Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

dotnet-domain-modeling(点网域建模)

dotnet-domain-modeling 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

dotnet-domain-modeling 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 7,484。

总安装 3,757周安装 155GitHub Stars 16下载 1,228核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dotnet-domain-modeling(点网域建模)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills
仓库路径:skills/dotnet-domain-modeling
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-domain-modeling
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-domain-modeling

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

该技能提供领域模型的战术设计模式,强调富领域模型而非贫血模型。适用于聚合根、实体和值对象的纯业务逻辑封装场景。核心能力包括领域事件定义、仓储契约设计和集成事件处理。使用时应避免与持久化技术细节耦合。dotnet-domain-modeling 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

安装前需确认项目已分离领域层与基础设施层。

来源仓库内路径:skills/dotnet-domain-modeling

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-domain-m…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

dotnet-domain-modeling 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/wshaddix/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-domain-modeling。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

dotnet-domain-modeling 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

dotnet-domain-modeling 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

dotnet-domain-modeling 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

dotnet-domain-modeling 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,757 次,近一周安装 155 次,下载 1,228 次,GitHub 16 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

dotnet-domain-modeling 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
dotnet-domain-modeling

点网域建模 · 本页

3,75716需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

dotnet-domain-modeling

Domain-Driven Design tactical patterns in C#. Covers aggregate roots, entities, value objects, domain events, integration events, domain services, repository contract design, and the distinction between rich and anemic domain models. These patterns apply to the domain layer itself -- the pure C# model that encapsulates business rules -- independent of any persistence technology.

Out of scope: EF Core configuration and aggregate persistence mapping -- see [skill:dotnet-efcore-architecture]. Tactical EF Core usage (DbContext lifecycle, migrations, interceptors) -- see [skill:dotnet-efcore-patterns]. Input validation at API boundaries -- see [skill:dotnet-validation-patterns]. Choosing between EF Core, Dapper, and ADO.NET -- see [skill:dotnet-data-access-strategy]. Vertical slice architecture and request pipeline patterns -- see [skill:dotnet-architecture-patterns]. Messaging infrastructure and saga orchestration -- see [skill:dotnet-messaging-patterns].

Cross-references: [skill:dotnet-efcore-architecture] for aggregate persistence and repository implementation with EF Core, [skill:dotnet-efcore-patterns] for DbContext configuration and migrations, [skill:dotnet-architecture-patterns] for vertical slices and request pipeline design, [skill:dotnet-validation-patterns] for input validation patterns, [skill:dotnet-messaging-patterns] for integration event infrastructure.


Aggregate Roots and Entities

An aggregate is a cluster of domain objects treated as a single unit for data changes. The aggregate root is the entry point -- all modifications to the aggregate pass through it.

Entity Base Class

Entities have identity that persists across state changes. Use a base class to standardize identity and equality:

public abstract class Entity<TId> : IEquatable<Entity<TId>>
    where TId : notnull
{
    // default! required for ORM hydration; Id is set immediately after construction
    public TId Id { get; protected set; } = default!;

    protected Entity() { } // Required for ORM hydration

    protected Entity(TId id) => Id = id;

    public override bool Equals(object? obj) =>
        obj is Entity<TId> other && Equals(other);

    public bool Equals(Entity<TId>? other) =>
        other is not null
        && GetType() == other.GetType()
        && EqualityComparer<TId>.Default.Equals(Id, other.Id);

    public override int GetHashCode() =>
        EqualityComparer<TId>.Default.GetHashCode(Id);

    public static bool operator ==(Entity<TId>? left, Entity<TId>? right) =>
        Equals(left, right);

    public static bool operator !=(Entity<TId>? left, Entity<TId>? right) =>
        !Equals(left, right);
}

Aggregate Root Base Class

The aggregate root extends Entity and collects domain events:

public abstract class AggregateRoot<TId> : Entity<TId>
    where TId : notnull
{
    private readonly List<IDomainEvent> _domainEvents = [];

    public IReadOnlyList<IDomainEvent> DomainEvents =>
        _domainEvents.AsReadOnly();

    protected AggregateRoot() { }
    protected AggregateRoot(TId id) : base(id) { }

    protected void RaiseDomainEvent(IDomainEvent domainEvent) =>
        _domainEvents.Add(domainEvent);

    public void ClearDomainEvents() => _domainEvents.Clear();
}

Concrete Aggregate Example

public sealed class Order : AggregateRoot<Guid>
{
    public CustomerId CustomerId { get; private set; } = default!;
    public OrderStatus Status { get; private set; }
    public Money Total { get; private set; } = Money.Zero("USD");

    private readonly List<OrderLine> _lines = [];
    public IReadOnlyList<OrderLine> Lines => _lines.AsReadOnly();

    private Order() { } // ORM constructor

    public static Order Create(CustomerId customerId)
    {
        var order = new Order(Guid.NewGuid())
        {
            CustomerId = customerId,
            Status = OrderStatus.Draft
        };

        order.RaiseDomainEvent(new OrderCreated(order.Id, customerId));
        return order;
    }

    public void AddLine(ProductId productId, int quantity, Money unitPrice)
    {
        if (Status != OrderStatus.Draft)
            throw new DomainException("Cannot modify a non-draft order.");

        if (quantity <= 0)
            throw new DomainException("Quantity must be positive.");

        var line = new OrderLine(productId, quantity, unitPrice);
        _lines.Add(line);
        RecalculateTotal();
    }

    public void Submit()
    {
        if (Status != OrderStatus.Draft)
            throw new DomainException("Only draft orders can be submitted.");

        if (_lines.Count == 0)
            throw new DomainException("Cannot submit an empty order.");

        Status = OrderStatus.Submitted;
        RaiseDomainEvent(new OrderSubmitted(Id, Total));
    }

    private void RecalculateTotal() =>
        Total = _lines.Aggregate(
            Money.Zero(Total.Currency),
            (sum, line) => sum.Add(line.LineTotal));
}

Aggregate Design Rules

RuleRationale
All mutations go through the aggregate rootEnforces invariants in one place
Reference other aggregates by ID onlyPrevents cross-aggregate coupling; use CustomerId not Customer
Keep aggregates smallLarge aggregates cause lock contention and slow loads
One aggregate per transactionCross-aggregate changes use domain events and eventual consistency
Expose collections as IReadOnlyList<T>Prevents external code from bypassing root methods to mutate children

For the EF Core persistence implications of these rules (navigation properties, owned types, cascade behavior), see [skill:dotnet-efcore-architecture].


Value Objects

Value objects have no identity -- they are defined by their attribute values. Two value objects with the same attributes are equal. In C#, record and record struct provide natural value semantics.

Record-Based Value Objects

// Simple value object -- wraps a primitive to enforce constraints
public sealed record CustomerId
{
    public string Value { get; }

    public CustomerId(string value)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(value))
            throw new DomainException("Customer ID cannot be empty.");

        Value = value;
    }

    public override string ToString() => Value;
}

// Composite value object -- multiple properties with validation
public sealed record Address
{
    public string Street { get; }
    public string City { get; }
    public string State { get; }
    public string PostalCode { get; }
    public string Country { get; }

    public Address(string street, string city, string state,
                   string postalCode, string country)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(street))
            throw new DomainException("Street is required.");
        if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(city))
            throw new DomainException("City is required.");
        if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(postalCode))
            throw new DomainException("Postal code is required.");

        Street = street;
        City = city;
        State = state;
        PostalCode = postalCode;
        Country = country;
    }
}

Money Value Object

Money is the canonical example of a multi-field value object with behavior:

public sealed record Money
{
    public decimal Amount { get; }
    public string Currency { get; }

    public Money(decimal amount, string currency)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(currency))
            throw new DomainException("Currency is required.");

        Amount = amount;
        Currency = currency.ToUpperInvariant();
    }

    public static Money Zero(string currency) => new(0m, currency);

    public Money Add(Money other)
    {
        EnsureSameCurrency(other);
        return new Money(Amount + other.Amount, Currency);
    }

    public Money Subtract(Money other)
    {
        EnsureSameCurrency(other);
        return new Money(Amount - other.Amount, Currency);
    }

    public Money Multiply(int quantity) =>
        new(Amount * quantity, Currency);

    public Money Multiply(decimal factor) =>
        new(Amount * factor, Currency);

    private void EnsureSameCurrency(Money other)
    {
        if (Currency != other.Currency)
            throw new DomainException(
                $"Cannot operate on {Currency} and {other.Currency}.");
    }

    public override string ToString() => $"{Amount:F2} {Currency}";
}

Value Object EF Core Mapping

Map value objects using owned types or value conversions (implementation in [skill:dotnet-efcore-architecture]):

// Owned type -- maps to columns in the parent table
builder.OwnsOne(o => o.Total, money =>
{
    money.Property(m => m.Amount).HasColumnName("TotalAmount");
    money.Property(m => m.Currency).HasColumnName("TotalCurrency")
        .HasMaxLength(3);
});

// Value conversion -- single-property value objects
builder.Property(o => o.CustomerId)
    .HasConversion(
        id => id.Value,
        value => new CustomerId(value))
    .HasMaxLength(50);

When to Use Value Objects

Use value objectUse primitive
Domain concept with constraints (email, money, quantity)Infrastructure IDs with no domain rules (correlation IDs, trace IDs)
Multiple properties that form a unit (address, date range)Single value with no validation needed
Need to prevent primitive obsession in domain methodsSimple DTO fields at API boundary

Domain Events

Domain events represent something meaningful that happened in the domain. They enable loose coupling between aggregates and trigger side effects (sending emails, updating read models, publishing integration events).

Event Contracts

// Marker interface for all domain events
public interface IDomainEvent
{
    Guid EventId { get; }
    DateTimeOffset OccurredAt { get; }
}

// Base record for convenience
public abstract record DomainEventBase : IDomainEvent
{
    public Guid EventId { get; } = Guid.NewGuid();
    public DateTimeOffset OccurredAt { get; } = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow;
}

// Concrete events
public sealed record OrderCreated(
    Guid OrderId, CustomerId CustomerId) : DomainEventBase;

public sealed record OrderSubmitted(
    Guid OrderId, Money Total) : DomainEventBase;

public sealed record OrderCancelled(
    Guid OrderId, string Reason) : DomainEventBase;

Dispatching Domain Events

Dispatch events after SaveChangesAsync succeeds to ensure the aggregate state is persisted before side effects execute:

public sealed class DomainEventDispatcher(
    IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
    public async Task DispatchAsync(
        IEnumerable<IDomainEvent> events,
        CancellationToken ct)
    {
        foreach (var domainEvent in events)
        {
            var handlerType = typeof(IDomainEventHandler<>)
                .MakeGenericType(domainEvent.GetType());

            var handlers = serviceProvider.GetServices(handlerType);

            foreach (var handler in handlers)
            {
                await ((dynamic)handler).HandleAsync(
                    (dynamic)domainEvent, ct);
            }
        }
    }
}

// Note: The (dynamic) dispatch pattern is simple but not AOT-compatible.
// For Native AOT scenarios, use a source-generated or dictionary-based
// dispatcher. See [skill:dotnet-native-aot] for AOT constraints.

// Handler interface
public interface IDomainEventHandler<in TEvent>
    where TEvent : IDomainEvent
{
    Task HandleAsync(TEvent domainEvent, CancellationToken ct);
}

Saving with Event Dispatch

Use an EF Core SaveChangesInterceptor or a wrapper to dispatch events after save:

public sealed class EventDispatchingSaveChangesInterceptor(
    DomainEventDispatcher dispatcher)
    : SaveChangesInterceptor
{
    public override async ValueTask<int> SavedChangesAsync(
        SaveChangesCompletedEventData eventData,
        int result,
        CancellationToken ct)
    {
        if (eventData.Context is not null)
        {
            var aggregates = eventData.Context.ChangeTracker
                .Entries<AggregateRoot<Guid>>()
                .Where(e => e.Entity.DomainEvents.Count > 0)
                .Select(e => e.Entity)
                .ToList();

            var events = aggregates
                .SelectMany(a => a.DomainEvents)
                .ToList();

            foreach (var aggregate in aggregates)
            {
                aggregate.ClearDomainEvents();
            }

            await dispatcher.DispatchAsync(events, ct);
        }

        return result;
    }
}

Domain Events vs Integration Events

AspectDomain EventIntegration Event
ScopeWithin a bounded contextAcross bounded contexts / services
TransportIn-process (dispatcher)Message broker (Service Bus, RabbitMQ)
CouplingReferences domain typesUses primitive/DTO types only
ReliabilitySame transaction scopeAt-least-once with idempotent consumers
ExampleOrderSubmitted (triggers email handler)OrderSubmittedIntegration (notifies shipping service)

A domain event handler may publish an integration event to a message broker. See [skill:dotnet-messaging-patterns] for integration event infrastructure.

// Domain event handler that publishes an integration event
public sealed class OrderSubmittedHandler(
    IPublishEndpoint publishEndpoint)
    : IDomainEventHandler<OrderSubmitted>
{
    public async Task HandleAsync(
        OrderSubmitted domainEvent, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        // Map domain event to integration event (no domain types)
        await publishEndpoint.Publish(
            new OrderSubmittedIntegration(
                domainEvent.OrderId,
                domainEvent.Total.Amount,
                domainEvent.Total.Currency),
            ct);
    }
}

Rich vs Anemic Domain Models

Rich Domain Model

Business logic lives inside the domain entities. Methods enforce invariants and return meaningful results:

public sealed class ShoppingCart : AggregateRoot<Guid>
{
    private readonly List<CartItem> _items = [];
    public IReadOnlyList<CartItem> Items => _items.AsReadOnly();

    public void AddItem(ProductId productId, int quantity, Money unitPrice)
    {
        var existing = _items.Find(i => i.ProductId == productId);

        if (existing is not null)
        {
            existing.IncreaseQuantity(quantity);
        }
        else
        {
            _items.Add(new CartItem(productId, quantity, unitPrice));
        }
    }

    public void RemoveItem(ProductId productId)
    {
        var item = _items.Find(i => i.ProductId == productId)
            ?? throw new DomainException(
                $"Product {productId} not in cart.");

        _items.Remove(item);
    }

    public Money GetTotal(string currency) =>
        _items.Aggregate(
            Money.Zero(currency),
            (sum, item) => sum.Add(item.LineTotal));
}

Anemic Domain Model (Anti-Pattern)

Entities are data bags with public setters. Business logic lives in external services:

// ANTI-PATTERN: Entity is just a data container
public class ShoppingCart
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public List<CartItem> Items { get; set; } = [];
}

// All logic lives here -- the entity has no behavior
public class ShoppingCartService
{
    public void AddItem(ShoppingCart cart, string productId,
        int quantity, decimal unitPrice)
    {
        var existing = cart.Items.Find(i => i.ProductId == productId);
        if (existing != null)
            existing.Quantity += quantity;
        else
            cart.Items.Add(new CartItem { ... });
    }
}

Decision Guide

FactorRich modelAnemic model
Complex invariantsEnforced in entityScattered across services
TestabilityTest entity behavior directlyTest service + entity together
DiscoverabilityMethods on entity show capabilitiesMust find the right service class
Persistence couplingRequires ORM-friendly private settersSimple property mapping
Team familiarityDDD experience requiredFamiliar to most developers

Recommendation: Start with a rich model for aggregates with complex business rules. Anemic models are acceptable for simple CRUD entities where the domain logic is minimal (e.g., reference data, configuration records).


Domain Services

Domain services encapsulate business logic that does not naturally belong to a single entity or value object. They operate on domain types and enforce cross-aggregate rules.

public sealed class PricingService
{
    public Money CalculateDiscount(
        Order order,
        CustomerTier tier,
        IReadOnlyList<PromotionRule> activePromotions)
    {
        var discount = Money.Zero(order.Total.Currency);

        // Tier-based discount
        discount = tier switch
        {
            CustomerTier.Gold => discount.Add(
                order.Total.Multiply(0.10m)),
            CustomerTier.Platinum => discount.Add(
                order.Total.Multiply(0.15m)),
            _ => discount
        };

        // Promotion-based discounts
        foreach (var promo in activePromotions)
        {
            if (promo.AppliesTo(order))
            {
                discount = discount.Add(promo.Calculate(order));
            }
        }

        return discount;
    }
}

When to Use Domain Services

  • Logic requires data from multiple aggregates that should not reference each other
  • A business rule does not belong to any single entity (e.g., pricing across products and customer tiers)
  • External policy or configuration drives the logic (e.g., tax calculation rules)

Domain services should remain pure -- no infrastructure dependencies. If the logic needs a database or external API, place it in an application service that calls the domain service with pre-loaded data.


Repository Contracts

Repository interfaces belong in the domain layer and express aggregate loading and saving semantics. Implementation details (EF Core, Dapper) live in the infrastructure layer.

// Domain layer -- defines the contract
public interface IOrderRepository
{
    Task<Order?> FindByIdAsync(Guid id, CancellationToken ct);
    Task AddAsync(Order order, CancellationToken ct);
    Task SaveChangesAsync(CancellationToken ct);
}

// Domain layer -- unit of work abstraction (optional)
public interface IUnitOfWork
{
    Task<int> SaveChangesAsync(CancellationToken ct);
}

For EF Core repository implementations, see [skill:dotnet-efcore-architecture].

Repository Design Rules

RuleRationale
One repository per aggregate rootChild entities are accessed through the root
No IQueryable<T> return typesPrevents persistence concerns from leaking into domain
No generic IRepository<T>Cannot express aggregate-specific loading rules
Return domain types, not DTOsRepositories serve the domain; read models use projections
Include CancellationToken on all async methodsRequired for proper cancellation propagation

Domain Exceptions

Use domain-specific exceptions to signal invariant violations. This separates domain errors from infrastructure errors:

public class DomainException : Exception
{
    public DomainException(string message) : base(message) { }
    public DomainException(string message, Exception inner)
        : base(message, inner) { }
}

// Specific domain exceptions for different invariant violations
public sealed class InsufficientStockException(
    ProductId productId, int requested, int available)
    : DomainException(
        $"Insufficient stock for {productId}: " +
        $"requested {requested}, available {available}")
{
    public ProductId ProductId => productId;
    public int Requested => requested;
    public int Available => available;
}

Map domain exceptions to HTTP responses at the API boundary (e.g., DomainException to 422 Unprocessable Entity). Do not let infrastructure concerns like HTTP status codes leak into the domain layer.


Agent Gotchas

  1. Do not expose public setters on aggregate properties -- all state changes must go through methods on the aggregate root that enforce invariants. Use private set or init for properties.
  2. Do not create navigation properties between aggregate roots -- reference other aggregates by ID value objects (e.g., CustomerId) not by entity navigation. Cross-aggregate navigation breaks bounded context isolation.
  3. Do not dispatch domain events inside the transaction -- dispatch after SaveChangesAsync succeeds. Dispatching before save means side effects fire even if the save fails.
  4. Do not use domain types in integration events -- integration events cross bounded context boundaries and must use primitives or DTOs. Domain type changes would break other services.
  5. Do not put validation logic only in the API layer -- domain invariants belong in the domain model. API validation ([skill:dotnet-validation-patterns]) catches malformed input; domain validation enforces business rules.
  6. Do not create anemic entities with public List<T> properties -- expose collections as IReadOnlyList<T> and provide mutation methods on the aggregate root that enforce business rules.
  7. Do not inject infrastructure services into domain entities -- entities should be pure C# objects. Use domain services for logic that needs external data, and application services for infrastructure orchestration.

References

平台分布

Codex

35.79%
按下载量换算440

Claude

29.68%
按下载量换算364

Cursor

19.06%
按下载量换算234

Gemini CLI

9.42%
按下载量换算116

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills