Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

retrospective(retrospective 分析)

retrospective 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

retrospective 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 42,382。

总安装 1,080周安装 45GitHub Stars 16,809下载 360核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:retrospective(retrospective 分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios
仓库路径:skills/retrospective
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios --skill retrospective
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios --skill retrospective

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

该技能生成迭代或里程碑后的反思总结和改进计划。适用于团队持续改进和文化建设场景。自动归类问题类型并提出 actionable 建议。支持增量更新已有回顾文档。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

retrospective 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/retrospective

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios --skill ret…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

retrospective 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios --skill retrospective。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

retrospective 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

retrospective 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

retrospective 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

retrospective 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,080 次,近一周安装 45 次,下载 360 次,GitHub 16,809 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

retrospective 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 16,809 星,维护活跃度相对可查。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
retrospective

retrospective 分析 · 本页

1,08016,809只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Phase 1: Parse Arguments

Determine whether this is a sprint retrospective (sprint-N) or a milestone retrospective (milestone-name).


Phase 1b: Check for Existing Retrospective

Before loading any data, glob for an existing retrospective file:

  • For sprint retrospectives: production/retrospectives/retro-[sprint-slug]-*.md (also check production/sprints/sprint-[N]-retrospective.md as an alternate location)
  • For milestone retrospectives: production/retrospectives/retro-[milestone-name]-*.md

If a matching file is found, present the user with:

An existing retrospective was found: [filename]

[A] Update existing retrospective — load it and add/revise sections
[B] Start fresh — generate a new retrospective, archiving the old one

Wait for user selection before continuing. If updating, read the existing file and carry its content forward into the generation phase, revising sections with new data.


Phase 2: Load Sprint or Milestone Data

Read the sprint or milestone plan from the appropriate location:

  • Sprint plans: production/sprints/
  • Milestone definitions: production/milestones/

If the file does not exist or is empty, output:

"No sprint data found for [sprint/milestone]. Run /sprint-status to generate sprint data first, or provide the sprint details manually."

Then use AskUserQuestion to present two options:

  • [A] Provide data manually — ask the user to paste or describe the sprint tasks, dates, and outcomes; use that as the source of truth for the retrospective.
  • [B] Stop — abort the skill. Verdict: BLOCKED — no sprint data available.

If the user chooses [A], collect the data and continue to Phase 3 using what they provide. If the user chooses [B], stop here.

Extract: planned tasks, estimated effort, owners, and goals.

Read the git log for the period covered by the sprint or milestone to understand what was actually committed and when.


Phase 3: Analyze Completion and Trends

Scan for completed and incomplete tasks by comparing the plan against actual deliverables. Check for:

  • Tasks completed as planned
  • Tasks completed but modified from the plan
  • Tasks carried over (not completed)
  • Tasks added mid-sprint (unplanned work)
  • Tasks removed or descoped

Scan the codebase for TODO/FIXME trends:

  • Count current TODO/FIXME/HACK comments
  • Compare to previous sprint counts if available (check previous retrospectives)
  • Note whether technical debt is growing or shrinking

Read previous retrospectives (if any) from production/sprints/ or production/milestones/ to check:

  • Were previous action items addressed?
  • Are the same problems recurring?
  • How has velocity trended?

Phase 4: Generate the Retrospective

## Retrospective: [Sprint N / Milestone Name]
Period: [Start Date] -- [End Date]
Generated: [Date]

### Metrics

| Metric | Planned | Actual | Delta |
|--------|---------|--------|-------|
| Tasks | [X] | [Y] | [+/- Z] |
| Completion Rate | -- | [Z%] | -- |
| Story Points / Effort Days | [X] | [Y] | [+/- Z] |
| Bugs Found | -- | [N] | -- |
| Bugs Fixed | -- | [N] | -- |
| Unplanned Tasks Added | -- | [N] | -- |
| Commits | -- | [N] | -- |

### Velocity Trend

| Sprint | Planned | Completed | Rate |
|--------|---------|-----------|------|
| [N-2] | [X] | [Y] | [Z%] |
| [N-1] | [X] | [Y] | [Z%] |
| [N] (current) | [X] | [Y] | [Z%] |

**Trend**: [Increasing / Stable / Decreasing]
[One sentence explaining the trend]

### What Went Well
- [Observation backed by specific data or examples]
- [Another positive observation]
- [Recognize specific contributions or decisions that paid off]

### What Went Poorly
- [Specific issue with measurable impact -- e.g., "Feature X took 5 days
  instead of estimated 2, blocking tasks Y and Z"]
- [Another issue with impact]
- [Do not assign blame -- focus on systemic causes]

### Blockers Encountered

| Blocker | Duration | Resolution | Prevention |
|---------|----------|------------|------------|
| [What blocked progress] | [How long] | [How it was resolved] | [How to prevent recurrence] |

### Estimation Accuracy

| Task | Estimated | Actual | Variance | Likely Cause |
|------|-----------|--------|----------|--------------|
| [Most overestimated task] | [X] | [Y] | [+Z] | [Why] |
| [Most underestimated task] | [X] | [Y] | [-Z] | [Why] |

**Overall estimation accuracy**: [X%] of tasks within +/- 20% of estimate

[Analysis: Are we consistently over- or under-estimating? For which types of
tasks? What adjustment should we apply?]

### Carryover Analysis

| Task | Original Sprint | Times Carried | Reason | Action |
|------|----------------|---------------|--------|--------|
| [Task that was not completed] | [Sprint N-X] | [N] | [Why] | [Complete / Descope / Redesign] |

### Technical Debt Status
- Current TODO count: [N] (previous: [N])
- Current FIXME count: [N] (previous: [N])
- Current HACK count: [N] (previous: [N])
- Trend: [Growing / Stable / Shrinking]
- [Note any areas of concern]

### Previous Action Items Follow-Up

| Action Item (from Sprint N-1) | Status | Notes |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------|
| [Previous action] | [Done / In Progress / Not Started] | [Context] |

### Action Items for Next Iteration

| # | Action | Owner | Priority | Deadline |
|---|--------|-------|----------|----------|
| 1 | [Specific, measurable action] | [Who] | [High/Med/Low] | [When] |
| 2 | [Another action] | [Who] | [Priority] | [When] |

### Process Improvements
- [Specific change to how we work, with expected benefit]
- [Another improvement -- keep it to 2-3 actionable items, not a wish list]

### Summary
[2-3 sentence overall assessment: Was this a good sprint/milestone? What is
the single most important thing to change going forward?]

Phase 5: Save Retrospective

Present the retrospective and top findings to the user (completion rate, velocity trend, top blocker, most important action item).

Ask: "May I write this to production/sprints/sprint-[N]-retrospective.md?" (or the milestone path if applicable)

If yes, write the file, creating the directory if needed. Verdict: COMPLETE — retrospective saved.

If no, stop here. Verdict: BLOCKED — user declined write.


Phase 6: Next Steps

  • Run /sprint-plan to incorporate the action items and velocity data into the next sprint.
  • If this was a milestone retrospective, run /gate-check to formally assess readiness for the next phase.

Guidelines

  • Be honest and specific. Vague retrospectives ("communication could be better") produce vague improvements. Use data and examples.
  • Focus on systemic issues, not individual blame.
  • Limit action items to 3-5. More than that dilutes focus.
  • Every action item must have an owner and a deadline.
  • Check whether previous action items were completed. Recurring unaddressed items are a process smell.
  • If this is a milestone retrospective, also evaluate whether the milestone goals were achieved and what that means for the overall project timeline.

平台分布

Codex

34.32%
按下载量换算124

Claude

30.31%
按下载量换算109

Cursor

19.33%
按下载量换算70

Gemini CLI

9.74%
按下载量换算35

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills