Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

bug-triage(错误分类)

bug-triage 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

bug-triage 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 54,843。

总安装 494周安装 21GitHub Stars 16,607下载 173核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:bug-triage(错误分类)
来源仓库:https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios
仓库路径:skills/bug-triage
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios --skill bug-triage
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios --skill bug-triage

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

该技能处理开放缺陷清单并按优先级分配至迭代周期。适用于敏捷团队启动新迭代时的缺陷管理场景。区分严重程度与优先级,识别系统性趋势。输出带分配建议和风险说明的行动列表。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

bug-triage 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/bug-triage

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios --skill bug…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

bug-triage 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios --skill bug-triage。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

bug-triage 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

bug-triage 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

bug-triage 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

bug-triage 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 494 次,近一周安装 21 次,下载 173 次,GitHub 16,607 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

bug-triage 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 16,607 星,维护活跃度相对可查。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
bug-triage

错误分类 · 本页

49416,607只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Bug Triage

This skill processes the open bug backlog into a prioritised, sprint-assigned action list. It distinguishes between severity (how bad is the impact?) and priority (how urgently must we fix it?), detects systemic trends, and ensures no critical bug is lost between sprints.

Output: production/qa/bug-triage-[date].md

When to run:

  • Sprint start — assign open bugs to the new sprint or backlog
  • After /team-qa completes and new bugs have been filed
  • When the bug count crosses 10+ open items

1. Parse Arguments

Modes:

  • /bug-triage sprint — triage against the current sprint; assign fixable bugs to the sprint backlog; defer the rest
  • /bug-triage full — full triage of all bugs regardless of sprint scope
  • /bug-triage trend — trend analysis only (no assignment); read-only report
  • No argument — run sprint mode if a current sprint exists, else full mode

2. Load Bug Backlog

Step 2a — Discover bug files

Glob for bug reports in priority order:

  1. production/qa/bugs/*.md — individual bug report files (preferred format)
  2. production/qa/bugs.md — single consolidated bug log (fallback)
  3. Any production/qa/qa-plan-*.md "Bugs Found" table (last resort)

If no bug files found:

"No bug files found in production/qa/bugs/. If bugs are tracked in a different location, adjust the glob pattern. If no bugs exist yet, there is nothing to triage."

Stop and report. Do not proceed if no bugs exist.

Step 2b — Load sprint context

Read the most recently modified file in production/sprints/ to understand:

  • Current sprint number / name
  • Stories in scope (for assignment target)
  • Sprint capacity constraints (if noted)

If no sprint file exists: note "No sprint plan found — assigning to backlog only."

Step 2c — Load severity reference

Read .claude/docs/coding-standards.md for severity/priority definitions if they exist. If they do not exist, use the standard definitions in Step 3.


3. Classify Each Bug

For each bug, extract or infer:

Severity (impact of the bug)

SeverityDefinition
S1 — CriticalGame crashes, data loss, or complete feature failure. Cannot proceed past this point.
S2 — HighMajor feature broken but game is still playable. Significant wrong behaviour.
S3 — MediumFeature degraded but a workaround exists. Minor wrong behaviour.
S4 — LowVisual glitch, cosmetic issue, typo. No gameplay impact.

Priority (urgency of the fix)

PriorityDefinition
P1 — Fix this sprintBlocks QA, blocks release, or is regression from last sprint
P2 — Fix soonShould be resolved before the next major milestone
P3 — BacklogWould be good to fix, but no active blocking impact
P4 — Won't fix / DeferredAccepted risk or out of scope for current product scope

Assignment

For each P1/P2 bug in sprint mode:

  • Identify which story or epic the fix belongs to
  • Check whether the current sprint has remaining capacity
  • If capacity exists: assign to sprint (Sprint: [current])
  • If capacity is full: flag as Priority overflow — consider pulling from sprint

For full mode: assign all P1 to current sprint, P2 to next sprint estimate, P3+ to backlog.

Deviation check

Flag bugs that suggest systematic problems:

  • 3+ bugs from the same system in the same sprint → "Potential design or implementation quality issue in [system]"
  • 2+ S1/S2 bugs in the same story → "Story may need to be reopened and re-reviewed before shipping"
  • Bug filed against a story marked Complete → "Regression in completed story — story should be re-opened in sprint tracking"

4. Trend Analysis

After classifying all bugs, generate trend metrics:

Volume trends

  • Total open bugs: [N]
  • Opened this sprint: [N]
  • Closed this sprint: [N]
  • Net change: [+N / -N]

System hot spots

  • Which system has the most open bugs?
  • Which system has the highest S1/S2 ratio?

Age analysis

  • How many bugs are older than 2 sprints?
  • Are any S1/S2 bugs un-assigned (sprint = none)?

Regression indicator

  • Any bugs filed against previously-completed stories?
  • Count: [N] regression bugs (story reopened implied)

5. Generate Triage Report

# Bug Triage Report

> **Date**: [date]
> **Mode**: [sprint | full | trend]
> **Generated by**: /bug-triage
> **Open bugs processed**: [N]
> **Sprint in scope**: [sprint name, or "N/A"]

---

## Triage Summary

| Priority | Count | Notes |
|----------|-------|-------|
| P1 — Fix this sprint | [N] | [N] assigned to sprint, [N] overflow |
| P2 — Fix soon | [N] | Scheduled for next sprint |
| P3 — Backlog | [N] | Deferred |
| P4 — Won't fix | [N] | Accepted risk |

**Critical (S1/S2) unfixed count**: [N]

---

## P1 Bugs — Fix This Sprint

| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Assigned to | Story |
|----|--------|----------|---------|-------------|-------|
| BUG-NNN | [system] | S[1-4] | [one-line description] | [sprint] | [story path] |

---

## P2 Bugs — Fix Soon

| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Target Sprint |
|----|--------|----------|---------|---------------|
| BUG-NNN | [system] | S[1-4] | [one-line description] | Sprint [N+1] |

---

## P3/P4 Bugs — Backlog / Won't Fix

| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Disposition |
|----|--------|----------|---------|-------------|
| BUG-NNN | [system] | S4 | [one-line description] | Backlog |

---

## Systemic Issues Flagged

[List any patterns from Step 3 deviation check, or "None identified."]

---

## Trend Analysis

**Volume**: [N] open / [+N] net change this sprint
**Hot spot**: [system with most bugs]
**Regressions**: [N] bugs against completed stories
**Aged bugs (>2 sprints old)**: [N]

[If N aged S1/S2 bugs > 0:]
> ⚠️ [N] high-severity bugs have been open for more than 2 sprints without
> assignment. These represent accepted risk that should be explicitly reviewed.

---

## Recommended Actions

1. [Most urgent action — usually "fix P1 bugs before QA hand-off"]
2. [Second action — usually "investigate [hot spot system] quality"]
3. [Third action — optional improvement]

6. Write and Gate

Present the report in conversation, then ask:

"May I write this triage report to production/qa/bug-triage-[date].md?"

Write only after approval.

After writing:

  • If any S1 bugs are unassigned: "S1 bugs must be assigned before the sprint can be considered healthy. Run /sprint-status to see current capacity."
  • If regression bugs exist: "Regressions found — consider re-opening the affected stories in sprint tracking and running /smoke-check to re-gate."
  • If no P1 bugs exist: "No P1 bugs — build is in good shape for QA hand-off." Verdict: COMPLETE — triage report written.

If user declined write: Verdict: BLOCKED — user declined write.


Collaborative Protocol

  • Never close or mark bugs Won't Fix without user approval — surface them as P4 candidates and ask: "Are these acceptable as Won't Fix?"
  • Never auto-assign to a sprint at capacity — flag overflow and let the sprint owner decide what to pull
  • Severity is objective; priority is a team decision — present severity classifications as recommendations, not mandates
  • Trend data is informational — do not block work on trend findings alone; surface them as observations

平台分布

Codex

35.37%
按下载量换算61

Claude

28.72%
按下载量换算50

Cursor

19.27%
按下载量换算33

Gemini CLI

8.82%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills