Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

dockerfile-validator(dockerfile validator 搜索)

用于辅助云资源、部署、容器、基础设施和运维自动化任务。它适合让 Agent 检查配置、整理部署步骤、分析资源状态、生成排障思路或辅助云服务接入。使用时需要明确目标环境、账号权限、区域和资源组,区分本地测试与生产操作;涉及删除资源、重启服务、修改网络或权限配置时,应先确认影响范围。

dockerfile-validator 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 25,387。

总安装 3,787周安装 161GitHub Stars 197下载 1,327核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dockerfile-validator(dockerfile validator 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akin-ozer/cc-devops-skills
仓库路径:skills/dockerfile-validator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akin-ozer/cc-devops-skills --skill dockerfile-validator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akin-ozer/cc-devops-skills --skill dockerfile-validator

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

对 Dockerfile 进行语法、安全和性能审查。识别 secrets 泄露、非 root 用户等风险点。提供明确的问题分类和改进建议列表。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。支持预合并检查和 CI 集成验证模式。

dockerfile-validator 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/dockerfile-validator

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/akin-ozer/cc-devops-skills --skill dockerfile-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

dockerfile-validator 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/akin-ozer/cc-devops-skills --skill dockerfile-validator。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

dockerfile-validator 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

dockerfile-validator 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

dockerfile-validator 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

dockerfile-validator 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,787 次,近一周安装 161 次,下载 1,327 次,GitHub 197 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

dockerfile-validator 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
dockerfile-validator

dockerfile validator 搜索 · 本页

3,787197需要联网未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Dockerfile Validator

Validate Dockerfiles with deterministic stages, clear severity reporting, and explicit fallbacks when tools or network access are constrained.

Trigger Phrases

Use this skill when the user asks for tasks like:

  • "validate this Dockerfile"
  • "lint/check my Dockerfile"
  • "security scan Dockerfile"
  • "optimize Docker image size/build time"
  • "review Dockerfile before merge"
  • "find issues in Dockerfile.prod/Dockerfile.dev"

Use / Do Not Use

Use this skill for:

  • Syntax and lint validation
  • Security and secrets checks
  • Best-practice and performance review
  • Dockerfile hardening before CI/CD or production

Do not use this skill for:

  • Generating a new Dockerfile from scratch (use dockerfile-generator)
  • Running containers, debugging runtime behavior, or image registry operations

Local Files In This Skill

  • Validator script: scripts/dockerfile-validate.sh
  • References:

- references/security_checklist.md - references/optimization_guide.md - references/docker_best_practices.md

  • Example Dockerfiles: examples/*.Dockerfile

Deterministic Execution Flow (Required)

Run these steps in order. Do not skip steps unless a documented fallback branch applies.

1. Preflight and Path Setup

Assume repo root as working directory:

cd /path/to/repo
SKILL_DIR="devops-skills-plugin/skills/dockerfile-validator"
TARGET_DOCKERFILE="Dockerfile"   # replace when user provides a path

Validate inputs before running tools:

test -f "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/dockerfile-validate.sh"
test -f "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE"

If either check fails, stop and report the exact missing path.

2. Read the Target Dockerfile Explicitly

Use explicit file-read commands (not abstract "Read tool" wording):

sed -n '1,220p' "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE"

If needed for long files:

sed -n '220,440p' "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE"

3. Run Validation Script

Primary command:

bash "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/dockerfile-validate.sh" "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE"

Optional captured run for structured reporting:

bash "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/dockerfile-validate.sh" "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE" | tee /tmp/dockerfile-validator.out

4. Classify Findings by Severity (Standard)

Use this standard severity model:

  • Critical

- Hardcoded secrets/credentials - Explicit root runtime with high-risk context - High-impact security policy failures

  • High

- Checkov failures for container hardening - hadolint errors likely to cause insecure/unreliable builds - Missing or unsafe runtime-user posture (USER)

  • Medium

- :latest image tags, missing pinning, cache-cleanup misses - Build cache inefficiency and layered install anti-patterns

  • Low

- Style/info guidance and non-blocking optimization suggestions

5. No-Issue Fast Path (Required)

If validation has no actionable findings:

  • Return a concise pass summary.
  • Do not open reference files.
  • Do not generate fix diffs.

Use fast path when all are true:

  • Script reports overall pass.
  • No security failures.
  • No error/warning findings requiring user action.

6. Reference Loading Rules (Only When Findings Exist)

Only read references that match actual findings. Read each required file once.

Issue-to-reference mapping:

Issue categoryTrigger examplesRead this file
Secrets, root user, exposed sensitive ports, hardening gapsCKV_DOCKER_*, hardcoded token/password, root runtimereferences/security_checklist.md
Image size, layer count, multi-stage opportunities, cache efficiency, .dockerignore gapstoo many RUN, single-stage with build deps, cache missesreferences/optimization_guide.md
Tag pinning, instruction usage, COPY vs ADD, WORKDIR/CMD/ENTRYPOINT conventions:latest, unpinned packages, instruction-level best practicesreferences/docker_best_practices.md

Explicit read commands:

sed -n '1,220p' "$SKILL_DIR/references/security_checklist.md"
sed -n '1,220p' "$SKILL_DIR/references/optimization_guide.md"
sed -n '1,220p' "$SKILL_DIR/references/docker_best_practices.md"

For targeted extraction:

rg -n "USER|secrets|EXPOSE|HEALTHCHECK" "$SKILL_DIR/references/security_checklist.md"
rg -n "multi-stage|cache|layer|dockerignore" "$SKILL_DIR/references/optimization_guide.md"
rg -n "FROM|COPY|ADD|WORKDIR|CMD|ENTRYPOINT|latest" "$SKILL_DIR/references/docker_best_practices.md"

7. Produce Standard Report Output

Use this template for every non-fast-path run:

## Dockerfile Validation Report
- Target: <path>
- Command: `bash <skill-script> <target>`
- Overall result: PASS | FAIL | PARTIAL (fallback)

### Critical
- <issue or `None`>

### High
- <issue or `None`>

### Medium
- <issue or `None`>

### Low
- <issue or `None`>

### Recommended Fixes
- <specific code-level fix per actionable issue>

### References Used
- <list only files actually read>

### Fallbacks Used
- `None` or exact fallback branch + reason

8. Offer Fix Application

After reporting:

  • Ask whether to apply fixes.
  • If user approves, patch the Dockerfile and rerun validation.

Fallback Behavior (Explicit)

When the primary script cannot complete, use deterministic fallback branches and report them.

Fallback A: Python/Tool Install Constraint

Condition:

  • Script exits with tool-install failure (for example Python missing, package install blocked, or restricted environment).

Action:

  1. Report primary failure and why.
  2. Run manual minimum checks:
# Basic syntax signal (if Docker is available)
DOCKERFILE_DIR="$(dirname "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE")"
docker build --no-cache -f "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE" "$DOCKERFILE_DIR"

# High-value static checks
grep -nEi "^[[:space:]]*FROM[[:space:]]+.*:latest" "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE" || true
grep -nEi "^[[:space:]]*(ENV|ARG)[[:space:]].*(password|secret|token|api[_-]?key)[[:space:]]*=" "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE" || true
grep -nEi "^[[:space:]]*USER[[:space:]]+(root|0(:0)?)$" "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE" || true
grep -nEi "^[[:space:]]*HEALTHCHECK[[:space:]]+" "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE" || true
  1. Classify output with PARTIAL result and clearly label skipped checks.

Fallback B: hadolint Not Available but Docker Available

Use hadolint container image:

docker run --rm -i hadolint/hadolint < "$TARGET_DOCKERFILE"

Fallback C: No Docker, No hadolint/checkov

Run only manual regex-based checks (Fallback A step 2), clearly mark as PARTIAL, and state which scanners were skipped.

Quick Command Set

Validate one Dockerfile

cd /path/to/repo
bash devops-skills-plugin/skills/dockerfile-validator/scripts/dockerfile-validate.sh Dockerfile

Validate alternate file

cd /path/to/repo
bash devops-skills-plugin/skills/dockerfile-validator/scripts/dockerfile-validate.sh Dockerfile.prod

Validate skill examples

cd /path/to/repo/devops-skills-plugin/skills/dockerfile-validator
bash scripts/dockerfile-validate.sh examples/good-example.Dockerfile
bash scripts/dockerfile-validate.sh examples/security-issues.Dockerfile

Run regression checks (CI entrypoint)

cd /path/to/repo
bash devops-skills-plugin/skills/dockerfile-validator/scripts/test_validate.sh

Optional strict mode for CI environments that must enforce ShellCheck:

STRICT_SHELLCHECK=true bash devops-skills-plugin/skills/dockerfile-validator/scripts/test_validate.sh

Progressive Disclosure Rules

  • Always read the target Dockerfile first.
  • Do not read any reference files unless findings require them.
  • Read only the matching reference file(s) from the issue-to-reference mapping.
  • Do not reread the same reference unless new issue categories appear.

Done Criteria

Consider this skill execution complete only when all conditions below are satisfied:

  • Trigger matched a Dockerfile validation/lint/security/optimization request.
  • Target Dockerfile path was explicitly verified.
  • Validation command (or explicit fallback) was executed.
  • Findings were reported using severity buckets (Critical, High, Medium, Low).
  • Reference usage matched issue categories and was explicitly listed.
  • No-issue fast path skipped unnecessary reference reads.
  • If fixes were applied, validation was rerun and final status reported.

Resources

  • Script: scripts/dockerfile-validate.sh
  • CI/regression entrypoint: scripts/test_validate.sh
  • Security reference: references/security_checklist.md
  • Optimization reference: references/optimization_guide.md
  • Best-practices reference: references/docker_best_practices.md
  • Examples: examples/good-example.Dockerfile, examples/bad-example.Dockerfile, examples/security-issues.Dockerfile, examples/python-optimized.Dockerfile, examples/golang-distroless.Dockerfile

Source Links

平台分布

Claude

33.61%
按下载量换算446

Codex

32.94%
按下载量换算437

Cursor

20.64%
按下载量换算274

Gemini CLI

10.48%
按下载量换算139

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills