Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

doc-spec-validator(文档规范验证器)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

doc-spec-validator 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 50,133。

总安装 629周安装 27GitHub Stars 14下载 220核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:doc-spec-validator(文档规范验证器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework
仓库路径:skills/doc-spec-validator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-spec-validator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-spec-validator

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于验证技术规格文档是否符合 Layer 9 标准架构要求。支持嵌套文件夹结构检查和 YAML 格式完整性验证。可识别关键路径缺失、接口定义错误等结构性问题。必须在创建或修改 SPEC 文件后手动触发执行验证。doc-spec-validator 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/doc-spec-validator

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-spe…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

doc-spec-validator 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill doc-spec-validato…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

doc-spec-validator 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

doc-spec-validator 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

doc-spec-validator 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

doc-spec-validator 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 629 次,近一周安装 27 次,下载 220 次,GitHub 14 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

doc-spec-validator 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
doc-spec-validator

文档规范验证器 · 本页

62914只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

doc-spec-validator

Validate Technical Specifications (SPEC) documents against Layer 9 schema standards.

Activation

Invoke when user requests validation of SPEC documents or after creating/modifying SPEC artifacts.

Validation Schema Reference

Schema: ai_dev_ssd_flow/09_SPEC/SPEC_MVP_SCHEMA.yaml Layer: 9 Artifact Type: SPEC

Validation Checklist

0. Folder Structure Validation (BLOCKING)

Nested Folder Rule: ALL SPEC documents MUST be in nested folders regardless of size.

Required Structure:

SPEC TypeRequired Location
YAMLdocs/09_SPEC/SPEC-NN_{slug}/SPEC-NN_{slug}.yaml

Validation:

1. Check document is inside a nested folder: docs/09_SPEC/SPEC-NN_{slug}/
2. Verify folder name matches SPEC ID pattern: SPEC-NN_{slug}
3. Verify file name matches folder: SPEC-NN_{slug}.yaml
4. Parent path must be: docs/09_SPEC/

Example Valid Structure:

docs/09_SPEC/
├── SPEC-01_f1_iam/
│   ├── SPEC-01_f1_iam.yaml        ✓ Valid
│   ├── SPEC-01.A_audit_report_v001.md (preferred)
│   ├── SPEC-01.R_review_report_v001.md (legacy-compatible)
│   └── .drift_cache.json
├── SPEC-02_f2_session/
│   └── SPEC-02_f2_session.yaml    ✓ Valid

Invalid Structure:

docs/09_SPEC/
├── SPEC-01_f1_iam.yaml            ✗ NOT in nested folder

Error Codes:

CodeSeverityDescription
SPEC-E020ERRORSPEC not in nested folder (BLOCKING)
SPEC-E021ERRORFolder name doesn't match SPEC ID
SPEC-E022ERRORFile name doesn't match folder name
VAL-H001ERRORDrift cache missing hash for upstream document
VAL-H002ERRORInvalid hash format (must be sha256:<64 hex chars>)

This check is BLOCKING - SPEC must pass folder structure validation before other checks proceed.


1. File Format Validation

File Format:
  - Extension: .yaml (NOT .md)
  - Naming pattern: SPEC-NNN_descriptive_name.yaml
  - Encoding: UTF-8
  - YAML version: 1.2

2. Required Top-Level Fields

Required fields:
  - id: Component identifier (snake_case)
  - summary: Single-sentence description (10-200 chars)
  - metadata: Document control and versioning
  - traceability: Upstream and downstream references
  - architecture: Component architecture and dependencies
  - interfaces: Interface definitions (classes, methods)
  - behavior: Behavioral specifications
  - performance: Performance targets
  - security: Security specifications
  - observability: Metrics, logging, health checks
  - verification: Test scenarios
  - implementation: Implementation specifics

Optional fields:
  - caching
  - rate_limiting
  - circuit_breaker
  - operations
  - changelog
  - maintenance
  - notes

3. Metadata Section Validation

Required Fields:

  • version: Semantic version (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH)
  • status: draft | review | approved | implemented | deprecated
  • created_date: YYYY-MM-DD format
  • last_updated: YYYY-MM-DD format
  • authors: Array with at least one author (name required)

Optional Fields:

  • task_ready_score
  • reviewers
  • owners

4. Interfaces Section Validation

Class Requirements:

  • name: PascalCase format
  • description: Required
  • methods: At least one method required per class

Method Requirements:

  • name: snake_case format
  • description: Required
  • input: Optional parameters object
  • output: Optional return object
  • errors: Optional error definitions

5. Performance Section Validation

Required Fields:

  • latency_targets:

- p50_milliseconds - p95_milliseconds - p99_milliseconds

  • throughput_targets:

- sustained_requests_per_second

  • resource_limits:

- cpu_cores_allocated - memory_mb_allocated

Validation Rules:

  • p95 must be greater than p50
  • p99 must be greater than p95

6. Security Section Validation

Required Fields:

  • authentication.required: boolean
  • authentication.methods: array
  • authorization.enabled: boolean
  • input_validation.strategy: string

7. Observability Section Validation

Required Fields:

  • metrics.standard_metrics: array (min 1 item)
  • logging.level: DEBUG | INFO | WARN | ERROR
  • logging.format: json | text | structured
  • health_checks.enabled: boolean
  • health_checks.endpoints: array

8. Traceability Validation

Layer 9 Cumulative Tags:

  • @brd: BRD.NN.EE.SS (required)
  • @prd: PRD.NN.EE.SS (required)
  • @ears: EARS.NN.24.SS (required)
  • @bdd: BDD.NN.13.SS (required)
  • @adr: ADR-NN (required)
  • @sys: SYS.NN.25.SS (required)
  • @req: REQ.NN.26.SS (required)
  • @ctr: CTR-NN (optional)

Downstream Expected:

  • TASKS documents
  • Code (src/...)
  • Tests (tests/...)

Same-Type References:

  • related_spec: [SPEC-NN]
  • depends_spec: [SPEC-NN]

Error Codes

CodeSeverityDescription
SPEC-E001errorFile is not valid YAML
SPEC-E002errorMissing required top-level field
SPEC-E003errorMissing required metadata field
SPEC-E004errorInvalid version format
SPEC-E005errorInvalid status value
SPEC-E006errorInvalid date format
SPEC-E007errorNo authors specified
SPEC-E008errorNo classes defined in interfaces
SPEC-E009errorClass has no methods
SPEC-E010errorMissing latency_targets in performance
SPEC-E011errorMissing authentication in security
SPEC-E012errorMissing metrics in observability
SPEC-E013warningFile name does not match format
SPEC-E014errorMissing traceability section
SPEC-E015errorMissing cumulative_tags in traceability
SPEC-W001warningMissing business_requirements in upstream
SPEC-W002warningMissing cumulative tags for traceability
SPEC-W003warningNo BDD scenarios in verification
SPEC-W004warningp95 latency not greater than p50
SPEC-W005warningp99 latency not greater than p95
SPEC-W006warningMethod name not in snake_case
SPEC-W007warningClass name not in PascalCase
SPEC-W008warningid field does not match file name
SPEC-W009warningtask_ready_score below target
SPEC-I001infoConsider adding caching section
SPEC-I002infoConsider adding rate_limiting section
SPEC-I003infoConsider adding circuit_breaker section
SPEC-I004infoConsider adding operations runbook

Validation Commands

# Validate single SPEC document
python3 ai_dev_ssd_flow/09_SPEC/scripts/validate_spec.py docs/09_SPEC/SPEC-001_example/SPEC-001_example.yaml

# Validate all SPEC documents
find docs/09_SPEC -name "SPEC-*.yaml" -exec python3 ai_dev_ssd_flow/09_SPEC/scripts/validate_spec.py {} \;

# Check with verbose output
python3 ai_dev_ssd_flow/09_SPEC/scripts/validate_spec_implementation_readiness.py docs/09_SPEC/SPEC-001_example/SPEC-001_example.yaml --verbose

Validation Workflow

  1. Verify file is valid YAML
  2. Check all required top-level fields present
  3. Validate metadata section (version, status, dates, authors)
  4. Check interfaces section (classes with methods)
  5. Validate performance section (latency targets, p50 < p95 < p99)
  6. Check security section (authentication, authorization)
  7. Validate observability section (metrics, logging, health)
  8. Check traceability cumulative tags (7 required)
  9. Verify verification section (BDD scenarios)
  10. Validate implementation section
  11. Check file naming convention
  12. Generate validation report

Integration

  • Invoked by: doc-flow, doc-spec (post-creation)
  • Feeds into: trace-check (cross-document validation)
  • Reports to: quality-advisor

Output Format

SPEC Validation Report
======================
Document: SPEC-001_example.yaml
Status: PASS/FAIL

YAML Validity: Valid/Invalid

Required Sections:
- metadata: Present/Missing
- traceability: Present/Missing
- architecture: Present/Missing
- interfaces: Present/Missing
- behavior: Present/Missing
- performance: Present/Missing
- security: Present/Missing
- observability: Present/Missing
- verification: Present/Missing
- implementation: Present/Missing

Interface Summary:
- Classes defined: N
- Methods defined: N

Performance Targets:
- p50: Nms
- p95: Nms (> p50: Yes/No)
- p99: Nms (> p95: Yes/No)

Errors: N
Warnings: N
Info: N

[Details listed by severity]

Related Resources

  • SPEC Skill: .claude/skills/doc-spec/SKILL.md
  • Naming Standards: .claude/skills/doc-naming/SKILL.md (ID and naming conventions)
  • SPEC Validation Rules: ai_dev_ssd_flow/09_SPEC/SPEC_MVP_SCHEMA.yaml
  • SPEC Schema: ai_dev_ssd_flow/09_SPEC/SPEC_MVP_SCHEMA.yaml

Version History

VersionDateChangesAuthor
1.42026-02-27Normalized metadata schema and command references to canonical ai_dev_ssd_flow/09_SPEC/scripts validatorsSystem
1.32026-02-26Fixed schema path to ai_dev_ssd_flow/09_SPEC/; Updated cumulative tag formats to unified dot notation; Fixed validation rules pathsSystem
1.22026-02-11Nested Folder Rule: Added Section 0 Folder Structure Validation (BLOCKING); SPEC must be in docs/09_SPEC/SPEC-NN_{slug}/ folders; Added error codes SPEC-E020, SPEC-E021, SPEC-E022System
1.1.02026-02-08Updated layer assignment from 10 to 9 per LAYER_REGISTRY v1.6; removed @impl from cumulative tagsSystem
1.0.02025-01-15Initial validator skill definitionSystem

Implementation Plan Consistency (IPLAN-004)

  • Treat plan-derived outputs as valid source mode and verify intent preservation from implementation plan scope/objectives.
  • Validate upstream autopilot precedence assumption: --iplan > --ref > --prompt.
  • Flag objective/scope conflicts between plan context and artifact output as blocking issues requiring clarification.
  • Do not introduce legacy fallback paths such as docs-v2.0/00_REF.

平台分布

Codex

33.51%
按下载量换算74

Claude

29.7%
按下载量换算65

Cursor

21.31%
按下载量换算47

Gemini CLI

9.47%
按下载量换算21

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills