Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

docker-dotnet-containerize(Docker dotnet containerize 部署)

用于辅助云资源、部署、容器、基础设施和运维自动化任务。它适合让 Agent 检查配置、整理部署步骤、分析资源状态、生成排障思路或辅助云服务接入。使用时需要明确目标环境、账号权限、区域和资源组,区分本地测试与生产操作;涉及删除资源、重启服务、修改网络或权限配置时,应先确认影响范围。

docker-dotnet-containerize 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 8,200。

总安装 306周安装 13GitHub Stars 21下载 107核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:docker-dotnet-containerize(Docker dotnet containerize 部署)
来源仓库:https://github.com/thapaliyabikendra/ai-artifacts
仓库路径:skills/docker-dotnet-containerize
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/thapaliyabikendra/ai-artifacts --skill docker-dotnet-containerize
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/thapaliyabikendra/ai-artifacts --skill docker-dotnet-containerize

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

为 .NET 项目生成高性能 Docker 配置,采用 BuildKit 加速构建过程。支持渐进式发布、层缓存优化及最小化运行时镜像生成,降低安全风险。提供跨平台兼容方案,适配 Windows/Linux 容器并集成 CI/CD 流水线模板。需指定 .NET SDK 版本与目标框架,生产部署应启用非特权用户运行容器。

docker-dotnet-containerize 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/docker-dotnet-containerize

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/thapaliyabikendra/ai-artifacts --skill docker-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

docker-dotnet-containerize 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/thapaliyabikendra/ai-artifacts --skill docker-dotnet-con…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

docker-dotnet-containerize 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

docker-dotnet-containerize 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

docker-dotnet-containerize 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

docker-dotnet-containerize 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 306 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 107 次,GitHub 21 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

docker-dotnet-containerize 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
docker-dotnet-containerize

Docker dotnet containerize 部署 · 本页

30621需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

.NET Docker Containerization Skill

Generate optimized Docker configurations for.NET projects using advanced build techniques, progressive layer publishing, and production-ready multi-stage builds.

What This Skill Does

I will analyze your.NET solution and generate:

  1. Optimized Dockerfile with BuildKit features and layer caching
  2. Build scripts (Bash/PowerShell) with version tagging
  3. .dockerignore file with comprehensive patterns
  4. Validation checklist and troubleshooting guidance

Advanced Techniques Applied

BuildKit Frontend (syntax=docker/dockerfile:1-labs)

I use the experimental BuildKit frontend for:

  • --parents flag support (preserves directory structure)
  • Better caching mechanisms
  • Advanced COPY operations
  • Improved build performance

Progressive Layer Publishing

For complex projects, I publish in dependency order:

  1. Domain layer → Publish first (most stable)
  2. Infrastructure/EF Core → Publish second
  3. Application/HttpApi → Publish third
  4. API Host → Publish last (changes most)

Why? This creates separate layers in /app/publish, optimizing Docker layer caching. When you change only the API code, earlier layers remain cached.

Non-Alpine SDK with Alpine Runtime

  • Build stage: Uses full SDK (not Alpine) for better compatibility
  • Runtime stage: Uses Alpine for minimal footprint
  • Benefit: Avoid Alpine SDK build issues while keeping final image small

Project Analysis

Detection Process

I'll examine:

  • Solution file (*.sln) location and structure
  • All project files (*.csproj) and their dependencies
  • Main entry point (typically *.Host, *.Api, *.HttpApi.Host)
  • .NET version from <TargetFramework> tags
  • Existence of common.props (ABP Framework indicator)
  • Project architecture (Simple, DDD, ABP, Clean Architecture)

Dependency Graph Mapping

I'll build a dependency graph to determine:

  • Which projects reference which
  • Optimal layer ordering for caching
  • Whether progressive publishing is beneficial

Simple projects (≤3): Single publish step Complex projects (≥4): Progressive multi-layer publishing

Dockerfile Generation

Standard Template Structure

# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1-labs
# BuildKit frontend for advanced features (--parents flag)

# Runtime base: Alpine for minimal size
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:{VERSION}-alpine AS base
USER app
WORKDIR /app
EXPOSE 8080
EXPOSE 8081

# Build stage: Full SDK (not Alpine) for compatibility
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:{VERSION}-alpine AS publish
ARG BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release
WORKDIR /src

# [Project-specific COPY and publish commands]

# Final runtime
FROM base AS final
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=publish /app/publish .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "{MainAssembly}.dll"]

Pattern 1: Simple Projects (2-3 projects)

# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1-labs

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:9.0-alpine AS base
USER app
WORKDIR /app
EXPOSE 8080
EXPOSE 8081

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:9.0-alpine AS publish
ARG BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release
WORKDIR /src

# Copy project files with --parents (preserves structure)
COPY --parents src/MyProject.Models/MyProject.Models.csproj \
               src/MyProject.Api/MyProject.Api.csproj \
              /src/

# Restore dependencies (quiet mode)
RUN dotnet restore "./src/MyProject.Api/MyProject.Api.csproj" -v q

# Copy all source code
COPY --parents src/MyProject.Models/ \
               src/MyProject.Api/ \
              /src/

# Single publish step
RUN dotnet publish "src/MyProject.Api/MyProject.Api.csproj" \
    -c $BUILD_CONFIGURATION \
    -o /app/publish \
    /p:UseAppHost=false \
    -v q

FROM base AS final
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=publish /app/publish .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "MyProject.Api.dll"]

Pattern 2: ABP Framework / Complex DDD (7+ projects)

# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1-labs

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:8.0-alpine AS base
USER app
WORKDIR /app
EXPOSE 8080
EXPOSE 8081

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:8.0-alpine AS publish
ARG BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release
WORKDIR /src

# Copy solution-level configuration (ABP Framework)
COPY common.props ./

# Layer 1: Copy all project files for restore
COPY --parents src/Project.Domain.Shared/Project.Domain.Shared.csproj \
               src/Project.Domain/Project.Domain.csproj \
               src/Project.EntityFrameworkCore/Project.EntityFrameworkCore.csproj \
               src/Project.Application.Contracts/Project.Application.Contracts.csproj \
               src/Project.HttpApi/Project.HttpApi.csproj \
               src/Project.Application/Project.Application.csproj \
               src/Project.HttpApi.Host/Project.HttpApi.Host.csproj \
              /src/

# Restore from entry point (restores all dependencies)
RUN dotnet restore "./src/Project.HttpApi.Host/Project.HttpApi.Host.csproj" -v q

# Layer 2: Publish Domain + EF Core (most stable, changes least)
COPY --parents src/Project.Domain.Shared/ \
               src/Project.Domain/ \
               src/Project.EntityFrameworkCore/ \
              /src/

RUN dotnet publish "src/Project.EntityFrameworkCore/Project.EntityFrameworkCore.csproj" \
    -c $BUILD_CONFIGURATION \
    -o /app/publish \
    /p:UseAppHost=false \
    -v q

# Layer 3: Publish Application.Contracts + HttpApi
COPY --parents src/Project.Application.Contracts/ \
               src/Project.HttpApi/ \
              /src/

RUN dotnet publish "src/Project.HttpApi/Project.HttpApi.csproj" \
    -c $BUILD_CONFIGURATION \
    -o /app/publish \
    /p:UseAppHost=false \
    -v q

# Layer 4: Publish Application + Host (changes most often)
COPY --parents src/Project.Application/ \
               src/Project.HttpApi.Host/ \
              /src/

RUN dotnet publish "src/Project.HttpApi.Host/Project.HttpApi.Host.csproj" \
    -c $BUILD_CONFIGURATION \
    -o /app/publish \
    /p:UseAppHost=false \
    -v q

FROM base AS final
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=publish /app/publish .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "Project.HttpApi.Host.dll"]

Key Optimization Techniques

1. --parents Flag (BuildKit)

# Preserves directory structure automatically
COPY --parents src/Domain/Domain.csproj /src/
# Result: /src/src/Domain/Domain.csproj (structure maintained)

Why? No need to manually match paths. Works with relative references in .csproj files.

2. Progressive Publishing Strategy

Traditional approach (single publish):

RUN dotnet publish "Host.csproj" -o /app/publish

❌ Changes to Host trigger rebuild of entire application

Progressive approach (layered publishing):

# Publish Domain (layer 1)
RUN dotnet publish "Domain.csproj" -o /app/publish

# Publish Infrastructure (layer 2)
RUN dotnet publish "Infrastructure.csproj" -o /app/publish

# Publish Application (layer 3)
RUN dotnet publish "Application.csproj" -o /app/publish

# Publish Host (layer 4)
RUN dotnet publish "Host.csproj" -o /app/publish

✅ Changes to Host only rebuild layer 4, cache layers 1-3

3. Quiet Mode Builds (-v q)

RUN dotnet restore "./Project.csproj" -v q
RUN dotnet publish "Project.csproj" -v q

Why? Cleaner build logs, easier to spot errors, less noise in CI/CD.

4. Alpine Runtime with Full SDK

# Build: Full SDK for better compatibility
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:9.0-alpine AS publish

# Runtime: Alpine for minimal size
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:9.0-alpine AS base

Why? Alpine SDK can have issues with certain NuGet packages. Full SDK works better, Alpine runtime keeps final image small.

5. Build Configuration as ARG

ARG BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release
RUN dotnet publish -c $BUILD_CONFIGURATION

Why? Allows docker build --build-arg BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Debug for testing.

Build Script Generation

Bash Script (build.sh)

#!/bin/bash
# Build script for .NET Docker image with version tagging

if [ -z "$1" ]; then
    echo "************************************************"
    echo ""
    echo "Usage: ./build.sh <version>"
    echo "Example: ./build.sh 1.0.0"
    echo ""
    echo "************************************************"
    exit 1
fi

VERSION=$1
IMAGE_NAME="mycompany/myproject"
DOCKERFILE_PATH="./Dockerfile"

echo "Building Docker image: ${IMAGE_NAME}:${VERSION}"

docker build \
    -f ${DOCKERFILE_PATH} \
    -t ${IMAGE_NAME}:${VERSION} \
    -t ${IMAGE_NAME}:latest \
    --build-arg BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release \
    .

if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
    echo ""
    echo "✅ Build successful!"
    echo "Image tagged as:"
    echo "  - ${IMAGE_NAME}:${VERSION}"
    echo "  - ${IMAGE_NAME}:latest"
    echo ""
    echo "To run: docker run -p 8080:8080 ${IMAGE_NAME}:${VERSION}"
else
    echo ""
    echo "❌ Build failed!"
    exit 1
fi

PowerShell Script (build.ps1)

# Build script for .NET Docker image with version tagging
param(
    [Parameter(Mandatory=$true)]
    [string]$Version
)

$ImageName = "mycompany/myproject"
$DockerfilePath = "./Dockerfile"

Write-Host "Building Docker image: ${ImageName}:${Version}" -ForegroundColor Cyan

docker build `
    -f $DockerfilePath `
    -t "${ImageName}:${Version}" `
    -t "${ImageName}:latest" `
    --build-arg BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release `
    .

if ($LASTEXITCODE -eq 0) {
    Write-Host ""
    Write-Host "✅ Build successful!" -ForegroundColor Green
    Write-Host "Image tagged as:"
    Write-Host "  - ${ImageName}:${Version}"
    Write-Host "  - ${ImageName}:latest"
    Write-Host ""
    Write-Host "To run: docker run -p 8080:8080 ${ImageName}:${Version}"
} else {
    Write-Host ""
    Write-Host "❌ Build failed!" -ForegroundColor Red
    exit 1
}

.dockerignore Generation

# Build outputs
**/bin/
**/obj/
**/out/
**/publish/

# IDE and editor files
**/.vs/
**/.vscode/
**/.idea/
**/*.user
**/*.suo
**/*.swp
**/.DS_Store

# Test results and coverage
**/TestResults/
**/coverage/
**/*.trx

# Package directories
**/node_modules/
**/packages/
**/bower_components/

# Logs and temporary files
**/*.log
**/logs/
**/temp/
**/tmp/

# Version control
.git/
.gitignore
.gitattributes

# CI/CD
.github/
.gitlab-ci.yml
azure-pipelines.yml

# Documentation
*.md
!README.md
docs/
documentation/

# Docker files (avoid recursion)
**/Dockerfile*
**/docker-compose*
**/.dockerignore

# Development tools
**/.editorconfig
**/.prettierrc
**/.eslintrc*

Decision Logic for Dockerfile Patterns

When to Use Single Publish

✅ Use for:

  • Projects with ≤3.csproj files
  • Simple API + Models structure
  • Microservices with minimal dependencies
  • Fast build times (<30 seconds)

When to Use Progressive Publishing

✅ Use for:

  • Projects with ≥4.csproj files
  • ABP Framework projects
  • Clean Architecture / DDD projects
  • Long build times (>1 minute)
  • Frequent changes to outer layers (API/Host)

Progressive publishing trades:

  • Slightly more complex Dockerfile
  • For significantly faster rebuild times

Architecture-Specific Patterns

ABP Framework Detection

Indicators:

  • common.props file exists
  • Projects named with .Domain.Shared, .HttpApi.Host suffixes
  • 7+ projects in solution

Special handling:

# Copy common.props first
COPY common.props ./

# Follow ABP layer order
# Domain.Shared → Domain → EF Core → Contracts → HttpApi → Application → Host

Clean Architecture Detection

Indicators:

  • Projects in src/Domain/, src/Application/, src/Infrastructure/, src/WebApi/ structure
  • 4-6 projects typically

Layer order:

Domain → Application → Infrastructure → WebApi

Simple API Detection

Indicators:

  • 2-3 projects total
  • Names like *.Models, *.Api, *.Data

Strategy: Single publish, no progressive layers needed.

Validation Checklist

After generation, I'll verify:

  • BuildKit syntax directive present (# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1-labs)
  • .NET version matches project <TargetFramework>
  • Alpine images used for SDK
  • Non-root user configured (USER app)
  • Ports correctly exposed (8080, 8081)
  • --parents flag used in COPY commands
  • Projects ordered by dependency (inner → outer)
  • Progressive publishing for complex projects (≥4 projects)
  • Quiet mode enabled (-v q)
  • BUILD_CONFIGURATION parameterized
  • /p:UseAppHost=false set
  • Entry point references correct DLL
  • .dockerignore excludes build artifacts
  • Build scripts have version validation
  • common.props copied if exists (ABP projects)

Common Issues & Solutions

IssueCauseSolution
"Could not find project or directory"Missing --parents flagAdd --parents to all COPY commands
"Project reference could not be resolved"Wrong project copy orderOrder by dependencies (Domain → API)
Build fails in Alpine SDKPackage compatibilityUse full SDK: mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:9.0
Large image size (>200MB)Not using Alpine runtimeUse -alpine
Cache not utilizedWrong layer orderPublish stable layers first (Domain before API)
Build script failsNo version argumentScript validates argument existence
Missing common.propsABP Framework projectCopy common.props before project files
Slow rebuildsSingle publish approachSwitch to progressive publishing

Build Commands Reference

Development Build

# Quick build for testing
docker build -t myproject:dev .

# Build with debug configuration
docker build --build-arg BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Debug -t myproject:debug .

Production Build

# Using build script (recommended)
./build.sh 1.0.0

# Manual build with version
docker build -t mycompany/myproject:1.0.0 -t mycompany/myproject:latest .

Testing the Image

# Run container
docker run -d -p 8080:8080 --name myproject-test myproject:1.0.0

# Check health
curl http://localhost:8080/health

# View logs
docker logs -f myproject-test

# Inspect image size
docker images myproject:1.0.0

# Stop and remove
docker stop myproject-test && docker rm myproject-test

CI/CD Integration

# Build with commit SHA
docker build -t myproject:${GITHUB_SHA} .

# Multi-platform build
docker buildx build --platform linux/amd64,linux/arm64 -t myproject:1.0.0 .

Performance Metrics

Typical improvements with this skill:

MetricBeforeAfterImprovement
Image size450MB120MB73% smaller
Build time (full)180s200s+20s (one-time cost)
Build time (cached)180s15s92% faster
Layer reuse30%85%2.8x better caching

*Note: Progressive publishing adds ~20s to initial build but saves 90%+ on subsequent builds*

Best Practices Applied

  1. BuildKit features - --parents flag for automatic path preservation
  2. Layer optimization - Progressive publishing by dependency order
  3. Minimal images - Alpine sdk (sdk:9.0-alpine)
  4. Compatible builds - Full SDK or runtime avoids Alpine musl runtime issues.
  5. Security - Non-root user, specific tags, minimal attack surface
  6. Build efficiency - Quiet mode, ARG parameterization
  7. Caching strategy - Copy.csproj before source, order by stability
  8. Version control - Build scripts with validation and tagging
  9. ABP support - Handles common.props and framework patterns
  10. Production ready - UseAppHost=false, proper entry points

Usage Examples

Simple API:

Containerize my .NET 9 Web API project with Models library

ABP Framework:

Create Docker setup for my ABP Framework solution with HttpApi.Host

Clean Architecture:

Generate optimized Dockerfile for my Clean Architecture DDD solution with 6 projects

Optimization:

My Docker builds are slow, optimize the existing Dockerfile for better caching

平台分布

Codex

36.44%
按下载量换算39

Claude

30.49%
按下载量换算33

Cursor

19.66%
按下载量换算21

Gemini CLI

10.88%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills