summarize-changes（总结变化）

Summarize Changes

Goal

Produce accurate, audience-specific summaries of code changes from a selected scope.

When to use

Use this skill when the user asks for change summaries such as:

• "summarize what changed"
• "summarize staged/unstaged changes"
• "summarize all uncommitted work"
• "summarize this branch/PR"
• "write this summary as an engineer/PM"

Invocation syntax

Preferred invocation:

$summarize-changes <author-type> <scope>

No-args invocation is allowed:

$summarize-changes

Examples:

$Summarize Changes engineer PR
$summarize-changes engineer branch
$summarize-changes product-manager all-uncommitted
$summarize-changes

Normalization rules:

• Treat skill trigger as case-insensitive ($Summarize Changes and $summarize-changes are both valid).
• Normalize author aliases before execution:

- product -> product-manager - pm -> product-manager

• Normalize scope aliases before execution:

- PR, pr, pr-wide -> pr-wide - branch, branch-wide -> branch-wide - unstaged -> unstaged - staged -> staged - all-uncommitted, uncommitted -> all-uncommitted - last-message, last -> last-message

• If scope token is unknown, ask one short clarification question.
• If author and/or scope is missing, ask one short clarification question with choices; if unanswered, default to product + PR.

Scope modes

Choose exactly one scope mode unless the user asks for multiple.

1. last-message

• Summarize only changes referenced in the latest user/assistant implementation message.
• Validate references against actual git diff before reporting.

1. unstaged

• Use: git diff
• Include untracked files separately via git status --porcelain.

1. staged

• Use: git diff --cached

1. all-uncommitted

• Combine:

- unstaged diff (git diff) - staged diff (git diff --cached) - untracked files (git status --porcelain)

1. branch-wide

• Use: git diff <base>...HEAD
• If base is not provided, infer from upstream (for example origin/main) and state assumption.
• Alias support: branch, branch-wide

1. pr-wide

• Prefer GitHub CLI when available:

- gh pr view --json baseRefName,headRefName,number,title - gh pr diff

• If PR metadata is unavailable, fall back to branch-wide and state fallback.
• Alias support: PR, pr, pr-wide

Author personas

Pick one primary persona. Optional secondary persona is allowed if user asks.

1. engineer

• Focus: technical implementation details, files, APIs, data model, migrations, tests, risk.
• Include concrete file-level notes and verification commands/results when available.

1. product-manager

• Focus: user-visible features, UX changes, workflow impact, release notes framing.
• Avoid low-value internal details unless they change behavior or risk.

1. designer

• Focus: UI/UX behavior, interaction flow, visual hierarchy, accessibility-relevant changes.

1. qa

• Focus: test impact, risk areas, regression vectors, what to test manually and automatically.

1. security

• Focus: authn/authz changes, data access boundaries, secrets/config, attack surface delta.

1. executive

• Focus: concise impact summary, delivery status, risks, and next steps.

Workflow

1. Resolve scope and persona

• If user did not specify, default to:

- scope: PR (normalized to pr-wide) - persona: product (normalized to product-manager)

• Normalize aliases first (PR -> pr-wide, branch -> branch-wide, product -> product-manager).
• Ask at most one question only if required to avoid wrong scope.

1. Collect evidence

• Run scope-appropriate git/PR commands.
• Build file list grouped by area (backend, frontend, db, tests, docs, infra).

1. Classify changes

• Identify:

- added/changed/removed files - behavioral vs refactor-only changes - data/model/API/test/documentation deltas

1. Draft persona-specific summary

• Apply persona focus rules.
• Keep statements evidence-based (from diff/logs/PR metadata).

1. Add risks and unknowns

• List material risks, assumptions, and missing validation.

Required sections

Every summary must include:

• Scope: explicit mode and command basis
• Audience: selected persona
• What changed: concise bullets
• Files touched: grouped list or highlights
• Risks / follow-ups: only material items

Output templates

Template: Engineer

Scope: `<scope-mode>`
Audience: `engineer`

What changed:
- <technical change>
- <technical change>

Files touched:
- `<path>`: <what changed and why>
- `<path>`: <what changed and why>

Verification status:
- `<command>` -> `<result>`
- `<command>` -> `<result>`

Risks / follow-ups:
- <risk or gap>
- <next action>

Template: Product Manager

Scope: `<scope-mode>`
Audience: `product-manager`

Feature/UX impact:
- <user-visible capability or behavior change>
- <user-visible capability or behavior change>

Experience changes by area:
- `<route/page/feature>`: <what changed for users>
- `<route/page/feature>`: <what changed for users>

Release notes draft:
- <customer-facing summary line>
- <customer-facing summary line>

Risks / rollout notes:
- <known risk, edge case, or migration note>
- <recommended mitigation or follow-up>

Template: QA

Scope: `<scope-mode>`
Audience: `qa`

Change inventory:
- <high-risk code path changed>
- <high-risk code path changed>

Regression focus:
- <what can break and where>
- <what can break and where>

Test plan updates:
- Automated: <tests to add/update/run>
- Manual: <critical user flows to verify>

Known gaps / blockers:
- <missing test coverage or environment blocker>

Guardrails

• Do not invent behavior that is not present in diffs/PR evidence.
• Do not mix scopes unless explicitly requested.
• Call out assumptions (for example inferred base branch).
• Prefer concrete file references over vague statements.
• If no changes are found for the selected scope, state that explicitly.

Useful commands

# unstaged
git diff

# staged
git diff --cached

# all uncommitted
git diff && git diff --cached && git status --porcelain

# branch-wide
git diff origin/main...HEAD

# PR-wide (if gh is available)
gh pr view --json baseRefName,headRefName,number,title
gh pr diff