Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

dotnet-ui-testing-core(dotnet ui 测试核心)

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

dotnet-ui-testing-core 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 62,244。

总安装 339周安装 14GitHub Stars 15下载 111核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dotnet-ui-testing-core(dotnet ui 测试核心)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills
仓库路径:skills/dotnet-ui-testing-core
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-ui-testing-core
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-ui-testing-core

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

提供跨 .NET UI 框架的统一测试模式。涵盖页面对象模型、选择器策略和异步等待。支持可维护的测试结构和可访问性检查。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。适用于 Blazor、MAUI 等平台的自动化测试设计。

dotnet-ui-testing-core 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/dotnet-ui-testing-core

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-ui-testi…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

dotnet-ui-testing-core 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-ui-testing-core。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

dotnet-ui-testing-core 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

dotnet-ui-testing-core 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

dotnet-ui-testing-core 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

dotnet-ui-testing-core 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 339 次,近一周安装 14 次,下载 111 次,GitHub 15 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

dotnet-ui-testing-core 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
dotnet-ui-testing-core

dotnet ui 测试核心 · 本页

33915操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

dotnet-ui-testing-core

Core UI testing patterns applicable across.NET UI frameworks (Blazor, MAUI, Uno Platform). Covers the page object model for maintainable test structure, test selector strategies for reliable element identification, async wait patterns for non-deterministic UI, and accessibility testing approaches.

Version assumptions:.NET 8.0+ baseline. Framework-specific details are delegated to dedicated skills.

Out of scope: Framework-specific testing APIs are owned by their respective skills: [skill:dotnet-blazor-testing] for bUnit, [skill:dotnet-maui-testing] for Appium/XHarness, [skill:dotnet-uno-testing] for Uno WASM testing. Browser automation specifics are covered by [skill:dotnet-playwright]. Test project scaffolding is owned by [skill:dotnet-add-testing].

Prerequisites: A test project scaffolded via [skill:dotnet-add-testing]. Familiarity with test strategy decisions from [skill:dotnet-testing-strategy].

Cross-references: [skill:dotnet-testing-strategy] for deciding when UI tests are appropriate, [skill:dotnet-playwright] for browser-based E2E automation, [skill:dotnet-blazor-testing] for Blazor component testing, [skill:dotnet-maui-testing] for mobile/desktop UI testing, [skill:dotnet-uno-testing] for Uno Platform testing.


Page Object Model

The page object model (POM) encapsulates page structure and interactions behind a class, isolating tests from UI implementation details. When the UI changes, only the page object needs updating -- not every test that touches that page.

Structure

PageObjects/
  LoginPage.cs           -- login form interactions
  DashboardPage.cs       -- dashboard navigation + widgets
  OrderListPage.cs       -- order list filtering + selection
  Components/
    NavigationMenu.cs     -- shared nav component
    ConfirmDialog.cs      -- reusable confirmation modal

Example: Generic Page Object Base

/// <summary>
/// Base class for page objects. Subclass per framework:
/// Playwright uses IPage, bUnit uses IRenderedComponent, Appium uses AppiumDriver.
/// </summary>
public abstract class PageObjectBase<TDriver>
{
    protected TDriver Driver { get; }

    protected PageObjectBase(TDriver driver)
    {
        Driver = driver;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Verifies the page/component is in the expected state after navigation.
    /// Call this in the constructor or after navigation to fail fast on wrong pages.
    /// </summary>
    protected abstract void VerifyLoaded();
}

Example: Playwright Page Object

public class LoginPage : PageObjectBase<IPage>
{
    public LoginPage(IPage page) : base(page)
    {
        VerifyLoaded();
    }

    protected override void VerifyLoaded()
    {
        // Fail fast if not on the login page
        Driver.WaitForSelectorAsync("[data-testid='login-form']")
            .GetAwaiter().GetResult();
    }

    public async Task<DashboardPage> LoginAsync(string email, string password)
    {
        await Driver.FillAsync("[data-testid='email-input']", email);
        await Driver.FillAsync("[data-testid='password-input']", password);
        await Driver.ClickAsync("[data-testid='login-button']");
        await Driver.WaitForURLAsync("**/dashboard");
        return new DashboardPage(Driver);
    }

    public async Task<string> GetErrorMessageAsync()
    {
        var error = Driver.Locator("[data-testid='login-error']");
        return await error.TextContentAsync() ?? "";
    }
}

// Usage in test
[Fact]
public async Task Login_ValidCredentials_RedirectsToDashboard()
{
    var loginPage = new LoginPage(Page);

    var dashboard = await loginPage.LoginAsync("user@example.com", "P@ssw0rd!");

    Assert.NotNull(dashboard);
}

Page Object Principles

  • Return the next page object from navigation actions. LoginAsync returns DashboardPage, guiding test authors through the application flow.
  • Never expose raw selectors from page objects. Tests call LoginAsync(), not ClickAsync("#submit").
  • Keep assertions in tests, not page objects. Page objects provide data (e.g., GetErrorMessageAsync()); tests make assertions on that data.
  • Compose page objects from reusable components. A NavigationMenu component object can be embedded in every page that has a nav bar.

Test Selector Strategies

Selectors determine how tests find UI elements. Fragile selectors are the leading cause of flaky UI tests.

Selector Priority (Most to Least Reliable)

PrioritySelector TypeExampleReliability
1data-testid[data-testid='submit-btn']Highest -- survives CSS/layout changes
2Accessibility role + nameGetByRole(AriaRole.Button, new() {Name = "Submit"})High -- tied to visible behavior
3Label textGetByLabel("Email address")High -- changes when copy changes
4Placeholder textGetByPlaceholder("Enter email")Medium -- often localized
5CSS class.btn-primaryLow -- changes with styling
6XPath / DOM structure//div[3]/button[1]Lowest -- breaks on any layout change

Adding Test IDs

Add data-testid attributes to elements that tests interact with. They are invisible to users and stable across refactors:

Blazor:

<button data-testid="submit-order" @onclick="SubmitOrder">Place Order</button>
<input data-testid="search-input" @bind="SearchTerm" />

MAUI XAML:

<Button AutomationId="submit-order" Text="Place Order" Clicked="OnSubmit" />
<Entry AutomationId="search-input" Text="{Binding SearchTerm}" />

Uno Platform XAML:

<Button AutomationProperties.AutomationId="submit-order" Content="Place Order" />

Selector Anti-Patterns

// BAD: Tied to CSS implementation
await page.ClickAsync(".MuiButton-root.MuiButton-containedPrimary");

// BAD: Tied to DOM structure
await page.ClickAsync("div > form > div:nth-child(3) > button");

// BAD: Tied to dynamic content
await page.ClickAsync($"text=Order #{orderId}");

// GOOD: Stable test identifier
await page.ClickAsync("[data-testid='submit-order']");

// GOOD: Accessibility-driven (Playwright)
await page.GetByRole(AriaRole.Button, new() { Name = "Place Order" }).ClickAsync();

Async Wait Strategies

UI tests deal with asynchronous rendering, network requests, and animations. Hardcoded delays cause flaky tests and slow suites.

Wait Strategy Decision Tree

Is the element already in the DOM?
|
+-- YES --> Is it visible and actionable?
|           |
|           +-- YES --> Interact immediately
|           +-- NO  --> Wait for visibility/enabled state
|
+-- NO  --> Wait for element to appear in DOM
            |
            Is it loaded via network request?
            |
            +-- YES --> Wait for network idle or specific API response
            +-- NO  --> Wait for render cycle to complete

Framework-Specific Wait Patterns

Playwright (browser-based):

// Auto-waiting: Playwright waits for actionability by default
await page.ClickAsync("[data-testid='submit']"); // waits until visible + enabled

// Explicit wait for network-loaded content
await page.WaitForResponseAsync(
    response => response.Url.Contains("/api/orders") && response.Status == 200);

// Wait for element state
await page.Locator("[data-testid='results']")
    .WaitForAsync(new() { State = WaitForSelectorState.Visible });

// Wait for specific text content
await Expect(page.Locator("[data-testid='status']")).ToHaveTextAsync("Completed");

bUnit (Blazor component testing):

// Wait for async state changes to render
var cut = RenderComponent<OrderList>();

// Wait for component to finish async operations
cut.WaitForState(() => cut.Instance.Orders.Count > 0,
    timeout: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));

// Wait for specific markup
cut.WaitForAssertion(() =>
    Assert.NotEmpty(cut.FindAll("[data-testid='order-row']")),
    timeout: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));

Wait Anti-Patterns

// BAD: Hardcoded delay -- slow and still flaky
await Task.Delay(3000);
await page.ClickAsync("[data-testid='results']");

// BAD: Polling with Thread.Sleep
while (!element.IsVisible)
{
    Thread.Sleep(100); // blocks thread, no timeout safety
}

// GOOD: Framework-native wait
await page.Locator("[data-testid='results']")
    .WaitForAsync(new() { State = WaitForSelectorState.Visible, Timeout = 5000 });

// GOOD: Assertion with retry (Playwright)
await Expect(page.Locator("[data-testid='count']")).ToHaveTextAsync("5");

Accessibility Testing

Accessibility testing verifies that UI components are usable by people with disabilities and compatible with assistive technologies. Automated checks catch common issues; manual review is still needed for subjective criteria.

Automated Accessibility Checks with Playwright

// NuGet: Deque.AxeCore.Playwright
[Fact]
public async Task HomePage_PassesAccessibilityAudit()
{
    await Page.GotoAsync("/");

    var results = await Page.RunAxe();

    Assert.Empty(results.Violations);
}

[Fact]
public async Task OrderForm_NoAccessibilityViolations()
{
    await Page.GotoAsync("/orders/new");

    // Scope to specific component
    var form = Page.Locator("[data-testid='order-form']");
    var results = await Page.RunAxe(new AxeRunOptions
    {
        // Focus on WCAG 2.1 AA rules
        RunOnly = new RunOnlyOptions
        {
            Type = "tag",
            Values = ["wcag2a", "wcag2aa", "wcag21aa"]
        }
    });

    // Report violations with details for debugging
    foreach (var violation in results.Violations)
    {
        // Log: violation.Id, violation.Description, violation.Nodes
    }
    Assert.Empty(results.Violations);
}

Accessibility Checklist for UI Tests

CheckHow to TestTool
Color contrastAutomated axe-core ruleDeque.AxeCore.Playwright
Keyboard navigationTab through all interactive elementsPlaywright page.Keyboard
ARIA labelsVerify aria-label / aria-labelledby presentPlaywright locators + assertions
Focus managementVerify focus moves to dialogs/modalsPlaywright page.Locator(':focus')
Screen reader textVerify aria-live regions updateManual + assertion on ARIA attributes

Keyboard Navigation Test Example

[Fact]
public async Task OrderForm_TabOrder_FollowsLogicalSequence()
{
    await Page.GotoAsync("/orders/new");

    // Tab through form fields and verify focus order
    await Page.Keyboard.PressAsync("Tab");
    await Expect(Page.Locator("[data-testid='customer-name']")).ToBeFocusedAsync();

    await Page.Keyboard.PressAsync("Tab");
    await Expect(Page.Locator("[data-testid='customer-email']")).ToBeFocusedAsync();

    await Page.Keyboard.PressAsync("Tab");
    await Expect(Page.Locator("[data-testid='order-items']")).ToBeFocusedAsync();

    // Verify Enter submits the form
    await Page.Keyboard.PressAsync("Tab"); // focus submit button
    await Expect(Page.Locator("[data-testid='submit-order']")).ToBeFocusedAsync();
}

Key Principles

  • Use the page object model for any UI test suite with more than a handful of tests. The upfront cost pays for itself quickly in reduced maintenance.
  • Prefer data-testid or accessibility-based selectors over CSS or DOM-structure selectors. Stable selectors are the single most effective defense against flaky tests.
  • Never use Thread.Sleep or Task.Delay as a wait strategy. Use framework-native waits that poll for conditions with timeouts.
  • Run accessibility checks as part of the standard test suite, not as a separate audit. Catching violations early prevents accessibility debt.
  • Keep page objects framework-agnostic where possible. The patterns (POM, selector strategy, wait patterns) are universal; only the driver API changes between Playwright, bUnit, and Appium.

Agent Gotchas

  1. Do not add data-testid attributes to production code without team agreement. Some teams strip them in production builds; others keep them. Check the project's conventions first.
  2. Do not use WaitForTimeout (hardcoded delay) in Playwright tests. It masks timing issues and makes tests slow. Use WaitForSelectorAsync, Expect(...).ToBeVisibleAsync(), or WaitForResponseAsync instead.
  3. Do not assert on element count without waiting for the list to load. FindAll("[data-testid='row']").Count returns zero if the component has not finished rendering. Use WaitForState or WaitForAssertion first.
  4. Do not skip accessibility testing because "it's not a requirement." WCAG compliance is increasingly a legal requirement. Automated checks catch the low-hanging fruit at near-zero cost.
  5. Do not create deeply nested page objects. If a page object has page objects inside page objects, flatten the hierarchy. One level of component composition (page -> components) is sufficient.

References

平台分布

Codex

33.8%
按下载量换算38

Claude

31.03%
按下载量换算34

Cursor

18.46%
按下载量换算20

Gemini CLI

8.7%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills