Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

dr-schedule-manager(博士日程管理器)

dr-schedule-manager 用于补充开发相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接开发相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

dr-schedule-manager 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 7,078。

总安装 4,079周安装 165GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,280核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dr-schedule-manager(博士日程管理器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/daniel-refahi-ikara/dr-schedule-manager
安装命令:
openclaw skills install dr-schedule-manager
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install dr-schedule-manager

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

博士日程管理器用于补充开发相关能力,支持自动化调度。适合为 OpenClaw 代理设计和实施事件触发的计划任务。确保模型、提示与交付策略的更改能立即生效。安装前建议确认是否会触发定时任务或系统级操作。dr-schedule-manager 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install dr-schedule-manager;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

dr-schedule-manager 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install dr-schedule-manager。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

dr-schedule-manager 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

dr-schedule-manager 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

dr-schedule-manager 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

dr-schedule-manager 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,079 次,近一周安装 165 次,下载 1,280 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

dr-schedule-manager 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
dr-schedule-manager

博士日程管理器 · 本页

4,079—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
dr-schedule-manager
description
Design and implement reliable scheduled or event-triggered automations for OpenClaw agents so changes to model, prompt, delivery, and policy take effect immediately on the next run. Use when cron jobs, daily briefings, reminders, digests, or background agents keep using stale models, stale prompts, stale session state, or detached execution contexts. Also use when standardizing automation architecture across multiple agents or converting brittle time-triggered workflows into reusable config-driven jobs.

dr-schedule-manager

Build scheduled automations so each run reflects current configuration immediately.

Core outcome

This skill is a scheduling architecture and migration playbook, not a one-command scheduler installer.

After installation or migration, scheduled jobs should:

  • pick up current prompt changes on the next run
  • pick up current policy changes on the next run
  • pick up current delivery changes on the next run
  • pick up current default model changes on the next run, unless intentionally pinned
  • avoid stale session residue from prior runs

If a design does not guarantee those properties, do not recommend it as the default.

Current OpenClaw constraint

Treat current OpenClaw cron as snapshot-based unless proven otherwise.

In practice, cron jobs may embed:

  • prompt text
  • model override
  • delivery route
  • other runtime details

That means editing local files alone may not change the behavior of the already-registered job.

Because of this, the preferred practical pattern for current OpenClaw is not "fat job config in cron". It is:

  • thin trigger in cron
  • local file resolution at runtime
  • explicit final delivery through the normal outbound path

Default architecture

Prefer a thin-trigger, fresh-run, config-driven job architecture.

Rule 1, scheduler is only a trigger carrier

The scheduler should only:

  • wake the job
  • identify the job slug or manifest
  • pass a small stable trigger message

Do not embed business logic, formatting rules, or model decisions in the scheduler unless you intentionally accept snapshot behavior.

Rule 2, manifest is the operational contract

Each scheduled job should have a manifest file that defines:

  • slug
  • name
  • agent id
  • schedule
  • runtime mode
  • trigger mode
  • prompt file path
  • policy file paths
  • delivery contract
  • model policy
  • verification rules
  • live scheduler id if your local tooling tracks one

Rule 3, runtime assembly happens at execution time

On every run, load current files before generating output.

Always assemble from:

  • current manifest
  • current prompt file
  • current policy files
  • current delivery rules
  • current model policy

Do not trust previous session state for these.

Rule 4, delivery is explicit and provider-aware

Store delivery in a clear adapter contract.

Do not assume session metadata is valid for outbound sends if the provider requires a different target format.

Rule 5, persistent sessions are not the source of truth

If you keep a persistent automation agent, use it only as a dispatcher or coordinator.

Do not let a persistent scheduled session be the authoritative source for:

  • prompt wording
  • model selection
  • formatting rules
  • delivery routing

Approved patterns

Pattern A, wake-only trigger into fresh main execution

Use when you want the latest main assistant behavior to apply automatically.

Best for:

  • personal briefings
  • reminders
  • evolving assistant workflows

Strengths:

  • changes propagate immediately
  • minimal drift risk
  • simple to reason about

Weaknesses:

  • less isolated
  • changes to main behavior affect the job immediately

Pattern B, thin trigger plus local manifest resolution

Use as the default reusable pattern across agents for current OpenClaw.

Best for:

  • reusable automation frameworks
  • reports and digests
  • jobs that need clean state on every run
  • setups where cron otherwise snapshots prompt, model, or delivery

How it works:

  • cron stores only a small stable trigger
  • the triggered agent reads local job files at runtime
  • prompt, policy, model policy, and delivery are resolved from the workspace
  • final delivery uses the normal outbound path, not cron announce, when announce is unreliable

Strengths:

  • avoids stale embedded prompt drift
  • avoids stale model pins in cron payloads
  • makes file edits effective on the next run
  • easy to migrate across agents

Weaknesses:

  • requires the agent to actually honor the trigger by reading the local files
  • still depends on reliable final outbound delivery

Pattern C, persistent dispatcher plus fresh worker run

Use for more advanced orchestration.

Best for:

  • retry queues
  • fan-out workflows
  • multi-step automation pipelines

Strengths:

  • scalable
  • strong separation between orchestration and generation

Weaknesses:

  • more moving parts

Default recommendation

For most current OpenClaw scheduled jobs, use Pattern B, thin trigger plus local manifest resolution.

Reason:

  • it works around snapshot-based cron behavior
  • it is reusable across many agents
  • it avoids stale embedded prompt and model drift
  • changes are effective on the next run because runtime inputs are file-based
  • it scales better than manual re-registration for every content tweak

Model policy rules

Model behavior must be explicit.

Preferred

Use inherit-default when upgrades should propagate automatically.

Example:

{
  "modelPolicy": {
    "mode": "inherit-default"
  }
}

Use only when intentionally pinned

{
  "modelPolicy": {
    "mode": "pin",
    "model": "openai-codex/gpt-5.4"
  }
}

If pinning is used, document why.

Shared-policy option

{
  "modelPolicy": {
    "mode": "policy-file",
    "path": "automation/policies/default-runtime.json"
  }
}

Use when many jobs should share the same rule.

Verification rules

Verification should catch broken assembly, not freeze intended upgrades.

Good checks:

  • prompt path exists
  • policy paths exist
  • delivery route matches current job contract
  • schedule matches manifest
  • pinned model matches manifest, if pinning is intentional

Avoid exact verification for settings that are supposed to inherit current defaults.

If the job should follow current default model changes, do not require an exact old model string.

Anti-patterns

Reject these by default.

Embedded full-payload cron jobs for dynamic automations

A cron job stores the full prompt, model, and delivery configuration even though the automation is expected to evolve via local files.

Stale exact model pinning

A manifest or cron payload hardcodes an old model and exact verification preserves it forever.

Chat-only preference changes

A user requests a format change in chat, but the job still reads an older prompt source.

Session-derived outbound routing

Outbound delivery copies stale or misleading session metadata rather than a provider-valid target.

Persistent scheduled generation context

A long-lived automation session accumulates outdated assumptions and keeps using them.

Assuming scheduler reliability equals delivery reliability

A job can resolve current local files correctly and still fail because the scheduler's announce/delivery adapter is broken.

Migration workflow

When fixing an existing job:

  1. Inspect current manifest and scheduler behavior
  2. Identify stale sources

- model - prompt - policy - delivery - session mode - embedded cron payloads

  1. Move all durable rules into files
  2. Replace fat cron payloads with a thin stable trigger
  3. Choose model policy
  4. Make delivery explicit
  5. Reduce over-strict verification that blocks intended inheritance
  6. Test one live run for content freshness
  7. Test final delivery separately
  8. Record provider-specific quirks

Required output when using this skill

Provide:

  • recommended runtime pattern
  • manifest structure
  • model policy recommendation
  • delivery contract recommendation
  • what must move out of session state
  • migration steps
  • verification plan
  • reliability risks and tradeoffs
  • whether additional local execution tooling is still required

Reliability review checklist

Before declaring the architecture good, confirm:

  • a prompt edit affects the next run
  • a policy edit affects the next run
  • a delivery target edit affects the next run
  • a default-model change affects the next run when inherit-default is used
  • the scheduler stores only a thin trigger for dynamic jobs, or re-registration is explicitly part of the workflow
  • no persistent session is required for content correctness
  • provider-specific outbound routing is documented where needed
  • final delivery works independently of cron announce delivery

References

Read references/architecture-patterns.md when designing the execution model. Read references/migration-checklist.md when converting an existing stale scheduled job. Read references/reliability-review.md before finalizing a job architecture or publishing this pattern for wider reuse. Read references/job-manifest-template.json for the recommended manifest shape. Read references/example-migration-daily-briefing.md for a concrete migration from a stale scheduled digest to a fresh-runtime job.

平台分布

OpenClaw

70.11%
按下载量换算897

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills