Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

dotnet-input-validation点网输入验证

Agent Skill

dotnet-input-validation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

343

周安装

14

GitHub Stars

15

下载量

110
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dotnet-input-validation(点网输入验证)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills
仓库路径:skills/dotnet-input-validation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-input-validation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-input-validation

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。dotnet-input-validation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

  • 适合根据关键词或场景快速定位候选结果。
  • 可结合来源仓库进一步核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围与维护状态。
  • 注意:不涉及 OWASP 安全原则等边界内容。

SKILL.md

dotnet-input-validation

Comprehensive input validation patterns for.NET APIs. Covers the.NET 10 built-in validation system, FluentValidation for complex business rules, Data Annotations for simple models, endpoint filters for Minimal API integration, ProblemDetails error responses, and security-focused validation techniques.

Scope boundary: This skill owns practical validation framework guidance -- when to use each framework, how to configure and integrate them, and security-focused input handling tips. OWASP security principles (injection categories, threat modeling) -- see [skill:dotnet-security-owasp]. Architectural validation strategy (where validation fits in clean architecture, vertical slices) -- see [skill:dotnet-architecture-patterns]. Options pattern validation with ValidateDataAnnotations() -- see [skill:dotnet-csharp-configuration].

Out of scope: Blazor form validation (EditForm, DataAnnotationsValidator) -- see [skill:dotnet-blazor-auth]. OWASP injection prevention principles -- see [skill:dotnet-security-owasp]. Architectural patterns for validation placement -- see [skill:dotnet-architecture-patterns]. Options pattern ValidateDataAnnotations -- see [skill:dotnet-csharp-configuration].

Cross-references: [skill:dotnet-security-owasp] for OWASP injection prevention, [skill:dotnet-architecture-patterns] for architectural validation strategy, [skill:dotnet-minimal-apis] for Minimal API pipeline integration, [skill:dotnet-csharp-configuration] for Options pattern validation.


Validation Framework Decision Tree

Choose the validation framework based on project requirements:

  1. .NET 10 Built-in Validation (AddValidation) -- default for new.NET 10+ projects. Source-generator-based, AOT-compatible, auto-discovers types from Minimal API handlers. Best for: greenfield projects targeting.NET 10+.
  2. FluentValidation -- when validation rules are complex (cross-property, conditional, database-dependent). Rich fluent API with testable validator classes. Best for: complex business rules, domain validation.
  3. Data Annotations -- when models need simple declarative validation ([Required], [Range]). Widely understood, works with MVC model binding and IValidatableObject for cross-property checks. Best for: simple DTOs, shared models.
  4. MiniValidation -- lightweight Data Annotations runner without MVC model binding overhead. Best for: micro-services with simple validation (see [skill:dotnet-architecture-patterns] for details).

General guidance: prefer.NET 10 built-in validation for new projects. Use FluentValidation when rules outgrow annotations. Do not mix multiple frameworks in the same request DTO -- pick one per model type and stay consistent.


.NET 10 Built-in Validation

.NET 10 introduces Microsoft.Extensions.Validation with source-generator-based validation that integrates directly into the Minimal API pipeline. It auto-discovers validatable types from endpoint handler parameters and runs validation via an endpoint filter.

Setup

// <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.Validation" Version="10.*" />
builder.Services.AddValidation();

var app = builder.Build();
// Validation runs automatically via endpoint filter for Minimal API handlers

AddValidation() scans for types annotated with [ValidatableType] and generates validation logic at compile time using source generators, ensuring Native AOT compatibility.

Defining Validatable Types

[ValidatableType]
public partial class CreateProductRequest
{
    [Required]
    [StringLength(200, MinimumLength = 1)]
    public required string Name { get; set; }

    [Range(0.01, 1_000_000)]
    public decimal Price { get; set; }

    [Required]
    [RegularExpression(@"^[A-Z]{2,4}-\d{4,8}$", ErrorMessage = "SKU format: AA-0000")]
    public required string Sku { get; set; }
}

The partial keyword is required because the source generator emits validation logic into the same type. The [ValidatableType] attribute triggers code generation at compile time -- no reflection at runtime.

How It Works

  1. Source generator discovers [ValidatableType] classes and emits IValidatableObject-like validation logic.
  2. AddValidation() registers an endpoint filter that inspects Minimal API handler parameters.
  3. When a request arrives, the filter validates parameters before the handler executes.
  4. On failure, returns a ValidationProblem response automatically.

Gotcha: AddValidation() integrates with Minimal APIs via endpoint filters. MVC controllers use their own model validation pipeline and do not participate in this filter-based system. For controllers, Data Annotations and ModelState.IsValid remain the standard approach.


FluentValidation

FluentValidation provides a fluent API for building strongly-typed validation rules. It excels at complex business validation with cross-property rules, conditional logic, and database-dependent checks.

Validator Definition

// <PackageReference Include="FluentValidation" Version="11.*" />
// <PackageReference Include="FluentValidation.DependencyInjectionExtensions" Version="11.*" />
public sealed class CreateOrderValidator : AbstractValidator<CreateOrderRequest>
{
    public CreateOrderValidator()
    {
        RuleFor(x => x.CustomerId)
            .NotEmpty()
            .MaximumLength(50);

        RuleFor(x => x.OrderDate)
            .LessThanOrEqualTo(DateOnly.FromDateTime(DateTime.UtcNow))
            .WithMessage("Order date cannot be in the future");

        RuleFor(x => x.Lines)
            .NotEmpty()
            .WithMessage("Order must have at least one line item");

        RuleForEach(x => x.Lines)
            .ChildRules(line =>
            {
                line.RuleFor(l => l.ProductId).NotEmpty();
                line.RuleFor(l => l.Quantity).GreaterThan(0);
                line.RuleFor(l => l.UnitPrice).GreaterThan(0);
            });

        // Conditional rule
        When(x => x.ShippingMethod == ShippingMethod.Express, () =>
        {
            RuleFor(x => x.ShippingAddress)
                .NotNull()
                .WithMessage("Express shipping requires an address");
        });
    }
}

DI Registration with Assembly Scanning

// Registers all AbstractValidator<T> implementations from the assembly
builder.Services.AddValidatorsFromAssemblyContaining<Program>(ServiceLifetime.Scoped);

Manual Validation Pattern (Recommended)

FluentValidation's ASP.NET pipeline auto-validation is deprecated. Use manual validation in endpoint handlers or endpoint filters instead:

app.MapPost("/api/orders", async (
    CreateOrderRequest request,
    IValidator<CreateOrderRequest> validator,
    AppDbContext db) =>
{
    var result = await validator.ValidateAsync(request);
    if (!result.IsValid)
    {
        return TypedResults.ValidationProblem(result.ToDictionary());
    }

    var order = new Order { CustomerId = request.CustomerId };
    db.Orders.Add(order);
    await db.SaveChangesAsync();
    return TypedResults.Created($"/api/orders/{order.Id}", order);
});

FluentValidation Endpoint Filter

For reusable validation across multiple endpoints, create a generic endpoint filter (see also [skill:dotnet-minimal-apis] for filter pipeline details):

public sealed class FluentValidationFilter<T>(IValidator<T> validator) : IEndpointFilter
    where T : class
{
    public async ValueTask<object?> InvokeAsync(
        EndpointFilterInvocationContext context,
        EndpointFilterDelegate next)
    {
        var argument = context.Arguments.OfType<T>().FirstOrDefault();
        if (argument is null)
            return TypedResults.BadRequest("Request body is required");

        var result = await validator.ValidateAsync(argument);
        if (!result.IsValid)
            return TypedResults.ValidationProblem(result.ToDictionary());

        return await next(context);
    }
}

// Apply to endpoints
products.MapPost("/", CreateProduct)
    .AddEndpointFilter<FluentValidationFilter<CreateProductDto>>();

Gotcha: Do not use the deprecated FluentValidation.AspNetCore auto-validation pipeline. It was removed in FluentValidation 11. Use manual validation or endpoint filters as shown above.


Data Annotations

Data Annotations provide declarative validation through attributes. They work with MVC model binding, Minimal API binding, and the.NET 10 AddValidation() source generator.

Standard Attributes

public sealed class UpdateProductDto
{
    [Required(ErrorMessage = "Product name is required")]
    [StringLength(200, MinimumLength = 1)]
    public required string Name { get; set; }

    [Range(0.01, 1_000_000, ErrorMessage = "Price must be between {1} and {2}")]
    public decimal Price { get; set; }

    [RegularExpression(@"^[A-Z]{2,4}-\d{4,8}$")]
    public string? Sku { get; set; }

    [EmailAddress]
    public string? ContactEmail { get; set; }

    [Url]
    public string? WebsiteUrl { get; set; }

    [Phone]
    public string? SupportPhone { get; set; }
}

Custom ValidationAttribute

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property | AttributeTargets.Parameter)]
public sealed class FutureDateAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
    protected override ValidationResult? IsValid(object? value, ValidationContext context)
    {
        if (value is DateOnly date && date <= DateOnly.FromDateTime(DateTime.UtcNow))
        {
            return new ValidationResult(
                ErrorMessage ?? "Date must be in the future",
                new[] { context.MemberName! });
        }
        return ValidationResult.Success;
    }
}

// Usage
public sealed class CreateEventDto
{
    [Required]
    [StringLength(200)]
    public required string Title { get; set; }

    [FutureDate(ErrorMessage = "Event date must be in the future")]
    public DateOnly EventDate { get; set; }
}

IValidatableObject for Cross-Property Validation

public sealed class DateRangeDto : IValidatableObject
{
    [Required]
    public DateOnly StartDate { get; set; }

    [Required]
    public DateOnly EndDate { get; set; }

    [Range(1, 365)]
    public int MaxDays { get; set; } = 30;

    public IEnumerable<ValidationResult> Validate(ValidationContext context)
    {
        if (EndDate < StartDate)
        {
            yield return new ValidationResult(
                "End date must be after start date",
                new[] { nameof(EndDate) });
        }

        if ((EndDate.ToDateTime(TimeOnly.MinValue) - StartDate.ToDateTime(TimeOnly.MinValue)).Days > MaxDays)
        {
            yield return new ValidationResult(
                $"Date range cannot exceed {MaxDays} days",
                new[] { nameof(StartDate), nameof(EndDate) });
        }
    }
}

Gotcha: Options pattern classes must use {get; set;} not {get; init;} because the configuration binder needs to mutate properties after construction. Validation attributes on init-only properties work for request DTOs but fail for options classes bound via IConfiguration. See [skill:dotnet-csharp-configuration] for Options pattern validation.


Endpoint Filters for Validation

Endpoint filters integrate validation into the Minimal API request pipeline as a cross-cutting concern. Filters execute before the handler, enabling centralized validation logic.

Generic Data Annotations Filter

public sealed class DataAnnotationsValidationFilter<T> : IEndpointFilter
    where T : class
{
    public async ValueTask<object?> InvokeAsync(
        EndpointFilterInvocationContext context,
        EndpointFilterDelegate next)
    {
        var argument = context.Arguments.OfType<T>().FirstOrDefault();
        if (argument is null)
            return TypedResults.BadRequest("Request body is required");

        var validationResults = new List<ValidationResult>();
        var validationContext = new ValidationContext(argument);

        if (!Validator.TryValidateObject(argument, validationContext, validationResults, validateAllProperties: true))
        {
            var errors = validationResults
                .Where(r => r.MemberNames.Any())
                .GroupBy(r => r.MemberNames.First())
                .ToDictionary(
                    g => g.Key,
                    g => g.Select(r => r.ErrorMessage ?? "Validation failed").ToArray());

            return TypedResults.ValidationProblem(errors);
        }

        return await next(context);
    }
}

// Apply to endpoints or route groups
products.MapPost("/", CreateProduct)
    .AddEndpointFilter<DataAnnotationsValidationFilter<CreateProductDto>>();

products.MapPut("/{id:int}", UpdateProduct)
    .AddEndpointFilter<DataAnnotationsValidationFilter<UpdateProductDto>>();

Combining with Route Groups

Apply validation filters at the route group level for consistent validation across all endpoints in a group (see [skill:dotnet-minimal-apis] for route group patterns):

var orders = app.MapGroup("/api/orders")
    .AddEndpointFilter<FluentValidationFilter<CreateOrderRequest>>();

Gotcha: Filter execution order matters -- first-registered filter is outermost. Register validation filters after logging but before authorization enrichment so that invalid requests are rejected early without unnecessary processing.


Error Responses

Use the ProblemDetails standard (RFC 9457) for consistent API error responses. ASP.NET Core has built-in support via TypedResults.ValidationProblem() and IProblemDetailsService.

ValidationProblem Response

// Returns HTTP 400 with RFC 9457-compliant body
app.MapPost("/api/products", async (CreateProductDto dto, IValidator<CreateProductDto> validator) =>
{
    var result = await validator.ValidateAsync(dto);
    if (!result.IsValid)
    {
        // Produces: { "type": "...", "title": "...", "status": 400, "errors": { ... } }
        return TypedResults.ValidationProblem(result.ToDictionary());
    }

    // ... create product
    return TypedResults.Created($"/api/products/{product.Id}", product);
});

Customizing ProblemDetails

builder.Services.AddProblemDetails(options =>
{
    options.CustomizeProblemDetails = context =>
    {
        context.ProblemDetails.Extensions["traceId"] =
            context.HttpContext.TraceIdentifier;
        context.ProblemDetails.Extensions["instance"] =
            context.HttpContext.Request.Path.Value;
    };
});

var app = builder.Build();
app.UseStatusCodePages();
app.UseExceptionHandler();

IProblemDetailsService for Global Error Handling

builder.Services.AddProblemDetails();

var app = builder.Build();

app.UseExceptionHandler(exceptionApp =>
{
    exceptionApp.Run(async context =>
    {
        var problemDetailsService = context.RequestServices
            .GetRequiredService<IProblemDetailsService>();

        await problemDetailsService.WriteAsync(new ProblemDetailsContext
        {
            HttpContext = context,
            ProblemDetails =
            {
                Title = "An unexpected error occurred",
                Status = StatusCodes.Status500InternalServerError,
                Type = "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc9110#section-15.6.1"
            }
        });
    });
});

Gotcha: ConfigureHttpJsonOptions applies to Minimal APIs only, not MVC controllers. Validation error formatting (e.g., camelCase property names in the errors dictionary) may differ between Minimal APIs and MVC if JSON options are not configured consistently. For MVC controllers, configure via builder.Services.AddControllers().AddJsonOptions(...).


Security-Focused Validation

Input validation is a first line of defense against injection and abuse. These patterns complement the OWASP security principles in [skill:dotnet-security-owasp] with practical validation techniques.

ReDoS Prevention

Regular expressions with backtracking can be exploited to cause catastrophic performance degradation (Regular Expression Denial of Service). Always apply timeouts or use source-generated regex.

// PREFERRED: [GeneratedRegex] -- compiled at build time, AOT-compatible (.NET 7+).
// Combine with RegexOptions.NonBacktracking or a timeout for ReDoS safety.
public static partial class InputPatterns
{
    [GeneratedRegex(@"^[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}$",
        RegexOptions.None, matchTimeoutMilliseconds: 1000)]
    public static partial Regex EmailPattern();

    [GeneratedRegex(@"^[A-Z]{2,4}-\d{4,8}$")]
    public static partial Regex SkuPattern();
}

// Usage in validation
if (!InputPatterns.EmailPattern().IsMatch(input))
{
    return TypedResults.ValidationProblem(
        new Dictionary<string, string[]>
        {
            ["email"] = ["Invalid email format"]
        });
}
// FALLBACK: Regex with explicit timeout (when source generation is not available)
var pattern = new Regex(
    @"^[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}$",
    RegexOptions.Compiled,
    matchTimeout: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1));

try
{
    if (!pattern.IsMatch(input))
        return TypedResults.BadRequest("Invalid format");
}
catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException)
{
    return TypedResults.BadRequest("Input validation timed out");
}

Allowlist vs Denylist

Always prefer allowlist validation over denylist. Denylists are inherently incomplete because new attack vectors bypass them.

// CORRECT: Allowlist -- only permit known-good values
private static readonly FrozenSet<string> AllowedFileExtensions =
    new HashSet<string>(StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
    { ".jpg", ".jpeg", ".png", ".gif", ".webp" }
    .ToFrozenSet(StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase);

public static bool IsAllowedExtension(string filename) =>
    AllowedFileExtensions.Contains(Path.GetExtension(filename));

// WRONG: Denylist -- attackers find extensions not in the list
// private static readonly string[] BlockedExtensions = [".exe", ".bat", ".cmd", ".ps1"];
// Allowlist for input characters
public static bool IsValidUsername(string username) =>
    username.Length is >= 3 and <= 50
    && username.All(c => char.IsLetterOrDigit(c) || c is '_' or '-');

Max Length Enforcement

Enforce maximum length on all user-controlled string inputs to prevent memory exhaustion and buffer-based attacks:

[ValidatableType]
public partial class SearchRequest
{
    [Required]
    [StringLength(200)]  // Always set max length on search inputs
    public required string Query { get; set; }

    [Range(1, 100)]
    public int PageSize { get; set; } = 20;
}

Also enforce at the Kestrel level for defense in depth:

// Configure BEFORE builder.Build()
builder.WebHost.ConfigureKestrel(options =>
{
    options.Limits.MaxRequestBodySize = 10 * 1024 * 1024; // 10 MB
    options.Limits.MaxRequestHeadersTotalSize = 32 * 1024; // 32 KB
});

File Upload Validation

Validate file uploads by content type, size, and extension -- never trust the client-provided Content-Type header alone:

app.MapPost("/api/uploads", async (IFormFile file) =>
{
    // 1. Validate extension (allowlist)
    var extension = Path.GetExtension(file.FileName);
    if (!AllowedFileExtensions.Contains(extension))
        return TypedResults.ValidationProblem(
            new Dictionary<string, string[]>
            {
                ["file"] = [$"File type '{extension}' is not allowed"]
            });

    // 2. Validate file size
    const long maxSize = 5 * 1024 * 1024; // 5 MB
    if (file.Length > maxSize)
        return TypedResults.ValidationProblem(
            new Dictionary<string, string[]>
            {
                ["file"] = [$"File size exceeds {maxSize / (1024 * 1024)} MB limit"]
            });

    // 3. Validate content by reading magic bytes (not Content-Type header)
    using var stream = file.OpenReadStream();
    const int headerSize = 12; // Need 12 bytes for WebP (RIFF + WEBP)
    var header = new byte[headerSize];

    // Guard against files shorter than header size
    int bytesRead = await stream.ReadAtLeastAsync(header, headerSize, throwOnEndOfStream: false);
    if (bytesRead < headerSize)
        return TypedResults.ValidationProblem(
            new Dictionary<string, string[]>
            {
                ["file"] = ["File is too small to be a valid image"]
            });

    stream.Position = 0;

    if (!IsValidImageHeader(header))
        return TypedResults.ValidationProblem(
            new Dictionary<string, string[]>
            {
                ["file"] = ["File content does not match an allowed image format"]
            });

    // 4. Save with a generated filename (never use the original)
    var safeName = $"{Guid.NewGuid()}{extension}";
    var path = Path.Combine("uploads", safeName);
    using var output = File.Create(path);
    await stream.CopyToAsync(output);

    return TypedResults.Ok(new { FileName = safeName });
})
.DisableAntiforgery(); // Only if using JWT/bearer auth, not cookie auth

static bool IsValidImageHeader(ReadOnlySpan<byte> header) =>
    header[..2].SequenceEqual(new byte[] { 0xFF, 0xD8 })                                   // JPEG
    || header[..8].SequenceEqual(new byte[] { 0x89, 0x50, 0x4E, 0x47, 0x0D, 0x0A, 0x1A, 0x0A }) // PNG
    || header[..4].SequenceEqual("GIF8"u8)                                                  // GIF
    || (header[..4].SequenceEqual("RIFF"u8) && header[8..12].SequenceEqual("WEBP"u8));      // WebP

For OWASP injection prevention beyond input validation (SQL injection, XSS, command injection), see [skill:dotnet-security-owasp].


Agent Gotchas

  1. Do not use FluentValidation auto-validation pipeline -- it was deprecated and removed in FluentValidation 11. Use manual validation or endpoint filters with IValidator<T> instead.
  2. Do not mix validation frameworks on the same DTO -- pick one (Data Annotations OR FluentValidation OR.NET 10 built-in) per model type. Mixing causes confusing partial validation.
  3. Do not use Regex without a timeout or [GeneratedRegex] -- unbounded regex matching on user input enables ReDoS attacks. Always set matchTimeout or use source-generated regex.
  4. Do not trust client-provided Content-Type headers -- validate file content by reading magic bytes. Attackers rename executables with image extensions.
  5. Do not forget validateAllProperties: true -- Validator.TryValidateObject without this flag only validates [Required] attributes, silently skipping [Range], [StringLength], and others.
  6. Do not use denylist validation for security -- denylists are inherently incomplete. Always validate against an allowlist of known-good values.
  7. Do not omit max length on string inputs -- unbounded strings enable memory exhaustion. Apply [StringLength] or [MaxLength] to every user-controlled string property.

Prerequisites

  • .NET 8.0+ (LTS baseline for endpoint filters, ProblemDetails, Data Annotations)
  • .NET 10.0 for built-in validation (AddValidation, [ValidatableType], Microsoft.Extensions.Validation)
  • Microsoft.Extensions.Validation package for.NET 10 built-in validation
  • FluentValidation and FluentValidation.DependencyInjectionExtensions for FluentValidation patterns
  • .NET 7+ for [GeneratedRegex] source-generated regular expressions

References

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.19%
按下载量换算39

Claude

31.08%
按下载量换算34

Cursor

19.85%
按下载量换算22

Gemini CLI

9.74%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

未通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills