are solid, building muscle memory, testing response speed. Solo devs play all roles: incident commander, service owner, on-call, comms lead.

Recommend Checklist first if the user has never done this.

Step 5: Generate & Write Persistent Doc

Generate the output AND write it to docs/. The file is the real deliverable.

File path: docs/DR_<MODE>_<DATE>.md

  • Checklist → docs/DR_CHECKLIST_2026-02-21.md
  • Drill → docs/DR_DRILL_<DOMAIN>_2026-02-21.md

Tone: Notes to future me at 2am. Practical, direct, copy-paste-friendly.

Conciseness rules:

  • Only include items that need action. If something is safe or properly configured, skip it entirely. No "this is fine" entries.
  • Skip items already completed in .dr-state.json
  • Every section must earn its place. Empty = omit.
Checklist doc structure
# <Project Name> — DR Checklist

> **Version**: 1.0
> **Created**: <date>
> **Profile**: <framework> / <hosting> / <database>

## Recovery Targets

| Metric | Target | Why |
|--------|--------|-----|
| **RTO** | < X hour | <1 sentence> |
| **RPO** | < X hours | <1 sentence> |

### What matters most

| Tier | Data | Recovery |
|------|------|----------|
| Critical | <actual tables> | <method> |
| Can rebuild | <derived data> | <method> |
| Expendable | <ephemeral data> | Restart |

## Your Stack

<ASCII diagram — keep it simple, only real services>

### Weak spots

<Only single points of failure with no mitigation yet. Skip if none.>

## Action Items

<Only items needing action. Severity first, then quick wins.>

| # | What | How | Effort |
|---|------|-----|--------|
| 1 | <problem> | <specific fix with command> | ⚡/🔧 |

## Readiness

<Scores — only domains below 8/10. If solid, skip it.>
Drill doc structure

Keep it concise. The doc is a practice exercise, not a textbook. Teach through the scenario itself, not extra sections explaining concepts.

# <Project Name> — Drill: <Vivid Scenario Title>

> **Domain**: <emoji> <domain> | **Difficulty**: <level> | **Created**: <date>

## Before you start

<3-4 honest self-check questions. Short. No fluff.>

## Scenario

<Background — 2-3 sentences setting the scene with real stack details.>

### ⏱️ INJECT 1 — <timestamp>

<What happened. Real error messages, real service names, real URLs.
End with 1-2 pause-and-think questions in bold.>

### ⏱️ INJECT 2 — <timestamp>

<Escalation or new info. Same format.>

## Resolution

**Right now:** <commands>
**Today:** <stabilize>
**This week:** <prevent recurrence>

## TODOs

| # | What | Deadline | Done? |
|---|------|----------|-------|
| 1 | ... | This week | ☐ |

**The takeaway:** <1-2 sentences. What big-tech calls this, what to
actually do at indie scale. No jargon walls.>

*Next suggested drill: <pick untried domain from .dr-state.json>*
Drill domains

Pick from these 7 domains (or random weighted by detected risks):

  • cost — 💸 Cost & Billing (DDoS, billing spikes, API abuse)
  • data — 🗑️ Data Loss (backup failure, accidental delete, corruption)
  • secrets — 🔐 Secrets & Credentials (leaked keys, rotation)
  • access — 🔓 Access Control (broken auth, IDOR, missing RLS)
  • availability — 🚫 Availability (outage, deploy failure, DNS)
  • code — 🤖 Code Vulnerabilities (XSS, SQLi, dependency CVEs)
  • recovery — 🔄 Recoverability (rebuild from scratch, lost env vars)

Difficulty controls inject count:

  • beginner: 2 injects, ~15 min
  • intermediate: 3 injects, ~20 min
  • advanced: 4 injects, ~30 min

Read references/risk-domains.md for extra scenario seeds and checklist items if you need more variety.

Step 6: Offer Follow-Up Docs

After writing the main doc, ask the human — don't assume:

  1. Runbook drift check: Check if docs/RUNBOOK.md exists.

- If no → ask: "Want me to write a docs/RUNBOOK.md with step-by-step recovery commands for your stack?" Only write if they say yes. - If yes → compare current stack against stack_snapshot in .dr-state.json (or scan runbook content if no state file). Look for: - New edge functions not in the runbook - New tables not covered by recovery scenarios - New services with no runbook entry - Removed components still referenced - If drift found → tell human: "Your docs/RUNBOOK.md is missing coverage for: X, Y. Want me to update it?" - If no drift → skip silently

  1. Post-mortem (Drill mode only): Ask: "Want me to save a post-mortem to docs/POSTMORTEM_<DOMAIN>_<DATE>.md? Useful to track patterns." Only write if they say yes.
  2. Backup script: If no backup strategy detected, ask: "Want me to generate a scripts/dr-backup.sh?" Only write if they say yes.

Update docs/.dr-state.json after each run:

  • checklist_completed / drills_completed for this session
  • stack_snapshot with current edge functions, tables, services, buckets
  • runbook_exists / postmortem_exists flags

Step 7: Follow Up

  • For Checklist: offer to generate fix code for top action items
  • For Drill: offer to implement the top TODO right now
  • Suggest next drill: pick an untried domain from .dr-state.json
  • Remind: "Run this again next quarter — I'll skip what you've already fixed."

Reference Files

The references/ directory has supplemental content for deeper scenarios:

  • references/risk-domains.md — All 7 risk domains with extra scenario seeds and checklist item libraries

平台分布

Codex

35.47%
按下载量换算67

Claude

28.75%
按下载量换算55

Cursor

16.87%
按下载量换算32

Gemini CLI

9.65%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills